• 0

VB.Net - Dynamically accessing controls then accessing them after


Question

Right, I have some code that dynamically creates controls that I need, and obviously you can give them a name and what have you.

The controls will be created on form load, yet how do I access the controls after I've added them?

VB.Net doesn't seem to know they are they due to me generating them at run time.

Any ideas?

[Just Read the Topic Title and realised i've typed a big steaming pile of ****. Lovely.]

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

OK, you've created the control, say a TextBox, the page has loaded, the user enters their input, the form is submitted and you want to get the value that the person entered, but it always turns up with no value in it?

  • 0
  Jelly2003 said:
OK, you've created the control, say a TextBox, the page has loaded, the user enters their input, the form is submitted and you want to get the value that the person entered, but it always turns up with no value in it?

No. Created a textbox using Code and not the IDE at runtime, but its not accessible? after you've created it you can't access it by the name you've created for it.

  • 0

If you dynamically create a control the "name" property means nothing... The Name property is for the IDE only and has no meaning at runtime

say you make a control like this

public class MyForm

Dim MyControl as new TextBox

public sub new

Me.Controls.Add(MyControl) ' add to form

with MyControl

.size = new size(21,100)

.Location = new Point(10,10)

end With

end sub

public sub UpdateControlsText

' Access the control now with the object you made in the class outside of a sub or function

MyControl.Text = "Text Here"

End Sub

end class

not that hard eh? anytime you make a control inside a sub though you need a reference to the control so you can access it outside that sub also!

  • 0

Wel, no doubt that you are adding them to the control container of the form (<form>.Controls) ? If so, you need to iterate through that to find your control, you may have to do it recusively if it is a nested control.

The best way to do this, is to apply a unique value to either the name, or the tag property of the control at runtime (i.e during the control generation):

Public Function FindControl(parent As Control, ident As String) As Control
   Dim control As Control
   For Each child As Control In parent.Controls
	  If (child.Tag.Equals(ident, StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase)) Then
		 control = child
		 Exit For
	  End If
   End For
   Return control
End Function

Start with passing the main form as the parent control.

  • 0

Assuming that you're using ASP.net and not Windows Forms then you could use the "FindControl" method (provided that it implements it).

Object.FindControl("ControlName")

or

Object.FindControl("ControlName", true)

To recursively search the controls.

I am a C# guy so you would need to do some research on the VB.net way of doing it, but it will be very much the same.

  • 0
  neufuse said:
If you dynamically create a control the "name" property means nothing... The Name property is for the IDE only and has no meaning at runtime

say you make a control like this

public class MyForm

Dim MyControl as new TextBox

public sub new

Me.Controls.Add(MyControl) ' add to form

with MyControl

.size = new size(21,100)

.Location = new Point(10,10)

end With

end sub

public sub UpdateControlsText

' Access the control now with the object you made in the class outside of a sub or function

MyControl.Text = "Text Here"

End Sub

end class

not that hard eh? anytime you make a control inside a sub though you need a reference to the control so you can access it outside that sub also!

  Jelly2003 said:
Assuming that you're using ASP.net and not Windows Forms then you could use the "FindControl" method (provided that it implements it).

Object.FindControl("ControlName")

or

Object.FindControl("ControlName", true)

To recursively search the controls.

I am a C# guy so you would need to do some research on the VB.net way of doing it, but it will be very much the same.

Its VB.NET but thanks for the PM anyway. And to the first reply, I thought of that but I have no idea how many controls i am going to have, therefore I'd need an array but not knowing how big it is, how would I allocate for that in .Net?

  • 0
  MiG- said:
Its VB.NET but thanks for the PM anyway. And to the first reply, I thought of that but I have no idea how many controls i am going to have, therefore I'd need an array but not knowing how big it is, how would I allocate for that in .Net?

why would you need an array? if you add it to a container control such as a form or panel that control / form has a controls property which you can use to reference controls that have been added to the form / container... that would be the only case you'd want to specify a "name" for a control then you could do a string.compare to compare the name of the control and the item you are looking for

  • 0
  neufuse said:
why would you need an array? if you add it to a container control such as a form or panel that control / form has a controls property which you can use to reference controls that have been added to the form / container... that would be the only case you'd want to specify a "name" for a control then you could do a string.compare to compare the name of the control and the item you are looking for

going on the code you demo'd, which is pretty much how i'm going about things...

