GTA 4 Gets a Release Date


Recommended Posts

Did you forget that Microsoft paid the makers of GTA IV $50 million for extra content?

For exclusive episodes, not for extra comment. I'm saying release it on the 360, hold out a couple of the missions, then when they release the PS3 versions, let it have the missions as exclusive for a month or two, then let the 360 owners download a key to unlock them. Works for everyone.

I don't agree.

The way I see it, I don't think Rockstar is expecting to hit sales numbers or anything like Halo 3. Everybody knows, including Rockstar, that the chances of that happening are very slim. What they are expecting though, are great reviews and nothing but positive feedback from the community. They're confident that their game will take innovation to the next level and everybody will notice. Even Jack Thompson.

I don't even care if you don't agree. Who said they are comparing to Halo 3? They said they would sell 4 Million of copies on launch. How do they really know the game will sell THAT well?

I like the game and all, but they really think they can make up some random predictions?

Edited by PiracyX
For exclusive episodes, not for extra comment. I'm saying release it on the 360, hold out a couple of the missions, then when they release the PS3 versions, let it have the missions as exclusive for a month or two, then let the 360 owners download a key to unlock them. Works for everyone.

that's all fine and dandy, but the game still looked and ran pretty crappy when it was first supposed to be released. it definitely was not ready to go at the time. i think the delay benefited the 360 version as well. gotta love joystiq's way of spinning the comment to make it seem like it was all because of the ps3.

I don't even care if you don't agree. Who said they are comparing to Halo 3? They said they would sell 4 Million of copies on launch. How do they really know the game will sell THAT well?

I like the game and all, but they really think they can make up some random predictions?

Perhaps because its multiplatform and all previous 3 3D titles are in the top10 most sold games? :p

Just saw this screenshot, that looks SO awesome!

http://media.gtanet.com/images/3901_gta_iv.jpg

Looks like a Chrysler C300 *drool*

Perhaps because its multiplatform and all previous 3 3D titles are in the top10 most sold games? :p

Still, pulling predictions from their arses doesn't mean its going to be true. They are almost predicting that 25% of owners of PS3/XBOX360 will pick up this game on launch.

Just because they are in the top 10 most sold, doesn't make them great games.

where did u get the screenshot from, it looks great!

and im a little annoyed if the ps3 is the reason for the delay. actually not totally- as i still have to play through assassin's creed and bioshock! not to mention guitar hero 3 and i just finished COD4, but have to keep my multiplayer stats up! man we were hit hard in Nov/Dec with great games! :)

Are you joking right? GTA3 was really really good and for it's first time in 3D, they did a great job of it. I can't really say the same about Vice City or San Andreas though (or even Liberty Stories). Those games were GTA3 underneath with different characters, story, missions to play, and slightly better graphics but it was still GTA3, not really a whole new game.

Joking?? No, Vice City and San Andreas were fantastic games!!! So what if they were "GTA3 underneath", I still had tons of fun playing them. I think your being far too critical.

Rockstar are the ones who has been hyping this game up so much, thinking that it will sell extremely well, because of GTA it will, but whether or not it's actually a good game, remains to be seen.

Hype?? 3 trailers and a hand full of screenshots, it's alot less than most games these days. It WILL sell extremely well. Read some of the press articles that have a Hands-on preview (IGN has one). I am pretty confident that this will be a good game.

Heh why is it coming out for the computer later, it is by far the most fun when played on PC.

Why? I 've played on both console and PC, and see no HUGE advantage of one over the other.

^Ye, San Andreas had no real load screens either..

And Gears of War I believe

I haven't played San Andreas in a long while but I don't recall it being this way. And I'm pretty damn sure there's a few in Gears too. Plus my point is I assumed it would've been mainstream in almost every release by now.
Still, pulling predictions from their arses doesn't mean its going to be true. They are almost predicting that 25% of owners of PS3/XBOX360 will pick up this game on launch.

