NFL determined Patriots have violated rules


Recommended Posts

Belichick has been fined $500k, the team $250K, and if they make the playoffs they lose a 1st round pick and if they dont, a 2nd and 3rd round picks

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3018338

From now on anyone who does this needs to forfeit the game, and they should make that retroactive in previous proven cases.

Belichick has been fined $500k, the team $250K, and if they make the playoffs they lose a 1st round pick and if they dont, a 2nd and 3rd round picks

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3018338

They better hope they make the playoffs, becuase lossing a 2nd and 3rd pick is worse then then a 1st round pick, much worse.

BUT

Since they are very deep, what if they traded away a good veteran that is somewhat replaceable for a 1st or 2nd round pick?

Edited by reidtheweed01

Interesting point about the SB XXXIX game with Pats vs Eagles.

The Pats currently have two first round draft picks, one they automatically get, and another they picked up from San Francisco:

If the Patriots lose their first-rounder next season they still will have a first-round pick, obtained from San Francisco in the deal that brought Moss from Oakland.

So it looks like if they make the playoffs (and it's likely that they will), they still have a first round pick. If they don't make it, they have two. I have to say that the punishment handed down wasn't hard enough in this case.

Also worth mentioning:

The NFL said the camera was seized before the end of the first quarter and had no impact on the game.

Source.

Take away the single touchdown the Pats scored in the first quarter, the score would've likely been 31-14. Jets still didn't have a chance. It's a shame too, they've got a lot of good talent on the Patriots.

If you're going to make them lose something they accomplished in the past, why stop at last Sundays game? Why not go back to other games where they were thought to have been cheating, such as the Super Bowl against the Eagles in 2005? Where does it end if you go back?

recordingits.gif

best post of the day :laugh:

o... and i do not believe that the punishment was severe enough... while we will never know the impact that it has had on previous games/years :cough: Superbowl win over eagles :cough:... but I believe that it should have resulted in a forfeit to the Jets as well as a few game susp for Belichick

cheaties3zi8.jpg

Patriotsnewlogo.jpg

Edited by jerzdawg
How astonishing. Even without "cheating" we dismantled the Chargers without breaking a sweat. What do you boys have to say about that?

And for the record, Chris Collinsworth is anti-Patriot. :rolleyes:

just shows you how stupid the organization really is... the talent on the team should have allowed them to win without the spying crap

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reluctantly forces strict new age checks on Texas users starting today by Paul Hill Apple will begin enforcing the Texas Age Assurance Law (SB 2420) following a recent court ruling that lifted an injunction on SB 2420. Starting June 4 (today), Apple will enforce strict age-verification and parental-consent rules for new Apple accounts created in Texas. This move will affect children under 18 who go to download apps or attempt to make in-app purchases. Apple previously expressed privacy concerns related to this law, but compliance is now mandatory for the company, nevertheless. Apple will use several APIs to follow the law. Principally, the Declared Age Range API will fetch the specific user age bracket (Under 13, 13-15, 16-17, or 18+) and a verification method. The Significant Change API (PermissionKit) will trigger a system dialog for parental consent if an app gets a major update or an age-rating shift. There is also a new property type in StoreKit that allows developers to automatically check when their app’s age rating has changed on a user’s device and then use the Significant Change API to request parental consent. Finally, App Store Server Notifications can be configured to tell developers when a parent revokes consent, blocking app launches. To ensure they are ready for these changes, developers must immediately use Apple’s sandbox testing environment to validate these APIs in their apps. For any developers out there finding this to be inconvenient, get used to it. Other regions, such as Utah, Louisiana, and Brazil, are looking at, or have implemented, similar rules.
    • They should show the onedrive recycle bin in a searchable manner and on app not just on the website
    • You looking at a phone or something? On my 4K HDR monitor it is frikking spectacular.
    • The Surface Pro 7+ already has a USB C port which can be used for everything you mentioned, except for eGPUs. Meanwhile, microsoft have gotten rid of ALL of the following that are present in the Surface Pro 7+:
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      230
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      60
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!