Crysis V1.1 Patch out now (PC)


Recommended Posts

Upon first installing the patch, the patch installed, however, the game would not start up stating something along the lines of "main application failed to launch." I uninstalled the entire game and reinstalled it followed by the 1.1 patch. The game now shows a black screen but fails to respond soon after. This occurs on DX10 and DX9.

Problem signature:

Problem Event Name: APPCRASH

Application Name: crysis64.exe

Application Version: 1.1.1.5879

Application Timestamp: 47629fc0

Fault Module Name: StackHash_749f

Fault Module Version: 6.0.6000.16386

Fault Module Timestamp: 4549d372

Exception Code: c0000374

Exception Offset: 00000000000c87b7

OS Version: 6.0.6000.2.0.0.256.1

Locale ID: 1033

Additional Information 1: 749f

Additional Information 2: c96d88f1f26b9b3e2d3565bdb09da443

Additional Information 3: ddb5

Additional Information 4: dec0f0da0e53e1dd252d10ca40b8697e

I have downloaded the patch from two different sites. I receive the same problems from each patch.

Edited by shattered
Installed the patch without problems. The game seems a little smoother but it could just be the placebo effect, ie. 'it's patched so it must be better'. :$

It is smoother. It's been benchmarked on a few gaming/graphics forums around with that outcome (and a ton of comments saying as much).

To "fix" my above problem, you can only run the game by going into the application folder and running the 32bit exe. Using Vista Games Explorer fails to launch the game properly (I am guessing it is trying to load the 64bit exe). Running the 64bit exe does not work either.

Settings: Everything on 'High', Postprocessing on Very High ( With DX10 tweak ), 1650x1050.

Windows XP 1.0 - Avg. FPS ( GPU Test ): 32.04

Windows XP 1.1 - Avg. FPS ( GPU Test ): 38.49

Windows Vista ( Ultimate 64 Bit ) 1.0 Avg. FPS: 27.17

Windows Vista ( Ultimate 64 Bit ) 1.1 Avg. FPS: 29.01

The performance results for me.

The one that allows DirectX 10 effects under Windows XP - Tweak might not have been the correct wording.

( http://www.crysis-online.com/?id=449

http://www.ngohq.com/news/12492-crysis-dem...tings-hack.html )

Some*

Not the same as*

Not quite*

;)

I think is better to have Stability than performance, i mean, if i have a superb performance but stability sucks why should i need more performance?

(Crashes, Freezes, Slow downs, etc. All of them when stability sucks)

This patch brings more stability, at least for me, and that is what i need.

The hell you on about

True DX10-only coding can not be simply be ran on DX9 hardware, simple as. It can be ported but it will either be the same visually but slower or worse quality at a decent speed.

If you are having trouble running 64 bit like I was, check the following.

If you are using a 680i or 650 mobo along with the Nvidia 15.08 drivers, you might have installed Network Access Manager. 64 bit Crysis has issues with this software. Uninstall it via the control panel and all should be well.

It's a new OS with more features. On the same hardware, of course Vista will perform a little slower than XP. It's the same with most software, especially operating systems.

i'm not bothered about the performance difference, I like vista. Xp can go rot in a bin.

about the patch though, no fps difference for me. The only option I had was to upgrade my gfx card, now at least its a tad more playable, but in places the fps drops to 11, but tends to be around 29-34 in most areas, i'm only on level 2 though. I get quite a bit of lag in the middle of the village level.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!