The Great UAC Debate!


UAC  

1412 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Use UAC?

    • Yes
      477
    • Yes, On "Silent Mode"
      91
    • No (I use an Admin Account)
      496
    • No (I use a Standard Account)
      39
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      118
  2. 2. Have You Ever Been Saved By UAC?

    • Yes
      226
    • No
      932
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      106


Recommended Posts

If you get a virus, the UAC won't help you one bit, I promise you. The UAC responds to user-started tasks. It is nothing more then to make sure and ask, "Do you really want to do that?". Do you realize how many UAC prompts you would be getting if background processes had to prompt you for every system change they made?

What everyday changes do people make that make UAC prompt them? The default configuration for Windows 7 is perfect. I don't get prompted unless I'm installing something or otherwise modifying system files.

For software that was designed before Vista existed, that's a side-effect of standards enforcement and wasn't exactly intentional. UAC is generally able to detect elevation needs for legacy software, silently redirecting protected writes that don't need elevation while providing elevation prompts for those that do, but this is partly a guessing game which it doesn't always get right, resulting in cases where programs don't run correctly unless you force elevation.

For software that has been updated since the release of Vista it's either oversight or pure laziness. Oversight would be something like a program with an update checking function requiring elevation every time you launch it, in preparation for installing updates, rather than only asking for it when an update is actually found. This is partly valid (it isn't writing to protected locations without elevation), but the implementation isn't efficient (it asks for elevation when it's not actually needed). Alternately, some programs demand elevation simply because the programmers couldn't be bothered reworking it. There's nothing stopping someone taking outdated code and slapping on an elevation request, which Windows then obeys.

As more and more users leave XP there is a visible move towards programs being as silent as possible, and those that haven't kept up with this stick out more than they used to. These will eventually be updated because of this since they could lose customers based on annoyance alone if they don't do something about it.

If you get a virus, the UAC won't help you one bit, I promise you. The UAC responds to user-started tasks. It is nothing more then to make sure and ask, "Do you really want to do that?". Do you realize how many UAC prompts you would be getting if background processes had to prompt you for every system change they made?

I think you're confusing the UAC admin approval mode prompts with the Explorer warning prompts for executables from untrusted sources. UAC applies to everything no matter how it is started.

If you get a virus, the UAC won't help you one bit, I promise you. The UAC responds to user-started tasks. It is nothing more then to make sure and ask, "Do you really want to do that?". Do you realize how many UAC prompts you would be getting if background processes had to prompt you for every system change they made?

UAC helps prevent you from getting a virus, not stopping the virus from working once you are infected with one. So obviously UAC isn't going to help once you get a virus.

There are programs out there that require a prompt upon every run, at least in my experience.

And those are MOSTLY written before Vista and not updated. Most software should not need admin privs to run properly. In all honesty I don't think I have any software installed right now (100GB used by my system drive, consisting of my OS, a few games, and lots of other software) that requires a prompt for normal operation, sure some require a prompt to update the software, but only one program I have installed requires a prompt to run, FRAPS, which I have scheduled to start with my computer in admin mode with a scheduled task anyway, so I never see the prompt for it.

More and more software developers are understanding how to program without Admin mode, and also how to make their software not need admin mode (such as writing to user directories other than system directories), unless someone goes back and updates all the outdated software, those old programs are probably going to require admin mode, but that's a fault of the programs themselves, not Vista or 7.

  • 2 weeks later...

When I used Windows, I'd leave it on. It never really bothered me.

Normally +1, sometimes it get's annoying, though...

Prefer the Mac OS X style of user security here...

*bashing opened :rolleyes:* (psst: way to show maturity now and NOT start flamewars :shifty: protip!)

Glassed Silver:mac

Normally +1, sometimes it get's annoying, though...

Prefer the Mac OS X style of user security here...

*bashing opened :rolleyes:* (psst: way to show maturity now and NOT start flamewars :shifty: protip!)

Glassed Silver:mac

Haha, well, I wasn't attempting anything. I still do use Windows on a regular basis, and UAC does more good than harm. It's the same on any system, elevating to admin priviledges... To be fair, it might be alright if UAC required a password as well (but then again, I've always had my personal account as an Administrator rather than User/Limited)

Haha, well, I wasn't attempting anything. I still do use Windows on a regular basis, and UAC does more good than harm. It's the same on any system, elevating to admin priviledges... To be fair, it might be alright if UAC required a password as well (but then again, I've always had my personal account as an Administrator rather than User/Limited)

Yea, always been admin on win as well... same for os x...

I don't see the need to castrate myself if I know what I'm doing and using some other security layers. (Y)

That wasn't pointed towards you, just a general advisory to all haters haha :D

On another note: Brian, what is this now? Forum love between you and me? we are reply-spamming like hell! :D

Be my forum-######! :rofl:

Glassed Silver:mac

Yea, always been admin on win as well... same for os x...

