• 0

[C#] Context Menu Strip with Windows Vista look and feel


Question

Hi,

I've searched and searched google but can't find anything... I'm currently using 2 context menu strips in my application, one for the notification icon and another for the contextual menu of a textbox. I want them to have the look and feel of menus in Vista with the possibility to use icons. However, if the application is used on XP, I want the menus to have the look and feel of XP, also using the icons.

Can anyone help me out?

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You'd probably have to create your own Renderer for the ContextMenuStrip.

Have a look at this:

http://www.chaliy.com/TipsAndTricks/Vs2005LikeRendering/

and

http://www.codeproject.com/cs/menu/Office2007Renderer.asp

Edit, and this:

http://www.chaliy.com/Sources/RebarRenderer/Default.aspx

Edited by Winston
  • 0
So you have no clue right? Maybe this is only possible on VS2008 and with .NET 3.0 or maybe not? I'm not really sure as I don't have it, but it must be a way...

I could probably figure it out. Time is my only issue. I'd rather spend time with the ladies than coding. LOL

I'll see what I can come up with. I sincerely doubt it's only doable in 2008/3/3.5.

  • 0

Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

Edited by virtorio
  • 0
Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

The current render modes on VS don't do the trick. I'm using ManageRenderMode which looks like the image below, Professional (I think) also makes it look like the image:

ScalablePictureBox.jpg

In my google searches I only found about one thing. In VS2005, there's only one way to make the menus have the Vista look, I have to use the ContextMenu control and not the ContextMenuStrip. ContexMenu control is hidden, you have to add it to the toolbox. Although, there are no way to add icons to ContextMenu items, only owner-drawing, but that will loose the Vista look...

  • 0
I guess I could be wrong about it not being tied to 3.0/3.5... There has to be a way to do it natively. It's just going to take some digging. I just grabbed the latest SDK, so I'll take a look at it when I can.

Thanks, whenever you have an answer, reply back :)

  • 0

You can fully modify menustrips look and feel by using ToolStripRenderer. Just create a new class like this:

public class VistaToolstripRenderer : System.Design.ToolstripRenderer

... or something like that.

Take a look at following article in codeproject. It shows how to create a style which follows Office 2007 guidelines. If you can't accomplish the style you're trying to make, I may create it as part of my project called Cloud Toolkit.Net (https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloudtoolkitnet/). It has Office 2007 toolstriprenderer but not yet Vista or any else renderer

Codeproject article about ToolstripRenderer

Regards,

Timo Salom?ki

  • 0

The problem is that I don't want the Vista renderer. If that was the case, users running XP would have their menus themed with Vista look and that's not what I want. I want to have menus that have the visual style OS look and use icons.

  • 0

Oh right, you didn't make it so clear, I suggest this is what you do:

You can either create a class and inherit from the old ContextMenu item and do some owner drawing yourself, and refer to this class:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s....menu.item.aspx

To actually retrieve the current OS's Visual Style menu item state's.

Or you can create your own managed renderer for the ContextMenuStrip, and use the above class to handle the drawing logic as well.

[EDIT] OK, my bad, I just realised, that it's not a class supported under Vista, hmm that's weird, I think you'd really have to result into using some PInvoking to achieve it.

Edited by Winston
  • 0

Just out of curiosity, is there some reason why you don't just use one of the normal menu classes, and do all of the drawing yourself? You've probably already spent much more time looking for a boxed solution than you would have had you just done the GDI+ work yourself.

  • 0

That has been answered many times in this thread...

I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

@Winston

I think I'll just forget it... I'm using ContextMenu for now, but I'm forgetting about the icons... Oh well, what you gonna do...

  • 0
I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

Ummm... it'll help you because you can query the system (through Windows.Forms) to get the bitmaps/colours making up the interface at any particular moment, and then draw the menu dynamically using GDI+. There are a whole set of classes in .NET for exactly this type of scenario.

There's no need for attitude here. Since you've spent two weeks on this, I was JUST wondering why you hadn't already considered the path of least resistance..........

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The $1,428 option The Steam Hardware lineup that Valve announced last year is slowly starting to roll out. Following the recent Steam Controller launch, Valve has now confirmed the price of the Steam Machine, its all-in-one console-like solution for PC gaming in the living room. There are currently four variants being presented, with only the storage and the included controller being the biggest differences. All of the Steam Machines have the same internals consisting of a semi-custom AMD Zen 4 CPU with six cores and 12 threads, an RDNA 3 28CU GPU, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, all inside the familiar box Valve has been showing off for months now. The Steam Machine base model starts at $1,049. This has a 512GB NVMe SSD but does not come with a Steam Controller. Keep in mind that storage can be expanded with the microSD card slot too. Next, the $1,128 model has the exact same storage as the previous one but it does come with the new Steam Controller. If you need the Steam Machine to have more storage for games and apps than that, then the 2TB tiers are also available. The $1,349 Steam Machine has no controller once again, but it does ship with two extra faceplates (red fabric and solid walnut) to replace the standard black one. The final option costs $1,428, and it adds the controller back into the bundle. The Steam Machine ships with the Linux-based SteamOS. The box has a 1 Gigabit Ethernet port, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDMI 2.0, as well as one USB-C and four USB-A ports. Keep in mind that when purchasing standalone, the Steam Controller has a $100 price tag. With the above bundles, that drops to $80. It's a rather expensive machine for the internals it is touting, though the design and small form factor do help it somewhat. However, at the same time, the lack of upgradability hurts it. Valve says the ongoing parts shortages and massive price hikes for memory were the leading causes for this price. "The overall effect is that our original goal for the price of Steam Machine is no longer viable," added the company. "So the prices we're sharing today reflect the state of the world for manufacturing; or, more accurately, it reflects the price of the components as we've secured them over the past 6 months." Valve wants interested gamers to reserve it now to get the chance to pre-order a Steam Machine starting June 25, with shipping starting on June 29. Head here to sign up. The invites to buy it will be sent in a randomized order.
    • What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, Natural gas plants use about 2,803 gallons of water per megawatt-hour produced, which is significantly less than coal-fired plants that use around 19,185 gallons per megawatt-hour. Overall, natural gas plants are more water-efficient, using 584% less water than traditional power plants on average. AI generated
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!