• 0

[C#] Context Menu Strip with Windows Vista look and feel


Question

Hi,

I've searched and searched google but can't find anything... I'm currently using 2 context menu strips in my application, one for the notification icon and another for the contextual menu of a textbox. I want them to have the look and feel of menus in Vista with the possibility to use icons. However, if the application is used on XP, I want the menus to have the look and feel of XP, also using the icons.

Can anyone help me out?

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You'd probably have to create your own Renderer for the ContextMenuStrip.

Have a look at this:

http://www.chaliy.com/TipsAndTricks/Vs2005LikeRendering/

and

http://www.codeproject.com/cs/menu/Office2007Renderer.asp

Edit, and this:

http://www.chaliy.com/Sources/RebarRenderer/Default.aspx

Edited by Winston
  • 0
So you have no clue right? Maybe this is only possible on VS2008 and with .NET 3.0 or maybe not? I'm not really sure as I don't have it, but it must be a way...

I could probably figure it out. Time is my only issue. I'd rather spend time with the ladies than coding. LOL

I'll see what I can come up with. I sincerely doubt it's only doable in 2008/3/3.5.

  • 0

Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

Edited by virtorio
  • 0
Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

The current render modes on VS don't do the trick. I'm using ManageRenderMode which looks like the image below, Professional (I think) also makes it look like the image:

ScalablePictureBox.jpg

In my google searches I only found about one thing. In VS2005, there's only one way to make the menus have the Vista look, I have to use the ContextMenu control and not the ContextMenuStrip. ContexMenu control is hidden, you have to add it to the toolbox. Although, there are no way to add icons to ContextMenu items, only owner-drawing, but that will loose the Vista look...

  • 0
I guess I could be wrong about it not being tied to 3.0/3.5... There has to be a way to do it natively. It's just going to take some digging. I just grabbed the latest SDK, so I'll take a look at it when I can.

Thanks, whenever you have an answer, reply back :)

  • 0

You can fully modify menustrips look and feel by using ToolStripRenderer. Just create a new class like this:

public class VistaToolstripRenderer : System.Design.ToolstripRenderer

... or something like that.

Take a look at following article in codeproject. It shows how to create a style which follows Office 2007 guidelines. If you can't accomplish the style you're trying to make, I may create it as part of my project called Cloud Toolkit.Net (https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloudtoolkitnet/). It has Office 2007 toolstriprenderer but not yet Vista or any else renderer

Codeproject article about ToolstripRenderer

Regards,

Timo Salom?ki

  • 0

The problem is that I don't want the Vista renderer. If that was the case, users running XP would have their menus themed with Vista look and that's not what I want. I want to have menus that have the visual style OS look and use icons.

  • 0

Oh right, you didn't make it so clear, I suggest this is what you do:

You can either create a class and inherit from the old ContextMenu item and do some owner drawing yourself, and refer to this class:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s....menu.item.aspx

To actually retrieve the current OS's Visual Style menu item state's.

Or you can create your own managed renderer for the ContextMenuStrip, and use the above class to handle the drawing logic as well.

[EDIT] OK, my bad, I just realised, that it's not a class supported under Vista, hmm that's weird, I think you'd really have to result into using some PInvoking to achieve it.

Edited by Winston
  • 0

Just out of curiosity, is there some reason why you don't just use one of the normal menu classes, and do all of the drawing yourself? You've probably already spent much more time looking for a boxed solution than you would have had you just done the GDI+ work yourself.

  • 0

That has been answered many times in this thread...

I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

@Winston

I think I'll just forget it... I'm using ContextMenu for now, but I'm forgetting about the icons... Oh well, what you gonna do...

  • 0
I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

Ummm... it'll help you because you can query the system (through Windows.Forms) to get the bitmaps/colours making up the interface at any particular moment, and then draw the menu dynamically using GDI+. There are a whole set of classes in .NET for exactly this type of scenario.

There's no need for attitude here. Since you've spent two weeks on this, I was JUST wondering why you hadn't already considered the path of least resistance..........

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!