2007-2008 Writers Guild of America strike


2007 Hollywood Strike  

282 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you support in the strike?

    • The AMPTP
      35
    • The WGA
      140
    • Undecided/Don't Care
      107


Recommended Posts

You do realize that the majority of the 10,500 writers, the majority of them don't make $30-40K a year, right?

You people need to get the facts before you start forming opinions it seems.

Yeah, apparently all these writers in Hollywood are rich. I never knew about that :rolleyes:

The funniest thing is that all these people opposed to the strike believe so because they don't have their facts straight. When you sit down, read a little, and really get a sense of what is happening it is pretty easy to support the writers.

When you sit down, read a little, and really get a sense of what is happening it is pretty easy to support the writers.

I disagree. I understand the facts and still can't be bothered with unions and strikers. It's hard to support a group of people who spend their time writing mindless entertainment.

I disagree. I understand the facts and still can't be bothered with unions and strikers. It's hard to support a group of people who spend their time writing mindless entertainment.

So you don't want any films, tv, etc.? So you don't think they should be payed for creating excellent work such as Pan's Labyrinth, Children of Men, Saving Private Ryan, A Beautiful Mind, etc.? Just because you don't watch this stuff doesn't mean that they shouldn't get paid for the work they do.

So you don't want any films, tv, etc.? So you don't think they should be payed for creating excellent work such as Pan's Labyrinth, Children of Men, Saving Private Ryan, A Beautiful Mind, etc.? Just because you don't watch this stuff doesn't mean that they shouldn't get paid for the work they do.

Sure I want them, but I don't need them. My life isn't going to feel empty because CSI or House stops airing. Yes, excellent work deserves higher pay.... but they are not being asked to be paid on the quality of their work. If they write crap, (i.e. CSI for example), expect to get paid crap. I understand they're just trying to make a living, and it's hard work writing for shows like CSI that put out 20 some odd episodes a season. But we would all like a little more money on a paychecks, that shouldn't be justification for them to strike... IMO.

Edited by OPaul
Sure I want them, but I don't need them. My life isn't going to feel empty because CSI or House stops airing. Yes, excellent work deserves higher pay.... but they are not being asked to be paid on the quality of their work. If they write crap, (i.e. CSI for example), expect to get paid crap. I understand they're just trying to make a living, and it's hard work writing for shows like CSI that put out 20 some odd episodes a season. But we would all like a little more money on a paychecks, that should be justification for them to strike... IMO.

You could say that about a lot of things though. We don't need cars, or the internet, or fast food. So let's stop paying them too.

Again most writers don't make over $30 to 40K a year. I may do a crappy job on a project, but that doesn't mean my boss is going to lower my pay for it. That doesn't happen in the real world. If I continue to do a bad job, then I get fired. The same thing happens with writers. They are released from their contracts or their contract isn't renewed when the project is over. If they did a crappy job, most likely they won't continue in the business. Or if they did do a crappy job, but the ratings were high and the money continues to flow in, then it isn't the writers fault, it is ours as a consumer to continue watching the stuff. I don't see how that's the writers' fault.

Sure I want them, but I don't need them. My life isn't going to feel empty because CSI or House stops airing. Yes, excellent work deserves higher pay.... but they are not being asked to be paid on the quality of their work. If they write crap, (i.e. CSI for example), expect to get paid crap. I understand they're just trying to make a living, and it's hard work writing for shows like CSI that put out 20 some odd episodes a season. But we would all like a little more money on a paychecks, that should be justification for them to strike... IMO.

In regards to compensation, there are two viable options:

1. Pay the writers at a much higher rate than they are paid now so that residuals are not factored. The pay would be significantly higher because there would be no income from DVD sales, online streaming, etc.

2. Pay them lower fees and then pay them a percentage of sales of their works. Studios make money in TV and online advertisements, box office sales, DVD sales, etc. They get residual income from those works, and the writers want this as well.

There really is no other option without going outside of having a union. Studios wouldn't like #1 because as you and others have noted, there is some bad crap out there, so why pay so much money for crap? If something that doesn't appear to be a big deal becomes one (Matrix comes to mind here because I'm sure they didn't expect it to become such a cult hit, as well with Heroes), then they have future money coming in based on sales, not just advertising. Studios would come out further ahead if they paid big bucks for something that is hugely successfull, but hits are few and far between each of the mediocre content that is usually dished out. For this reason, #2 is done. Lower initial investment, if it's a hit, it generates more money in future sales. Bleh, enough business talk, I'm starting to feel tainted.

So you don't want any films, tv, etc.? So you don't think they should be payed for creating excellent work such as Pan's Labyrinth, Children of Men, Saving Private Ryan, A Beautiful Mind, etc.? Just because you don't watch this stuff doesn't mean that they shouldn't get paid for the work they do.

They do get paid, plenty enough. YOU need to get the facts straight. You seem to love making comparisons so let me give you a few so that you know how silly you sound.

If I buy a TV from Best Buy, should I send a check to the manufacturer everytime I turn it on?

If I hire an employee with a salary rate, should I pay him individually for every task he completes?

If I get my brakes done on my car, should I tip the mechanic everytime they stop me at a stopsign?

If I order a steak at a restaurant, should I give an additonal dollar for every bite I take?

I can go on and on, these writers are trying to make themselves look like something they are NOT.

Writing is the same as any other job, you get paid a said rate for a service, if you don't like it, find another profession. GET OVER IT!

