Bioshock Vs Halo 3 - Wich one is better?


Bioshock Vs Halo 3 - Wich one is better? (in single player mode)  

302 members have voted

  1. 1. Bioshock Vs Halo 3 - Wich one is better? (in single Player mode)

    • Bioshock
      156
    • Halo 3 (single player mode)
      146


Recommended Posts

It's gotta be Bioshock single player, Halo multiplayer.

I haven't played Halo 3 single player but it surely can't touch Bioshocks unique underwater city, story and voice acting/characters. Not to mention Big daddies/Little sisters just kick ass!

I'm open to pe proven wrong, but I don't think I can be convinced.

Both are great games. I've been a Halo fan since shortly after the first one came out and the story is fantastic. But in the end, it's just a run and gun game when it comes to single player (which isn't a bad thing - that's actually part of the reason I love it so much). Bioshock is something different and, having been built ground up as a single player game, I think the devs did just an astounding job making probably one of the best SP experiences ever, and for that reason, despite the fact that I like Halo as a franchise a whole lot more (I've had way too much fun with it not too), I have to pick Bioshock for SP.

Everyone saying Halo wins for MP, I have one work for you: "duh" :p As Bioshock doesn't have MP, it really can't compare...

-Spenser

I just wasn't all that impressed with Bioshock. I can't really put my finger on what bothered me, but I know I breathed a sigh of relief when I finally finished it. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. Halo 3 for me!

Both are great games. I've been a Halo fan since shortly after the first one came out and the story is fantastic. But in the end, it's just a run and gun game when it comes to single player (which isn't a bad thing - that's actually part of the reason I love it so much). Bioshock is something different and, having been built ground up as a single player game, I think the devs did just an astounding job making probably one of the best SP experiences ever, and for that reason, despite the fact that I like Halo as a franchise a whole lot more (I've had way too much fun with it not too), I have to pick Bioshock for SP.

Everyone saying Halo wins for MP, I have one work for you: "duh" :p As Bioshock doesn't have MP, it really can't compare...

-Spenser

Very well said.

I think the point that Bioshock was built as a new IP is not one to be taken likely.

i beat Bioshock and Halo 3 both on the hardest difficulty and i can say basically for a fact that bioshock single player is better. There is just simply WAY more content, WAY more to do, and its free-roam!! many different ways to do things (non-linear)....

Halo 3 is just straight action linear game play to get your achievements and then its off to online. fun, but not near as satisfying as bioshock

anybody who says different is just a halo fanboy

I think Irrational Games / 2K Games have done really well and this poll shows just that.

Who expected that Microsoft/Bungie would get such stiff competition from Irrational Games -> 2K Games.

One of the great things about Bioshock is that it's just the first episode and more to come while for Halo this is the end of the line.

Bioshock is so much better, Halo 3 might as well be Halo 2 with better GFX, no innovation.

Halo 3 not innovative? Have you even played it?? Have you seen the replay feature, where you can re-watch your entire campaign, or any multiplayer match you've played, pause it anytime you want, and move around the level in free roam, moving it frame by frame from any perspective you want? Take screenshots of the frame, upload it all to the internet, share it with friends etc. I'd call that pretty damn innovative for the Halo series, and for console games in general.

Anyway, i voted Bioshock, as it have me the best SP experience Ive ever had

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
    • Does anyone remember the time when VSCode was a lightweight solution, just shy of 40 MB? No?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      404
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!