• 0

Windows Vista vs. Windows XP?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
What the hell are you talking about? Both are RC1, it doesn't matter how long they've been in development if they're at the same milestone now. If we go by your logic of not comparing something that's been in development for a year, then we shouldn't compare XP and Vista at all :laugh:

What the hell are you talking about? Windows XP SP3 isn't even comparable in any sense. Windows Vista SP1 was made to address the horde of initial bug-fixes whilst Windows XP SP3 was made to add some further functionality, a few new bug-fixes and a few new features. I suggest you read the official white-paper by Microsoft:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...ang=en#filelist

If we all go by your logic a service-pack for an operating system which has been in development for eight years whilst another operating system was even put into consideration after the first operating system's release.

/facepalm

EDIT: Addressing the edit to Hurmoth's post:

The only thing Vista has that would ever interest me is DirectX 10 and none of the games I play use it, so it doesn't matter to me. There's nothing else in Vista that would benefit me or most users in general. I don't know anyone in my every day life that actually uses Vista and likes it, most hate it.

I say hold on to XP, there's nothing in Vista that is worth the cost of the upgrade.

You obviously know virtually nothing about Vista since you can't even list one thing which would benefit a generic user. I guess I can just cross you off as another 'Vista Basher/Troll'.

  • 0
^ Not because XP is just better, it's because XP is better for their current hardware.

With those specs, I would not bother (although you are missing out!). Just go Vista with your next computer, Vista will run better than XP on better hardware.

This is very true.

Components are cheap now so when you upgrade to a quad core, 4gb ram and a new gfx card everything will be so fast on vista and stable.

  • 0
What the hell are you talking about? Windows XP SP3 isn't even comparable in any sense. Windows Vista SP1 was made to address the horde of initial bug-fixes whilst Windows XP SP3 was made to add some further functionality, a few new bug-fixes and a few new features. I suggest you read the official white-paper by Microsoft:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...ang=en#filelist

If we all go by your logic a service-pack for an operating system which has been in development for eight years whilst another operating system was even put into consideration after the first operating system's release.

/facepalm

EDIT: Addressing the edit to Hurmoth's post:

You obviously know virtually nothing about Vista since you can't even list one thing which would benefit a generic user. I guess I can just cross you off as another 'Vista Basher/Troll'.

https://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/11/24/w...-over-vista-sp1

So I'm a Vista basher/troll because I don't like Vista and I don't see any reason to paying out money for something that I don't see any benefit to? I guess I can't have my own opinion, I'm sorry, let me bow down to you since your opinion is worth so much more than mine.

Components are cheap now so when you upgrade to a quad core, 4gb ram and a new gfx card everything will be so fast on vista and stable.

It will be just as fast and stable on XP too ;)

  • 0
https://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/11/24/w...-over-vista-sp1

So I'm a Vista basher/troll because I don't like Vista and I don't see any reason to paying out money for something that I don't see any benefit to? I guess I can't have my own opinion, I'm sorry, let me bow down to you since your opinion is worth so much more than mine.

It will be just as fast and stable on XP too ;)

No your opinion is fine but the fact is people who have strong opinions against Vista seem to constantly try and pursuade others that it won't benefit them in any way whatsoever over XP and will be slow or crash or whatever.

This makes this type of person no more different than say a religious extremist trying to force his views onto others for example.

  • 0
No your opinion is fine but the fact is people who have strong opinions against Vista seem to constantly try and pursuade others that it won't benefit them in any way whatsoever over XP and will be slow or crash or whatever.

This makes this type of person no more different than say a religious extremist trying to force his views onto others for example.

:laugh: If I'm not mistaken, he asked for people's opinion. I'm not trying to persuade anyone. Everyone should take my opinion at face value. I'm not holding a gun to their head.

But some of you are doing the same thing though, just opposite. You defend Vista as if there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, and there is, a ton of things wrong with it.

