[Review] Shure SE530


Recommended Posts

I was meaning to do a review a week or two ago. Since Netrack did a good review, it encouraged me to do one too. Since i have all my camera equipment packed away, i can't take photos i'm afraid, so i'll just use some from websites. It's all the same!

Brand: Shure

Model: SE530

RRP: $499

site_img_pa_se530_l.jpg

The Upgrade

I have been using my Senhesiers CX300's for a while now, very popular due to its price and what it has to offer in terms of comfort and quality. To simply put it, i'm an audiophile. A complete geek when it comes to audio. Yes i have an iPod, don't hate, i have many valid reasons! Anyway, i have a pair of AKG K271's i use at home. I wanted something which could deliver such quality but in an 'in-ear' form, so i can travel around with them. After endless of positive, raving, Shure fan boy, forum reviews, it led me into the Shure SE range. I was initially put off by the price tag of the SE530's but i knew i would have to pay a little bit more to get what i was wanting. It was one of those things when you think, if you're spending $400, you might as well get the $500 pair, since you're spending a ridiculous amount on headphones.

About

Key Features:

The SE530 and SE530PTH mark the bridge from the classic E Series line, to the new line of Sound Isolating Earphones from Shure (SE Models). Evolved from personal monitor technology road-tested by pro musicians and fine-tuned by Shure engineers, the SE530PTH and SE530 earphones deliver unparalleled acoustic accuracy. Triple TruAcoustic MicroSpeakers, one tweeter and dual woofers, deliver an expansive sound stage with full-bodied bass—for an auditory experience rivaled only by live performances.

Sound Isolating Design

Included sound isolating sleeves block over 90 percent of ambient noise. Combined with a low-profile ergonomic design and modular cable options, interruptions from the outside world are minimized—so you can focus on your passion. On occasions when you must tear yourself away from the music, the Push-To-Hear Control included with the SE530PTH activates a VoicePort microphone, allowing conversation without removing your earphones. Shure Sound Isolating Earphones require a proper fit to achieve the best sound.

Triple TruAcoustic MicroSpeakers

Optimized for listening to high-quality recordings and lossless formats, the SE530PTH utilizes three balanced armature drivers—one dedicated tweeter and dual woofers. Additionally, integrated passive crossovers ensure that high and low frequencies remain distinct and defined. The result is an incredibly wide and detailed soundstage, distinguished by precision highs and robust bass. This innovative triple driver configuration is first in class for universal fit, sound isolating earphones.

Packaging

Possibly the most unneeded yet amazing packaging for headphones. It comes in a steel type box. Not your standard plastic casing. It has a brushed metal look. Great.

Inside

Premium Fit Kit Includes:

Sound Isolating Sleeves

The role of the included sound isolating sleeves is twofold: blocking ambient noise and ensuring customized fit and comfort. Because every ear is different, the Premium Fit Kit includes three sizes (S, M, L) of the Flex and Black Foam Sleeves as well as a pair of universal-fit Triple Flange Sleeves. Experiment with the size and style that creates the best fit for you—a good seal is key to optimizing sound isolation and bass response as well as maximizing comfort during extended wear.

Wow, Shure provide you with every type of sleeve possible and in all sizes. This is such a key part to headphones. If they don't fit, you won't be hearing its full potential. I opted for the foam sleeve. This moulds inside your ear, creating a tight fit, great noise isolation and it makes sure you hear all the frequencies (18Hz – 19kHz) the headphones have to offer

Modular Cable

Based on extensive user feedback, Shure engineers have developed a detachable cable solution to enable unmatched personal customization. An included 3-foot cable (91 cm) and 9” cable (23 cm) allows you to tailor your experience depending on activity and application.

Thanks! I'm sure many of you get annoyed by the cable length of your headphones.

In addition to the sound isolating sleeves and modular cables, the premium accessories kit includes:

- ?” Adapter >

Offers a solution for home stereos or other applications with ?" jacks

- Carrying Caseb>

Provides a convenient, tangle-free solution to store your earphones

- Level Attenuatorb>

Allows for comfortable listening from any high-output audio source, including airplane armrests

- Airline Adapterb>

Optimizes compatibility with European airplane armrests

Build Qualityb>

Something i've noticed in many headphones is the build quality. Especially the wires. My Senheisers felt very fragile and the wire ended up breaking at both ends of the left and right speaker. The SE530's have shown no sign of wear as of yet. I have read of the wires breaking but apparently the Shure support is fantastic and send out a brand new set, even out of warranty is some cases (2 year standard warranty).Comfort/Fitb>

To put it simply, if they aren't comfortable, you've wasted your money. To get the full potential at of any headphones, they need to fit and be comfortable. As i mentioned before, Shure (many other high end brands) provide different sleeves for all sizes. Take your time and find the best fit. Simple as that. I tried all of the sleeves and found the small foam ones to be the best for my ears. From looking at reviews, it seems like the foam ones are most people's favourite type. Once again, this means nothing until you try them all. Soundb>

