"Nightmare on Elm Street" Remake


Recommended Posts

I liked it. I've read that people are criticizing their acting. Through most of the film they are supposed to portray being awake for days... how do they expect them to act? Fred (as he's called) is more serious.. though he still cracks a joke every so often. <spoiler>I like the suspense how they lead you to believe that he was inocent.</spoiler> They show more backstory of him. They use the internet to search about "sleep derivation" and it comes up something that looks like Wikipedia (very brief), so it's very 21st century and we learn the reason they go into a dream and don't know it is because of "micro naps". Haley isn't anything like Englund, he did his own thing while brining the scary and sinister Freddy back. :)

And.. it's got a very Nigthmare-ish ending. :D

3.5 out of 5

Pros:

Katie Cassidy is SO HOT!!! :drool:

supernatural_Katie_Cassidy_2.jpg

ALL the actors are actually pretty good/talented IMO. Acting is one thing DOES NOT SUCK!

Very good PQ compared to the Original NOES but that's to be expected anyway.

A few of creepy scenes that had jump out of seat scare.

1-2 Freddy coming for you song is BACK! :D

New Freddy Has cool lines.

Con:

NOT enough NOES music

Less teen get-together. In the original, like a bunch of them are together.

Screentime should be LONGER with MORE beautiful Katie, other kids got killed. Like Asian dude screen time too short.

Not too used to the NEW Freddy face...

Should have more CREEPY alleys

Not enough

Nudity and Sex

:p

3.5 out of 5

Pros:

Katie Cassidy is SO HOT!!! :drool:

supernatural_Katie_Cassidy_2.jpg

ALL the actors are actually pretty good/talented IMO. Acting is one thing DOES NOT SUCK!

Very good PQ compared to the Original NOES but that's to be expected anyway.

A few of creepy scenes that had jump out of seat scare.

1-2 Freddy coming for you song is BACK! :D

New Freddy Has cool lines.

Con:

NOT enough NOES music

Less teen get-together. In the original, like a bunch of them are together.

Screentime should be LONGER with MORE beautiful Katie, other kids got killed. Like Asian dude screen time too short.

Not too used to the NEW Freddy face...

Should have more CREEPY alleys

Not enough

Nudity and Sex

:(

I'm not really feeling her hotness.. I mean she does not look that attractive really. I have better looking girls at my school.

oh yeah I'm looking forward to see J.E.H's performance.. how was it?

Oh man, If you are going to remake a classic: Do it right. They went wrong on so many levels. I thought the cast worked out well, Haley was a good pick to be the successor. The film itself also looked great. They gave the dream sequences a nice realism, without getting really silly like they did in the later sequels.

Where this movie falls completely apart is in the amazingly boring story. They took all the interesting parts of the character, totally ignored them, and just went blood happy. Gone are the great tension building moments. Instead they are replaced by lame "boo! we tried to scare you with quick camera changes and loud sounds"

Sorry Freddy, but you came back in a shiny new package, but someone left the testicles accessory pack out of the box.

1/5

I went to see the movie last night. I am sorry but that movie sucked. NO ONE will ever replace Robert Englund. That dude did an OK job as Freddy, but Robert Englund was the absolute best. It's like that role was written for him and no one else. Jackie Earle Haley tried...and I mean, really tried...but in my book, he was not succesful. He did not convince me. I still miss Englund.

Oh and that ending. What the hell were they thinking about? That ending didn't make any sense (a lot of things didn't make any sense on that film anyways...).

I am sorry...it sucked.

Saw it on Friday.... hated it. Really thought some of the lines were just total crap and the acting was sub-par. Being a huge fan of the original I really wanted to like this movie. And at times during I felt myself enjoying it.. but it ended quickly when someone through out some worthless one-liner. Highly suggested you save your money and wait for a rental.

2.5/5

I think people are overly comparing this with the original.

Personally, the originial is silly too(it was not a masterpiece either, dumb in many own ways) so this remake is not really that bad. People who compare this to the original are gonna be more disappointed than people going in without comparing the two.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!