The Perfect Installation of Windows


Recommended Posts

You're absolutely right that I should advise making a pre drivers / updates backup. I just don't know how to integrate that into my guide without further complicating things for a newbie who is trying to follow it word for word step by step. I will go ahead and put a message there.

I have a very similar checklist for doing complete reinstalls for people.

I would suggest adding

Spyware Terminator, free real time anti-spyware protection

Moving the Favorites, Desktop Folder and Firefox Profile Folders

And disabling system restore, which is redundant when you are doing complete backups.

---

I am against installing any software anywhere other than C: and also against moving the page file.

I backup before making changes and restore if anything goes wrong. And I want a restore to fix 100% of the problems 100% of the time.

Problems can and do occur when you restore you OS to a previous state, without restoring all installed programs (including games) along with it.

What if a new game update causes more problems than it fixes, what if it breaks compatibility with old saved games, what if the update uses registry files no present in your last backup.

This may not happen all of the time, but it happens some of the time.

Obviously I then use a larger C: partition.

When I restore from a damaged OS, I backup before restoring so I can pull any files that were updated since the last backup. (Saved Games comes to mind).

---

I also integrate the latest Driver Packs into my Windows XP CD and use an unattended install file.

At first I was suspicious that adding Drivers would lead to driver problems, but I have had no such problems. For a gaming system I usually then install the latest drivers for the graphics card and sound card.

--

Obviously preferences and needs differ, and I am not suggesting anything you are doing is incorrect or less optimal. :)

I am against installing any software anywhere other than C:

I agree whole heartedly my friend! Some things do conflict when you install them on another partition, but there is a great deal that is bad about installing those programs on the C: partition.

Say for instance you install a program on the C: partition, then you make a backup. After using your computer for some time, that program either auto-updates itself or you manually update it with a downloadable patch or something. Now you need to rollback your PC to your latest backup for some unknown performance related issues (computer is running slugishly or you have viruses etc.) The rollback is going to wipe clean your C: partition, including any updates made to those programs. Now you have 2 options: update the program again only for you to have to do it multiple times in the future, or update and immediately make a backup of your system again.

This can become tedious and extremely annoying. One example of such a program is X-Fire. This program can safely be installed on another partition and continue to be used regardless of whether or not your rollback your PC. X-fire will stay intact no matter what. An example of a program that does not stay intact after a rollback is Skype. Skype will ALWAYS revert no matter what partition it is stored on. Firefox also will revert your profile if you do not manually store the profile on the D: partition.

It's simply a matter of knowing which programs behave weirdly.

and also against moving the page file.

I have restored and backed up my PC for years. I have never encountered any issues related to moving the page file.

And disabling system restore, which is redundant when you are doing complete backups.

I agree 10,000% here. I should add that to my guide. I'm just afraid someone will try to do a system restore and because they decided to turn it off they won't be able to.

I backup before restoring so I can pull any files that were updated since the last backup. (Saved Games comes to mind).

We're speakin the same language here. :) That's exactly what I do. What program do you use to make backups?

I think that maintaining coherence between the OS and all installed programs if far more important than reducing the backup size at any cost. Hard drive space is about $.20 per Gig, you are not saving that much money when you try to save space.

Right now I have 120 GB of backups and I estimate it cost $24-$36 in HD real estate. Less than the cost of the backup software.

What I do believe in is keeping data and software as separate as possible.

Also whenever I install software I perform a backup before and after. Before in case something goes wrong, after so if everything goes right I never have to do the same work twice.

And I always do a backup of the damaged OS before restoring just in case there are important information that might be overwritten.

System restore should only be disabled by those who own backup software and can be trusted to use it.

---

Anyway your procedures are probably right for your needs and your goals. Maybe you should have used "My" instead of "Perfect" and there would be more discussion and less debate.

You probably need about 4-5 guides based on people's priorities, how often they are willing to backup, how much space they are comfortable using for backups, how often they make software changes .....

Any in any case the perfect setup had D: as a large two drive RAID 1 array. :)

This guide is not perfect. What caught my eye as being flat out wrong is the section on the page file. It is not recommened to have the page file on the same physical drive as your OS. This is because it takes too much time and resources to resize the page file when need be. Even if you have it as a fixed size, it still is best practice to put it on a seperate physical drive. Your hard drive can only do one thing at a time, so no matter where you put the page on the same hard drive, you can still only access either system files or the page at one time. And setting it as a fixed size is not the best practice for performance. All that a fixed size does is prevent fragmenting of the page file. Just think. The more information, you can keep in extremely fast RAM the better, right? When you set the page file to system managed, Windows will do just that. It will keep as much information in the physical memory - RAM, and only use the page when necessary. Of course, when you have one hard drive, having a fixed page file size is beneficial because it sucks when the size of the page needs to be changed and it is noticable when it is on the same drive as the OS.

