[Review] 13" Black MacBook - Santa Rosa chipset


Recommended Posts

Great review. Thanks for sharing.

Might want to look up how they saved Apple around the time Jobs had to come back...

Actually.. this isn't entirely true. I was reading an interesting technologists site back a few weeks ago where they discussed this item in some detail. Microsofts 'saving' payment to Apple was literally about 5% of what they actually currently had financially and in assets. Microsoft helped them a bit, absolutely - but Apple could have managed to stay afloat. The flip side of this is that Microsoft would have been stupid to do what they WERE thinking at the time, and ditch Mac Office. Just two months prior to the announcement by Bill Gates about helping Apple out, (leaked) internal memo's show that Gates was asking for GOOD reasons why he shouldn't just scrap Mac Office!

Its all quite interesting and if I can find the link, i'll share it!

OK.. here we go. Windows users are not in the stone ages. We use our operating system for a WIDE plethora of software. That said... go download the Cyrsis demo and get it to run on OS X. What about something small like.... Party Poker? Americas Army? Will that run on OS X? Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/2/2142? Can you download and use Trillian? Winamp? Enemy Territory? Do ya see where I'm going with this?

My point is, use your "game lacking" OS. I'll load XP and have fun. I LOVE my games. LOVE THEM! Now... if/when I can run ALL OF MY SOFTWARE on a Mac, I'll probably use that full time. I fear though, when that happens, so will the malware, trojans and viruses. So they'll be no point in switching anyways.....

surely bootcamp negates your post?

I've never used it and am currently running XP SP3, but from what I'm given to understand...

Edit: Most of your post actually refers to OS ten, thus the edit. However, in the fifth sentence of your final paragraph, you mention a hypothetical situation where you can run all of your software on your mac. surely this situation exists already (see above).

I have to admit, the Macbook does look like a piece of art. An educated person would not judge a product by its looks. I do appreciate that you wrote a review on the new Macbook, though the info was quite useless for people seeking a quality product. We want to know performance ratings, reliability, and stability, as-well-as what type of person (in the sense of usability) would benefit using this product. We also want to know what you can and can not do with this product.

It will be very hard for anyone to convince me to use a Mac for the following 13 reasons:

1: No Windows Media Center

2: No DX10 graphics

3: games are almost unheard of on a Mac

4: Hardware compatibility (Though some hardware will work)

5: Single click mouse (What's up with that). you actually have to buy a double click mouse to get the right click functionality.

6: Can not custom build a Mac

7: Application compatibility

8: Can you even maximize application windows in a Mac with just one click (not a click and drag, and not a keyboard shortcut)?

9: compatibility limitations between OS platforms.

10: Mac uses the Unix core (not Linux) and not their own (come one, how old is the unix code?)

11: Administrative fuctionality and control

12: Those Communist fanboys need to start getting along with the rest of the world. To them it's not "Think Different, it's Think against!"

13: it's too trendy :)

You guys want Mac to dominate? If mac does then the hackers and virus makers will start finding an interest in Mac. Even if Mac and Windows is head-to-head in the market share, those hackers and virus makers will attack both. It will be easier to make Mac viruses, now that Mac is on the Intel Platform. Windows users know that nothing is impossible and that there is no such thing as 100% perfection. That is all I have to say.

Guys, I'm not writing stuff like this to attack, I write this stuf because it's educational to know what you know. And if I'm wrong I will be corrected. This is a Group discussion right? :)

Edited by jesseinsf
OK.. here we go. Windows users are not in the stone ages. We use our operating system for a WIDE plethora of software. That said... go download the Cyrsis demo and get it to run on OS X. What about something small like.... Party Poker? Americas Army? Will that run on OS X? Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/2/2142? Can you download and use Trillian? Winamp? Enemy Territory? Do ya see where I'm going with this?

All of that can be done with either similar software, or Parallels / VMWare Fusion / Bootcamp.

My point is, use your "game lacking" OS. I'll load XP and have fun. I LOVE my games. LOVE THEM! Now... if/when I can run ALL OF MY SOFTWARE on a Mac, I'll probably use that full time.

Too bad you can play games on a Mac, too. You can even, oh I don't know, run Windows on it and play them that way?

I fear though, when that happens, so will the malware, trojans and viruses. So they'll be no point in switching anyways.....

That will never happen, imo. OS X is too secure. To do some damage, you'd have to modify system files which needs user authentication.

Edit: To the post above - you can take number 5 off the list. I can't believe that people still try to pass off that **** as true. The Mighty Mouse has a touch sensitive top, so you can right click. The Apple notebooks let you two finger tap to right click.

Sigh. Another yawn inducing Windows/Mac fanboy (child) argument-a-thon.

That said... go download the Cyrsis demo and get it to run on OS X. What about something small like.... Party Poker? Americas Army? Will that run on OS X? Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/2/2142?

Um -> http://www.apple.com/games/articles/2007/09/battlefield2142/

Some people just do not realise how lucky we are, we are in a great situation where computational rivalry between companies like Microsoft, Apple and Google is only helping to improve technology at an even greater pace.