  • 0

If you get 2 gb ram vista will run perfectly (And maybe even faster than XP) I actually have better framerates for some of my games in vista than in XP (Mainly Source games)

FEAR- Max settings Smooth framerates (High textures, 4xaa/6xAF/Full Volumetric Lighting)

CSS,HL2,Hl2:EP1,Lost Coast, Insurgency -Max settings Smooth framerates (6xaa,16xAF,HDR Full)

COD4 - Max settings Smooth framerates (4xAA/High Settings)

Bioshock - Max DX9 settings, No problems smooth.

Quake Wars - Max settings

Vista games perfectly for me, and it is fast and responsive. Programs seem to open much faster than in XP and boot time is about the same. It's been perfectly stable and I like the new features (And really miss things like search when I'm in XP)

Edited by ViperAFK
  • 0
:laugh: If I'm not mistaken, he asked for people's opinion. I'm not trying to persuade anyone. Everyone should take my opinion at face value. I'm not holding a gun to their head.

But some of you are doing the same thing though, just opposite. You defend Vista as if there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, and there is, a ton of things wrong with it.

There is a ton load wrong with XP, in fact, probably more so than there is with vista.

  • 0
https://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/11/24/w...-over-vista-sp1

So I'm a Vista basher/troll because I don't like Vista and I don't see any reason to paying out money for something that I don't see any benefit to? I guess I can't have my own opinion, I'm sorry, let me bow down to you since your opinion is worth so much more than mine.

I applaud and congragulate you for reading all of my posts... Oh wait, you obviously didn't even bother to read my previous posts :(

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=589049149

Impeccable work on making a fool out of yourself, again. Failing to read my post then providing me with a link which I specifically referenced is an amazing sight of unwitting self-defeat. Before you try to mock me again with your sarcastic superiority rhetoric I suggest you watch your mouth and try to be a bit nicer before you so ungraciously throw yourself into orbit. Hell, I'm so nice I'll even address your post after reading it (that's what logical people do, maybe you should follow suit :)).

No, you're a Vista basher because you indiscriminately decide to pick at negative points against Vista without checking to see if they have any validity at all, you're a Vista basher because you make comments about the general consensus' capacity to use the operating system due to your own liking (disliking in this case) of it. Normally I'd not respond to a sarcastic comment with a serious response but in this occasion I'll make an exception; yes, my opinion is worth "so much more" than yours, why? My opinion is based on fact, you didn't even bother to read my posts before posting a response.

  • 0
No, but you keep your finger on the ban button :)

There is a ton load wrong with XP, in fact, probably more so than there is with vista.

I couldn't ban someone even if I wanted to without approval from someone higher than me. ;) Need not worry about that.

But as for a "ton load wrong with XP," I'd like to know what is more wrong with XP than Vista? I don't get constant crashes with XP like I do with Vista. In fact, my system has never crashed with XP, the first time I installed Vista, I got a BSOD almost instantly and it wasn't my hardware, the hardware is fine.

  • 0
https://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/11/24/w...-over-vista-sp1

So I'm a Vista basher/troll because I don't like Vista and I don't see any reason to paying out money for something that I don't see any benefit to? I guess I can't have my own opinion, I'm sorry, let me bow down to you since your opinion is worth so much more than mine.

It will be just as fast and stable on XP too ;)

I think the reason a few people are arguing with you is because you're being an IGNORANT IDIOT! If you would simply acknowledge that the newer software is/will be better able to efficiently handle powerful hardware with advanced architectures and capabilities, then other users wouldn't be calling you a BASHER!

Unfortunately, you're sticking to your close-minded little world where everything is fine and dandy in "bliss," whatever could be better? My assumption is that you have not used Vista for any extended period of time, for if you did you would be able to realize the performance gains it shows in everyday computing, which because of its nature, shows over time.

