• 0

[C#] Context Menu Strip with Windows Vista look and feel


Question

Hi,

I've searched and searched google but can't find anything... I'm currently using 2 context menu strips in my application, one for the notification icon and another for the contextual menu of a textbox. I want them to have the look and feel of menus in Vista with the possibility to use icons. However, if the application is used on XP, I want the menus to have the look and feel of XP, also using the icons.

Can anyone help me out?

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You'd probably have to create your own Renderer for the ContextMenuStrip.

Have a look at this:

http://www.chaliy.com/TipsAndTricks/Vs2005LikeRendering/

and

http://www.codeproject.com/cs/menu/Office2007Renderer.asp

Edit, and this:

http://www.chaliy.com/Sources/RebarRenderer/Default.aspx

Edited by Winston
  • 0
So you have no clue right? Maybe this is only possible on VS2008 and with .NET 3.0 or maybe not? I'm not really sure as I don't have it, but it must be a way...

I could probably figure it out. Time is my only issue. I'd rather spend time with the ladies than coding. LOL

I'll see what I can come up with. I sincerely doubt it's only doable in 2008/3/3.5.

  • 0

Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

Edited by virtorio
  • 0
Don't you just set the RenderMode to System?

contextMenuStrip1.RenderMode = ToolStripRenderMode.System;

EDIT: never mind, I see that doesn't do it either.

The current render modes on VS don't do the trick. I'm using ManageRenderMode which looks like the image below, Professional (I think) also makes it look like the image:

ScalablePictureBox.jpg

In my google searches I only found about one thing. In VS2005, there's only one way to make the menus have the Vista look, I have to use the ContextMenu control and not the ContextMenuStrip. ContexMenu control is hidden, you have to add it to the toolbox. Although, there are no way to add icons to ContextMenu items, only owner-drawing, but that will loose the Vista look...

  • 0
I guess I could be wrong about it not being tied to 3.0/3.5... There has to be a way to do it natively. It's just going to take some digging. I just grabbed the latest SDK, so I'll take a look at it when I can.

Thanks, whenever you have an answer, reply back :)

  • 0

You can fully modify menustrips look and feel by using ToolStripRenderer. Just create a new class like this:

public class VistaToolstripRenderer : System.Design.ToolstripRenderer

... or something like that.

Take a look at following article in codeproject. It shows how to create a style which follows Office 2007 guidelines. If you can't accomplish the style you're trying to make, I may create it as part of my project called Cloud Toolkit.Net (https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloudtoolkitnet/). It has Office 2007 toolstriprenderer but not yet Vista or any else renderer

Codeproject article about ToolstripRenderer

Regards,

Timo Salom?ki

  • 0

The problem is that I don't want the Vista renderer. If that was the case, users running XP would have their menus themed with Vista look and that's not what I want. I want to have menus that have the visual style OS look and use icons.

  • 0

Oh right, you didn't make it so clear, I suggest this is what you do:

You can either create a class and inherit from the old ContextMenu item and do some owner drawing yourself, and refer to this class:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s....menu.item.aspx

To actually retrieve the current OS's Visual Style menu item state's.

Or you can create your own managed renderer for the ContextMenuStrip, and use the above class to handle the drawing logic as well.

[EDIT] OK, my bad, I just realised, that it's not a class supported under Vista, hmm that's weird, I think you'd really have to result into using some PInvoking to achieve it.

Edited by Winston
  • 0

Just out of curiosity, is there some reason why you don't just use one of the normal menu classes, and do all of the drawing yourself? You've probably already spent much more time looking for a boxed solution than you would have had you just done the GDI+ work yourself.

  • 0

That has been answered many times in this thread...

I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

@Winston

I think I'll just forget it... I'm using ContextMenu for now, but I'm forgetting about the icons... Oh well, what you gonna do...

  • 0
I can't use ContextMenu nor ContextMenuStrip because they don't use the system look depending on the OS and VisualStyle. Doing it in GDI+ wouldn't help at all. What if the user is using WindowBlinds or a hacked uxtheme.dll and use a different visual style? How is GDI+ going to help me there?

Ummm... it'll help you because you can query the system (through Windows.Forms) to get the bitmaps/colours making up the interface at any particular moment, and then draw the menu dynamically using GDI+. There are a whole set of classes in .NET for exactly this type of scenario.

There's no need for attitude here. Since you've spent two weeks on this, I was JUST wondering why you hadn't already considered the path of least resistance..........

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!