Crysis @ Very High @ 60 FPS?


Recommended Posts

Apparently my friend got 60FPS with his SLi'd 8800GTSs at either Medium or High (one of the two...) on Vista Business.

I get around 50 FPS in Medium with one 8800 GTS so I can imagine two will produce 60 FPS in High (Y)

I get around 50 FPS in Medium with one 8800 GTS so I can imagine two will produce 60 FPS in High (Y)

I can believe that. I get around 25 FPS if I put everything in medium on my 8400 GS. (C2D 2.2Ghz 4L2C, 2GB RAM)

But I don't think 2 will produce 60FPS on high.

As per discussion, yes I remember the day Far Cry came out, as well as FEAR, and HL2.. We were all screaming the same things out about how much our PCs suck. Now I can run FarCry on completely high using my PC.

I wonder what Crytek, given a few more years, will be able to produce. I mean, we thought FarCry was amazing, then Crysis was near-photogenic, what could be up ahead in the road? Games that look better than real life lol.. that would be kind of an odd sight.

I can believe that. I get around 25 FPS if I put everything in medium on my 8400 GS. (C2D 2.2Ghz 4L2C, 2GB RAM)

I mean, we thought FarCry was amazing, then Crysis was near-photogenic, what could be up ahead in the road? Games that look better than real life lol.. that would be kind of an odd sight.

There's only one way to go after achieving photogenic gameplay and that's great story and gameplay! Seriously, some of the games that came out this year had AMAZING visuals but the story was absolutely horrendous. Example: Lost Planet.

Graphics cannot get better than real life... >_<

I mean, maybe better visuals than a photo, but not compared to real life as seen through an eye.

True I see your point. But I was thinking that with CG you can take out certain things that aren't as beautiful as others, and add others, as well as modifying some. "Perfection" - Don't try it at home.

The answer to all...current max possible 37.9FPS at Very High...

http://kotaku.com/gaming/craziness/1800-in...ysis-333598.php

We know Crysis is all about the high end, pushing the PC platform to its max. But I had no idea it went this far. PC Games Hardware magazine created a beefy system with NVIDIA's latest and greatest video card...err...video cards. Their brand new Triple SLI, a combination of three NVIDIA geforce 8800s, should make short work of any PC game on the planet. But it couldn't crush Crysis. Running on "very high" settings, the system reached a respectable (but far from mind-blowing) 37.9 FPS. In the words of a Gizmodo staffer, "I don't know how these ****ers developed it." In the words of this Kotaku staffer, "If you can't see a game's graphics on one of the world's most powerful consumer setups, they don't actually exist yet."
The answer to all...current max possible 37.9FPS at Very High...

http://kotaku.com/gaming/craziness/1800-in...ysis-333598.php

Wow thats low..

I expected like 50-55 FPS on that kind of beastly machine! Guess my computer is pretty good then lol. (considering I didn't spend 4000 bucks..)

  • 11 months later...

eh when this thread was current, 4870X2's wern't round :p

Old post but now, with the GTX 280, 3 of them in Sli the EVGA Overclocked ones can run crysis at 80FPS Max with 4x AA on Very High all i saw it on youtube someone tested it and he overclocked 1 of the cards untill it blew up.

must have been a noob overclocker, he should have known to drop it all in mineral oil.

Give a big, warm welcome to the Falcon Northwest Mach V! Cnet reckon, based on tests, that it's the fastest consumer PC on the planet. It's so fast, in fact, that it's the first off-the-shelf PC they (or we) have seen that can run Crysis at 60FPS. On its highest settings. Of course, it had want to run Crysis at 60FPS, since it costs $8000. That's the kind of price bracket where we'd joke that the metallic red paint job costs an extra $500 and...oh, the metallic red paint job really does cost an extra $500.

Falcon.jpg

http://kotaku.com/5092751/worlds-fastest-p...crysis-at-60fps

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!