Windows not detecting Samsung LE32R41B LCD TV - Help?


Recommended Posts

I have a Toshiba Windows Vista HP laptop connected via it's VGA port to my Samsung LE32R41B LCD TV but it is not working.

When plugged into the TV using a 1m VGA cable that came with a separate monitor it works fine. Windows lets me choose a 1368x768 resolution and the Nvidia drivers detect the TV as made by Samsung.

However when using a cheap 3m VGA cable and a more expensive 5m Belkin Pro Series cable Windows doesn't detect a TV is plugged into the laptop. As it happens 3m wasn't long enough I need about 4.5m.

Looking in the Nvidia drivers it doesn't detect the Samsung TV any more. If I choose "Analogue Source" and set it to 1024x768 (1368x768 is not an option) plus 60Hz refresh rate the TV then detects the signal but only because it happens the TV also supports this.

This is more me forcing it to work than being picked up properly.

I've also discovered if I plug my separate monitor into my laptop using the same 3m cable it's also not detected. I'd have thought this should work, the monitor supports 1440x900. If I use the regular 1m cable that came with the monitor it's fine.

Any ideas why longer lengths than 1m do not work and Windows doesn't recognise the TV any more? Thanks in advance.

Anyone?

The laptop has a Nvidia GeForce Go 7300 Graphics card, with the latest version installed (7.15.11.56.16) as shown here:

http://uk.computers.toshiba-europe.com/cgi...iverLanguage=42

I cannot use the actual Nvidia drivers and have to use Toshiba's Nvidia drivers. I guess they modified the graphics board but used a Nvidia chip. If I try Nvidia drivers they refuse to install with a card not found error.

Here is the cable I have, it's not exactly the same as mine is 5m, is gold plated and has those ferrite cores blocks to help stop interference:

ful1f3h982b02mek2.jpg

I cannot find an exact picture.

How about returning the bad cable and getting another one?

The thing is I've now tried two different cables by two different manufacturers leading me to think it's not a case of a faulty cable. I've tried a cheap 3m cable and a more expensive Belkin Pro 5m cable, gold plated.

I think it's something to do with the distance the signal has to travel. It's fine with my cheap 1m cable. I do not know how to overcome this though.

What model laptop do you have?

It's a Toshiba Satellite A100-049 15.4" laptop with an Intel Core 2 Duo 1.66Hz, 2Gb RAM and 120Gb SATA hard disk. I bought it new in May.

Why do you ask? Thanks for your help so far.

Do you have the latest BIOS installed on the laptop?

Yes. I checked it only the other day.

Have you compared the pin layout of the cable that works to one that does not?

No. Please explain what I am looking for? Even if the number of pins differs I'm unsure how I'd go about finding the right cable?

EDIT: I've just checked and interestingly both the non-working 3m cable and the non-working 5m cable has 1 less pin less than the working 1m cable. The missing pin on both cables is in the same place.

Is this likely to be the reason? If so I'll see if I can track down a 15 pin 5m cable. I counted the number of pins and the total number is 15 but the other two cables have 14 pins.

I bought the 5m cable from Amazon which does specifically say it has 15 pins, have they sent me a faulty item?

EDIT: I've just checked and interestingly both the non-working 3m cable and the non-working 5m cable has 1 less pin less than the working 1m cable. The missing pin on both cables is in the same place.

I think you need to find a cable that does not have that one pin missing as the cables that I've used to connect a PC to a TV have all the pins.

I think you need to find a cable that does not have that one pin missing as the cables that I've used to connect a PC to a TV have all the pins.

Interesting thanks. Checking the Belkin website the pictures shows a cable with 14 pins:

http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage...oduct_Id=266074

Honestly, I don't know the difference, but that's the only difference between the cables that work and don't work so I'd start there.

I assume you're from the UK so I copied a link to a store in the UK that sells a cable with all 15 pins.

http://www.futureshop.co.uk/profigold-pgm1...e-5m-p-404.html

I assume you're from the UK so I copied a link to a store in the UK that sells a cable with all 15 pins.

Yes I am. How did you guess? I should put that in my profile.

I just had a look at that store. I'll try the Amazon returns root first. I suspect they'll only send me out the exact same cable and not bother to check the number of pins but I may as well try first.

Thanks for all your help.

I e-mailed an eBayer seller who sells what looks like a high quality VGA cable to confirm his have 15 pins and here is response:

"The 9th pin sends no signal, that is why there is no 9th pin."

If you count the pins it is always the 9th pin that is missing. So I guess I'm back to square one :(

i had a similar belkin cable, when i was using it i found that i could select screen resolutions their is no way on earth my monitor could handle, probably some communication signal from the screen to the graphics card.

good luck on your search for a compatible cable

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!