[Review] Shure SE530


Recommended Posts

I was meaning to do a review a week or two ago. Since Netrack did a good review, it encouraged me to do one too. Since i have all my camera equipment packed away, i can't take photos i'm afraid, so i'll just use some from websites. It's all the same!

Brand: Shure

Model: SE530

RRP: $499

site_img_pa_se530_l.jpg

The Upgrade

I have been using my Senhesiers CX300's for a while now, very popular due to its price and what it has to offer in terms of comfort and quality. To simply put it, i'm an audiophile. A complete geek when it comes to audio. Yes i have an iPod, don't hate, i have many valid reasons! Anyway, i have a pair of AKG K271's i use at home. I wanted something which could deliver such quality but in an 'in-ear' form, so i can travel around with them. After endless of positive, raving, Shure fan boy, forum reviews, it led me into the Shure SE range. I was initially put off by the price tag of the SE530's but i knew i would have to pay a little bit more to get what i was wanting. It was one of those things when you think, if you're spending $400, you might as well get the $500 pair, since you're spending a ridiculous amount on headphones.

About

Key Features:

The SE530 and SE530PTH mark the bridge from the classic E Series line, to the new line of Sound Isolating Earphones from Shure (SE Models). Evolved from personal monitor technology road-tested by pro musicians and fine-tuned by Shure engineers, the SE530PTH and SE530 earphones deliver unparalleled acoustic accuracy. Triple TruAcoustic MicroSpeakers, one tweeter and dual woofers, deliver an expansive sound stage with full-bodied bass—for an auditory experience rivaled only by live performances.

Sound Isolating Design

Included sound isolating sleeves block over 90 percent of ambient noise. Combined with a low-profile ergonomic design and modular cable options, interruptions from the outside world are minimized—so you can focus on your passion. On occasions when you must tear yourself away from the music, the Push-To-Hear Control included with the SE530PTH activates a VoicePort microphone, allowing conversation without removing your earphones. Shure Sound Isolating Earphones require a proper fit to achieve the best sound.

Triple TruAcoustic MicroSpeakers

Optimized for listening to high-quality recordings and lossless formats, the SE530PTH utilizes three balanced armature drivers—one dedicated tweeter and dual woofers. Additionally, integrated passive crossovers ensure that high and low frequencies remain distinct and defined. The result is an incredibly wide and detailed soundstage, distinguished by precision highs and robust bass. This innovative triple driver configuration is first in class for universal fit, sound isolating earphones.

Packaging

Possibly the most unneeded yet amazing packaging for headphones. It comes in a steel type box. Not your standard plastic casing. It has a brushed metal look. Great.

Inside

Premium Fit Kit Includes:

Sound Isolating Sleeves

The role of the included sound isolating sleeves is twofold: blocking ambient noise and ensuring customized fit and comfort. Because every ear is different, the Premium Fit Kit includes three sizes (S, M, L) of the Flex and Black Foam Sleeves as well as a pair of universal-fit Triple Flange Sleeves. Experiment with the size and style that creates the best fit for you—a good seal is key to optimizing sound isolation and bass response as well as maximizing comfort during extended wear.

Wow, Shure provide you with every type of sleeve possible and in all sizes. This is such a key part to headphones. If they don't fit, you won't be hearing its full potential. I opted for the foam sleeve. This moulds inside your ear, creating a tight fit, great noise isolation and it makes sure you hear all the frequencies (18Hz – 19kHz) the headphones have to offer

Modular Cable

Based on extensive user feedback, Shure engineers have developed a detachable cable solution to enable unmatched personal customization. An included 3-foot cable (91 cm) and 9” cable (23 cm) allows you to tailor your experience depending on activity and application.

Thanks! I'm sure many of you get annoyed by the cable length of your headphones.

In addition to the sound isolating sleeves and modular cables, the premium accessories kit includes:

- ?” Adapter >

Offers a solution for home stereos or other applications with ?" jacks

- Carrying Caseb>

Provides a convenient, tangle-free solution to store your earphones

- Level Attenuatorb>

Allows for comfortable listening from any high-output audio source, including airplane armrests

- Airline Adapterb>

Optimizes compatibility with European airplane armrests

Build Qualityb>

Something i've noticed in many headphones is the build quality. Especially the wires. My Senheisers felt very fragile and the wire ended up breaking at both ends of the left and right speaker. The SE530's have shown no sign of wear as of yet. I have read of the wires breaking but apparently the Shure support is fantastic and send out a brand new set, even out of warranty is some cases (2 year standard warranty).Comfort/Fitb>

To put it simply, if they aren't comfortable, you've wasted your money. To get the full potential at of any headphones, they need to fit and be comfortable. As i mentioned before, Shure (many other high end brands) provide different sleeves for all sizes. Take your time and find the best fit. Simple as that. I tried all of the sleeves and found the small foam ones to be the best for my ears. From looking at reviews, it seems like the foam ones are most people's favourite type. Once again, this means nothing until you try them all. Soundb>