It will beat you. They pack a serious punch. It'll hurt if you're not careful (they can get very very very very loud). I find myself turning my iPod Classic down to halfway, which is more than acceptable. Something a lot of headphones fail on is the bass. Many can't produce the intended low ends from songs. A great example is Massive Attack - Angel. After the break in period, which can be around 10-14 hours, you can really test these babies out to its full potential. I put on Massive Attack and felt the bass go through me (obviously listening to it way too loud) but the clarity, presence it delivered was unbelievable. Just like the low ends, many cheaper headphones are far too tinny in the high mids/highs and can become ear piercing. The Shure supports a wide frequency band, with the tweeter powering the top ends and the dual woofers filling in the gaps and beating away at the low ends, it's a special experience. It's like a concert in your ears. You feel the energy of the song.

I use Apple Lossless as a regular format, combined with these headphones, it's like a wet dream, really.

I use an iPod Classic, simply because of the easy and simple integration with my Mac. I can transfer Apple Lossless files in seconds and the quality of iPods have improved ten fold in terms of sound. The classic complements these headphones very well.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/613389-review-shure-se530/
Share on other sites

500 for headphones is... man... much.

i know how much you can spend, really, and as an audiophile myself i can somehow understand it but you could also get earbuds for like half the money and less that are maybe only a little less perfect...

shure kicks ass, though, i use shure mics for shouting and drums.

I have a set of high end Shure's myself. For an in ear solution, they sound pretty amazing. In comparison to a quality on ear/over the ear, they sound like garbage. I still don't know why people cry about the price of things. If you can't afford it, too bad for you. I never found mine to be terribly comfortable for long term listening, or anything over half to an hour at most.

I really like my SE530's (although they are a tad warm sounding, on the bassy side, and not really travel friendly)

My favorite pair of IEM's are the q-JAYS .. so tiny and comfortable .. excellent natural sound across all ranges (better than the 530's in some areas), very eq friendly, and excellent price for the quality.

Glad you are also enjoying the Shure se530's :)

q-jays + ipod nano ...

1.jpg

Edited by WolfDV
WolfDV, have you tried UE's Super.Fi 5 Pros? If so, how do those & your q-Jays compare?

yes, my brother has a pair .. they sound quite nice, powerful, eq'd with a bias towards a slight warmer sound compared to the q-jays.. the q-jays are nice and tight bass, while i found the super.fi 5 pros have a better bottom end, but roll off more at the high end. Also ... they are huge and fatiguingly uncomfortable compared to the tiny q-jays (which you can hardly feel, could wear all day, and sleep on side without any issues, probably regarded as the more pleasurable IEM's to wear, mostly due the the microscopic size, shape, and light weight). plus the sound fantastically balanced, quite a nice peice of engineering :)

check out the forums at www.head-fi.org for users with much more in-depth reviews and comparisons.

I certainly hope you're only listening to HD audio with those. I would think MP3 files would sound even worse with those things! Or maybe you're a .flac guy...

I didn't read the whole review because if I'm going to spend over $100 on headphones they'll be over the ear style anyway. I had no idea they made earbuds this pricey.

yes, my brother has a pair .. they sound quite nice, powerful, eq'd with a bias towards a slight warmer sound compared to the q-jays.. the q-jays are nice and tight bass, while i found the super.fi 5 pros have a better bottom end, but roll off more at the high end. Also ... they are huge and fatiguingly uncomfortable compared to the tiny q-jays (which you can hardly feel, could wear all day, and sleep on side without any issues, probably regarded as the more pleasurable IEM's to wear, mostly due the the microscopic size, shape, and light weight). plus the sound fantastically balanced, quite a nice peice of engineering :)

check out the forums at www.head-fi.org for users with much more in-depth reviews and comparisons.

If you were to choose, you'll chose the q-Jays right? I'm having a hard time deciding between the two. My gut feeling tells me to go with UE, but they do seem uncomfortable for a long period of time. I've notice the price on the SF5Pro are dropping, so maybe UE is going to release something new to replace them.

I had no idea they made earbuds this pricey.

I think some goes up to the thousands. But they're custom molded IEMs.

I'm always suprised by how many people who seem to think a couple of hundred pounds (or $400-500) is outrageous, or a waste of money.

I listen to my Shure SE310s for not much less than 4 hours a day. Sometimes longer if I'm travelling with work. I watch probably not more than an hour's TV each night. But spending ?1,000 on a TV raises no eyebrows at all from those who think that 20% of that is too much to spend on headphones.

To me the best thing about my Shure's (and I had the e3c's before these) is the sound isolation. I don't have to listen to the pathetic natter of the drunkard on the train even if I'm only listening to Radio 4 (speech radio) and therefore have the volume low.

If you were to choose, you'll chose the q-Jays right? I'm having a hard time deciding between the two. My gut feeling tells me to go with UE, but they do seem uncomfortable for a long period of time. I've notice the price on the SF5Pro are dropping, so maybe UE is going to release something new to replace them.

my first purchase was the se530's .. which i love, except for the fact they weren't exactly sleep friendly or comfortable for extended periods of time (especially when travelling/moving around)

I bought the q-jays because of the excellent reviews for both sq, and comfort .. which they were spot on about. The bass is less in the bottom end, but completely acceptable for the size difference.

