• 0

[C#] Context Menu Strip with Windows Vista look and feel


Question

Hi,

I've searched and searched google but can't find anything... I'm currently using 2 context menu strips in my application, one for the notification icon and another for the contextual menu of a textbox. I want them to have the look and feel of menus in Vista with the possibility to use icons. However, if the application is used on XP, I want the menus to have the look and feel of XP, also using the icons.

Can anyone help me out?

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You'd probably have to create your own Renderer for the ContextMenuStrip.

Have a look at this:

http://www.chaliy.com/TipsAndTricks/Vs2005LikeRendering/

and

http://www.codeproject.com/cs/menu/Office2007Renderer.asp

Edit, and this:

http://www.chaliy.com/Sources/RebarRenderer/Default.aspx

Edited by Winston
  • 0
So you have no clue right? Maybe this is only possible on VS2008 and with .NET 3.0 or maybe not? I'm not really sure as I don't have it, but it must be a way...

I could probably figure it out. Time is my only issue. I'd rather spend time with the ladies than coding. LOL

I'll see what I can come up with. I sincerely doubt it's only doable in 2008/3/3.5.

  • 0

Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

Edited by virtorio
  • 0
Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

The current render modes on VS don't do the trick. I'm using ManageRenderMode which looks like the image below, Professional (I think) also makes it look like the image:

ScalablePictureBox.jpg

In my google searches I only found about one thing. In VS2005, there's only one way to make the menus have the Vista look, I have to use the ContextMenu control and not the ContextMenuStrip. ContexMenu control is hidden, you have to add it to the toolbox. Although, there are no way to add icons to ContextMenu items, only owner-drawing, but that will loose the Vista look...

  • 0
I guess I could be wrong about it not being tied to 3.0/3.5... There has to be a way to do it natively. It's just going to take some digging. I just grabbed the latest SDK, so I'll take a look at it when I can.

Thanks, whenever you have an answer, reply back :)

  • 0

You can fully modify menustrips look and feel by using ToolStripRenderer. Just create a new class like this:

public class VistaToolstripRenderer : System.Design.ToolstripRenderer

... or something like that.

Take a look at following article in codeproject. It shows how to create a style which follows Office 2007 guidelines. If you can't accomplish the style you're trying to make, I may create it as part of my project called Cloud Toolkit.Net (https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloudtoolkitnet/). It has Office 2007 toolstriprenderer but not yet Vista or any else renderer

Codeproject article about ToolstripRenderer

Regards,

Timo Salom?ki

  • 0

The problem is that I don't want the Vista renderer. If that was the case, users running XP would have their menus themed with Vista look and that's not what I want. I want to have menus that have the visual style OS look and use icons.

  • 0

Oh right, you didn't make it so clear, I suggest this is what you do:

You can either create a class and inherit from the old ContextMenu item and do some owner drawing yourself, and refer to this class:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s....menu.item.aspx

To actually retrieve the current OS's Visual Style menu item state's.

Or you can create your own managed renderer for the ContextMenuStrip, and use the above class to handle the drawing logic as well.

[EDIT] OK, my bad, I just realised, that it's not a class supported under Vista, hmm that's weird, I think you'd really have to result into using some PInvoking to achieve it.

Edited by Winston
  • 0

Just out of curiosity, is there some reason why you don't just use one of the normal menu classes, and do all of the drawing yourself? You've probably already spent much more time looking for a boxed solution than you would have had you just done the GDI+ work yourself.

  • 0

That has been answered many times in this thread...

I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

@Winston

I think I'll just forget it... I'm using ContextMenu for now, but I'm forgetting about the icons... Oh well, what you gonna do...

  • 0
I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

Ummm... it'll help you because you can query the system (through Windows.Forms) to get the bitmaps/colours making up the interface at any particular moment, and then draw the menu dynamically using GDI+. There are a whole set of classes in .NET for exactly this type of scenario.

There's no need for attitude here. Since you've spent two weeks on this, I was JUST wondering why you hadn't already considered the path of least resistance..........

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 by Hamid Ganji The iPhone Fold is one of the most anticipated tech products expected to debut this fall. It will be Apple’s first foldable iPhone, ushering in a new product category for the company. While the first generation has yet to hit the shelves, a new leak suggests Apple has already begun work on its successor. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claims that the second-generation iPhone Fold has already been confirmed, meaning Apple could launch a successor in fall 2027. The foldable iPhone is also reportedly referred to as the “iPhone Ultra,” though it remains unclear whether Apple will ultimately choose that branding, especially as Samsung is rumored to rename the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as the Galaxy Z Fold Ultra this year. The leaker also claims that the second-generation foldable will feature a wider folding display while reusing the same screen found in the first generation. Apple’s first foldable iPhone is expected to feature a 7.8-inch inner display and a 5.3-inch outer screen in a passport-style form factor. It has already been reported that Apple plans to change its iPhone release cycle in 2026 to spread launches throughout the year. Under this strategy, the iPhone Fold is expected to debut this fall alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. The standard iPhone 18 and iPhone Air 2 are expected to arrive later in 2026 or in early 2027. Speaking of the iPhone Air, Digital Chat Station says Apple remains undecided about a third-generation model. The company is reportedly waiting to see how the iPhone Air 2 performs in the market, and if sales disappoint, a successor may never materialize. As we reported this week, the iPhone Air has not been scrapped from Apple’s plans. The second-generation model is reportedly scheduled for spring 2027 and could introduce upgrades such as an additional rear camera for ultrawide photography and improved battery life.
    • ahh yes the good old your opinion differs from mine so you are therefore insane lol destiny 1 had no agenda pushing and was a massive success of a game, if you clearly look online the team for some reason thought they had too many men on the team and went on a woman and dei recruitment drive and we all know how destiny 2 performed from then on in
    • The limited imaginations and business acumen of non-dominant players is simply that: the abject lack of creative business acumen. Businesses often want to operate in a financially-rewarding marketplace (free market economics) and/or exit/cash-out at maximal financial recompense. Money is their incentive; regulations are both their obstacles and their tools; politics is their means of influencing the marketplace. Google, in this story's example, is crying that AWS and Azure are "too dominant" -- cuz Google Cloud is not printing as much money as Alphabet wants (although it is still dramatically more than they actually need). The EU DMA should truly follow-the-money and treat the EU as its own sovereign nation in order to protect European market players: Domestic entities are exempt from market-influence regulations until absolute monopoly is achieved; Foreign (non-EU/non-Euro) entities are all regulated via stricter DMA measures whereby regulated partnership with independent domestic entity becomes the only way for foreign entities to 'tip the scale' for favorable financial remunerations. Basically create a dual-track aligning with China's foreign investment models. In my eyes, this is the only way to properly protect the European marketplace beyond the current dot-com/ai-bubble/social-media crazes.
    • I have a fire n ice theme w my bedroom laptops. one is a red lenovo gaming laptop (fire) and the precision is ice
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Vistor earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      406
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      131
    4. 4
      Xenon
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!