It will beat you. They pack a serious punch. It'll hurt if you're not careful (they can get very very very very loud). I find myself turning my iPod Classic down to halfway, which is more than acceptable. Something a lot of headphones fail on is the bass. Many can't produce the intended low ends from songs. A great example is Massive Attack - Angel. After the break in period, which can be around 10-14 hours, you can really test these babies out to its full potential. I put on Massive Attack and felt the bass go through me (obviously listening to it way too loud) but the clarity, presence it delivered was unbelievable. Just like the low ends, many cheaper headphones are far too tinny in the high mids/highs and can become ear piercing. The Shure supports a wide frequency band, with the tweeter powering the top ends and the dual woofers filling in the gaps and beating away at the low ends, it's a special experience. It's like a concert in your ears. You feel the energy of the song.

I use Apple Lossless as a regular format, combined with these headphones, it's like a wet dream, really.

I use an iPod Classic, simply because of the easy and simple integration with my Mac. I can transfer Apple Lossless files in seconds and the quality of iPods have improved ten fold in terms of sound. The classic complements these headphones very well.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/613389-review-shure-se530/
Share on other sites

500 for headphones is... man... much.

i know how much you can spend, really, and as an audiophile myself i can somehow understand it but you could also get earbuds for like half the money and less that are maybe only a little less perfect...

shure kicks ass, though, i use shure mics for shouting and drums.

I have a set of high end Shure's myself. For an in ear solution, they sound pretty amazing. In comparison to a quality on ear/over the ear, they sound like garbage. I still don't know why people cry about the price of things. If you can't afford it, too bad for you. I never found mine to be terribly comfortable for long term listening, or anything over half to an hour at most.

I really like my SE530's (although they are a tad warm sounding, on the bassy side, and not really travel friendly)

My favorite pair of IEM's are the q-JAYS .. so tiny and comfortable .. excellent natural sound across all ranges (better than the 530's in some areas), very eq friendly, and excellent price for the quality.

Glad you are also enjoying the Shure se530's :)

q-jays + ipod nano ...

1.jpg

Edited by WolfDV
WolfDV, have you tried UE's Super.Fi 5 Pros? If so, how do those & your q-Jays compare?

yes, my brother has a pair .. they sound quite nice, powerful, eq'd with a bias towards a slight warmer sound compared to the q-jays.. the q-jays are nice and tight bass, while i found the super.fi 5 pros have a better bottom end, but roll off more at the high end. Also ... they are huge and fatiguingly uncomfortable compared to the tiny q-jays (which you can hardly feel, could wear all day, and sleep on side without any issues, probably regarded as the more pleasurable IEM's to wear, mostly due the the microscopic size, shape, and light weight). plus the sound fantastically balanced, quite a nice peice of engineering :)

check out the forums at www.head-fi.org for users with much more in-depth reviews and comparisons.

I certainly hope you're only listening to HD audio with those. I would think MP3 files would sound even worse with those things! Or maybe you're a .flac guy...

I didn't read the whole review because if I'm going to spend over $100 on headphones they'll be over the ear style anyway. I had no idea they made earbuds this pricey.

yes, my brother has a pair .. they sound quite nice, powerful, eq'd with a bias towards a slight warmer sound compared to the q-jays.. the q-jays are nice and tight bass, while i found the super.fi 5 pros have a better bottom end, but roll off more at the high end. Also ... they are huge and fatiguingly uncomfortable compared to the tiny q-jays (which you can hardly feel, could wear all day, and sleep on side without any issues, probably regarded as the more pleasurable IEM's to wear, mostly due the the microscopic size, shape, and light weight). plus the sound fantastically balanced, quite a nice peice of engineering :)

check out the forums at www.head-fi.org for users with much more in-depth reviews and comparisons.

If you were to choose, you'll chose the q-Jays right? I'm having a hard time deciding between the two. My gut feeling tells me to go with UE, but they do seem uncomfortable for a long period of time. I've notice the price on the SF5Pro are dropping, so maybe UE is going to release something new to replace them.

I had no idea they made earbuds this pricey.

I think some goes up to the thousands. But they're custom molded IEMs.

I'm always suprised by how many people who seem to think a couple of hundred pounds (or $400-500) is outrageous, or a waste of money.

I listen to my Shure SE310s for not much less than 4 hours a day. Sometimes longer if I'm travelling with work. I watch probably not more than an hour's TV each night. But spending ?1,000 on a TV raises no eyebrows at all from those who think that 20% of that is too much to spend on headphones.

To me the best thing about my Shure's (and I had the e3c's before these) is the sound isolation. I don't have to listen to the pathetic natter of the drunkard on the train even if I'm only listening to Radio 4 (speech radio) and therefore have the volume low.

If you were to choose, you'll chose the q-Jays right? I'm having a hard time deciding between the two. My gut feeling tells me to go with UE, but they do seem uncomfortable for a long period of time. I've notice the price on the SF5Pro are dropping, so maybe UE is going to release something new to replace them.

my first purchase was the se530's .. which i love, except for the fact they weren't exactly sleep friendly or comfortable for extended periods of time (especially when travelling/moving around)

I bought the q-jays because of the excellent reviews for both sq, and comfort .. which they were spot on about. The bass is less in the bottom end, but completely acceptable for the size difference.

