Recommended Posts

Don't ever enable compression on your system drive (if it is even possible, dont think it is). If you do enable compression manually compress files you dont use much. If it is personal it is better to encrypt it. Compressing a file makes loading it a little slow but with computers these days you wont notice. The compression isnt that good, not as good as WinRAR so if you want to save space RAR up the files/folders and create a solid archive. that will save you more space.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/60612-disk-compression/#findComment-614914
Share on other sites

danbalsh and jkuy9,

Your points are interesting. BTW I have that crappy computer hooked up to my real machine. Which has dual hard drives. 30gig each. I do have compressed my Windows XP on the first partition of the second drive. I haven't used that OS much, except to install programs. It seems to run OK. About as good as my main OS. I was just wondering if there were any disadvatages and advatages to enabling that option to compress the drive. XP allows this to occur.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/60612-disk-compression/#findComment-615068
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amarok 3.3 Beta 2 replaces Phonon API with GStreamer by David Uzondu Audio players come and go, but one of the long-standing pack leaders is Amarok, a KDE project that has been around since 2003. This player was an essential application for anyone who ran a KDE 3 system, mostly because its interface was simple and did not get in your way. After spending some time in hibernation following the 2.x series, development has picked up again. Now we have version 3.3 Beta 2, bringing some changes under the hood. The most important of which is a complete overhaul of the audio engine. The developers have ditched the old Phonon multimedia framework on Qt6 and reworked everything to use GStreamer instead. The developers have also partially restored CUE sheet support, which is fantastic news for anyone who keeps albums as single audio files. ReplayGain logic has been improved to apply a default fallback value for tracks without loudness data, helping to even out the volume. Some work was also done to prevent potential database issues that could happen during library scans. This release also finalizes some major changes that were introduced in the first beta, as outlined below: Dropping support for Qt5 and KDE Frameworks 5 entirely. It is Qt6 from here on out. Updating the database character set to allow full UTF-8 values, which is great for international music collections. Fixing a year 2038 bug for dates stored in the database. Removing TagLib extras support, which affects RealMedia and Audible files. Now, before you rush off to install it, there are a couple of things to know. Because the first beta updated the database schema, downgrading from this beta back to an older version is not really possible unless you manually backed up your music library first. Also, if you are a big Last.fm user, its official library has not caught up with the Qt6 world yet. You will need a specific build from a repository like this one to get those features working for now. If you are feeling adventurous and want to try the new beta, you will probably have to build it yourself. For that, you can check out the project on GitLab for the source code and guidance. Some Linux distributions might also package the beta in their testing or unstable repositories, so it is worth a look there, too. You can grab the latest stable version of Amarok on Linux via FlatHub.
    • Yeah, stable and consistent data-harvesting to secure you and your 801 partners bottom line...thanks but no thanks.
    • The ethical thing for MS to do (a foreign concept) would be to continue full support for WIndows-10; until WIndows-11 is stable and mature enough to be considered reliable. Give users the ability to get decent use out of hardware they have bought, that MS decided are no longer able to run WIndows-11.
    • Why should users give up using a relatively stable OS (after almost a decade from its initial release) and move to a Beta+ level OS? Maybe in four or five more years, when it finally becomes more stable. Oh, and we have finally gotten fair use out of the hardware we bought, only to have MS say "toss it."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Bert Fershner earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Reacting Well
      ChrisOdinUK earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Year In
      Steviant earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      545
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      205
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      150
    5. 5
      Som
      131
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!