I'm currently doing...

Adding tab pages to a Tab Control based on the number specified. Then for each tab I need to have the same grid drawn on them, which would be a series of textboxes.

Seen as I need a variable name for each control that is added, preferably an array seen as its a grid ;) how would I determine how many variables I need?

Probably going about this all wrong but whatever! :D

  • 0
  neufuse said:
If you dynamically create a control the "name" property means nothing... The Name property is for the IDE only and has no meaning at runtime

I'm not sure that I agree with you here.

The "Name" property is plenty valid at runtime, and I think that it's good programming practice to set it when you create a control

eg

Dim newctl As New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

newctl.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(102, 9)

newctl.Name = "txtMyNewControl"

newctl.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(95, 20)

newctl.TabIndex = 9

Me.Controls.Add(newctl)

  neufuse said:
say you make a control like this

public class MyForm

Dim MyControl as new TextBox

public sub new

Me.Controls.Add(MyControl) ' add to form

with MyControl

.size = new size(21,100)

.Location = new Point(10,10)

end With

end sub

public sub UpdateControlsText

' Access the control now with the object you made in the class outside of a sub or function

MyControl.Text = "Text Here"

End Sub

end class

not that hard eh? anytime you make a control inside a sub though you need a reference to the control so you can access it outside that sub also!

True - but if you've named the control you can find it ;-)

The following function will "find" a control by name on a form, even if it's hiding inside a tab control...

Private Function FindControl(ByVal parent As Control, ByVal ident As String) As Control

Dim n As Integer

Dim tmpctrl As Control

Dim tmpctrl2 As Control

For n = 0 To parent.Controls.Count - 1

tmpctrl = parent.Controls(n)

If tmpctrl.Name = ident Then

Return parent.Controls(n)

ElseIf tmpctrl.Controls.Count > 0 Then

tmpctrl2 = FindControl(tmpctrl, ident)

If Not IsNothing(tmpctrl2) Then

Return tmpctrl2

End If

End If

Next

' Not found

Return Nothing

end function

You call it by sending "me" (ie the form) and the name of the control you want to manipulate.

  • 0
  MiG- said:
going on the code you demo'd, which is pretty much how i'm going about things...

I'm currently doing...

Adding tab pages to a Tab Control based on the number specified. Then for each tab I need to have the same grid drawn on them, which would be a series of textboxes.

Seen as I need a variable name for each control that is added, preferably an array seen as its a grid ;) how would I determine how many variables I need?

Probably going about this all wrong but whatever! :D

Well first of all, it sounds like what you really want is a custom UserControl that includes the appropriate TextBox grid. Then when you need to add a page, you add one of those to it, instead of manually adding all the text boxes each time. You can even build your custom control in the Forms Designer. And you can put simple methods / properties on it to handle any work it needs to do for you, or expose any data you need in the parent form.