Partitioning is not practical either, the only good that comes out of partitioning is some sort of organization. I guess if having all user files on a seperate partition is useful for you, than that's good for you.

Most of these tweaks and such can be done easily and seamlessly with nLite. Service Pack 2 can be slipstreamed into the XP disc as can IE7 and even drivers and Windows Updates. All with more tweaks than you can imagine!

Edited by lord_xenos
I think that maintaining coherence between the OS and all installed programs if far more important than reducing the backup size at any cost. Hard drive space is about $.20 per Gig, you are not saving that much money when you try to save space.

Right now I have 120 GB of backups and I estimate it cost $24-$36 in HD real estate. Less than the cost of the backup software.

What I do believe in is keeping data and software as separate as possible.

Also whenever I install software I perform a backup before and after. Before in case something goes wrong, after so if everything goes right I never have to do the same work twice.

And I always do a backup of the damaged OS before restoring just in case there are important information that might be overwritten.

System restore should only be disabled by those who own backup software and can be trusted to use it.

---

Anyway your procedures are probably right for your needs and your goals. Maybe you should have used "My" instead of "Perfect" and there would be more discussion and less debate.

You probably need about 4-5 guides based on people's priorities, how often they are willing to backup, how much space they are comfortable using for backups, how often they make software changes .....

Any in any case the perfect setup had D: as a large two drive RAID 1 array. :)

disk space maybe cheap but, time is money :) the quicker your restores and backups take the more you get to play with your computer, i have alwasy installed apps on drives other than the system drive, and NEVER had any problems, except for apps that insist on installing themsleves to the system drive which isn't a great problem, if an app stops workgin after you re-image, just re-insatll the app.

why the hell woudl you care about raid 1 on d: i woudl rather have raid 0 on c: speed is my priority drives are cheap geta NAS and backup to that, most NAS's come with the softwrae needed.

disk space maybe cheap but, time is money smile.gif the quicker your restores and backups take the more you get to play with your computer, i have alwasy installed apps on drives other than the system drive, and NEVER had any problems, except for apps that insist on installing themsleves to the system drive which isn't a great problem, if an app stops workgin after you re-image, just re-insatll the app.

You took the words right out of my mouth. :)

@Lord Xenos

The purpose of my guide is to make backing up and restoring Windows as painless and easy as possible. I stated that multiple times in my guide. You guys are right, this is probably not the "Perfect" installation of windows, but for the average user, this guide is a gem. I insist on putting the page file on another partition because not everybody has 2 or more harddrives at their disposal.

I absolutely agree that moving the page file to another physical harddrive is the best option and should probably be stated somewhere in my guide. I will make changes to better explain this in my guide, but as of right now... the page file is only being moved to make the C: partition smaller, thus easier to backup and restore.

@Codesmith

Right now I have 120 GB of backups

Jesus freaking christ man. You and I both know that is bloat more than efficiency. My first backup is 800 MB. My second backup is 1200 MB and my third backup is usually around 1200 MB. I am extremely efficient when it comes to making my backups.

Nobody should ever and I really mean this, EVER install windows on an unpartitioned harddrive. After about 1 or 2 months, your harddrive becomes extremely huge and making backups becomes extremely unpractical in terms of space required and time spent backing up and restoring. By making the backups as small as possible, you ensure that restoring is quick and painless. But I already said that like a hundred times. :)

Also whenever I install software I perform a backup before and after. Before in case something goes wrong, after so if everything goes right I never have to do the same work twice.

When I build computers for my friends and I do all of the installing of OS drivers updates programs etc, I make sure I follow the same pattern of backing up before and after stuff is installed.

Why is 120 GB Bloat? Each backup is about 24 GB.

I manually backup when I make major changes and have an automatic backup every two weeks.

Plus I always keep a backup of a clean install.

I only delete the old backups when I run low on disc space.

Backups take about 7-14 minutes and I can continue using the computer while they run.

It never takes me more than 15 minutes to recover from a software problem. I never have to install the same program twice.

I got a 74 GB Raptor, 2 400GB RE2 in a RAID 1 config for important data, and a 750 GB for less important data. And 5 120 GB for external use.

Even my VMWare virtual machines use at least 20 GB, because they are a pain to enlarge latter.

I also use EMC retrospect to backup important folders, then copy the backup from the RAID 1 to an external in case my PC gets fried.

Not a lot of work, and it give me a lot of protection.

Why is 120 GB Bloat? Each backup is about 24 GB.

Extremely inefficient.