Home / air-travel -> SE530's .. everywhere else -> q-Jays

now you are comparing the q-jays to the sf5pro's ... it depends on your needs like i stated earlier

If i wanted perfect sq .. the se530 are them, the q-jays are near that level of sq, and very comfortable. to me the few times i tried the sf5pros (despite have nice sq, are also quite bulky and not worth the loss in comfort).

overall if I could only have one set, I'd go with the q-Jays, they really are extraordinarily well designed.

but don't base solely on my decision, check out reviews on each, and ask questions at head-fi. You are making a nice purchase, get one that fits you.

I've got these and have to say they are amazing, I was a bit disappointed with my Shure e4c as the bass was weak, but these have amazingly clear sound with powerful bass, everybody I know thinks I was crazy spending ?214 on them, but if you can afford them the sound is incredible.

Yeah the high-end models by Shure and Etymotic are pretty expensive, in the $500 range but their entry models are much more affordable, in the $100's (Etymotic ER-6i for example) and they're way better than most crap out there and even better than some of those huge earmuff headphones that make you look like a Daft Punk DJ.

Yeah the high-end models by Shure and Etymotic are pretty expensive, in the $500 range but their entry models are much more affordable, in the $100's (Etymotic ER-6i for example) and they're way better than most crap out there and even better than some of those huge earmuff headphones that make you look like a Daft Punk DJ.

Nice comparison! :D

I do believe you that these headphones sound better than 10$ crap from wal-mart but I certainly do not think that you would hear the difference between a 100$ and a 500$ earplug.

Am I wrong?

I do believe you that these headphones sound better than 10$ crap from wal-mart but I certainly do not think that you would hear the difference between a 100$ and a 500$ earplug.

Am I wrong?

The difference ain't big that's for sure, and you would have to have good quality music to notice it like high vbr bitrate or a lossless codec like FLAC

I personally wouldn't spend beyond the $100 range for earbuds, but I would go that high because in-ear earbuds in those range allow you to use a low volume and isolate your music from outside sound. Some people might think in-ear earbuds aren't safer but they are. What's more dangerous for your hearing? Having cheap buds with the volume at near max because you're trying to listen to your music rather than to the noise of the subway or to have high end buds with low volume and nothing else?

Right now I have a pair of Sony EX71's but it's time for me to change those.... As good as those Shure sound, $500 surely aint my budget for many things out there today, so yeah..... I'd have to aim the $100ish priced buds.

I'm always suprised by how many people who seem to think a couple of hundred pounds (or $400-500) is outrageous, or a waste of money.

I listen to my Shure SE310s for not much less than 4 hours a day. Sometimes longer if I'm travelling with work. I watch probably not more than an hour's TV each night. But spending ?1,000 on a TV raises no eyebrows at all from those who think that 20% of that is too much to spend on headphones.

To me the best thing about my Shure's (and I had the e3c's before these) is the sound isolation. I don't have to listen to the pathetic natter of the drunkard on the train even if I'm only listening to Radio 4 (speech radio) and therefore have the volume low.

I feel the same. You spend your money on what you want, what you think you'll need. I know for me, I'm a bit of an audiophile myself, and thus I don't see spending $500 on earbuds to be a huge investment the way others would. It's only money, after all. No pointing making it all if you don't spend it once in a while.

BTW... Do the earbuds bundle the new iPhone compatibility jack, or do we still have to buy it separately?

  • 2 weeks later...

Unfortunately, I'll never get along with that type of headphone. At any size, the bit which sits in your ear, just makes it feel like a plunger is sucking on my ear. Meh!

My ideal type of headphone would have to be the BOSE Quiet Comfort 3's. They are comfortable, sound spot on and are basically an all-round excellent pair of [albeit expensive] headphones. But hey, you get what you pay for.

I feel the same. You spend your money on what you want, what you think you'll need. I know for me, I'm a bit of an audiophile myself, and thus I don't see spending $500 on earbuds to be a huge investment the way others would. It's only money, after all. No pointing making it all if you don't spend it once in a while.

BTW... Do the earbuds bundle the new iPhone compatibility jack, or do we still have to buy it separately?

Well, I just picked up a pair of these earbuds myself, so I guess I can answer my own question now...

No, the SE530 do not come bundled with the phone adapter module, even though they should. However, Amazon was selling their own bundle for just over $400, which means you get both for about $100 cheaper than Shure sells just the earbuds.

What happens when the cable snaps near the ear from over-bending? Or it's yanked out by accident?

Do you have to cover it with personal insurance?

The earbuds come with a standard 2 year warranty, and even then, I know from personal experience Shure is pretty liberal about replacing defective earbuds even after two years, so long as you have some sort of proof of purchase. So save your receipts and/or e-mail.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!