I don't see the need to castrate myself if I know what I'm doing and using some other security layers. (Y)

That wasn't pointed towards you, just a general advisory to all haters haha :D

On another note: Brian, what is this now? Forum love between you and me? we are reply-spamming like hell! :D

Be my forum-######! :rofl:

Glassed Silver:mac

We're the only two awake.

Also. Keep it on-topic. :p

As an aside, if you try to elevate from a user/limited account, does it prompt for a password?

We're the only two awake.

Also. Keep it on-topic. :p

As an aside, if you try to elevate from a user/limited account, does it prompt for a password?

Scared of truth, much? :p

What exactly do you mean?

Like if I were logged in as a non-admin account in os x and try to change settings / sudo in terminal?

I guess yes, if it will let me definately, but I'm not that experienced with limited accounts, so ... idk for sure whether it's possible in first place.

It will always ask on admin accounts. (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

Scared of truth, much? :p

What exactly do you mean?

Like if I were logged in as a non-admin account in os x and try to change settings / sudo in terminal?

I guess yes, if it will let me definately, but I'm not that experienced with limited accounts, so ... idk for sure whether it's possible in first place.

It will always ask on admin accounts. (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

I meant on Windows Vista/7... If you're logged in as a User does it prompt for an administrator logon or does it just tell you that you don't have permission?

I meant on Windows Vista/7... If you're logged in as a User does it prompt for an administrator logon or does it just tell you that you don't have permission?

NO idea, I guess it will ask for a password, or at least it will work on a "execute as user -> select an admin" base I guess...

Glassed Silver:mac

NO idea, I guess it will ask for a password, or at least it will work on a "execute as user -> select an admin" base I guess...

Glassed Silver:mac

Anyone with a bit more knowledge care to chime in? I'd be interested to know.

yes, if you are a regular user it will prompt for the admin password, which was the general idea behind UAC anyway, but they left the prompt in for admins to because people are idiots :p

On OS X/Unix it'll still prompt for a password, but then again, it elevates to root account. I'm logged in as my root account (well admin) but it still asks for a password. I wonder why UAC didn't go down that path? I guess with the number of UAC prompts though it would get tired, fast.

On OS X/Unix it'll still prompt for a password, but then again, it elevates to root account. I'm logged in as my root account (well admin) but it still asks for a password. I wonder why UAC didn't go down that path? I guess with the number of UAC prompts though it would get tired, fast.

You can bet good money on that! (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

On OS X/Unix it'll still prompt for a password, but then again, it elevates to root account. I'm logged in as my root account (well admin) but it still asks for a password. I wonder why UAC didn't go down that path? I guess with the number of UAC prompts though it would get tired, fast.

You can configure the admin approval mode prompt (the prompt given to administrator users) to always ask for credentials if you really want to, but what's the point.

When you say "Unix," I'm going to assume you only mean OS X and the handful of popular Linux distros that come preconfigured with a sudo setup since it's otherwise a meaningless umbrella term for a whole host of OSes which can't be grouped as one.

Anyway, I would speculate that the reason it's configured to prompt for your password there is for security reasons. I suspect the sudo prompts (and whatever frontends exist for them) are not secure and could easily be bypassed. Windows deals with this by prompting on a separate desktop running in a separate session so it can't be manipulated, while OS X and the Linux distros deal with it by prompting for a password. There is also a subtle technical difference in what sudo and Windows do. Sudo substitutes users, in other words runs a program as a separate user. Windows runs the program as the same user but with a different security token.

All you have to do is install to a folder other than Program Files, which is protected. No more prompts.

Uh, it's not that simple. By that logic, if I were to install CCleaner outside of PF, I'd get no prompts. Which I know would not be true since the program itself specifically asks for elevation.

With Vista, I shut it off. It's way too intrusive.

Try installing 3 gb of user created content for Morrowind / Oblivion on Vista with UAC on :)

With Windows 7, I think it's the right balance.

I've had no issue's with using UAC like features with Linux/Ubuntu or OS X, they also have the right balance.

If you get a virus, the UAC won't help you one bit, I promise you. The UAC responds to user-started tasks. It is nothing more then to make sure and ask, "Do you really want to do that?". Do you realize how many UAC prompts you would be getting if background processes had to prompt you for every system change they made?

Wrong. If you get a virus and you have UAC on your computer will be safe. The virus won't be able to touch your system files or the other accounts on your system. Your account will be attacked by the virus, but any other accounts on the machine will be safe. If you turn UAC off and you get a virus your f*****.

Wrong. If you get a virus and you have UAC on your computer will be safe. The virus won't be able to touch your system files or the other accounts on your system. Your account will be attacked by the virus, but any other accounts on the machine will be safe. If you turn UAC off and you get a virus your f*****.

UAC still doesn't remove the need for AV software though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!