[Review] 13" Black MacBook - Santa Rosa chipset


Recommended Posts

I recently reviewed my new MacBook on my blog. I thought that since I have had a lot of good responses about some of my phone reviews from my fellow Neowinians I wrote a few years ago, that I would share this with you. This review is more me being very general towards the audience of my blog, so forgive me if it is not that in depth. If you would rather read the article on my blog, then you can do so by clicking here...

Three weeks have passed since a lovely black MacBook found it?s way into my possession, and now the time has come for me to review it. I mean, you would be disappointed in me if I did not write a small piece on such a lovely specimen of human engineering like this, would you not?

071127(1).jpg

I ordered my MacBook and it?s lovely case on the 2nd November, and it was meant to be delivered on November 5th?but thanks to a **** up from UPS I only received the case. Imagine how depressing it would be just to receive a laptop case and no laptop? Bloody hell it was almost if they where torturing me, the gits! I later found out that the delivery man had left the laptop in the truck as he had not realised the delivery was a consignment of two, just my luck. Anyway, I got it in the end and that is all that matters, and anyway, and they do say absence makes the heart grow fonder?

As you would expect from an Apple product, the packaging was almost as elegant and as beautiful as the actual laptop. I like that about Apple, they take great care in everything about their product and seek to perfect every detail. As you would expect, included in the box where various manuals, software CD?s, a FrontRow remote, various power cables (even they are sexy)?oh, and a MacBook! All of which where beautifully packaged, and a joy to open.

071127(2).jpg

I have never used OS X before. Never ever. Of course, I have seen various screenshots around on the online world, but that is a lot different to actually being familar with the operating system. So what was I to expect when I pressed the power button on my new cold black MacBook for the very first time? I never expected it to blow up, and thankfully it did not. I must say though that booting up into OS X is a lot more pleasant than booting into Windows, everything just worked as it should do but in an efficient and beautiful way. After running through the short and sweet configuration wizard and inputting a few details, I was presented with a whole new world in front of me, an OS X desktop was waiting for me.

I had always believed that OS X was pretty, but as I said before I had only experienced it through screenshots on the internet. My first impressions of OS X is that everything seemed to be perfect, it is hard to describe what I thought. Everything just worked, and it is that beautiful simplicity that I love. There is just something about OS X that you cannot explain.

071127(3).jpg

Don?t get me wrong. I am a big fan of Windows and what Microsoft have done for the industry. Without Microsoft I highly doubt the world would be as it is today, technology plays an important role in evolving society. Without Microsoft I doubt I would even own a blog, and I would not be writing this right now, who knows what I would be doing instead?

A lot of people express their view that OS X is a better operating system than Windows, but I believe each of them to have its own individual strengths, and weaknesses. People enjoy bickering and slagging each other off far to much in this world, don?t get me wrong, I love a good rant (like now!) but I hope I never become blinded and ignorant towards other technologies. I just do not understand the constant hate between ?fanboys?. Some people just do not realise how lucky we are, we are in a great situation where computational rivalry between companies like Microsoft, Apple and Google is only helping to improve technology at an even greater pace.

071127(4).jpg

Anyway, back to my new lovely MacBook. Some of you may remember I was talking about getting one a while ago, but I decided to hold off because there where rumours of Apple updating the MacBook line. Well, I did decide to wait a few weeks and it was worth it because Apple updated the MacBook?s in early November to the Santa Rosa chipset, they also improved clock speeds as well as upgrading the integrated graphics cards.

I have to say, taking a laptop to University is really beneficial to me. My eye sight is not the best, and it makes things a lot easier downloading the notes directly off the University intranet and viewing them on my MacBook in lectures rather than squinting at an over head projector. Also, for some reason in my University there seems to always be a lack of available computers, so now I have the pleasure of studying on my MacBook wherever I want and connecting wirelessly to to the University?s WiFi system without the hassle of searching for a computer. There are countless other advantages of me taking a laptop to University, but it would take to long to list them and I doubt any of my faithful readers (anybody out there??) would be that interested! I do love the fact though that my new MacBook is so small and sexy, and a total joy and ease to carry round!

071127(5).jpg

Now the bad things. I can?t be totally positive can I? I mean, Bill Gates may feel a little bit down hearted when he visits my blog if I do not have one small, minor annoyance with my MacBook. Well anyway Bill, here it is?I hate trackpads! Ok, maybe that is more to do with my incompetence at using them them rather than my beautiful MacBook. I find trackpads to be clumsy, slow and annoying. Because it is a laptop, there is nothing you can do besides buying a mouse and I have done just that, I purchased a ?Microsoft Wireless Notebook Optical Mouse 4000″. I would like to challenge Apple right here and right now to innovate and change the world of computing once more, and create a better inputting device than a trackpad!

