Terminator Salvation : The Future Begins


Recommended Posts

Looks like this could be a good movie. Although, I don't see what all the Christian Bale love is for. He's a horrible actor. Well, he will no doubt play the exact same personality that he has in all his other movies. Oh, except for Dark Knight and Batman Begins where he added a horrid raspy voice to his normal persona.

How dare you, he had to hide his voice from the villains!!!

I think he's a great actor, he plays his roles very well. While most of the time he's the "badass asskickin guy" he does it good. Just like Ryan Reynolds is the "cool ladies man" He does it very well lol

Plus John Connor has notoriously been a little sissy wimp. We got an American Psycho now. Now we need Huey Lewis's hip to be square play while he massacres Terminators.

Why does the T-1 look different?

terminator10.JPG

This is how the T-1 looked like in T3, why does it look so different?

Also, hell yeah it should be an extra on the DVD and with the Remix. :p

ummm.. it's more advanced?

Well this movie isn't based off the T3 events. In some aspects yes, but I don't think SkyNet comes to be the same way, aka by the military, so their advanced weapons they showed at the end, the earlier terminators don't exist yet. This I assume would be the machines attempt at making them on their own, hence the grittiness to it. There's also those bike terminators which never existed before. I like the newer one better. The other was too sleek and polished, I want something that looks like a tank, not a cadillac.

Well this movie isn't based off the T3 events. In some aspects yes, but I don't think SkyNet comes to be the same way, aka by the military, so their advanced weapons they showed at the end, the earlier terminators don't exist yet. This I assume would be the machines attempt at making them on their own, hence the grittiness to it. There's also those bike terminators which never existed before. I like the newer one better. The other was too sleek and polished, I want something that looks like a tank, not a cadillac.

Yeah I understand that, but from what we have learned from the movies is that the name of the Terminators go by model. I assumed that the T-1 came out and if this is the update it should be the T-2 or w/e.

After much speculation, Terry Crews told MTV that Arnold Schwarzenegger will indeed be doing a cameo in Terminator Salvation. ?That?s it,? he said. ?And so am I.? Who knows if Crews actually knows what he?s talking about, as the actor admits that he doesn?t know what capacity Arnold is featured as the production only distributed pages of the film?s screenplay to the relevant players. It?s very possible that Crews just heard about the initial plans to include Arnold in the film.

Also, our friends at DVD Forum have sent us this concept art (seen above) for the big robot you?ve seen in the trailers, which is called The Harvester.

be2408a6.jpg&thumb_height=400

[Source]

This film is going to be amazing, I simply can't wait for this! It will put Terminator 3 to shame thats for sure.

Yeah I think I am going to buy Blu-Rays of the first 3 just before the new film! just get back in the mood!

I got em all, watched them recently, haven't watched the 1st though, been waiting to watch that again. Kyle Reese is too cool. Hope Arnie really is in it, a cameo is all I want. Just a shot of his face on a production line or something similar and I'd just squeal with geek delight :p

71041109.jpg

Sarah Connor Society has gotten their hands on some new concept art from Terminator Salvation.

The beautiful concept paintings by ILM artist Christian Alzmann and visual effects art director Warren Fu includes a big Hunter Killer aerial unit called a Transporter, a different variation of the big robot terminator we?ve seen in the trailers - The Harvester, the mototerminator, and a scale comparison of the robot?s arm up against a human. But most interesting is our first look at SkyNet. You?ve seen the futuristic San Francisco in the Star Trek trailers?. Well, McG?s San Francisco is a 180 degree turn from JJ Abrams? vision of the future.

I wish they would offer some of this concept art in Giclee prints. I would totally buy a print of the above Golden Gate Bridge painting.

5089412f.jpg

e7a0b14c.jpg

e4204c6b.jpg

bcf832fc.jpg

b1ab6315.jpg

935c0fef.jpg

538d532a.jpg

Source

lets see if they dont ruin the movie with a cliche story, people want what T2 showed that was the future, is what all the people (i think...) wanted to see in a new terminator since then

and also, Baile is not that great actor like many says he his but his my opinion only of course

for ex for me the last batman was by actor role:

1. Jocker

2. Two Face

3. Batman

his performance was really bad, he was for me like a actor almost like that ones that are their first 3 or 4 movie in their career

Awesome concept art. That's a good question about the T-1000's. We've yet to see them in the future, only in the past. If they made it I'm sure they could recreate it, but after it's made I'm not entirely sure how they control them. Where's the chip even located if they don't have a body. I think we get to see them in Terminator Salvation 2 which would no doubt explain how they managed to create them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!