Disable internet for a computer but allow network: sharing, print etc?


Recommended Posts

Hi all. I have a home wireless network set up through a router in my house. I have a couple of computers that have complete wireless access - I.E. file sharing, printer sharing, internet, etc.

But now what I'm looking to do is to add a computer to the network, but disallow it internet access. Just the one computer. However, I do need this computer to be able to access shared folders on the network, shared printers, and any other available network resources.

Is there some kind of hackish fix for this, some setting on the computer or on the router (router would be best) to accomplish this? I've read you can do it by setting no gateway on the computer... is this valid?

Thanks for your help in advance :)

Thanks, I see a page in my router that has a Block Services option but I don't see anywhere an option for Internet. I see HTTP in the service list but I figured that would be like an Apache server on the computer... or am I wrong? If I am that's the solution I'm looking for.

  kevinmd88 said:
Hi all. I have a home wireless network set up through a router in my house. I have a couple of computers that have complete wireless access - I.E. file sharing, printer sharing, internet, etc.

But now what I'm looking to do is to add a computer to the network, but disallow it internet access. Just the one computer. However, I do need this computer to be able to access shared folders on the network, shared printers, and any other available network resources.

Is there some kind of hackish fix for this, some setting on the computer or on the router (router would be best) to accomplish this? I've read you can do it by setting no gateway on the computer... is this valid?

Thanks for your help in advance :)

assign a static IP and don't enter any DNS servers or change the routing table so that the default route doesn't point to the right gateway. quick and dirty way and would be easy to work around - i guess it depends upon who will be using it and whether or not they will try to get around your restrictions.

The routing table works like a charm :) Thanks! I think that's the method I'll use until either I get a new router or I figure out a setting in it that will do this more efficiently. I know he won't be able to figure out how to change the routing table for sure (he wouldn't even be able to figure out how to change the gateway if I left it blank in the properties :) ) but the only thing I worry about are his friends. I don't think any of them know how to do this kind of stuff, I am pretty sure they don't but I'd rather be safe than sorry.

Thanks to everyone who posted for your help!

Whats the model number of your router - then we can lookup if your router supports blocking internet access.. Most any decent router would support this. But without a model number, its impossible to know what features supports or does not support.

An what version of the firmware are you running? As of yesterday does not give the version number, over the years I have come to understand that users version of lastest, an the actual latest version of the firmware rarely matches up ;)

It's just easier for everyone involved to just give the actual number!

Why do people continue to buy such crap devices?? The feature set of that router is a complete an utter joke. That being said, you can still accomplish what your wanting to do.. Just setup tcp ports 1-65534 and udp 1-65534 as user defined services an then block those by the IP address of the machine you do not want to access the internet.. An they yes make sure you set a reservation for that machine or set up its IP static.. the details of doing that are on page 4-4 of the manual.

Since it does not seem to allow blocking access by mac. An since it would be possible for them to change their IP quite easy -- maybe setting a route on their machine might be harder for them to figure out ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I always just assumed that how I start programs is pretty close to how most people do it, which is... 1)Either start a program from desktop icon. or... 2)Windows key (or mouse click on start menu) and when start menu appears type in a little of what program you are trying to find, it will highlight, then press enter (or find it with mouse pointer and click it) is the very basic idea. this is very basic core functionality I would never change since it's quick and to the point and just works and has been this way a long time now. NOTE: I am on Linux Mint 22.1-Xfce, but the very basics like this are the same as Windows in this regard. I like how Mint tends to pretty much stay the same (minor tweaks from point release to point release that are slight but overall it's pretty much the same) instead of change for the sake of change like Windows does and ends up making some stuff potentially worse as a result. I say screw all of those trends where something has to 'look current' as I am more of the mindset once something looks good enough, which Mint does, you pretty don't screw with it as if someone does want to mess with it, they can do their own custom tweaks but the base install should be like that 'old faithful' type of interface that everyone has been familiar with for decades now. so by that standard the 'Start Menu' is still useful. I would NEVER get rid of that core functionality as Win8 pretty much tried that upon release and it made doing VERY basic stuff a chore which is why after I briefly tried Win8 in a VM, I never bothered with that OS again as that was easily Microsoft's biggest mess up with interface changes and I have been using Windows since v3.11 in mid-1990's and that Win8 interface change was by far the biggest mess up from Microsoft (how that made it to the final product is beyond me). I realize they supposedly fixed it in Win 8.1, but by then no one really cared as Win7 was the standard and those moving on from that went to Win10.
    • i click a few things on the start menu, other wise I do still use the run box daily.
    • That article title has a typo, it's supposed to say "Do I even need it?" And... I would not have wasted time writing a full article on a software [or feature] analysis based on exactly 1 user experience.
    • Lots of people use it without having an angsty Gotterdammerung.
    • Why certain models only? It should be provided on all high end phones.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      MikeK13 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      679
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      275
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      207
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      171
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      148
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!