Well, even with a very nice education discount MacBook?s do not come cheap. I normally class myself as an orthodox tight arse, but since I bought my desktop I have been on a bit of a spending spree. Although, my spending spree can no longer continue as I really cannot afford to buy anything else now, besides of course four pence tins of beans in some unpopular Scandinavian supermarket that exists in England. So a quick one line summary for those who skipped my drivel and came to the bottom of this post; my MacBook is the best thing since sliced bread and I would like to shag it, now is that wrong?

Just for reference my blog is UnknownLogic.com.

Edited by Martyn

Thank you very much for this review, I was just searching for someone who had reviewed this one :)

EDIT: Think you could extend this review a bit? It doesn't seem to say much. What's the glossy screen like? Good outdoors? What about battery life? Graphics card? :p

nice review, now this might sound strage but before i had used my 1st gen macbook with with apples two finger tap/scroll freatures i didn't like trackpads much at all. now i love using the trackpad, more so than a mouse except for in graphics software. maybe im just one of the crazy ones..

EDIT: Think you could extend this review a bit? It doesn't seem to say much. What's the glossy screen like? Good outdoors? What about battery life? Graphics card? :p

I'll extend it for my fellow Neowinians then! I didn't want to have a massive, massive review because I only did it as a blog post originally!!

The glossy screen is absoloutely awesome, and the image quality is just shockingly good and I was pretty surprised at the quality when I fired the laptop up for the first time. I have not actually played around with my laptop outdoors yet, it is winter and I don't want to get it nicked either.

I was pretty happy with the battery life as well. My old laptop had the battery life of a goldfish though so maybe I am not used to having a good battery in my laptop. Anyway, battery life of course depends on what you are doing with the laptop, but typically I would get around four hours with moderate use...and when I say moderate use I mean programming/reading/browsing the web. I use this utility called CoconutBattery which tells you the health of your battery, and apparently my battery is healthier now than it was when I first got it.

I've not really tried out the graphics card to be honest, I only really use my MacBook for programming and actual University work, so I have not tested any games on it. Although of course, I welcomed the new graphics card that added when the system was recently updated. I suppose one day I could install BootCamp and have a go on Team Fortress 2 to see how it handles it, but I have my desktop for gaming, and I know if I install games on my MacBook then I will end up doing no work on it :p

Any other questions just ask, I know this review was a lot briefer than my normal reviews, so I am sorry about that. But yeah, anything you would like to know...just post in this thead or comment on my blog.

Without Microsoft I doubt I would even own a blog, and I would not be writing this right now, who knows what I would be doing instead?

Technically you would still have your blog because it's hosted on a Linux machine :p

Nice review (Y)

Technically you would still have your blog because it's hosted on a Linux machine :p

Nice review (Y)

Cheers!

The originally point I wanted to get accross to my readers is that Microsoft has done a lot for the world, and inspired a lot of people. Would Linux exist if Microsoft had not been founded?

Cheers!

The originally point I wanted to get accross to my readers is that Microsoft has done a lot for the world, and inspired a lot of people. Would Linux exist if Microsoft had not been founded?

Microsoft didn't have the first OS, so technically yes. :)

:p

The point I meant to try and get accross was that Linux was inspired by Windows, at least partially!

Ummm. No.

Linux was designed to be a Minix clone that worked on the x86 (specifically the 80386 CPU). It was not designed to be a Windows clone. The wine project (and its offshoots) intend on allowing apps written for Windows to run in Linux.

Some UIs resemble Windows to make transitions easier (or if you bounce between a Linux box and a Windows box, I suppose). But I am not big on the Windows "start" button, and use Fluxbox where you right-click on an iconless (ahhh, so clean! ) desktop to initiate most apps. There is a Blackbox UI for Windows, bb4win, I believe that aims to bring Blackbox to Windows platforms. So, inspiration goes both ways (three or more ways, if you count OSX and other OSes).

Thats true. If Microsoft didn't make crappy software, we wouldn't have the amazing Mac OS. :D

And if it wasn't for MS Apple might be out of business!... Might want to look up how they saved Apple around the time Jobs had to come back... Also I don't think OSX had anything to do with MS having windows... it was just the next logical path for a company that bought NeXT and wanted to ditch their legacy Mac OS..

Ummm. No.

Linux was designed to be a Minix clone that worked on the x86 (specifically the 80386 CPU). It was not designed to be a Windows clone. The wine project (and its offshoots) intend on allowing apps written for Windows to run in Linux.

