2007-2008 Writers Guild of America strike


2007 Hollywood Strike  

282 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you support in the strike?

    • The AMPTP
      35
    • The WGA
      140
    • Undecided/Don't Care
      107


Recommended Posts

Spring 09.

It should be before then. I can't imagine that this will drag on past July 08. I personally think the DGA will end this strike since they're known for taking the lowest the AMPTP is willing to offer. They've done is a lot in the past, I don't see why they'd change this time. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that they strike a deal on Day 1 of negotiations personally.

It should be before then. I can't imagine that this will drag on past July 08. I personally think the DGA will end this strike since they're known for taking the lowest the AMPTP is willing to offer. They've done is a lot in the past, I don't see why they'd change this time. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that they strike a deal on Day 1 of negotiations personally.

I agree Spring 09 seems a bit far I mean its already gone on nearly a month or maybe just over a month and when they get back to the table I can't see it being long until they come to some deal.

It should be before then. I can't imagine that this will drag on past July 08. I personally think the DGA will end this strike since they're known for taking the lowest the AMPTP is willing to offer. They've done is a lot in the past, I don't see why they'd change this time. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that they strike a deal on Day 1 of negotiations personally.

They won't negotiate with the directors until the writers are resolved. I don't even think they CAN do that, skip over one union to negotiate with another. I would venture to say that would be illegal.

But, even if the strike ends in July, that would mean the Fall season is still effected by the catching up that the series will have to do. It wouldn't be until spring when everything would be running on normal schedules, which is what he asked.

I agree Spring 09 seems a bit far I mean its already gone on nearly a month or maybe just over a month and when they get back to the table I can't see it being long until they come to some deal.

And the estimates by people that know things (not clueless morons who THINK they know things) said it would last 8-10 months.

Both of the previous strikes by the WGA lasted 5 months. This one will be AT LEAST that.

They won't negotiate with the directors until the writers are resolved. I don't even think they CAN do that, skip over one union to negotiate with another. I would venture to say that would be illegal.

But, even if the strike ends in July, that would mean the Fall season is still effected by the catching up that the series will have to do. It wouldn't be until spring when everything would be running on normal schedules, which is what he asked.

They can sadly. The DGA announced yesterday that they will begin negotiations in January.

"The DGA announced today that it may commence negotiations with the AMPTP in January."

I'm wondering though, since the studios are going to have to repay a lot of advertising fees back, then I'm wondering if the studios will just write off this season of television and restart next season. If they do that, then everything, excluding new shows, will be back to normal.

Edited by Hurmoth
They can sadly. The DGA announced yesterday that they will begin negotiations in January.

"The DGA announced today that it may commence negotiations with the AMPTP in January."

Right ... but the article even says they filed charges, which will result in at least a temporary injunction until the judge hears the case.

And besides, even if the directors DO take the minimum, the WGA isn't obligated to also agree with it. They always have, yes, but if they are going to get screwed over like this then they won't.

And besides, even if the directors DO take the minimum, the WGA isn't obligated to also agree with it. They always have, yes, but if they are going to get screwed over like this then they won't.
But that's the thing, you say they won't take it because they're being screwed, but history has already shown us that they will.

I'm not saying it will happen, but I wouldn't be surprised based on their history.

The thing that might help push this along though is that the writers are thinking of doing shows off of the internet. They could do deals with Apple (iTunes), Microsoft (Zune), Google (YouTube) and/or MySpace. If the studios see that that the writers don't need the studios, then they're going to be more willing to get the writers back at the table to hammer out a new contract.

And the estimates by people that know things (not clueless morons who THINK they know things) said it would last 8-10 months.

Both of the previous strikes by the WGA lasted 5 months. This one will be AT LEAST that.

Yeah I hear ya don't think I don't I know it will last at least 6 months its inevitable but neither me or you are even close to these people to know the real facts and just live off what we hear on the net or on the news so we can all have estimates of when these things will end.

Considering the GARBAGE that is on TV today, I would love to see them stay on strike for a few years.

Nick @ Nite TV land must be doing a booming business. If you want QUALITY tv programming, try the old

TV shows on TVland. They had something that is missing with today's sitcoms.....they are FUNNY without having

to be vulgar or 3/4 nude on TV. Also, the old shows like Gunsmoke acutally have a STORY that is interesting.

The only downside to the strike, is that it will give the pinheads at the TV networks more of an opportunity to

cram down our throats more of the stupid (so called) reality shows. COPS! is the only reality show on TV.

^ You do realize that Cops was born out of the first writers strike back in the '80s right?

There are a lot of interesting TV shows on that have great stories today: Burn Notice, The 4400, Heroes, Lost, Psych (if you want comedy) and Monk, Law & Order is still good to an extent, CSI, etc. None of those shows have vulgar language and/or have women 3/4 nude (maybe Burn Notice due to it's location, but even then it rarely shows that).

And this strike isn't going to last for years, I'd say a year at most, but the studios will be truly hurting by then and will give up the fight. Either that or the writers will make deals with companies such as Google (YouTube) or another online video distribution host (possibly even Apple (iTunes)).

