Why do people bid so early on ebay?


Recommended Posts

I wonder if some people are bitter about those who can afford the item 's final price and they get kicks out of raising the price. And perhaps they get an added thrill out of taking the risk that they might actually win something they can't afford. I mean, there are people who win auctions and never pay. This is a very cynical reason and personally I bid as late as possible but I think I can picture some people doing this, am I alone in this?

Quite frankly I think eBay should move to open-ended bidding. IE: The auction ends 5 seconds after the last bid.

As a seller, I feel a lot of frustration that bid sniping occurs at the last second and I'm not getting my 'full monies worth' from a listing.

Equally, as a buyer, I also think the same way, I possibly could've won an auction and been willing to pay more if I wasn't outbid "at the last second".

Hence I tell everyone : Bid early, bid often. DON'T leave it to the last second.

I never buy more expensive items on eBay unless it's a Buy Now and the price is close to what I want to pay.

When it comes to bidding for lesser items, I just enter a max amount I feel I want to pay for the item. If someone pays more and I lose it, not a big deal I just find another auction.

I guess if you are someone who is always buying stuff on eBay or one who has to have the item, then pulling out scientific calculations will work for you. I guess I'm in the minority.

I don't see anything wrong with it. I suppose it all comes down to you time constraints, budget as well as how important the item is.

There are a lot of people on e-bay that would just like the item, but are not too bothered about it. You enter the bid high enough and don't worry about it as long as you are willing to pay.

I mean the value of item should not change from amount of bidders and current price.

That said, it is stupid to enter bid of 100 2 days early for an item worth 500. That simply serves no purpose.

Therefore I think it does not matter if you snip or not. You set your limit as to how much you are willing to spend and as long it is that or below you got what you wanted.

Your limit should not change whether you snipped or not and it did not change for other highest bidder. Only way you pay less money is if snipper does not make it in time and that is not depended on wheter you did it or not.

My argument might not be valid if the item is something that you really want. Then you should have more relaxed budget and time to raise the bid.

I usually bid in the last 10 seconds about $5-10 more if its a low price and I get it about 90% of the time unless someone else does the same thing haha

edit: jeeze this is an old thread, and I notice I even posted in it after posting this

This is how eBay works:

You see an item you want, and bid the maximum you're willing to pay for it. If you are willing to pay the most, you get the item, if not, you don't.

It shouldn't matter when you bid, as long as you bid the maximum you're willing to pay.

wouldn't that decrease your chances of winning the auction?

Surely if you put your maximum bid in straight away, and someone wants the item more or is willing to pay more then they will keep bidding throughout the auction to outbid you.. when they do that your out because you have already bet your maximum...

if i bid on something and keep being automatically outbid by someones maximum bid then i'm more likely to splash an extra few quid to try and beat them if it's close to the amount i'd want to pay for it..

i do it 50/50 i have a few bids early on/mid auction but save the main bidding until the last 30 seconds... if it's pretty cheap i'll throw 1 maximum bid in.

I tend to think it has to do with how much you want the item. If you come across something you really want, you become excited and place a bid. Not only does it end up in your bidding list, it also alerts you when someone outbids you. Convenience is key here I think. But to call people naive or stupid just because they place a bid early... you might take a look in the mirror and start criticizing what you see there. No offence, but not everyone is the same.

I wrote a program to bid for me at the last second of the auction. So I'm almost guaranteed to win the stuff I want. I'd say I win 3 out of 10 auctions due to the auto bidder, that is to say 7 times out of 10 I would have won anyway regardless because of other bidders not willing to meet my maximum. And 3 times out of 10 I win because I was able to get the last bid in before someone else.

There are programs written by other people that do this but most of them require you to enter your ebay account information in the program itself and I don't like that as these programs are accessing the internet and you don't know if they are forwarding your account information on to someone else. That is why I wrote my own.

Before this I would lose most of my auctions usually because right at the last 2-3 seconds someone else would outbid whatever my maximum bid was. I didn't like putting in the maximum amount I'm willing to pay because when people try and bid and notice your maximum bid is over theirs sometimes they see that as a challenge to outbid you and then what you've done is artificially inflated the price, this is why bidding with your maximum bid right at the last second is the best way to win as it doesn't give other people the chance to decide if they want to outbid you.

I've got some great deals on ebay this way. I got a Core i7 920 for my server half retail price. I got a HP SAS Expander Card for ?110 on there yesterday (brand new still in the box) retails for ?320. I've saved tons of money over the years using ebay and I never bid early.

