My Guide to Music Management for Windows


Recommended Posts

Thanks for the tip on MediaMonkey - I checked it out. It seems really good...interface is not that great, but seems like it'll assist me in getting myself organized with my music files.

Yeah, the interface takes some getting used to, but once you're familiar with it and you have everything setup, it'll be a breeze. I remember I downloaded it for the first time last year but immediately deleted it because I wasn't used to the interface, but I downloaded it a few weeks ago to giver it another try and I love it now.

no problem! i love embedding the album art, that way i can transfer between my windows desktop, my ibook, or htpc media center, and they all display the album art immediately with no fuss. I'll also have the option of transferring them to an mp3 player so to show the album art, without it being incompatible or something.

no problem! i love embedding the album art, that way i can transfer between my windows desktop, my ibook, or htpc media center, and they all display the album art immediately with no fuss. I'll also have the option of transferring them to an mp3 player so to show the album art, without it being incompatible or something.

So is embedding the best way to handle the Album Art?

Also - there seems to be a new version of MediaMonkey available now - Version 3.

^ That's quite unfortunate.

That's what I heard too. Oh well. It seems like Mac has more polished entertainment software.

Yeah, Front Row is much better than Media Center... :whistle:

I have all of my CDs on my PC (20GB) plus purchased music and have a whole 3 albums that WMP can't find artwork for, and they're independent bands.

MediaMonkey is pretty cool though. It's the easiest app I've found for removing album art from MP3 tags as well. ;)

I used to use iTunes, but it's rather slow with a large library. I switched to foobar as iTunes couldn't handle my library anymore. Foobar has no problem handling a currently 22k song library on my computer. Of course, with so many songs, you need to stay organized, otherwise you're screwed. All my music is stored under Z:\music\Artist\Album\00 Title.mp3. Tagging is made easy with MusicBrainz' Picard which moves the music into the proper folder for me from my temp folder. Tag'n'Rename is also helpful to mass tag.

Either way, nice guide.

Great guide! Another tagger program I use is Tigotago, but iTunes sorts my stuff out easier from the start - just bits I haven't reripped from years ago that I use the tagger on.

For me, I only use iTunes for playing music and that's it. Don't use the store, podcasts, videos, nada. So what I do is install iTunes, remove the extras installed in add/remove programs (mobile device support etc.), and turn on the parental locks in iTunes disabling the features I don't want. I also tell it not to search for speakers, not to check for updates automatically (I either look on here or click the option myself to be honest). There's a few other options, but I rarely sync my iPod, and use iTunes to play music whilst I'm online chatting really. A memory footprint of 50 odd meg whilst playing isn't something I'm looking to tweak down or something that will bother me enough to do something about it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!