I regret to inform that InfraRecorder has proven extremely unreliable. This has been the final verdict based on using it on 3 different computers with terrible results. CDs fail, CDs succeed but are not entirely 100% stable. Yes I have tried different brands of CDs. This is my final verdict. Sorry, InfraRecorder is just not a suitable free alternative to Nero.

Personally after a restore I want all my 100% of my software to work 100% of the time exactly like it did when the backup was taken.

The easiest way to do that is keep on the software on one partition.

If some of your software is out of sync with your OS you can't be sure everything will work properly.

Also True Image only backup up the physical partition. The Boot CD would 100% ignore the link you are suggesting, which means its something you need to avoid if you are using backup software.

Why is 120 GB Bloat? Each backup is about 24 GB.

I manually backup when I make major changes and have an automatic backup every two weeks.

Plus I always keep a backup of a clean install.

I only delete the old backups when I run low on disc space.

Backups take about 7-14 minutes and I can continue using the computer while they run.

It never takes me more than 15 minutes to recover from a software problem. I never have to install the same program twice.

I got a 74 GB Raptor, 2 400GB RE2 in a RAID 1 config for important data, and a 750 GB for less important data. And 5 120 GB for external use.

Even my VMWare virtual machines use at least 20 GB, because they are a pain to enlarge latter.

I also use EMC retrospect to backup important folders, then copy the backup from the RAID 1 to an external in case my PC gets fried.

Not a lot of work, and it give me a lot of protection.

there is redundancy and there is just plain waste of space, yours my friend, i hate to say is waste of space, really how many backups of the backups do you need

Great guide!!

I'd recommend adding Deepburner it's the best free burner I have found.

Also GomPlayer is a fantastic video player, I prefer it over VLC.

I have an AMD 6000 3ghz 2 gigs of ram and an 8600 GT and Gomplayer actually lags while watching high def x264 files. VLC doesn't lag.

I have an AMD 6000 3ghz 2 gigs of ram and an 8600 GT and Gomplayer actually lags while watching high def x264 files. VLC doesn't lag.

Wierd I've never had lag with gomplayer, and your PCs much better than mine. The only annoance I have with VLC are slow responses with the controls, such as pause.

I need one backup of a clean install.

A backup from last month.

A Backup from last week.

A Backup from yesterday.

The backups happen automatically.

This has costs me maybe $25 in hard drive capacity on an old 120 GB drive I converted to external use.

This backup strategy has saved me at least 100 hours of unnecessary work in the past 4 years.

It all depends on how often you make major system changes.

Mind you this is the system where I am constantly installing and uninstalling new software, games, drivers .....

I probably install/uninstall something 2-3 times a week.

My other PCs and the ones of my family and friends only have one backup.

Those computers only have familiar, trusted software installed, and other than updates, don't see much change.

Also the PC I tinker with is also the one I use for work, so I can afford zero unexpected downtime

If you really want to accuse me of overkill, then consider that I run my web programming server and development environment inside a virtual machine, stored on a RAID 1 array.

When I upgraded to vista all I had to do is install some VMWare software and fire up the virtual machine and I was ready to get to work.

Edited by Codesmith
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Nice Guide thanks for taking the time to do this! :D , just one problem.... (well not really a problem)

Not a big problem.

(I recommend you create 2 directories on your D: drive, 1)Program Files &

2)(inside your new D:\program files)Common Files ,, then Just open regedit and goto this key,,

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion

Here you will see 2 entries for 1)"ProgramFilesDir" & 2)"CommonFilesDir",,,

Just change the drive letter to "D" in both cases by double clicking on the "Name" entry in the

right pane, and changing the drive letter in the popup. After this any installer will offer the

new directory as the default install directory,,,

  • 1 month later...
The glorious thing about this setup is, if you ever get a virus, spyware, adware, or a program malfunctions, you can restore your computer in a matter of 2 or 3 minutes... and know beyond a shadow of a doubt it will work just the way you like and you won't lose any important data like documents, music, videos, pictures, programs, or settings.

Have fun!

Thanks for the guide but i have 1 question.

I start using windows and got hit by a deadly virus. now i restore my system with this will i loose the files i had in "My Documents" folder which were created after i took the backup and before i got hit my the virus ?

my guide:

install xp

install updates

install programs I use FREQUENTLY

install any games I may play FREQUENTLY

optimize xp

burn image to cd

if I need to restore then plop cd into drive and restore image.

simple. no need for a user guide and no need to worry about my hard drive crashing and having no backup.

Thanks for the guide but i have 1 question.

I start using windows and got hit by a deadly virus. now i restore my system with this will i loose the files i had in "My Documents" folder which were created after i took the backup and before i got hit my the virus ?

Yes, any file created After the backup will be gone.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      555
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!