Crysis @ Very High @ 60 FPS?


Recommended Posts

Apparently my friend got 60FPS with his SLi'd 8800GTSs at either Medium or High (one of the two...) on Vista Business.

I get around 50 FPS in Medium with one 8800 GTS so I can imagine two will produce 60 FPS in High (Y)

I get around 50 FPS in Medium with one 8800 GTS so I can imagine two will produce 60 FPS in High (Y)

I can believe that. I get around 25 FPS if I put everything in medium on my 8400 GS. (C2D 2.2Ghz 4L2C, 2GB RAM)

But I don't think 2 will produce 60FPS on high.

As per discussion, yes I remember the day Far Cry came out, as well as FEAR, and HL2.. We were all screaming the same things out about how much our PCs suck. Now I can run FarCry on completely high using my PC.

I wonder what Crytek, given a few more years, will be able to produce. I mean, we thought FarCry was amazing, then Crysis was near-photogenic, what could be up ahead in the road? Games that look better than real life lol.. that would be kind of an odd sight.

I can believe that. I get around 25 FPS if I put everything in medium on my 8400 GS. (C2D 2.2Ghz 4L2C, 2GB RAM)

I mean, we thought FarCry was amazing, then Crysis was near-photogenic, what could be up ahead in the road? Games that look better than real life lol.. that would be kind of an odd sight.

There's only one way to go after achieving photogenic gameplay and that's great story and gameplay! Seriously, some of the games that came out this year had AMAZING visuals but the story was absolutely horrendous. Example: Lost Planet.

Graphics cannot get better than real life... >_<

I mean, maybe better visuals than a photo, but not compared to real life as seen through an eye.

True I see your point. But I was thinking that with CG you can take out certain things that aren't as beautiful as others, and add others, as well as modifying some. "Perfection" - Don't try it at home.

The answer to all...current max possible 37.9FPS at Very High...

http://kotaku.com/gaming/craziness/1800-in...ysis-333598.php

We know Crysis is all about the high end, pushing the PC platform to its max. But I had no idea it went this far. PC Games Hardware magazine created a beefy system with NVIDIA's latest and greatest video card...err...video cards. Their brand new Triple SLI, a combination of three NVIDIA geforce 8800s, should make short work of any PC game on the planet. But it couldn't crush Crysis. Running on "very high" settings, the system reached a respectable (but far from mind-blowing) 37.9 FPS. In the words of a Gizmodo staffer, "I don't know how these ****ers developed it." In the words of this Kotaku staffer, "If you can't see a game's graphics on one of the world's most powerful consumer setups, they don't actually exist yet."
The answer to all...current max possible 37.9FPS at Very High...

http://kotaku.com/gaming/craziness/1800-in...ysis-333598.php

Wow thats low..

I expected like 50-55 FPS on that kind of beastly machine! Guess my computer is pretty good then lol. (considering I didn't spend 4000 bucks..)

  • 11 months later...

eh when this thread was current, 4870X2's wern't round :p

Old post but now, with the GTX 280, 3 of them in Sli the EVGA Overclocked ones can run crysis at 80FPS Max with 4x AA on Very High all i saw it on youtube someone tested it and he overclocked 1 of the cards untill it blew up.

must have been a noob overclocker, he should have known to drop it all in mineral oil.

Give a big, warm welcome to the Falcon Northwest Mach V! Cnet reckon, based on tests, that it's the fastest consumer PC on the planet. It's so fast, in fact, that it's the first off-the-shelf PC they (or we) have seen that can run Crysis at 60FPS. On its highest settings. Of course, it had want to run Crysis at 60FPS, since it costs $8000. That's the kind of price bracket where we'd joke that the metallic red paint job costs an extra $500 and...oh, the metallic red paint job really does cost an extra $500.

Falcon.jpg

http://kotaku.com/5092751/worlds-fastest-p...crysis-at-60fps

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!