Striking Writers To Speak Directly With Studios

Striking Hollywood writers say they'll bypass the producers' union and will instead negotiate directly with studios and production companies ? a move could put some TV shows back on the air quickly.

In a letter to its members, the Writer's Guild says it will no longer negotiate with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers. Those talks have been stalled since December 7th. The guild plans to start approaching the companies tomorrow.

The writers ? angry over compensation for programs, movies and other content streamed or downloaded over the Internet ? took to the picket lines on November 5th.

Word of the Day: Collusion

col-lu-sion [kuh-loo-zhuhn]

secret agreement or cooperation between two or more parties for a fraudulent, illegal, or deceitful purpose

The New York Times reported that David Letterman is pursuing an interim agreement with the WGA that would allow his late-night talk show back on the air, even if the strike is still ongoing. As the Times article linked above states, "that could potentially put Mr. Letterman at an enormous advantage over most of his late-night colleagues."

Boy, CBS must be thrilled, right? I mean, Letterman's show, which runs second in the late-night ratings to NBC's Tonight Show, could slingshot past Leno and the Peacock due to such an advantage. Yes, Les Moonves and Co. must be jumping for joy at the mere possibility of such a competitive coup in the cutthroat world of network TV.

Guess again.

According to Nikki Finke at Deadline Hollywood Daily, "Letterman's network CBS felt the need (Saturday) to disassociate itself from his pending WGA deal (Saturday), obviously worried that Les Moonves' AMPTP colleagues will be miffed."

In fact, instead of releasing champagne corks at their good fortune, CBS instead released a press statement...

"Regarding David Letterman's company, Worldwide Pants, seeking an interim agreement with the WGA: We respect the intent of Worldwide Pants to serve the interests of its independent production company and its employees by seeking this interim agreement with the WGA. However, this development should not confuse the fact that CBS remains unified with the AMPTP, and committed to working with the member companies to reach a fair and reasonable agreement with the WGA that positions everyone in our industry for success in a rapidly changing marketplace."

And that, in a nutshell, is exactly what is so odious about the AMPTP - made up of competitors! - bargaining as a single entity against the WGA.

As Robert J. Elisberg stated in his Huffington Post column, it would be unconscionable if the major automakers - Ford, GM, Daimler-Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, Nissan - banded together and bargained as one against a single, isolated division of the UAW. Yet not only is a similar situation happening in Hollywood - with six mega media corporations up teaming up against a single Guild - as the statement above reveals, it's even worse: the collusion is so bad, the individual mega-corps won't even entertain an offer that might give their company a competitive - and thus financial - leg up.

It'd be almost laughable if it wasn't so shameful.

But the competitive instincts of one - one - of the CEOs of these media mega-corps will take over, right?

Guess again, Part II says Nikki Finke...

"I find it that the moguls may not have the strength of character, the commitment to their shareholders, or, let's face it, the balls of steel necessary to go against The Club. For weeks now, I've talked to several CEOs about why they don't deal individually with the WGA. After all, the car companies have a lot in common, but they still bargain individually with the auto workers. But Hollywood studios and networks are colluding, not competing.

Sony and Paramount are primarily in the movie business. Why not get their films restarted? NBC has been in the cellar ratings-wise. Why not leap-frog other networks and ensure the Golden Globes go off without a hitch? Then there's ABC: doesn't it have the most to lose with most of its Nielsen Top 10 series in primetime not to mention the Academy Awards? And do Fox's rivals really want to cede January to May ratings to Peter Chernin?

Any network that does a deal now could save the Back 9 of scripted shows not to mention pilot season. Any movie exec could finish the 2009 slate and move on to 2010. Makes sense, right?

But when I raise this possibility, the CEO's answer is an audible shrug, followed by stammering and a simple, "I just can't." Time to upset protocol and break ranks."

Or then again, maybe it's time for Congress to take a look.

Edited by Hurmoth

Striking writers in talks to launch Web start-ups

Dozens of striking film and TV writers are negotiating with venture capitalists to set up companies that would bypass the Hollywood studio system and reach consumers with video entertainment on the Web.

At least seven groups, composed of members of the striking Writers Guild of America, are planning to form Internet-based businesses that, if successful, could create an alternative economic model to the one at the heart of the walkout, now in its seventh week.

Three of the groups are working on ventures that would function much like United Artists, the production company created 80 years ago by Charlie Chaplin and other top stars who wanted to break free from the studios.

"It's in development and rapidly incubating," said Aaron Mendelsohn, a guild board member and co-creator of the "Air Bud" movies.

Writers walked off their jobs Nov. 5, virtually shutting down television production and throwing 10,000 people out of work. The Writers Guild is fighting the major studios over how much their members are paid when their work is distributed online.

Silicon Valley investors historically have been averse to backing entertainment start-ups, believing that such efforts were less likely to generate huge paydays than technology companies. But they began considering a broader range of entertainment investments after observing the enormous sums paid for popular Web video companies, including the $1.65 billion that Google Inc. plunked down last year for YouTube, a site where users post their own clips.

They also have been emboldened by major advertisers, which prefer supporting professionally created Web entertainment to backing user-generated content on sites such as MySpace that can be in poor taste.