If the parent form (code outside the UserControl) needs to access the text boxes, or they need to access each other, there are several ways to accomplish that. For example, you can maintain an array / list with references to all the custom controls you added. Or you can simply get to the custom control through the Tab control.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I suspect this was primarily developed with the Switch 2 in mind, which would explain the poor visuals. It seems like they're hoping the nostalgic GoldenEye 64 crowd is still loyal to Nintendo consoles. Unfortunately, this might be yet another title limited by development for underpowered Nintendo hardware.
    • Amazon's Lab126 ventures into "Physical AI" with new robotics team by Paul Hill Amazon has announced that it’s forming a new agentic AI team within its secretive hard research and development division, Lab126, to begin work on physical AI. Specifically, the company is looking to develop an agentic AI framework for use in robotics, which could start to impact blue-collar jobs, especially at its warehouses. Agentic AI is one of the latest developments in AI, superseding the previous generative AI that took off with the launch of ChatGPT. Agentic AI models are special because they can complete multi-step actions for the user to complete complex tasks. Thanks to all the visual and audio capabilities added to generative AI in previous years, these agentic models can perceive their environment, reason, plan, and act to achieve goals with minimal human intervention. If Amazon can successfully bring agentic AI to robots, they will finally be able to interact with the real world in a way they can’t today, as software running on a computer. Many people are concerned about AI’s impact on white-collar jobs right now, but when Amazon develops physical AI, it will also affect blue-collar manual work. The work is going to be carried out by Amazon’s R&D company, Lab126. It was set up over 20 years ago and has created many iconic Amazon devices, including the Kindle, Fire tablets, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Echo devices, and more. Who it affects, and how The biggest impact of physical AI developed by Lab126 will be on Amazon’s warehouses and logistics. The company said it wants to create robots that can perform tasks based on natural language instructions. As usual for a big tech company, Amazon claims that these robots will be assistants, but it’s difficult to see how they won’t reduce the need for people. Solely based on Amazon’s plans to automate work in its factories, customers will see an indirect impact from the move through faster deliveries and potentially lower costs. The decision by Amazon to focus on agentic AI in robots is pretty interesting because so far, we’ve mainly been hearing about agentic AI limited to computer applications, such as intelligent web browsers like Opera Neon. Why it's happening Amazon has a reputation for being an efficient company, particularly when it comes to the employment of warehouse workers who are known to have strict restroom breaks. Creating robots that can help speed up warehouse activities will further boost efficiency at the company and could potentially reduce its costs and improve safety. The beginning of work on physical AI is just the next evolution of AI that we could start to hear about in the coming months and years. As agentic AI gets better, companies will be looking to see what they can advance next and physical AI may be where they choose to go next; it certainly seems like this is what Amazon has settled on in this move. If Amazon’s physical AI doesn’t lead to mass layoffs of warehouse employees, it could drastically boost worker safety. Employees could potentially be less fatigued from moving around so much, which could lead to better concentration and fewer accidents. Right now, Amazon claims that these robots will only be assistants and not replacements. While Amazon will certainly be a leader in physical AI, given its massive wealth to throw at the problem, once the technology is available, it will likely be available for sale to other businesses to use, too. Caveats and what to watch for While it’s a notable development, it still sounds like Amazon is in the early stages of developing these physical AI systems, given that it has only just set up the team. We also don’t know what specific products Amazon is planning to build or the timelines for deployment. Ever since generative AI came onto the scene, there has been discussion of AI safety. With AI moving into the physical world, it will also bring up discussion about the safety concerns. Current measures are mainly concerned with AI software running on computers, not when it interacts physically with the world. Finally, and probably the biggest concern, what will these “assistants” do to people’s jobs? Companies will likely find themselves bringing in fewer new hires initially, but it could also displace people from their jobs. Source: CNBC