Just because they are in the top 10 most sold, doesn't make them great games.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

GTA is a game everyone can play - its even a party game :/

I haven't played San Andreas in a long while but I don't recall it being this way. And I'm pretty damn sure there's a few in Gears too. Plus my point is I assumed it would've been mainstream in almost every release by now.

Well, it had a initial load screen when the game started - then there were small loads when walking into a store..

But compared to GTA3 and Vice City you didnt have to load everytime you went to another island.

Joking?? No, Vice City and San Andreas were fantastic games!!! So what if they were "GTA3 underneath", I still had tons of fun playing them. I think your being far too critical.

They were alright, but hardly brilliant! They were not really even sequels, more like spinoffs. They were fun, but not even close to fantastic! GTA3 was great.

Hype?? 3 trailers and a hand full of screenshots, it's alot less than most games these days. It WILL sell extremely well. Read some of the press articles that have a Hands-on preview (IGN has one). I am pretty confident that this will be a good game.

And all the predictions they made with it such as IT will sell 4 million copies on launch day. It's not impossible no, but they really have to be smoking something to think/say that. I am not denying it will sell well, because it will, but 4 million?

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

GTA is a game everyone can play - its even a party game :/

Err....what? Listen to you. You must love GTA to death or something (wait you have your avatar GTA4 so....)

All i'm saying is they are not top 10 Material (i'm talking about VC and SA, NOT GTA3) but you seems to think otherwise. Wow, because someone has a opinion which differs from you, you don't like it :huh:

Edited by PiracyX
snip

Err....what? Listen to you. You must love GTA to death or something (wait you have your avatar GTA4 so....)

All i'm saying is they are not top 10 Material (i'm talking about VC and SA, NOT GTA3) but you seems to think otherwise. Wow, because someone has a opinion which differs from you, you don't like it :huh:

Ye I do love GTA :wub:

Simply exaggerating your "Are you joking right?"

What made GTA3 great to you?

Because in my opinion Vice City and San Andreas were both great also - they still had hidden humor, an alright storyline, freeroam, a GREAT soundtrack, everything :wub:

They were alright, but hardly brilliant! They were not really even sequels, more like spinoffs. They were fun, but not even close to fantastic! GTA3 was great.

VC and SA had new everything, and more. I just don't see how you thought GTA3 was great and the others weren't. I mean of course there going to be all fairly similar in gameplay and style ect.. they were all built in a single "generation" and that was the idea. But what did you expect?? I certainly had a great time playing each one. :yes:

Ye I do love GTA :wub:

Simply exaggerating your "Are you joking right?"

What made GTA3 great to you?

Because in my opinion Vice City and San Andreas were both great also - they still had hidden humor, an alright storyline, freeroam, a GREAT soundtrack, everything :wub:

VC and SA had new everything, and more. I just don't see how you thought GTA3 was great and the others weren't. I mean of course there going to be all fairly similar in gameplay and style ect.. they were all built in a single "generation" and that was the idea. But what did you expect?? I certainly had a great time playing each one. :yes:

It was the fact that GTA3 was the first GTA to be put into 3D and it was a great game and surpassed everyones expectation. VC and SA were good games, don't get me wrong, just not as great, because the expectation was far higher.

I agree freeroam was great in all of them, plus the soundtrack was also good and i had a great time playing each one.

There is not need to fight fellow neowinians ;)

I don't even care if you don't agree.

Well that's nice? lol.

Who said they are comparing to Halo 3? They said they would sell 4 Million of copies on launch. How do they really know the game will sell THAT well?

I like the game and all, but they really think they can make up some random predictions?

Please keep up. I did not say that they were comparing it to Halo 3. Nobody did. I put it there as an example of because of it's high sales numbers.

And I would also think Rockstar is justified enough to make sales predictions about THEIR OWN GAME.