Some UIs resemble Windows to make transitions easier (or if you bounce between a Linux box and a Windows box, I suppose). But I am not big on the Windows "start" button, and use Fluxbox where you right-click on an iconless (ahhh, so clean! ) desktop to initiate most apps. There is a Blackbox UI for Windows, bb4win, I believe that aims to bring Blackbox to Windows platforms. So, inspiration goes both ways (three or more ways, if you count OSX and other OSes).

I am not saying that Linux totally copied and ripped off Windows. What I was trying to get across is that it was inspired by Windows, in my opinion at least. There was a gap on the market for an open source operating system when Windows was popular in the 90's, and Linux filled it very well. Every operating system takes different concepts from their counterparts as you said and Windows has been main stream for a long, long time now and that has to be for a reason. I also think that recently Windows has been taking various design elements from OS X, and I don't really have a problem with that if in the end it improves operating systems.

Just for reference, I am not a particular fanboy of Windows, Linux or OS X. I like them all!

I am not saying that Linux totally copied and ripped off Windows. What I was trying to get across is that it was inspired by Windows, in my opinion at least. There was a gap on the market for an open source operating system when Windows was popular in the 90's, and Linux filled it very well. Every operating system takes different concepts from their counterparts as you said and Windows has been main stream for a long, long time now and that has to be for a reason. I also think that recently Windows has been taking various design elements from OS X, and I don't really have a problem with that if in the end it improves operating systems.

Just for reference, I am not a particular fanboy of Windows, Linux or OS X. I like them all!

Just to make sure, you are aware that X is not Linux and Linux is not X, right? The Linux operating system is basically the Linux kernel, and functionally speaking, a shell by which to access it. Many, many fully-functional Linux systems either do not boot into a GUI by default, or don't even have a GUI installed. A default install of Slackware will see the user booting to a command-line and needing to start X manually (until you add the line to one of those million /etc/rc.init.d.script.02.rc2.init.i.can.never.keep.these/things/straight.forthe/life.of.me files). Fedora, Ubuntu, SuSE, Mandriva, and others set up X to boot by default in order to make things easier, but it's not a requirement of the OS where Linux is concerned.

You could argue that Linux was inspired by DOS (and I don't know enough Linux history to say for sure whether it was or not) but to say that the core of Linux - the kernel - was inspired by Windows in any capacity beyond being an operating system is false.

Mac OS was crap. Mac OS X, however, is quite good.

You know, when I got my G4 back in 2001 it shipped with a dual boot configuration - Mac OS 9.2.2 and Mac OS X 10.0.0.4. Though OS X was severely lacking in polish and I had to use OS 9 out of necessity (few apps out at that time for OS X), I have to say that any OS wherein you need to manually assign memory to applications has something seriously wrong with it. OS X on the other hand, while being an extremely memory-hungry beast, has the courtesy to handle allocation for you.

Just to make sure, you are aware that X is not Linux and Linux is not X, right? The Linux operating system is basically the Linux kernel, and functionally speaking, a shell by which to access it. Many, many fully-functional Linux systems either do not boot into a GUI by default, or don't even have a GUI installed. A default install of Slackware will see the user booting to a command-line and needing to start X manually (until you add the line to one of those million /etc/rc.init.d.script.02.rc2.init.i.can.never.keep.these/things/straight.forthe/life.of.me files). Fedora, Ubuntu, SuSE, Mandriva, and others set up X to boot by default in order to make things easier, but it's not a requirement of the OS where Linux is concerned.

You could argue that Linux was inspired by DOS (and I don't know enough Linux history to say for sure whether it was or not) but to say that the core of Linux - the kernel - was inspired by Windows in any capacity beyond being an operating system is false.

To be honest I do not know that much about Linux and its inner workings and I am not pretending to either. I am still learning about the deep inner workings of operating systems. When I was comparing Linux to Windows I was just slighting on the fact that the GUI is similar (in my opinion). Thanks for the informative post though :)!

Great review! I know the joy you feel when you sit down in front of your new Mac. I just switched from a PC to a new Macbook on Nov. 30th. I've finally escaped the stone ages. :woot:

OK.. here we go. Windows users are not in the stone ages. We use our operating system for a WIDE plethora of software. That said... go download the Cyrsis demo and get it to run on OS X. What about something small like.... Party Poker? Americas Army? Will that run on OS X? Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/2/2142? Can you download and use Trillian? Winamp? Enemy Territory? Do ya see where I'm going with this?

My point is, use your "game lacking" OS. I'll load XP and have fun. I LOVE my games. LOVE THEM! Now... if/when I can run ALL OF MY SOFTWARE on a Mac, I'll probably use that full time. I fear though, when that happens, so will the malware, trojans and viruses. So they'll be no point in switching anyways.....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!