Difference between two different revisions of TV tuner card?


Recommended Posts

I just got a replacement dv9500 laptop to replace an older one. I had a tv tuner with the old one and they gave me a tv tuner with the new one.

So I have two expresscard tv tuners, same make and model, except:

The old one is HP Part #: 438587-001

The new one is HP Part #: 438587-002

Same thing for the serial numbers... 439130-001, and 439130-002.

Old one says HP RMN HSTNN-TH15 Rev C

New one says HP RMN HSTNN-TH15 Rev A

The old driver CD works only with the old one, while the new driver cd works with both the old and new one.

When I install the new one with the new driver, Windows Media Encoder device properties says Hardware Model 77000, and shows a tab named CxCorona with audio firmware version 2.0.139.

When I install the old one with the old driver, Windows Media Encoder device properties says Hardware says Model 71000, and does NOT show a tab named CxCorona. However, if I install the old one with the new driver, I get Model 77000 and the tab CxCorona with the firmware version 2.0.139.

Is there any special way, sans opening the units (which I dont plan on doing, regardless), to determine any minute differences in the cards?

Revisions happen all the time. It's what companies are supposed to be doing on regular basis - going back to drawing boards and revise the product or process.

Is there any special way, sans opening the units (which I dont plan on doing, regardless), to determine any minute differences in the cards?

Looking for a label on the packaging which hopefully will state all the particularities.

P.S. You have too much free time, dude.

Just install the rev C drivers, and use the rev C tuner. Rev C means that it had some type of fix or change in it.

for example, one of the chips in Rev A gets too warm, so they changed to another chip, and created rev C.

Also, a chip in Rev A doesnt get made anymore, so they has to use a new one and so they create Rev C. If you open them, the only difference you will see is that one of the chips has a different lable. Also, do not use the drivers for rev A for the card that is rev C. Its not good :no:

If u want to check which one is better, just record a 30min show with both cards, and compare which one has the best bitrate, framerate, and aspect. You can use Gspot v2.1.

Just install the rev C drivers, and use the rev C tuner. Rev C means that it had some type of fix or change in it.

for example, one of the chips in Rev A gets too warm, so they changed to another chip, and created rev C.

Also, a chip in Rev A doesnt get made anymore, so they has to use a new one and so they create Rev C. If you open them, the only difference you will see is that one of the chips has a different lable. Also, do not use the drivers for rev A for the card that is rev C. Its not good :no:

If u want to check which one is better, just record a 30min show with both cards, and compare which one has the best bitrate, framerate, and aspect. You can use Gspot v2.1.

i unfortunately had to send back the tv tuner unit (along with the defective laptop) to HP (there is a 3 day window between which I receive the new unit and have to send back the old unit, and today was day 2). So i sent back the old one (the one with Rev C, which is older).

The driver CD from the old tv tuner had drivers on that were an earlier version (1.11.24335), and did NOT work with the newer card.

The driver CD from the new tv tuner had drivers of a newer version (1.21.25165), and worked with both the newer and older card.

My friend finally convinced me that the newer card has to be newer based on the higher part number, besides the fact that the drivers are newer and the newer card doesnt work with the old drivers.

Do I have a lot of free time? Maybe...but I like to solve life's little mysteries if I can.

If anything, this thread will at least create the first Google search result for the new tuner part number (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=438587-002 :D). There are a few results for the old tuner part number (438587-001), and this is the first for the new tuner part number (438587-002).

  • 1 month later...

I figured out the difference after inspecting the driver file that comes with the Hauppauge HVR-1600 (but works for this HP tuner card, a rebranded Hauppauge HVR-1500) and then inspecting the driver file that comes with the older revision HP tuner.

The Hauppauge driver file, hcw85bda.inf, shows the following lines towards the bottom (which is what controls the identification in the Device Manager).

CX885.M7710 = "Hauppauge WinTV HVR-1500 (Model 77xxx, Hybrid ATSC)"

CX885.M7717 = "HP Digital/Analog TV Tuner"

CX885.M7790 = "Hauppauge WinTV HVR-1500 (Model 77xxx, Hybrid ATSC/QAM)"

CX885.M7797 = "HP Digital/Analog TV Tuner"

The driver file which comes with the older revision 438587-001, same driver file name, shows only the following:

CX885.M7710 = "Hauppauge WinTV HVR-1500 (Model 77xxx, Hybrid ATSC)"

CX885.M7717 = "HP Digital/Analog TV Tuner"

So it looks like the new revision includes QAM.

So in sum:

438587-001 Revision C = CX885.M7717

438587-002 Revision A = CX885.M7797, which has QAM support.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!