The Great UAC Debate!


UAC  

1412 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Use UAC?

    • Yes
      477
    • Yes, On "Silent Mode"
      91
    • No (I use an Admin Account)
      496
    • No (I use a Standard Account)
      39
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      118
  2. 2. Have You Ever Been Saved By UAC?

    • Yes
      226
    • No
      932
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      106


Recommended Posts

It really is no wonder Windows has such a horrible security reputation that persists even to this day: It seems that a large portion of its user base simply doesn't care about security.

If you know what you're doing, UAC won't help much. UAC helps those who don't know what UAC is but end-users with a bit of intelligence to question what's happening and not simply click allow or cancel blindly.

I myself changed the UAC setting from completely off to on in quiet mode with TweakUAC. At least the admin rights are elevated when I want to install something and don't want to get bothered by it because I know what I'm doing & clicking.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
If you know what you're doing, UAC won't help much. UAC helps those who don't know what UAC is but end-users with a bit of intelligence to question what's happening and not simply click allow or cancel blindly.

I myself changed the UAC setting from completely off to on in quiet mode with TweakUAC. At least the admin rights are elevated when I want to install something and don't want to get bothered by it because I know what I'm doing & clicking.

Yeah silent mode is still more secure. I think it's just dumb to turn it completely off when you can use silent mode.

I found out how to turn it off like 6 months ago, which was pivotal.

I actually like Vista, especially since that feature had been turned off.

...and no it didn't save me. I'm sure it did some people though.

As a hobby during off hours and occasionally during work hours, I persevere to help people with various software-related issues. On a regular basis I have to show people how to disable and enable certain features of their XP-based systems. Surprisingly a huge amount of Windows users are still using XP. Unsurprisingly, this kind of hesitation is brought about from a well-placed fear for Vista's instability.

Vista boasted a list of features that users have been craving since some of the early releases of XP, but there were flaws. Naturally, bugs, glitches, and eventually crashes are ultimately native to all software. Especially high-demand operating systems like the Windows platform. One of the best-yet-underrated features of MS Windows Vista is User Account Control, sometimes called User Access Control (UAC) is so discredited for it's persistant annoyance anytime someone wants to change the system configuration, install programs, or affect the registry.

Here's the fact about UAC. UAC can prevent unauthorized installation (and in some cases, authorized installation) of malicious software by forcing the user to pay attention to nearly everything affecting their system. One of the problems is, people go into "autopilot" and have a habit of clicking OK/YES/ACCEPT on every prompt without actually reading the description and scrutinizing unrecognized applications or registry entries.

When UAC is off, you're susceptible to the mounting plague of viruses spyware and malware invading the internet, p2p software and even offline networks. Even though UAC isn't 100% effective at preventing malicious viral attacks, I have been saved several times when moving data from portable/external drives to PCs.

If you're an advanced user and can solve viral issues yourself, it's not really a big deal. However, if you're not willing to spend hours trying to recover your system, can't afford industry-level virus protection, and simply don't have persistant internet access to receive virus /trojan definition updates on a regular basis, you might consider turning UAC back on.

If you're insistant on disabling the UAC utility in Windows Vista, I urge you to consider a 3rd party option. They can be as or even more effective in preventing these sorts of infections/attacks. Here's a few of the more popular ones to consider.

AVG Antivirus (Free).

I have used this with XP since I discovered it in 2006 and have had unparalelled success in stomping and preventing infections.

Spybot Search & Destroy (free)

Spybot kills spyware, plain and simple, but it also blocks literally thousands (possibly in the hundreds of thousands) of threats to your system. It includes an Immunization tool as well which (with current updates) prevents the installation of over a hundred-thousand infections. The program also includes an array of advanced mode features which include a system integrity scanner / registry scanner and startup config utility. Spybot also includes two plug-ins which provide UAC-like support, but are not nearly as persistantly annoying. Some email support is also included.

ClamWin (Free)

This powerful light-weight virus scanner (found at portableapps.com) updates in less than a minute. It has an ultra light-weight memory footprint, supports file, folder, drive, entire system scans. It's robust with usable features, and downsizes on the things that don't fall under "Virus Scanner".

______________________________________________________________________

  • 2 weeks later...

Surely not using UAC means you're an Admin user? So what does:

No (I use a Standard Account) - Mean?

The Aministrator account and Standard Accounts with UAC off are effectively the same.

p.s - There's next to no reason anyone should ever completely disable UAC. Given that it's the prompts and not security people hate, simply set it to Silent mode. Problem sorted.

Security Software alone isn't really enough. UAC works with not instead of security software. If the Security Software fails UAC will prevent access to the System folders.

Edited by bradavon

I turn UAC off as part of my standard Vista install. I would class myself as a very competant Windows user and know how to maintain an install. The only reason I would consider enabling UAC is if I was going to ditch my anti-virus and needed a little extra assurance.

