Vista & Dualcore (msconfig)


Recommended Posts

Just seing the Dualcore tweeking guide for XP in the guides section got me thinking, so i jumped into msconfig and pressed advanced, and i noticed something interesting, even though im running a dualcore (see sig for specs) ive got the following showing.

Is this normal to show thw number of processors blanked out, surly it should be ticked and saying 2 processors shouldnt it?

post-97030-1199286056.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/610746-vista-dualcore-msconfig/
Share on other sites

I think when the option is not selected, it will be blanked on the lowest option possible. If you look to the right on your screenshot, you'll notice the same with the memory option.

edit: Just read your question fully. Don't know if you have to select the option and what exactly it will do.

although you will notice if you click the check box by memory, it pops up to 2048 (the ammount of memory i have installed), and stays that way when you un-check it, though if you do the same with procesors it stays at 1... hmmm

i want to change the option, but i know thats a bad idea

I'm sure those options are if you want to set the environment variables yourself. I would leave the options alone as windows will select the best options for you automatically.

It says 1 for number of processors because that's how many it's coded to say initially before it is activated and does not reflect your actual configuration.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • low latency mode is still bugged and causing bootup times slow to a crawl. To fix, you have to disable the feature with vivetool. Seems as though it's not rolled out to a lot of people yet since I've only been able to find only a handful of people that are having issues.
    • I would recommend the Nothing 2a. The battery life is awesome, 2 or 3 days without going into battery power mode. The only thing that I've been looking into recently is that it doesn't "support" Graphene OS. I'm pretty sure there is a way, I just need to do some more looking.
    • You'd have to show me an example of a listing that says Gen 1, usually i'd expect that to mean Snapdragon Gen 1 (a type of chipset, which the Pixels don't use). Pixel 7 - White - 128gb - Unlocked - 85%+ battery - Grade B+ - $159 with free delivery - https://www.ebay.com/itm/398046617206 Pixel 7 - Obsidian - 128gb - Unlocked - 80%+ battery - Very Good - $157 with free delivery - https://www.ebay.com/itm/355617734563 Both look to be sold by companies with good feedback, dealing with refurbished phones and state the phones are unlocked with a clean IMEI. Obviously I can't vouch for either company though, but the listings look good in my opinion.
    • Because Chrome is doing it. And no one said anyone had to update immediately. That's silly. They could update every day for all I care as long as it's fast, and the next time the browser restarts, you're good. And the basic point is not to tee it up for bigger updates. As it is right now, all the windows I had open reopen anyway except inprivate.
    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!