I am not arguing that you should love Vista and go spend $300-$400 right at this minute... I myself have 3 copies of Ultimate, and love every one of them, but I think if some people who constantly BASH Vista saying that it's even worse than its predecessor would instead say that for they're tiny little world of use, XP is much better and they don't want to deal with learning how a new operating system works and how to get around small issues when they occur.

I've used Vista for over 2.5 years, I love it, I game on it, I even had a system with a P4 w/HT @ 3.2Ghz and 1GB ram running it fine, much better than the system ever ran XP. My other systems with Vista on it run extremely well, and games run fine on it, I don't see any issues... but maybe I have a less-trained eye than you good sir and couldn't recognize that 2% difference in performance in FEAR.

All in all, it is up to opinion whether you like the new OS or not, but it is only the acceptance of the fact that this new software is in-and-of-itself more powerful, and capable of better performance than its aging predecessor that will allow you to have INTELLIGENT discussions with non-bashers unlike yourself, but since you're probably not going to listen to anything I just said.... Flame On!

have a good day, I just took 10 minutes out of my life to address this idiot, I have 2 final exams to take today so I better get moving

I couldn't ban someone even if I wanted to without approval from someone higher than me. ;) Need not worry about that.

But as for a "ton load wrong with XP," I'd like to know what is more wrong with XP than Vista? I don't get constant crashes with XP like I do with Vista. In fact, my system has never crashed with XP, the first time I installed Vista, I got a BSOD almost instantly and it wasn't my hardware, the hardware is fine.

BSOD during the install or post-install? BIOS updated? I've installed on many various hardware configs and have not had a problem a driver update/change would not fix.

  • 0
I couldn't ban someone even if I wanted to without approval from someone higher than me. ;) Need not worry about that.

But as for a "ton load wrong with XP," I'd like to know what is more wrong with XP than Vista? I don't get constant crashes with XP like I do with Vista. In fact, my system has never crashed with XP, the first time I installed Vista, I got a BSOD almost instantly and it wasn't my hardware, the hardware is fine.

May not be a hardware problem but sounds like a driver issue to me.. I've never got a BSOD in XP or Vista though (On my own computers; but my dads got one the other day)

  • 0
There is a ton load wrong with XP, in fact, probably more so than there is with vista.

Aha yes this is what I was trying to think of but never could lol.

It's true, XP was only truly sorted in SP2 and that took years to come out. Vista is almost perfect out the box bar a few minor OS related issues being fixed in SP1.

  • 0

On a dual Octo core system with 32GB ram.... wait Vista has 1GB on all my systems except main desktop and runs fine. Ed Blott (ZDNet blogger who does a lot of Vista benchmarking) claimed that in some scenarios systems with 1GB were actually booting faster. I have installed Vista on a system virtually identical to the OP, I suggest that you dual boot to see if you even like Vista.

  • 0
I applaud and congragulate you for reading all of my posts... Oh wait, you obviously didn't even bother to read my previous posts :(
Sorry, I got a little ahead of myself. I apologize, but the personally attacking me because I have an opinion, regardless of whether or not you believe it is flawed, is stupid and petty. I will not tolerate being personally attacked anymore. If you disagree with me, then post your opinion, but without personal attacks.
  • 0
Sorry, I got a little ahead of myself. I apologize, but the personally attacking me because I have an opinion, regardless of whether or not you believe it is flawed, is stupid and petty. I will not tolerate being personally attacked anymore. If you disagree with me, then post your opinion, but without personal attacks.

Oh I'm so sorry, it's not like you mocked me like this...

https://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/11/24/w...-over-vista-sp1

So I'm a Vista basher/troll because I don't like Vista and I don't see any reason to paying out money for something that I don't see any benefit to? I guess I can't have my own opinion, I'm sorry, let me bow down to you since your opinion is worth so much more than mine.

Oh wait...

  • 0
I didn't personally attack you though. I was sarcastic, I didn't call you a fool or an idiot now did I?