Very well said!

dude i just wanna know how easy the osx operating system is.. is it really as simple as windows? and yes macbooks especially in black look very nice.. can someone also tell me the actual use of having a glossy screen? other than it looking good?

Overal I like the review, but it lacks details. Anyway, have fun with it! :)

------------------------------------------------------------------

4: Hardware compatibility (Though some hardware will work)

Most printers, scanners, keyboards, mouses, monitors, routers, speaker sets, optical drives (both internal and external), HDDs (both internal and external), RAM cards etc. will work just fine with a Macintosh. People even managed to swap CPUs with the latest Intel models.

5: Single click mouse (What's up with that). you actually have to buy a double click mouse to get the right click functionality.

Apple released a multi-buttoned mouse over two years ago, which ships by default with every desktop Mac (except for the Mac mini). They don't even build the one-buttoned mouses anymore.

Even with an old one-buttoned mouse you can access right-click contextual menus by holding down control.

6: Can not custom build a Mac

If you want that you can buy a Mac Pro. There's plenty you can adjust before buying other Macs as well.

7: Application compatibility

Obviously Windows applications won't run on Mac OS X. But then again nor will Mac OS X applications on Windows. So far there aren't any Windows applications I truly miss on Mac OS X. Next to that I found that most applications on Mac OS X are of higher quality than the ones found on Windows (some may or may not disagree). Microsoft Office exists on Mac OS X as well, version 2008 will be released next month.

8: Can you even maximize application windows in a Mac with just one click (not a click and drag, and not a keyboard shortcut)?

Mac OS X' zoom feature simply doesn't work that way.

9: compatibility limitations between OS platforms.

I have a PC on my home network just fine. Basically all popular media formats can be exchanged without a single problem.

10: Mac uses the Unix core (not Linux) and not their own (come one, how old is the unix code?)

It's a bit silly to think the UNIX kernel used by Mac OS X remained unchanged since it's initial release. Development of the NT kernel started somewhere in the late 80s, did it stay exactly the same as well?

11: Administrative fuctionality and control

What about it?

C'mon man if you're going to draw up a list at least make it accurate. ;)

Edited by .Neo
Overal I like the review, but it lacks details. Anyway, have fun with it! :)

------------------------------------------------------------------

C'mon man if you're going to draw up a list at least make it accurate. ;)

About the Administrative Functionality. I was comparing with Active Directory in Windows server with Mac server.

The rest of the list was said to get more accurate info from people like yourself. Can you compare the first 3 with apple's technologies and where they are headed with it? Thanks: :)

About the Administrative Functionality. I was comparing with Active Directory in Windows server with Mac server.

The rest of the list was said to get more accurate info from people like yourself. Can you compare the first 3 with apple's technologies and where they are headed with it? Thanks: :)

For Media Center there's Front Row 2. DirectX on Mac OS X obviously will never happen as it's being developed by Microsoft. There are more and more games being released for Mac OS X, and EA puts in quite some effort to port over many of it's titles.

Most of this information is available on the Mac OS X website.

I dislike the fingerprints the blackbook gets. I mean, seriously, they crop up almost right away and you have to scrub to get them off, really annoying. Other than that, it's a great laptop but would have done better with a built in SD card slot.

I dislike the fingerprints the blackbook gets. I mean, seriously, they crop up almost right away and you have to scrub to get them off, really annoying. Other than that, it's a great laptop but would have done better with a built in SD card slot.

There's always the Invisible Shield. Although, I do think Apple bundles a small micro-fiber cloth with the MacBooks now, and honestly, it's just fingerprints. You can always wipe them away, the same can't be said of the hairline scratches the white casing seems to pick up.

Thank you for all the nice comments everyone, I am glad so many of you enjoyed reading my review :)

I have to admit, the Macbook does look like a piece of art. An educated person would not judge a product by its looks. I do appreciate that you wrote a review on the new Macbook, though the info was quite useless for people seeking a quality product. We want to know performance ratings, reliability, and stability, as-well-as what type of person (in the sense of usability) would benefit using this product. We also want to know what you can and can not do with this product.

Well the information might of been useless to you, but to other people it might of been useful. I did not write the review to sell MacBook's to other people, I just thought I would write about my MacBook and my feelings for it through the eyes of me. I looked at benchmarks and the lark a lot more when I built my gaming PC in the summer, but for my MacBook I just wanted it for its beautiful simplicity and how it suited my student needs in particular. My blog is simply my opinions and feelings about things that interest me, and I wrote the review for my blogging audience but mainly for myself, and not for my awesome Neowinian friends but I thought I would share it regardless. I have wrote a few reviews for Neowin in the past, and they focused more on the technical aspect, but for my MacBook review I just wanted more freedom and to take a more technical approach.

I dislike the fingerprints the blackbook gets. I mean, seriously, they crop up almost right away and you have to scrub to get them off, really annoying. Other than that, it's a great laptop but would have done better with a built in SD card slot.

That is one of the small qualms I have with my MacBook, it does pick up fingermarks relatively easily. To be honest though, it does not really bother me that much, I tend to clean the screen of my MacBook with the included cloth and I also whipe the casing down at the same time. It only takes a few seconds, no biggie.

