Recommended Posts

2 Matches Named So Far:

Matt Serra vs Matt Hughes (Welterweight Championship)

Cheick Kongo vs. Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira

----

Do you think thats wrong? I mean Kongo deserves a crack against someone who could lead him to the title.

Edited by Rappy
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/
Share on other sites

Both UFC 78 and UFC 79 have the same names? :huh:

As for Kongo, well I think they're putting him up against Nogueira so that the winner of that fight could possibly get a title shot. I think it's more about giving the ex-PRIDE fighters a chance, after all they have paid them the big bucks. Whatever happens, Nogueira is gonna have to improve big time to get past Kongo.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588893747
Share on other sites

Both UFC 78 and UFC 79 have the same names? :huh:

As for Kongo, well I think they're putting him up against Nogueira so that the winner of that fight could possibly get a title shot. I think it's more about giving the ex-PRIDE fighters a chance, after all they have paid them the big bucks. Whatever happens, Nogueira is gonna have to improve big time to get past Kongo.

Yeah I know Wikipedia had that down as the name I think it was just an error I will change when announced.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588894102
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In all honesty I think it is now Serra who is the cocky and arrogant one.

Just watch one episode of The Ultimate Fighter.

He is truly full of himself because of that one (dont get angry at me here, just my opinion) "flukey" win over St. Pierre.

When he said he is 'on cloud 9', boy did he mean it.

We have seen what used to be the 'coach and friend' Matt Serra become the 'Im the best and somehow managed to get my hands on a title so I dont really care about you losers' Serra.

Dont get me wrong, I really liked Matt Serra when he was a contestant on The Ultimate Fighter.

Hes just taken a huge turn for the worse.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588927685
Share on other sites

Well you can add Chuck Liddell and Wanderlei Silva to that card.

Took them long enough.

Is it just me or does this not have that much appeal? Not because both lost their last two fights; but due to the UFC rule set. I want to see Wanderlei when he's free to knee a downed opponent, stomp and soccer kick.

And come to think of it, in the Vera-Sylvia fight, Vera could have very well finished Sylvia off had knees to a downed opponent been legal.

I wish the "unified" rules would change. I'm tired of watching grainy Rio Heroes videos.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588941650
Share on other sites

Is it just me or does this not have that much appeal? Not because both lost their last two fights; but due to the UFC rule set. I want to see Wanderlei when he's free to knee a downed opponent, stomp and soccer kick.

And come to think of it, in the Vera-Sylvia fight, Vera could have very well finished Sylvia off had knees to a downed opponent been legal.

I wish the "unified" rules would change. I'm tired of watching grainy Rio Heroes videos.

I'm tired of seeing Chuck, period. I just wish he'd look like he's at least putting some sort of half-assed effort into a fight anymore.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588941664
Share on other sites

Chuck seemed to take defeat to Rampage and loss of the title pretty bad. He was pretty dire against Jardine too. As Dana White said, it seemed as though he had lost his fire. I'm gonna give Chuck 1 last benefit of the doubt, purely based on his record prior to the title loss. However, 2 losses in a row seems to be disaster nowadays in the UFC, 3 defeats would surely mean retirement. I personally wouldn't like to see Chuck go out like that though. Maybe not another title run, but at least some credit! That's what makes a true champion though, the ability to fight back, and so far, Chuck hasn't shown it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588944059
Share on other sites

I don't know how Liddell's contract is structured. But if he loses for a third time and is near the end of his contract. I can see M-1 throwing more money at him than he's worth. I don't know what parts of Europe where open-weight fights are sanctioned but they could definitely do it in Asia; Liddell vs Fedor. Yes, wishful thinking based on assumptions. :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588953873
Share on other sites

I don't know how Liddell's contract is structured. But if he loses for a third time and is near the end of his contract. I can see M-1 throwing more money at him than he's worth. I don't know what parts of Europe where open-weight fights are sanctioned but they could definitely do it in Asia; Liddell vs Fedor. Yes, wishful thinking based on assumptions.

Liddell's much to loyal to the UFC/Dana to do that, I think it's much more likely he would have a go at the UFC heavyweight division.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588955545
Share on other sites

I think Liddell would do pretty well in the Heavyweight division. Although that's probably because the current pack kinda suck. I'd love to see him own Tim Sylvia, but then anyone owning Sylvia is a good thing! :p

I can just see the lower end of the LHW division making the step up. If Tito doesn't go anywhere fast, he may be next to make the move. It'll be interesting to see if CroCop goes the opposite way.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588956359
Share on other sites

I think we will see either Rashad Evans or Bisping making the step closer to number 1 contender status after their match at UFC 78 but that doesnt mean that Chuck is out the picture I think he can return bigger then ever because I feel the jardine match was a blip.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-588956901
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
The UFC 79 main event is no more.

UFC welterweight champion and current ?The Ultimate Fighter? coach Matt Serra (9-4 MMA, 6-4 UFC) suffered a herniated disc during a Monday training session and has been forced to pull out of his headline bout with former champ Matt Hughes (41-5 MMA, 15-3 UFC).

The fight was supposed to be the main draw of UFC 79, which takes place Dec. 29 at the Mandalay Bay Events Center in Las Vegas.

?This is devastating news because they were so looking forward to fighting each other,? stated UFC President Dana White on UFC.com. ?Unfortunately, injuries happen, and I look forward to Serra recovering quickly and to getting him back into the octagon.?

According to the report, Serra had just finished a routine training session when he was ?gripped with pain and fell to the floor? while demonstrating a move. The 33-year-old New Yorker was rushed to a hospital, where an MRI revealed the herniated disc in his lower back.

