NVIDIA AGP DirectX 10 cards?


Recommended Posts

mah man, the age of agp stops at 9.0c thaz it ... if you want dx10 then you must get pci-e ... they dont even make agp anymore :D .... which is good and bax, cause i am stuck with an x800 and i wanna have sm3 to play some dirt and splinter cell and nfs which i know is a bit ... something

  • 5 weeks later...
I'm sure ATi were going to be doing an AGP part on the RV670 boards; an HD3850 or HD3870. ATi have a pretty good PCI-E > AGP bridge, at least so I heard. So don't lose all hope just yet :p

Well, Nvidia may or may not. But ATI is putting out a wickedly powerful 3850 AGP card via PowerColor.

http://www.powercolor.com/Global/products_...?ProductID=1730

It is held up until Jan when ATI should have drivers for it.

I would wait to see how the drivers work before buying it though. The 2600 AGP cards

have many MANY game compatibility issues due to ATI only releasing AGP version of their drivers every 4-6 months vs PCIe that get new drivers every month.

-W

I would personally say spend the little extra and get a board with PCI Express. Especially when you can find them from as little as ?20/$40. You could probably buy a slightly cheaper card and get better performance from the extra bandwidth, and also be prepared from the future!

It would be silly to purchase a new AGP card today, it's just old technology. You really won't get what you pay for. The performance just isn't there - especially in a DirectX 10 card.

It would be silly to purchase a new AGP card today, it's just old technology. You really won't get what you pay for. The performance just isn't there - especially in a DirectX 10 card.

Perfectly said. Just save up until you are able to make your own PCI-E powered computer. It may seem like a stupid idea now (saving a ton), but in the long run, you will be alot happier.

It's not? Can you share your AGP vs. PCIe DX10 benchmarks then?

There's no way they could be compared as AGP has at least half and sometimes more than 50% less bandwidth, you could have a dual GPU high end card in AGP and a single GPU in PCI Express and the AGP would still lose.

There's no way they could be compared as AGP has at least half and sometimes more than 50% less bandwidth, you could have a dual GPU high end card in AGP and a single GPU in PCI Express and the AGP would still lose.

if such technology did exsist, remember no dual gpu's with agp except for i think that 6600 limited series with dual chips on one card but still no dual physical cards ;)

Does NVIDIA make any AGP directX 10 cards? I just about a 7900 DirectX 9 card for about 200 but couldnt find any info on any directX 10 cards.

I would never EVER buy any ATI crap, so im just wondering whether Nvidia made anything DirectX 10 that is AGP.

nVidia does have them, the 8500 and above are Directx 10. I bought once PCI and one AGP that support Directx 10

There's no way they could be compared as AGP has at least half and sometimes more than 50% less bandwidth, you could have a dual GPU high end card in AGP and a single GPU in PCI Express and the AGP would still lose.

Any hard numbers to back this up or are you going to impress us with speculation and theories?

Well, of course he's under the assumption that the card uses the maximum potential of a PCI Express x16 slot. Unless it uses all the bandwidth, then the performance difference would favor the one with the faster graphics card, instead of the combination with the slower graphics card and a PEG slot. :p

There's no way they could be compared as AGP has at least half and sometimes more than 50% less bandwidth, you could have a dual GPU high end card in AGP and a single GPU in PCI Express and the AGP would still lose.

Your argument would be valid if video cards utilized all the bandwidth available to them. It was proven upon the release of PCI-E that cards didn't really need any more bandwidth than AGP offered, hence the NULL difference in performance. A similarly unnecesary move was the release of dual 16x laned SLi boards being touted as superior to dual 8x lanes for the same performance. Quite frankly, the extra bandwidth PCI-E offers just isn't used. Perhaps the very latest and greatest cards, such as the 8800GTX, use more bandwidth than an AGP port would allow them, but that is just about the only case in which the technology behind AGP itself would be a limiting factor.

That said, investing in a high-end AGP video card is unwise, since it is to dig yourself deeper into a hole of components that you won't be able to upgrade. Chances are your motherboard still uses DDR1, AGP, and perhaps even a CPU socket that has been discontinued. Thus, any upgrade to such a system would be an exercise in futility, since the rest of the components are either lacking or will be soon. A modest recommendation on my behalf would be to wait longer, get the most out of your current system, and make a system-wide overhaul when you can.

nVidia does have them, the 8500 and above are Directx 10. I bought once PCI and one AGP that support Directx 10
Do you have a link to them? Because even nVidia says there isn't one.
Any hard numbers to back this up or are you going to impress us with speculation and theories?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_device_bandwidths

PCI Express (x8 link)[15] 16,000 Mbit/s 2000 MB/s

AGP 8x 17,066 Mbit/s 2133 MB/s

Keep in mind that first generation crossfire and sli solutions run each card at x8 PCI-E speeds so AGP 8x is running out of capacity but perhaps not yet a bottleneck in the real world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_device_bandwidths

PCI Express (x8 link)[15] 16,000 Mbit/s 2000 MB/s

AGP 8x 17,066 Mbit/s 2133 MB/s

Keep in mind that first generation crossfire and sli solutions run each card at x8 PCI-E speeds so AGP 8x is running out of capacity but perhaps not yet a bottleneck in the real world.

Those are bandwidth figures.

Where are the video card performance figures?

Powercolor came out with the 3850 AGP. DX10.1 card! Too bad its not the 3870.

http://www.powercolor.com/Global/pro...ProductID=1730

Availability in January, pending driver release

And maybe more powerful agp cards from ati coming out in the future?

Edited by a-l-e-x
mah man, the age of agp stops at 9.0c thaz it ... if you want dx10 then you must get pci-e ... they dont even make agp anymore :D .... which is good and bax, cause i am stuck with an x800 and i wanna have sm3 to play some dirt and splinter cell and nfs which i know is a bit ... something

Meh put down the crack pipe ;) DX10 does NOT need PCI-e buddy :) Its a 3d hardware API and has no graphic card interface contraints.

If you want a good AGP card dood find a 7950GT on AGP ;) (I have the 7800GT golden Sample on AGPx8)

There was noises made that 8800GS cards would appear on AGP from selected Vendors (BFG or Gainward i "think") but in all honesty the 7950GT would prolly wee on the GS anyways

All my info was based on hypothetical situations, based on what would be the wisest purchase not just for now, but to maybe save you having to spend more money in a short (probably very short) time. With the advances in graphics technology, it's not going to be long before pci express is used to it's full potential, and dual / triple setups improve too. Simple fact is, what's the point in spending the cash on a dying technology. When you could, for example, either spend ?100 on an AGP card, or ?25 on a motherboard with pci-express and ?75 on a new card. The worst case scenario is that you'll get the same (most probably better) graphics performance, but will also be somewhat prepared for the future.

When you could, for example, either spend ?100 on an AGP card, or ?25 on a motherboard with pci-express and ?75 on a new card. The worst case scenario is that you'll get the same (most probably better) graphics performance, but will also be somewhat prepared for the future.

You conveniently left out a few additional hardware items that would be required to transition from AGP to PCIe.

Systems with AGP slots typically utilize DDR-1 and the last models produced had Intel socket 478 or AMD socket 754 (there few a few socket 939 boards made with AGP slots but not many). That means you'd need a new CPU, RAM, motherboard and a graphics card. You'll also need Windows Vista to play DX10 games.

In my opinion, a fast graphics card in a late Pentium 4 or Athlon X2 system still makes sense price-wise (but probably not too much longer).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!