That was a personal attack if nothing else, the whole point of it was to demean me and make it seem like I'm irrationally arguing due to some sense of superiority. I even gave you a fair warning about speaking without thinking, read the second paragraph of post #35.

Anyway, I highly suggest we stop going off-topic since this will spiral down until we need a thread necromancer.

Either admit that you were wrong or logically debate your stand-point in regards to Vista's supposed incompetence.

  • 0

Hurmoth, if you wish to continue this debate then read the last post on page 3.

Now back to topic...

There are no tests to prove that Vista is any slower/faster than XP, any such tests are faceless unless they test all aspects of the OS and we've yet to see any of this manner.

Vista generally is an OS of higher demand due to the new features (aesthetic and in the background) but if your PC can handle that then you'll notice generally faster speeds in most tasks and more pleasant features. What it comes down to is your computer's power and your needs, from there it's solely your choice :)

EDIT: It seems Hurmoth posted right before I did and it also appears that he lacks the ability to be be gracious even with an apology. So I guess I'll do the mature thing and stop dealing with him before we get off on another tangent but I will leave him with this;

Apparently you can't read either, I did admit I was wrong: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=589049288

Apparently you can't differentiate posts or you're incredibly bad at wording. From my perspective it seems like you're referring to not reading the article. That means absolutely nothing because I'm asking for you to withdraw your original statement. Maybe I'm just bad at wording :p

Edited by x0r
  • 0

All I am going to add to this is this, I installed Vista Home Premium (full install, not upgrade) on my wife's system. Previously she was running XP Pro. She runs a 3GHz P4 (old Northwood core) and 1 gig of ram with an old 9600XT.

She is a very typical user. She uses Word, Outlook, surfs the web and plays a few non-system stressing games. On this system Vista runs about the same as XP (Vista may be a bit smoother but that is a very subjective determination). In essence she lost zero performance in the move. What did she gain for the 130 bucks?

  • Media Center
  • Integrated image tagging for photos she downloads from her camera
  • A better experience in handling/processing digital images
  • Improved system searching/indexing with virtual search result folders
  • Out of the box support for our networked color printer/scanner
  • Various Eye Candy (important to her...)
  • A 'sandboxed' web browser
  • Most importantly, increased system security

She is very happy with the system and her productivity is higher than it was before the upgrade. Once again, she is a typical user (that means she is a member of about 95% of the user base) not a power user like we are. For her, the upgrade had value.

  • 0
There are no tests to prove that Vista is any slower/faster than XP, any such tests are faceless unless they test all aspects of the OS and we've yet to see any of this manner.

Vista generally is an OS of higher demand due to the new features (aesthetic and in the background) but if your PC can handle that then you'll notice generally faster speeds in most tasks and more pleasant features. What it comes down to is your computer's power and your needs, from there it's solely your choice :)

http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-...ista/page4.html

No tests prove it huh?

http://www.softwaretipspalace.com/tech_and...ion_systems.php <-- Although XP on most tests is only slightly better, but it still beats Vista. Which is the opposite of what you said it would do.

"...booting both Vista and XP on the same hardware, and Vista was between 15% and 25% slower than XP in benchmarks." --http://www.pctipsbox.com/is-windows-vista-...han-windows-xp/

Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test --http://www.news.com/Windows-XP-outshines-V..._3-6220201.html