    • Nintendo Switch 2 launches, where to buy and a list of games that it may not support by Sayan Sen Nintendo announced the Switch 2 back in early April this year and then followed that up with more details related to performance and hardware features later. The company touted 10x the performance of the Switch. However, on the flip side, the battery suffers, and you also need new microSD Express cards for storage. For those who need a refresher, here are the technical specification details of the Switch 2: Specification Details Dimensions Approx. 166mm x 272mm x 13.9mm (with Joy-Con 2 attached); Maximum thickness from control stick tip to ZL/ZR buttons: 30.7mm Weight Approx. 401g (console only); Approx. 534g (with Joy-Con 2 controllers attached) Screen 7.9-inch capacitive touch LCD; 1920x1080 resolution; HDR10 support; VRR up to 120 Hz CPU/GPU Custom processor made by NVIDIA Storage 256 GB UFS (a portion reserved for system use) Communication Wireless LAN (Wi‑Fi 6), Bluetooth; Wired LAN available in TV mode via dock Video Output Up to 3840x2160 at 60 fps via HDMI in TV mode; Supports 120 fps at lower resolutions; HDR10 enabled Audio Output Linear PCM 5.1 channel via HDMI; Stereo speakers Microphone Built-in monaural microphone with noise cancellation, echo cancellation and auto gain control Buttons POWER and Volume buttons USB Ports 2 USB Type-C ports (bottom port for charging/dock connection; top port for accessories/charging) Audio Jack 3.5mm stereo mini plug (CTIA standard) Game Card Slot Supports both Nintendo Switch 2 and Nintendo Switch game cards Expansion Slot microSD Express card slot (compatible with cards up to 2 TB; other microSD cards can copy screenshots and videos) Sensors Accelerometer, gyroscope, brightness sensor Battery Lithium-ion, 5220 mAh; Approx. 2–6.5 hours lifetime; 3-hour charge time in sleep mode Dock Approx. 115mm x 201mm x 51.2mm; Weight: approx. 383g For those looking to get one, major retailers like Walmart, GameStop, Best Buy, and Target have all confirmed that they will have limited console stock from time to time so you will need to be on alert and check back. Nintendo has also published a full list of games that may not work on the Switch 2: Borderlands 3 Chrono Cross: The Radical Dreamers Edition Crash Bandicoot N-Sane Trilogy Guilty Gear XX Accent Core Plus R KarmaZoo Marvel vs. Capcom Fighting Collection: Arcade Classics Mortal Kombat 1 Overwatch 2 Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords Star Wars Republic Commando Super Mega Baseball 4 Tombi! Special Edition Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1+2 Touhou Genso Wanderer Reloaded Ty the Tasmanian Tiger HD Warriors: Abyss However, keep in mind that Nintendo last updated the support list last month on May 27th and the company may still be testing these. So keep an eye on the official list of games on this webpage here on Nintendo's site. Have you managed to pick up the Nintendo Switch 2? Let us know in the comments.
    • Court orders Apple to keep web links in the App Store, eroding its iOS payment monopoly by Fiza Ali Apple has been ordered to continue permitting web links and external payment options in the App Store after its bid to halt court’s ruling was declined today by a higher court. Earlier this year, in April, a federal judge decreed that Apple must allow developers to include web links in their iOS apps, remove restrictions on link formatting, and enable external payment methods without taking a commission on transactions. Apple immediately appealed and sought an injunction to delay implementation of the order while the case progressed. However, the United States Court of Appeals has now refused Apple’s emergency request to stay the district court’s order. In its decision, the panel held that Apple had not demonstrated a sufficient likelihood of success on appeal, nor that it would suffer irreparable harm if the order were enforced. The court also considered potential prejudice to other parties and the public interest, concluding that an immediate suspension was not warranted. This ruling makes it much harder for Apple to overturn the April decision, which came from a lawsuit initiated by Epic Games. Epic first sued Apple’s App Store policies in 2020, claiming that the company’s restrictions harmed competition. While Epic did not prevail on every count, the court did rule that Apple must allow developers to inform users of alternative purchasing options at better prices. Despite that narrow victory, Apple repeatedly failed to conform to the terms from the original 2021 ruling, prompting the judge in April to issue a more detailed order outlining precisely how the App Store must be “opened up”. In response to the April ruling, prominent third-party apps have swiftly implemented web-based purchasing links. Both Spotify and Amazon’s Kindle app now include buttons directing users to purchase subscriptions via their websites, bypassing Apple’s in-app payments. Additionally, Fortnite has made a comeback on iOS after around five years, presenting users with the choice between Apple’s in-app payment system and Epic’s own payment and rewards mechanism. According to Epic CEO Tim Sweeney, there is presently a 60:40 split in usage favouring Apple’s system over Epic’s, though the gap appears to be narrowing. An Apple spokesperson, Olivia Dalton, issued a statement expressing the company’s disappointment: For now, Apple must comply with the existing injunction. Unless the Appeals Court later overturns the ruling, developers can continue to include web payment links, and Apple’s longstanding monopoly over iOS payment processing may continue to erode. The ultimate resolution will depend on the outcome of the ongoing appeals, which could set a significant precedent for how app marketplaces operate in the future. Source: The Verge
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      GTRoberts went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Apprentice
      DarkShrunken went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Dedicated
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      397
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      177
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      170
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      167
    5. 5
      Xenon
      134
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!