Recommended Posts

I've been using litestep for...ever (5 yrs or so). I installed Vista ultimate x64 about 4mths ago and i'm dieing to get my litestep back.

I got it installed and running properly running my theme i created bout two years ago that works exactly like i need it to. My only problem i have is that with Vista when I click on my "file manager" (it is supposed to open an explorer window) shortcut button it start explorer (the taskbar and everything).

Is there somewhere else I need to change the shell to litestep? Does anyone else run litestep in vista?

I don't like windowblinds. It eats up too many resources and it doesn't really get rid of explorer it just skins it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/605138-litestep-in-vista/
Share on other sites

yea, but it doesn't do EVERYTHING i want it to. I can completely change the layout of how things are...not just the apperance. I do alot of coding and graphics work and I created a theme a while back that put everything at my finger tips without taking up alot of screen real estate. As well as not having to view the desktop to click icons. It's perfect for me. But in vista it's a pain the ass to run litestep. I had to go through a **** ton to get it working correctly. Now my biggest problem is my evar i have set to open up a explorer window actually starts explorer the shell.

you can't do this http://customize.org/litestep/themes/15324 with windowblinds.

this is a long shot but try changing the shortcut to run explorer.exe /e

i didn't even think of that....i'll give it a shot...gimme a second

Of course you can't, and why would you want to? But my opinion on how that looks is irrelevant; Windowblinds isn't a shell replacement or a widget engine, or any kind of desktop enhancement program, it's a skinning app. Try Desktop X.

i need the flexibility of litestep and it's what i'm used to and love...it's been working amazing for me for years. I was just wondering if anyone knew a fix.

not the explorer.exe /e doesn't work....

ok...well i'm stupid...using a direct path like "D:\Temp" opens an explorer window in that path. So that works for me.

ok next step is try changing these reg keys:

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer]

"DesktopProcess"=dword:00000001

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced]

"DesktopProcess"=dword:00000001

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...
... My only problem i have is that with Vista when I click on my "file manager" (it is supposed to open an explorer window) shortcut button it start explorer (the taskbar and everything)...

I know you already have your problem solved but I'd like to point out one other possible solution.

There is an explorer replacement that is a far cry better than explorer. So much so, I really miss it when I'm working on a system that doesn't have it installed. It is called xplorer? (explorer squared). It has a free lite version and a pro version. The lite version alone is exponentially better than explorer :pp

You can find it here:

lite: http://zabkat.com/x2lite.htm

pro: http://zabkat.com/

btw, I am in no way, personally or professionally, connected to xplorer?. I just love it and wanted to share the info.

-madwhit

<><

  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!