For Media Center there's Front Row 2. DirectX on Mac OS X obviously will never happen as it's being developed by Microsoft. There are more and more games being released for Mac OS X, and EA puts in quite some effort to port over many of it's titles.

Most of this information is available on the Mac OS X website.

EA is using another company to port its games, and frankly, EA is one of the laziest game devs - year after, they either make lazy rehashes of the previous, or very buggy games at that. Macs don't do games, until Apple releases a desktop that can take the same video cards as a PC (or EFI becomes mainstream in PC's), you won't get hardcore or moderate gamers to switch.

There are some programs I wish were on the Mac that I found better on Windows, most of which are image viewers, like FastStone or Picasa (I really don't understand the hype with most iLife apps, most are sort of lame or bloated for what they are). iWorks '08 is OK, but I much prefer Office 2007, and I hope 2008 is just as good (I really think if the UI used in 2007 was designed by Apple, Mac fanatics would trip over themselves, but since it's "M$"...)

Leopard is pretty good, but the upgrade went horribly - a clean install later, it's fine. Macs usually work, but they aren't perfect by any stretch, I firmly believe Apple's QC has gone, way, way downhill the past couple of years (the problems with condensation and cheap LCDs on the new iMacs, wonky keyboards on the MB and MBP make me laugh). And the "Mighty" mouse is one of the worst mice I've ever used (wired and Bluetooth).

Overall, OSX does have some real benefits to Windows, and I do like the BSD/UNIX certification, as I'm also wishing to learn PERL/AWK script, and do Java programming on my Mini, and it does have the benefit of better vendor support than Linux.

But there are some things I do miss about Vista - it's easier to customize IMO, there are more programs that you can pick and choose from, plus, you install and run about any piece of hardware, and install Windows without jumping through hoops on hardware bought from newegg.

However, the problem I have with Apple, as an agnostic OS user, is Jobs/Apple's failure to produce a real desktop tower, and the cult of Mac, some Mac users will just bend over for anything from Apple, or but up with software/hardware bugs that get other OEMs roasted over and nasty letters written to. I really do like have choices in my hardware selection, my Mini is mainly a compromise of a number of factors.

My Mac is a Mini (1.83 GHz C2D, 1 GB (soon to be 2), basic model that I got a couple of weeks ago, to play around with and co-exist on my Windows home network. And it has impressed me in that regard as well, I can use RDC without problems and Samba works great when connecting to my Windows shares. And I have installed Hamachi, so I can grab my Mini and remotely access my Vista desktop from a friend's house.

OSX is really great, but so is Vista/XP too IMO.

I've had a Macbook since the first batch of them, and I've enjoyed it through good times and bad. One thing I will point out though is that the Macbook has a far superior trackpad than any windows laptop I have ever tried.

The Macbook's trackpad is wider, more sensitive, and the acceleration seems to be spot on. I love using this trackpad, and I absolutely despise any Windows laptop trackpad I have ever tried (various brands include Toshiba, IBM/Lenovo, HP, and Dell).

That's my little input there. I'm sure they could be at least slightly better if they just make them a little bigger. Who's idea was it to make a square trackpad? *sigh*

People saying running boot camp negates my post, to you I say... Where's your logic? Why would I pay extra just to run XP or Vista on a Mac? From benchmarks I've seen, a Mac does not even come close to hitting the FPS that a custom build can hit, for less money. "BUY A MAC.... so you can run Windows!!!!" Stupid.

You still can't load all the games and software a Windows computer can run.... unless you load Windows. :rolleyes:

People saying running boot camp negates my post, to you I say... Where's your logic? Why would I pay extra just to run XP or Vista on a Mac? From benchmarks I've seen, a Mac does not even come close to hitting the FPS that a custom build can hit, for less money. "BUY A MAC.... so you can run Windows!!!!" Stupid.

Bootcamp is free, so where's your logic? The newer Macs with Nvidia 8600 cards are DirectX 10 capable, so you can run games in Windows perfectly fine. And your statement about low FPS on a Mac is just plain stupid. The only difference is software, not hardware.

You still can't load all the games and software a Windows computer can run.... unless you load Windows. :rolleyes:

Which is why there's the option to do so. Can you run OS X programs on your PC l? Didn't think so ;)

Nice review mate, i have to admit that they do look rather lovely and the OSX operating system is different and refreshing to use when you have been using windows for so long.

I don't think i am sold on macs just yet, personally i think Apple are too up their own a*se , when they released those Mac Vs. PC ads it annoyed me because they portrayed that they where superior to windows pcs which they aren't, they are just different, there is nothing wrong with being different, it gives the consumer a wider choice which is good isn't it? Why can't they go for that angle? I guess it annoys Steve Jobs that Microsoft have such a big share in Apple that he had to show his feelings a little.

Anyways nice review and i hope to see more entertaining reading from you in the future! Good job!

awesome, I don't know many laptops that have an optical port. Also can you run Windows Vista at the same time?

You can run Windows Vista via Boot Camp, or virtualize it via Parallels Desktop and/or VMware Fusion.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!