Crysis @ Very High @ 60 FPS?

[Elliot B.]

Is there a system available at the moment that can play Crysis with everything set to max (apart from AA) at 1280x1024 at 60 FPS?

I doubt even a system with a Intel Core 2 Extreme Quad QX6850 processor, 4 GB DDR3 memory and a NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra 768 MB could to be honest, and just those components alone come to ?1350 without the rest of the system!

[Slimy]

I doubt even a system with a Intel Core 2 Extreme Quad QX6850 processor, 4 GB DDR3 memory and a NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra 768 MB could to be honest, and just those components alone come to ?1350 without the rest of the system!

What makes you say that?

[Elliot B.]

What makes you say that?

I have an Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 processor, 2 GB DDR2 memory and a NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB and it runs around 10-20 FPS at the levels I stated and I can't see the faster hardware I listed being 3x/4x faster personally.

[Flash]

No single card will be able to get 60FPS average. Not even SLI'ed Ultras will be able to get an average of 60FPS on very high. I suggest waiting for a Geforce 9 or even 10 ;)

[Ayepecks]

My bet: within one year, a card (or cards, if SLI or Crossfire or whatever) will be able to run Crysis easily at those settings. It will be from game patches, drivers and new technology.

[Prince Charming]

Whut Ayepecks said. Technology advances very fast, Crysis will be a "lolwut, i use it as a screensaver" in a years time.

[sundayx Veteran]

Whut Ayepecks said. Technology advances very fast, Crysis will be a "lolwut, i use it as a screensaver" in a years time.

No you won't be able to play Crysis at max settings on a 9300GT.

[Prince Charming]

Low end pos cards not counted of course. They don't really count anyways ;P

[Sethos]

Currently on Windows XP - Core 2 Extreme X6800 - 4 Gigs - 8800 Ultra ( Overclocked ) and i can manage around 40 steady FPS at mix of High / Very High settings at 1650x1200.

We still need to get a hardware generation ahead before It's possible i believe.

[chrismaddern]

Yeah.. on my system, with a little over clocking I get playable frame rates from mostly MAX settings, however I don't think 60 is possible atm unless you *really* spend some money and overclock like heck.

Probably the top C2Quad overclocked with watercooling, 4GB DDR 1066, Dual 8800GTXs (OCd to heck), Dual 10K RPM Raptors :D,

.... and a small screen so it's playing in low res :p

Chris

[WAR-DOG]

much depends on drivers, not only hardware

[darkz]

**** crysis!

[sithmasteranirudh]

I saw some videos on youtube that show quite good frames, although I can't place an average on how many.

[Lt-DavidW]

I saw some videos on youtube that show quite good frames, although I can't place an average on how many.

I guarantee it wasn't more than 24 fps.

[sithmasteranirudh]

Really? Hmm. You might very well be right as I'm only a casual gamer and lack experience at measuring frames without FRAPS.

[Pupik]

Crysis still looks nice on everything on high. And, it's very playable at those settings (was getting ~60 fps on [email protected], HD2600XT, 2x1gb 800mhz DDR2 on Vista 32bit Ultimate and 1280x1024 res.).

[Jason S. Global Moderator]

there's no way you were getting 60fps on high settings w/ that 2600XT. my 8800GTS 320MB would only get <20fps on those settings.

[(Spork)]

Crysis still looks nice on everything on high. And, it's very playable at those settings (was getting ~60 fps on [email protected], HD2600XT, 2x1gb 800mhz DDR2 on Vista 32bit Ultimate and 1280x1024 res.).

LOL sure you did

[Snakehn]

Why do they develop games that you can't even freaking play??????

[Yusuf M. Veteran]

Crysis still looks nice on everything on high. And, it's very playable at those settings (was getting ~60 fps on [email protected], HD2600XT, 2x1gb 800mhz DDR2 on Vista 32bit Ultimate and 1280x1024 res.).

I find that hard to believe. My C2D @ 2.7Ghz, 2GB DDR2 RAM, and HD 2900 XT gets ~20fps with those exact settings.

[Ayepecks]

Gotta agree -- 60FPS doesn't seem too realistic given your specs -- especially the video card.

[Pupik]

Oh, relax you hyenas. Made unnoticed mistake while typing on the keypad (clicked the six instead of the three), and you jumped on me like I was bleeding in the middle of the desert :huh:

Gotta agree -- 60FPS doesn't seem too realistic given your specs -- especially the video card.

And what's wrong with a card that got 512mb of DDR3 memory, in this days of time?

Not new enough?

[darkz]

And what's wrong with a card that got 512mb of DDR3 memory, in this days of time?

Not new enough?

not expensive/fast/new/whatever enough to run this @60FPS

[Prince Charming]

30FPS doesn't seem to realistic given the specs either.

And Pupik; its not about the RAM at all. You can put 1GB of ram on a radeon 9200 and it won't do crap all. An HD2600XT is a midrange card.

[Beastage]

The resolution people... the resolution

All tests I seen and all reports I heard were with retarded high res

at 1280x1024 it sounds possible and a couple of o/c 8800gt beat one 8800ultra