Edited by Hurmoth
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Disabling open on hover, great! That was so stupid! They need to do a fix, where if a network share is disconnected, it doesn't hang when opening "This PC" for 20 seconds.
    • Microsoft releases major feature updates for stock Windows 11 apps by Taras Buria In addition to releasing new Windows 11 preview builds, Microsoft announced that inbox Windows apps now have dedicated release notes in the official documentation. At long last, users have access to all the release notes for each app, with changes listed in chronological order. Microsoft used to announce feature updates for stock apps with each build. Now, with Windows Insider release notes hosted on the Microsoft Learn website, each app has a dedicated space for its changelog, which is very useful for those who want to track new features and improvements. Alongside that, Microsoft dropped massive feature updates for six stock apps: Clock, Media Player, Calculator, Voice Recorder, Photos, and Paint. Each app packs quite a lot of changes and new capabilities, so here are the release notes. Here are quick notes so that you can jump to the app you are interested in the most: Calculator Camera Clock Media Player Paint Photos Sound Recorder Here is what is new for the Calculator in version 11.2605.9.0: More accurate square-root results — Fixed rare cases where a calculation that should equal zero (like sqrt(2.25) - 1.5) returned a tiny leftover value instead. Readable text in High Contrast themes — Settings text now shows the correct colors in the High Contrast Aquatic and Desert themes. Fixed layout for right-to-left languages — For languages like Arabic and Hebrew, the graph, number pad, equation fields, and scroll buttons now appear correctly oriented. Reliable launch after upgrading — Fixed an issue where upgrading from much older versions could leave outdated settings that stopped the app from opening. Here is what is new for the Camera app (version 2026.2605.7.0): Zoom slider works on more cameras — The zoom slider now works on the latest cameras, respects your system zoom settings, and updates instantly when you change those settings. Full range of zoom levels — Fixed an issue where the zoom slider only showed three steps on some devices that zoom in finer increments. Front camera works on more devices — Resolved a problem that blocked the front-facing camera on certain wide-angle devices. More video resolution choices — You can now pick video resolutions that were previously hidden; the app shows a heads-up warning instead of removing them. QR links you can still use — When a scanned QR code points to something with no matching app, the link is now copied to your clipboard (with a notification) while still offering a Store search. Smarter default settings — When you haven't set a preference, the app now follows your system settings by default. The Clock app has a massive changelog with the following improvements in version 11.2605.9.0: Timers keep counting after they hit zero — When a timer runs out, it now keeps counting up (for example, -00:27:31) so you can see how far past the time you've gone. You can turn off the daily goal — Focus Sessions now include an "Off" option so you can skip setting a daily goal entirely. New 15-minute snooze option — Alarms now offer a 15-minute snooze interval. Run up to 3 countdowns at once — The Countdown Widget now supports three simultaneous countdowns, up from two. Timer Widget notifications now appear — Fixed an issue where the "timer finished" notification didn't show when the timer was started from the widget. Less clutter in Focus Sessions — Tasks you've already completed no longer show up in the Focus Session task list. More accurate focus progress — Fixed a rounding issue that could show your daily focus progress as a minute short (for example, 49 minutes instead of 50). Smoother World Clock comparisons — The World Clock compare page now loads dates as you scroll, so it feels more responsive. Up-to-date World Clock locations — Refreshed country and city names to match their current names. Correct sun and moon icons during midnight sun — Fixed an icon that wrongly showed a moon during all-day daylight in polar regions. Fixed back-button behavior in clock comparisons — Pressing back once now takes you back as expected, instead of jumping the date to 1926. Corrected the Newfoundland time zone — Newfoundland now uses the right time zone (St. John's). Disabled alarms stay looking disabled — Editing a turned-off alarm no longer makes it appear turned on. Cleaner timer cards — The expand button is now turned off on timer cards that have no time set, preventing actions that wouldn't do anything. Clearer theme setting — Updated the wording to "Choose your preferred app theme." Smoother Settings links — The "About" links in Settings no longer trigger an unexpected "switch apps" prompt. Fixed spacing in Spotify settings — Corrected uneven spacing in the Spotify settings card. Better focus visibility in High Contrast — The focus highlight in World Clock is now clearly visible in the High Contrast Aquatic and Desert themes. No