Because they are idiots - only a idiot would start bidding on a item that's got days or even hours of auction time to go. I have browser plugins and standalone software on desktop and phone to do any bidding for me, even if I forget the auction is running. If I know that I really want something, like the Schwalbe Ice Spiker Tyres I recently won, then I already know how little I can get them for brand new - I could have paid ?38.39 each through Wiggle, but instead in the last 6 seconds JBidwatcher got them for me for ?25 each because I snipped them, at ?38.38 and it did all that for me while I was busy at work occupied by how to keep the wheels of industry running and not sat in front of my PC waiting for the auction to end.

I used to do the watch the auction bit, but since I've had software do the bidding and watching for me I have made some amazing savings and if anyone wants to bid more than me then they are quite welcome to whatever it is that's up for sale because I already know how little it costs elsewhere.

If you are the only person bidding on a particular item , it doesn't matter when you put it in.

I've won several items on ebay with early bids , simply because there was no one else interested!

If there is competition and I *really* want to win , of course I leave it till the last 2 - 3 seconds!

I usually bid within the last few minutes if I can (assuming the price is still within reason). But as Spielo said earlier if you want something and are prepared to pay more than anyone else for it, then it doesn't matter when you bid.

This is one pitfall people fall into when they get outbid at the last minute. There's no point bidding 50 for something with a few minutes to spare hoping for a bargain, if you would be prepared to go to 100 if pushed. Pick your price and go all-in. If you win that's great, if you don't then someone was willing to pay up more than you were. eBay will bid incrementally until it reaches your max bid.

that would be rational if you weren't engaging in a bidding war. ebay accepts a bid and will incrementally increase the bid until it reaches the ceiling you specify. in this sense, if you won't be around when the auction ends, you should put in your valuation and then hope for the best. if your valuation is the highest at this point, the price will go up only incrementally; and if your valuation isn't the highest, you would have lost anyway.

now, a bidding war (by the same people) suggests that people are putting in successive bids, which is irrational. there's no reason to not put in your real valuation.

As a frequent seller on eBay, I've never understood the logic of people who will get into a bidding war over an item. I've actually had people do that on items and actually drive the price well above what I had originally set as the Buy-It-Now price! The other thing I've never understood: sometimes I list items with ONLY a B-I-N price, and yet people put it on their watch list. Why??? If you are interested in the item at the price it is listed, then just ****ing buy it! If you don't buy it when you are looking at it, it is quite likely that it WON'T be there when you come back later.

As a frequent seller on eBay, I've never understood the logic of people who will get into a bidding war over an item. I've actually had people do that on items and actually drive the price well above what I had originally set as the Buy-It-Now price! The other thing I've never understood: sometimes I list items with ONLY a B-I-N price, and yet people put it on their watch list. Why??? If you are interested in the item at the price it is listed, then just ****ing buy it! If you don't buy it when you are looking at it, it is quite likely that it WON'T be there when you come back later.

Well... at least you get to profit from people's stupidity, that's something (Y) I never understood that either. Boggles the mind. :blink:

Then i quickly realised i wasnt going to get that brand new sony laptop for 0.99p :p

That's the other thing that gets on my nerves as a seller. Serisously people, do you REALLY think that you are going to get something for 1 or 2% of its market value?? And yet, I get max bids in the $10 range for laptops, etc. all the time.

As a seller: I love it!

As a buyer: It drives me batty. But it does make me think about the item and whether I really need it. I determine my limit leading up to the last minute of the auction and then hope for the best.

As a frequent seller on eBay, I've never understood the logic of people who will get into a bidding war over an item. I've actually had people do that on items and actually drive the price well above what I had originally set as the Buy-It-Now price! The other thing I've never understood: sometimes I list items with ONLY a B-I-N price, and yet people put it on their watch list. Why??? If you are interested in the item at the price it is listed, then just ****ing buy it! If you don't buy it when you are looking at it, it is quite likely that it WON'T be there when you come back later.

I watch BIN items because if I'm picking something up off Ebay, I watch prices for a week or two before buying / bidding. If it's something rare or unusual, yeah, I'll just BIN before someone gets it, but when you're trying to get the best price on a mass market item, it's a good idea to keep tabs on a few and see if they sell or not rather than search for them every time. I do the same when selling to get the best value.

This is especially true of sporting or season items, as you can watch the BIN price of some things drop at the end of a season, or pick up just before. As for bidding early, I suppose I do that since I just plug in the price I want it at. If it doesn't pan out, I keep bidding elsewhere.

  • 10 months later...

I agree as a seller it is great but never happens to me. As a buyer I have seen idiots bid for a used item for mor ethan the can get new as a "buy it now", stupid stupid stupid. These people need to understand what an acution is about. Keep your cards to your self until the last minute. I had these idiots...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!