It's like you're saying a student can't even predict what they made on their own exam.

that's all fine and dandy, but the game still looked and ran pretty crappy when it was first supposed to be released. it definitely was not ready to go at the time. i think the delay benefited the 360 version as well. gotta love joystiq's way of spinning the comment to make it seem like it was all because of the ps3.

Whoa now, chill out. I never said the PS3 was the reason. I was quoting an article and saying if the 360 version is further along, release it first, fix kinks in the PS3 version and do what I said. I never said ship an unfinished product.

Well that's nice? lol.

Please keep up. I did not say that they were comparing it to Halo 3. Nobody did. I put it there as an example of because of it's high sales numbers.

And I would also think Rockstar is justified enough to make sales predictions about THEIR OWN GAME.

It's like you're saying a student can't even predict what they made on their own exam.

Wow.... Yes we are not comparing it to Halo 3 but their predictions seems to tell a different story doesn't it. Yes they can make all the predictions they like, but when they pulling such high predictions from their arses, you have to question are they being Realistic or just pure Arrogant. Id say the latter by a mile.

All arguements aside, the game should be good though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I do not remember anything happening to Apple and Google for bribing people not to make Apps for Windows Phone. Edge barley has a foot print to matter. If the other browser companies want more of the Pie, they need to do better. I use Brave on all my personal device. However in industry, Edge of default, as we can manage it easier with MS tools.
    • On the one hand, it shouldn't be difficult. You buy a computer, you decide what OS you want, which browser etc. Simple enough. But that's the techie side of things. My sister, my mother, wouldn't bother with such a thought. And I'm pretty sure that if you presented a window asking them what to pick they would say, "I don't care! I just want to access my Email!"
    • CPU-Z 2.20.2 by Razvan Serea CPU-Z is a freeware utility that gathers information on some of the main devices of your system. CPU-Z does not need to be installed, just unzip the files in a directory and run the .exe. In order to remove the program, just delete the files. The program does not copy any file in any Windows directory, nor write to the registry. CPU Name and number. Core stepping and process. Package. Core voltage. Internal and external clocks, clock multiplier. Supported instructions sets. All cache levels (location, size, speed, technology). Mainboard Vendor, model and revision. BIOS model and date. Chipset (northbridge and southbridge) and sensor. Graphic interface. Memory Frequency and timings. Module(s) specification using SPD (Serial Presence Detect) : vendor, serial number, timings table. System Windows and DirectX version. CPU-Z 2.20.2 changelog: Intel Arc G3 and G3 Extreme (Panther Lake)(2.20.2). AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D (Raphael) (2.20.1). AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 495, 492, 488 (Gorgon Halo). AMD Ryzen AI Max 490, 485 (Gorgon Halo). AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 495, 490, 485, 480 (Gorgon Halo). AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9965X3D, PRO 9945 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, PRO 9745 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen AI 7/PRO 450G/GE (Gorgon Point 2). AMD Ryzen AI 5/PRO 440G/GE (Gorgon Point 2). AMD Ryzen AI 5/PRO 435G/GE (Gorgon Point 3). AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (Strix Halo). Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (Arrow Lake Refresh). Intel Core 7 360 and 350 (Wildcat Lake). Intel Core 5 330, 320 and 315 (Wildcat Lake). Intel Core 3 304 (Wildcat Lake). Intel Core 9 273PQE, 273PTE, 273PE (Bartlett Lake). Intel Core 7 253PQE, 253PTE, 253PE, 251TE, 251E (Bartlett Lake). Intel Core 5 223PQE, 223PTE, 223PE, 221TE, 221E, 213PTE, 213PE, 211TE, 211E (Bartlett Lake). Intel Core 3 201TE, 201E (Bartlett Lake). Intel Arc Pro B70 and B65 (BMG-G31). Intel Arc Pro B60 and B50 (BMG-G21). Support of HUDIMM and HSODIMM memory modules. Download: CPU-Z 2.20.2 | Portable ~5.0 MB (Freeware) View: CPU-Z Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Anyone who expects MS to play fair is a complete idiot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!