more double announcements — Screen readers no longer read the timer value twice. Countdown names read correctly — Screen readers now properly announce the name of each countdown. Keyboard focus stays put — Focus no longer disappears after you press the Timer Reset button. Clearer alarm toggle for screen readers — Tidied up how the alarm on/off switch is announced. The Media Player app received plenty of changes as well (version 11.2605.14.0): Custom captions — You can now personalize how closed captions appear, with caption styling tied to your Windows caption settings, plus a quick link to open those settings directly. "Indexing" banner in the play queue — When your media library is still being scanned, a banner now explains why some items may not appear yet. Fixed the look of selected items — Corrected a layout glitch with selected items in lists. Fewer playback failures — Improved how the app recognizes supported file types, so more files play without issues. Playlists need a name — You can no longer accidentally save a playlist with a blank name. Cleaner look for empty playlists — Improved how a playlist appears when it has no items yet. More stable play queue edits — Fixed a crash that could happen when changing the play queue while the app was switching between sessions. Clearer "missing codec" message — Improved the dialog that appears when a file needs a codec you don't have, with clearer guidance on what to do. A big update is also available for Paint in version 11.2605.61.0: Adjustable eraser transparency — You can now control how transparent the eraser is. Cleaner stamp brush strokes — Fixed visible color shifts and artifacts when using stamp-style brushes. JPEG photos save in place — Opening a rotated JPEG and pressing Save now overwrites the original instead of unexpectedly prompting "Save As." No more crash on bad image files — Opening a damaged or invalid image, from within the app, by double click, or commandline, now shows a clear error message instead of closing the app. Classic selection behavior restored — The selection outline now hides while you move, resize, or rotate a selection, just like in classic Paint. Tidier AI image panel — Fixed missing spacing at the bottom of the AI image generation panel for a cleaner layout. Visible button hover in light theme — Toolbar split buttons now show a clear hover highlight in the light theme. Snappier toolbar — Streamlined how the ribbon lays out, giving a small speed boost at startup. Fewer background crashes — Fixed a crash that could happen while background tasks were finishing up. Stable app shutdown — Prevented rare crashes when closing the app. Fixed layer removal glitch — Deleting the active layer no longer leaves the layers list in an inconsistent state. Here is what is new in the Photos app (version 2026.11060.2004.0): AI watermarking — AI-generated or edited images can now carry a visible Copilot watermark. You choose Never, Always, or Ask Every Time in Settings, with a confirmation when saving. The watermarking is off by default in settings. Better viewing of small images and pixel art — Tiny images (like 16×16 pixel art) now zoom in far more to fill the screen and stay crisp instead of looking blurry. Select scanned text with the keyboard — When text is detected in an image, you can now navigate and select it using the arrow keys, Shift+Arrow, Home/End, and Ctrl+A, with a clear focus highlight. Fixed a crash in text recognition — Resolved a crash that could close Photos while detecting text in images; the app now recovers gracefully. Easier keyboard navigation — Tabbing through the navigation bar no longer stops on hidden controls, so it takes a single Tab to move past it instead of three. And finally, here is the Sound Recorder (version 11.2605.1.0): Waveform shows with Bluetooth mics — The live waveform now displays correctly when you record using a Bluetooth audio device. No more stray scrollbar — A non-working horizontal scrollbar no longer appears at the bottom of the waveform unless you've zoomed in. Mark button ready right away — The Mark button no longer looks grayed out until you hover over it after opening the app. Markers hidden for WAV files — Markers are now turned off for WAV recordings, since that format can't store them — so they're no longer lost silently. Smoother deleting — Quickly pressing Delete and Enter to remove several recordings in a row no longer triggers a "file doesn't exist" error. Fixed a memory issue — Resolved a memory leak that occurred each time a recording started. You can find all these changelogs in the official documentation here.
    • again, an article about Microsoft Edge and ridicules hater's comments
    • From this very same article: "For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option."
    • Or every other browser, because they all behave the same, at least the mainstream ones. Firefox does exactly the same: background updates, restart to install them. Haters gotta hate, I guess.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      170
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      162
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!