There was no word on how long Serra might be out of action.

?This is the hardest thing I?ve ever had to do,? Serra stated. ?I?ve never had a back injury before; I could hardly get off of the MRI table. There is no way I can train through this, and I?m devastated, especially because this was such an important fight. I was looking forward to fighting Matt Hughes. All my training was going phenomenally until Monday. All I can do now is to get better and to fight again as soon as possible.?

Unfortunately, the welterweight division?s title picture ? which was already shut down for the taping and release of ?The Ultimate Fighter: Team Hughes vs. Team Serra? ? will be further delayed.

The division, which is perhaps the deepest in the organization, has been on hold since Serra defeated former champ Georges St. Pierre nearly eight months ago. Soon after winning the belt, Serra was offered a chance to coach opposite Hughes, with whom he has a fairly bitter feud. The championship fight was supposed to cap off the Spike TV reality series.

In fact, St. Pierre, who scored a unanimous-decision over Josh Koscheck in August to earn top-contender?s status, could also be out of action for an extended period of time. White said that St. Pierre won?t fight again until his title shot with the winner of Serra vs. Hughes, and the former champion has already been on the sideline for the past three months.

With the loss of Serra vs. Hughes, and with the short time frame until UFC 79, a main-card bout between former UFC light heavyweight champion Chuck Liddell and former PRIDE title-holder Wanderlei Silva could be bumped up to main-event status for the pay-per-view event. Both fighters are coming off back-to-back losses, but the bout remains one of the most-anticipated in mixed martial arts.

Puts pay to that!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-589012589
Share on other sites

He wont even be able to show after talking such a big game.

Saw that one coming a mile away.

I bet the people who had already purchased tickets are ****ed.

How could they even be close to compensated after a title shot is removed from the card?

Chuck vs. Silva just isnt enough. I wonder what Dana will (try to?)do to make up for this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-589013151
Share on other sites

Serra just got a few more months on his title reign. Hughes has his number big time IMO. When they do eventually meet in the Octogon, I think Hughes will have a relatively easy victory with Hughes/GSP 3 coming soon afterwards.

I think Dana needs to put another "decent" match on the card but he'll get away with bumping Liddell/Silva to main event status. Infact, that is probably what he wanted all along.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-589013386
Share on other sites

Georges St. Pierre (14-2 MMA, 8-2 UFC) will fill in for injured UFC welterweight champion Matt Serra and fight Matt Hughes (41-5 MMA, 15-3 UFC) for the interim title at UFC 79.

The five-round title fight will headline the Dec. 29 pay-per-view event, which takes place at the Mandalay Bay Events Center in Las Vegas.

The stunning announcement came Saturday evening from UFC.com. Hughes confirmed the fight on his official website, matt-hughes.com.

Additionally, a source close to the UFC today told MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com) that St. Pierre showed no hesitation in taking the fight on short notice.

We passed along the news from early Friday morning that Serra had suffered a herniated disc. The injury occurred during a workout session earlier this week, prompting an announcement that the fighter would be unavailable to compete at UFC 79. Serra, who won the title by upsetting St. Pierre at UFC 69 in April, coached opposite Hughes on the current sixth season of ?The Ultimate Fighter.? The show was supposed to build up to their title fight.

Serra doesn?t know how long the injury will keep him sidelined.

However, possibly fearing the worst, UFC President Dana White decided to book the interim title fight. Apparently, though, it didn?t come without a few stipulations from Hughes.

?I?ve asked for this to be for an interim title, and if Matt Serra can?t fight in a year, then this would just be the title fight,? Hughes stated on his site. ?But I don?t know if that is going to happen right now. I will keep you all posted.?

Gonna be good!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-589015535
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Can't wait! Big time career breaker for Liddell/Silva. Who can come out on top?

I'd say it's more important for Liddell because Silva has just made the transition from PRIDE. It'll be more easily forgiven should he lose his first in the UFC.

As for Liddell, I think the move to heavyweight beckons should he lose. However, if he wins, he'll definately want to be on the fast track to one more title reign. I wish he does move to HW though. Anyone kicking Sylvia's ass at the moment would be wonderful viewing!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/591565-ufc-79-nemesis/#findComment-589096111
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 10 games join Xbox Free Play Days this weekend by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Another Free Play Days offer has just landed, and this one is a unique one. On top of offering 10 games to jump into for Xbox players, all the titles are from a single publisher: No More Robots. The promotion has games like Little Rocket Lab, Spirittea, Descenders Next, Let's Build a Zoo, and much more. Almost every game in the selection does need an Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, or Essential subscription, so keep this in mind when browsing. Many of the titles are Xbox Play Anywhere titles though, so both Xbox console and PC players can jump in. Here's how the announcement blog post described some of the available titles: There is one game that's available to all Xbox players without the need for any subscriptions, which is Descenders. Here are the announced games and the platforms they are available to play on: Little Rocket Lab (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Spirittea (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Soccer Story (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Descenders Next (Game Preview) (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Let's Build a Zoo (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Hypnospace Outlaw (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Slayers X: Terminal Aftermath: Vengance of the Slayer (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Nowhere Prophet (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Family Man (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) Descenders (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) To easily find the titles on Xbox consoles, first head to the Store, then in the sidebar, find the Home section. In there, open the Subscriptions tab. The Free Play Days collection will show up in this area. This week's Free Play Days promotions will end on Sunday, June 7, at 11:59 pm PT.
    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!