They do get paid, plenty enough. YOU need to get the facts straight. You seem to love making comparisons so let me give you a few so that you know how silly you sound.

If I buy a TV from Best Buy, should I send a check to the manufacturer everytime I turn it on?

If I hire an employee with a salary rate, should I pay him individually for every task he completes?

If I get my brakes done on my car, should I tip the mechanic everytime they stop me at a stopsign?

If I order a steak at a restaurant, should I give an additonal dollar for every bite I take?

So who should get the money every time you buy a DVD? Just the studios? No one else should?

Your examples don't work in the film industry at all. Again this is a union thing, something you obviously aren't going to get.

The writers get only $.04 per $20 DVD sale. That's not a lot of money there.

Consider this, the recently retired CEO of Viacom (parent company of CBS) got a $60,000,000 severance package while the writers, the guys and gals who do the real work creating the content we see on CBS may only make $30 to 40K a year. Some how that doesn't make sense.

Yet you couldn't care less.

Check these videos out:

&
Edited by Hurmoth
Consider this, the recently retired CEO of Viacom (parent company of CBS) got a $60,000,000 severance package while the writers, the guys and gals who do the real work creating the content we see on CBS may only make $30 to 40K a year. Some how that doesn't make sense.

Of course it doesn't make any sense. But it is no different then any other large organization. The guy on top is always going to make more money then the guys holding everything together at the bottom.

Of course it doesn't make any sense. But it is no different then any other large organization. The guy on top is always going to make more money then the guys holding everything together at the bottom.

Then if it isn't right for a CEO, who didn't create the content to begin with, to get that kind of money, then what's wrong with giving the writers a piece of the pie?

That's what I don't get about some of your positions (maybe not you specifically OPaul), but the writers are asking for something that will only cost the studios roughly $153 million over the next three years (that's 5 or 6 major studios). Why is that such a big deal?

They created the content and some barely make ends meat vs the cost of living in Hollywood and NY City. So one writer may go from $30 to 40K a year to $35 to 45K a year (obviously that depends on the writer, the content, how popular the show is, etc.).

All of these figures are based on a percent to begin with, but what the WGA is asking for is pennies to the producers.

Here's an interesting question for those who say that the writers don't deserve residuals.

Do you think authors of novels should continue to get residuals for their novels that they write after it is published? Or just a one time fee and everything else goes to the publisher?

This is essentially the same thing.

Or how about this. Musicians get money for every CD that's sold and because of iTunes they get money for legal purchases online. Now they're setup differently (non-union) because there's so many different distributors in that business as opposed to the film/tv industry where there's only 5 or 6 major studios.

Anyone see Letterman and Conan last night? So hilarious. Haven't seen Conan that funny in a while. (Y)

The strike beards are the best.

I saw some clips, they were funny, how long can they keep that up tho! (the beards also :laugh: )

Anyone see Letterman and Conan last night? So hilarious. Haven't seen Conan that funny in a while. (Y)

The strike beards are the best.

I recorded Conan but haven't watched it yet. Letterman was pretty good, but Craig Ferguson was a riot :laugh:

To those not supporting the writers, I don't get you. The writers make their money off residuals for everytime their episode it aired on TV, so why should it be any different everytime the episode is aired online?

Unless you think they shouldn't get residuals for TV airings either, in which case they aren't making much at all.

-Spenser

Oh God, what has the Writers Strike done?! :p

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVxbAvD1onc

If this strike drags on for long enough he will probably eventually do that show he's always talking about where he dances for the whole hour.

If this strike drags on for long enough he will probably eventually do that show he's always talking about where he dances for the whole hour.

Question is tho is it gonna be as "good" as American Gladiators

These are the dates of the Finales...

BY DATE:

Women?s Murder Club (ABC) Jan. 4

Desperate Housewives (ABC) Jan. 6

Gossip Girl (CW) Jan. 9

CSI (CBS) Jan. 10

Grey?s Anatomy (ABC) Jan. 10

My Name Is Earl (NBC) Jan. 10

30 Rock (NBC) Jan. 10

Family Guy (Fox) Jan. 13

CSI Miami (CBS) Jan. 14

NCIS (CBS) Jan. 15

ER (NBC) Jan. 17

Without A Trace (CBS) Jan. 17

Moonlight (CBS) Jan. 18

Life Is Wild (CW) Jan. 20

Law & Order: SVU (NBC) Jan. 22

Ugly Betty (NBC) Jan. 24

Brothers & Sisters (ABC) Jan. 27

Boston Legal (ABC) Jan. 29

Friday Night Lights (NBC) Feb. 8

Cashmere Mafia (ABC) Feb. 13

Scrubs (NBC) Feb. 14

Psych (USA) Feb. 15

Prison Break (Fox) Feb. 18

Samantha Who? (ABC) Feb. 18

Nip/Tuck (FX) Feb. 19

Las Vegas (NBC) Feb. 22

Monk (USA) Feb. 22

Medium (NBC) March 3

Terminator (Fox) March 3

Stargate Atlantis (SciFi) March 7

The Wire (HBO) March 9

Breaking Bad (AMC) March 16

Kyle XY (ABC Family) March 17

Lost (ABC) March 20

L Word (Showtime) March 23

Quarterlife (NBC) March 24

Jericho (CBS) March 25

In Treatment (HBO) March 25

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!