I turn UAC off as part of my standard Vista install. I would class myself as a very competant Windows user and know how to maintain an install. The only reason I would consider enabling UAC is if I was going to ditch my anti-virus and needed a little extra assurance.

Just put uac in silent mode, no prompts bothering you + extra assurance.

Has UAC been improved? I just upgraded from Home Premium x86 to Vista Ultimate x64 and I don't get confirmation messages as much as before, and I'm using just about the same applications. Anyone notice this? Or is it just me?

Then again, I did upgrade to Norton Antivirus 2009 Gamer Edition instead of the good ol' Kaspersky. But I doubt that'll make a difference.

  • 2 weeks later...

To be honest, I'd actually let it on.

Had it been not too effective. There are many application, be it games, or even completely different, that sometimes use lua modding etc.

UAC does not prompt, no window comes up, but it does not allow the changes from many of these things to take effect.

I use UAC, on the highest settings. I will say that sometimes (very rarely) it causes problems with certain executables in that they will never load, and it will just be waiting for the UAC prompt to come up and ends up slowing the entire system down considerably. I've only experienced this on one program installer, and generally have never had any problems. It can be circumvented by installing through the command prompt.

To be honest, I'd actually let it on.

Had it been not too effective. There are many application, be it games, or even completely different, that sometimes use lua modding etc.

UAC does not prompt, no window comes up, but it does not allow the changes from many of these things to take effect.

For Apps that fail, right click and Run as Admin.

Turning UAC off means Malware can run as Admin too (like XP). No Anti-Malware software is 100% effective.

  • 1 month later...
I never got viruses or spyware running XP with an admin account, so why should I need UAC popping up and annoying me all the time.

It doesn't pop up all the time, unless you're constantly doing things that require elevation, and there's no reason why you would be.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Although I totally see the benifits of UAC, it annoys me, therefore as a tech savvy user I trust myself enough to leave it turned off

It's not about trusting yourself. It's about trusting the applications you use and the web sites, good or bad, you visit. By turning UAC off, you trust that such things won't change any system settings or install applications to system directories without your say so. Which is what can happen now that UAC is off. Therefore, you do not see the benefits of UAC. If you truly did see the benefits, you would have left it on.

In the end, I do not see UAC prompts often enough or in places I feel they shouldn't be to consider them annoying. The benefits of UAC far outweigh any potential annoyances it could provide.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stopped using Windows as my main workflow. Migrated completed to Linux. Been happier than a clam without a single issue nor windows annoyance. Leaving Windows has shown me the light at the end of the tunnel, or rather I went through the tunnel and I'm already at the light.
    • AirPods Pro 3 are now available for only $179 by Taras Buria Apple's third-gen AirPods Pro 3 introduced a few important upgrades over the previous generation while retaining the old $249 price. Still, that is quite a lot of money for a pair of earbuds, but the good news is that right now, you can save quite a lot of money on them, thanks to a new all-time low price. AirPods Pro 3 retain their classic look and form factor, with changes focused on the inside. These earbuds now come with five sets of foam-silicone tips, which sit much more securely in your ear, making the earbuds a perfect choice for physical activities and workouts. Additionally, new tips provide better passive noise cancellation. Speaking of noise cancellation, ANC is now much better at blocking outside noise, with Apple claiming the AirPods Pro mute up to two times more sound than the AirPods Pro 2. The AirPods Pro 3 also have heart rate sensors for activity tracking during workouts. They also support Live Translation and Hearing Aid mode. As for battery life, you get up to 8 hours on a single charge, with the case adding 20 more. The case supports wireless (Qi or Apple Watch charger) and wired charging over USB Type-C (cable not included). AirPods Pro 3 - $179 | $50 off on Amazon US This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit the Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus, or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Everything I have read is that the BBC is still Pro Doctor Who but wants a solid plan before they let anyone else try to do it. Which is fair.
    • I totally agree no one should trust governments AND big tech companies that have near monopolies in certain market segments. The difference is of course citizens at least have some say in government. Yes, requiring Apple to open up Sirsi to other AI backends is in the interest of EU customers and certainly "opens" up the platform a crack. What are you saying? I wish the US would regulate tech companies more here and even break them up in some cases. Granted trusting the government to do it right is a crap shot at best but what is the alternative? To allow a few tech companies to continue to run everything and just print money? It's crazy to me for example that in most of the world 99% of communications go thru Facebook servers via WhatsApp. What kind of dystopian world are we living in?
    • You can.. make sure you have ADB tools on whatever OS you are running, plug your phone into your PC give it approval to talk to the phone then run this command. adb shell pm uninstall -k --user 0 com.android.chrome So long as you leave Android Webview untouched it wont break anything on your Phone to do this. I have been using exclusively Firefox mobile since it was released.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      204
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!