"I'm 100% confident that you will see some companies get formed," said Todd Dagres, a Boston-based venture capitalist who has been flying to L.A. and meeting with top writers for weeks. "People have made up their minds."

What effect this would have on the strike is unclear. So far, the percentage of the guild's 10,000 striking writers who are in discussions with venture capitalists appears to be small. Any deal of this kind, however, could put pressure on the studios and help the writers' public relations campaign. Writers who are talking to venture investors say the studios would suffer a brain drain if high-profile talents received outside funding and were no longer beholden to them.

Mendelsohn and others said they would stick with their ventures after the strike ended.

The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which represents the studios in negotiations, declined to comment on the issue, as did the Writers Guild.

Already this year, a handful of sites have received venture backing, including FunnyorDie.com, co-founded by comedic actor Will Ferrell, and MyDamnChannel.com, launched by former MTV executive Rob Barnett.

MyDamnChannel pays for the production of original content by a handful of artists and splits ad revenue with them.

Under the Hollywood system, writers, in most cases, are employed by the studios to create and manage TV shows and movies. The studios own the copyrights and pay writers for the initial use of the material and a small percentage of the licensing fees they collect when the work is rerun or sold on DVD.

With television viewership and DVD revenue declining in the digital age, writers have sought bigger rewards when their work is distributed online. There have been isolated successes, such as Viacom Inc.'s agreement in August to give the co-creators of "South Park" 50% of a new online entertainment venture based on the TV program.

For the most part, however, the studios have argued that Web economics are still too uncertain for them to give a larger share of the proceeds to writers.

Most writers who have been talking with venture capitalists declined to discuss their plans on the record, saying it was too early to provide details. Yet an array of strategies have emerged from interviews with writers, investors and others involved in the process.

The groups modeled after United Artists (which eventually was bought by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. and recently was revived with the help of Tom Cruise) envision creating and distributing programming for the Web and recouping their investments by selling rights to the most successful properties to TV networks or movie companies.

The initiative would change the career paths of many writers. They would be leaving well-paying jobs in television and film for the Internet, which often has been viewed as a steppingstone to Hollywood.

Some high-profile writers and technologists are trying to create a collaborative studio they hope would be officially sanctioned by the Writers Guild. They want to build on the popularity of strike-related videos on the guild-inspired blog UnitedHollywood, YouTube and elsewhere.

"We are uniquely positioned to take our case and new business model directly to consumers," said a leader of that effort, the primary writer on a TV show that was a blockbuster a decade ago. "This will be the officially sanctioned Hollywood union portal."

Others seek to create a privately owned studio that would develop episodic series for the Web. The studio could turn a profit even without cutting movie or TV deals if it developed an audience coveted by advertisers.

Dagres said he had met with one group focused on developing material for potential theatrical distribution and another concentrating on Web series.

At least two additional groups plan to create companies that would distribute material on Facebook or other online gathering places where they might quickly become popular.

Facebook director Jim Breyer, a partner at Silicon Valley venture firm Accel Partners, said he was weighing deals that would rely on Facebook's platform. "It is likely we will make investments in Los Angeles screenwriter/content-oriented companies in 2008," he said.

Accel and Dagres' Spark Capital are among four venture firms that have been meeting with writers since the strike began. Hedge funds are also interested in investing, writers who have met with them said.

The screenwriters have been consulting with writer-entrepreneurs who say they earn their living from their work online by running low-cost operations.

"I basically give them a 'Come on in, the water's grand,' " said news website owner Andrew Breitbart, the coauthor of a 2004 book on celebrity culture who worked on the Drudge Report and Huffington Post websites.

"There is no one answer about what works," Breitbart said. "The great thing about online is you can adapt to the changes."

Another common stop on the educational tour is Kent Nichols, co-creator of the profitable "Ask a Ninja" franchise, a two-man Web operation.

His advice is, "You have to think like Jerry Bruckheimer," the television and movie producer who keeps ownership of everything he makes and tries to wring profit from every revenue stream, including merchandise, advertising and licensing.

Even before the strike, changes were afoot that made the recent ventures possible.

The spread of broadband access has allowed more Americans to watch video online. That has prompted the big entertainment companies and a host of others to put more clips on the Web, which in turn has brought in more viewers.

Among broadband users, the proportion who watch videos at least weekly has risen to 61% from 45% a year ago, market research firm Horowitz Associates Inc. reported this month.

"I think it's a great opportunity," said Silicon Valley investor Gus Tai of Trinity Ventures. "This trend started prior to the strike and is only accelerating."

Some of the writers who are drafting business plans said that if the strike had lasted only a week, they would have just gone back to work. But now they've had time to plot strategy -- and to realize that a prolonged strike with reruns and reality shows filling the airwaves might allow them to grab a wandering audience.

"The companies are pushing us into the embrace of people that are going to cut them out of the loop," marveled one show runner who is tracking the start-up trend but not participating.

"We are one Connecticut hedge-fund checkbook, one Silicon Valley server farm and two creators away from having channels on YouTube, where the studios don't own anything."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!