Home / air-travel -> SE530's .. everywhere else -> q-Jays

now you are comparing the q-jays to the sf5pro's ... it depends on your needs like i stated earlier

If i wanted perfect sq .. the se530 are them, the q-jays are near that level of sq, and very comfortable. to me the few times i tried the sf5pros (despite have nice sq, are also quite bulky and not worth the loss in comfort).

overall if I could only have one set, I'd go with the q-Jays, they really are extraordinarily well designed.

but don't base solely on my decision, check out reviews on each, and ask questions at head-fi. You are making a nice purchase, get one that fits you.

I've got these and have to say they are amazing, I was a bit disappointed with my Shure e4c as the bass was weak, but these have amazingly clear sound with powerful bass, everybody I know thinks I was crazy spending ?214 on them, but if you can afford them the sound is incredible.

Yeah the high-end models by Shure and Etymotic are pretty expensive, in the $500 range but their entry models are much more affordable, in the $100's (Etymotic ER-6i for example) and they're way better than most crap out there and even better than some of those huge earmuff headphones that make you look like a Daft Punk DJ.

Yeah the high-end models by Shure and Etymotic are pretty expensive, in the $500 range but their entry models are much more affordable, in the $100's (Etymotic ER-6i for example) and they're way better than most crap out there and even better than some of those huge earmuff headphones that make you look like a Daft Punk DJ.

Nice comparison! :D

I do believe you that these headphones sound better than 10$ crap from wal-mart but I certainly do not think that you would hear the difference between a 100$ and a 500$ earplug.

Am I wrong?

I do believe you that these headphones sound better than 10$ crap from wal-mart but I certainly do not think that you would hear the difference between a 100$ and a 500$ earplug.

Am I wrong?

The difference ain't big that's for sure, and you would have to have good quality music to notice it like high vbr bitrate or a lossless codec like FLAC

I personally wouldn't spend beyond the $100 range for earbuds, but I would go that high because in-ear earbuds in those range allow you to use a low volume and isolate your music from outside sound. Some people might think in-ear earbuds aren't safer but they are. What's more dangerous for your hearing? Having cheap buds with the volume at near max because you're trying to listen to your music rather than to the noise of the subway or to have high end buds with low volume and nothing else?

Right now I have a pair of Sony EX71's but it's time for me to change those.... As good as those Shure sound, $500 surely aint my budget for many things out there today, so yeah..... I'd have to aim the $100ish priced buds.

I'm always suprised by how many people who seem to think a couple of hundred pounds (or $400-500) is outrageous, or a waste of money.

I listen to my Shure SE310s for not much less than 4 hours a day. Sometimes longer if I'm travelling with work. I watch probably not more than an hour's TV each night. But spending ?1,000 on a TV raises no eyebrows at all from those who think that 20% of that is too much to spend on headphones.

To me the best thing about my Shure's (and I had the e3c's before these) is the sound isolation. I don't have to listen to the pathetic natter of the drunkard on the train even if I'm only listening to Radio 4 (speech radio) and therefore have the volume low.

I feel the same. You spend your money on what you want, what you think you'll need. I know for me, I'm a bit of an audiophile myself, and thus I don't see spending $500 on earbuds to be a huge investment the way others would. It's only money, after all. No pointing making it all if you don't spend it once in a while.

BTW... Do the earbuds bundle the new iPhone compatibility jack, or do we still have to buy it separately?

  • 2 weeks later...

Unfortunately, I'll never get along with that type of headphone. At any size, the bit which sits in your ear, just makes it feel like a plunger is sucking on my ear. Meh!

My ideal type of headphone would have to be the BOSE Quiet Comfort 3's. They are comfortable, sound spot on and are basically an all-round excellent pair of [albeit expensive] headphones. But hey, you get what you pay for.

I feel the same. You spend your money on what you want, what you think you'll need. I know for me, I'm a bit of an audiophile myself, and thus I don't see spending $500 on earbuds to be a huge investment the way others would. It's only money, after all. No pointing making it all if you don't spend it once in a while.

BTW... Do the earbuds bundle the new iPhone compatibility jack, or do we still have to buy it separately?

Well, I just picked up a pair of these earbuds myself, so I guess I can answer my own question now...

No, the SE530 do not come bundled with the phone adapter module, even though they should. However, Amazon was selling their own bundle for just over $400, which means you get both for about $100 cheaper than Shure sells just the earbuds.

What happens when the cable snaps near the ear from over-bending? Or it's yanked out by accident?

Do you have to cover it with personal insurance?

The earbuds come with a standard 2 year warranty, and even then, I know from personal experience Shure is pretty liberal about replacing defective earbuds even after two years, so long as you have some sort of proof of purchase. So save your receipts and/or e-mail.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!