• 0

[MS-DOS Batch] Automatically determine if drive is already mapped


Question

I didn't know if I should start this topic under "Programming" but it seems to be the only place to put it.

I want to run a batch file that will automatically map a network drive before it continues the script. The problem I have is that if for some reason the drive is already mapped, or the batch file has been run twice in one session, the "net use" command returns an error. The script still works in the end, but I would like to bypass the "net use" command altogether if the drive is already mapped.

I've been digging through the net trying to find anything that can help me out, but to no avail. The closest thing I can find is just typing "net use" can tell you if the drive is already mapped or not, but I can't take any one piece of that result and use it in my script.

Does anyone have any suggestions? My purpose here is to write an IF statement that determines:

IF drive X: is already mapped, then skip net use command and proceed with the remainder of the script.

ELSE, run net use command and proceed with the remainder of the script.

I figured ERRORLEVEL could come in handy, but that only works after I get the error that I'm trying to avoid in the first place.

Thanks!

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would be careful with what you are checking. If the user mapped a different drive than the one that is supposed to be there, it may see a drive mapped and skip the mapping.

What we have done is unmap and then map the drive in the same script. This will ensure that the correct drives are mapped to the desired letter every time.

  • 0

You could always look for a specific file to that share, which should eliminate the chance of having the wrong share mapped.

Unmapping the share could cause issues if other processes are using the same share.

  • 0
I would be careful with what you are checking. If the user mapped a different drive than the one that is supposed to be there, it may see a drive mapped and skip the mapping.

What we have done is unmap and then map the drive in the same script. This will ensure that the correct drives are mapped to the desired letter every time.

Very true. I thought about that but I realized that this is happening in a fairly controlled environment... but I suppose it would be good to do. The only downside is if I try to unmap it while another resource is using the same drive to do something, causing other errors in the process.

How about using IF EXIST for a file on the mapped drive?

Asssuming W: is your mapped drive.

IF NOT EXIST W:\. netuse..etc..

I might give that a try, thanks. I suppose maybe I can merge these two suggestions together? To unmap a drive you have to make sure the drive is mapped in the first place otherwise another error will appear. *sigh*

Also, thanks for your speedy replies.

EDIT:

You could always look for a specific file to that share, which should eliminate the chance of having the wrong share mapped.

Unmapping the share could cause issues if other processes are using the same share.

Yes exactly. If I look for a specific file on that share, I wouldn't need to unmap at all.

I'll give that a try now and report back.

  • 0

I made an assumption that mappings are needed, can you run the process using UNC without having to map to a specific drive letter?

Good point, Joe. I was just considering the case of the script running at login.

I learned that the hard way, with WFW 3.11.

Multithreaded batch processing, completely crazy, but it worked.

  • 0

Alright I just gave this a try and it seems to work perfectly fine so far. I'll keep testing to make sure.

@echo off

echo --------------------------------------------------

echo Now running database maintenance. Please wait...

echo IMPORTANT: DO NOT TOUCH THE COMPUTER DURING THIS PROCESS

echo --------------------------------------------------

IF EXIST \\domain and filename here.exe (

echo The drive is already mapped.

GOTO SKIPPED

) ELSE (

echo The drive has not yet been mapped.

net use x: \\domain and share here Password /user:domain\user

)

:SKIPPED

[command that I need to run regardless]

echo --------------------------------------------------

echo Maintenance complete.

echo --------------------------------------------------

pause

Thanks for the help guys! I'll post here again if something comes up. The only thing I'm uncertain about is if it's okay that I don't specify X: in the EXISTS statement.

  • 0
Here is a link to a HTA from the Hey Scripting Guys that uses a HTA to list available drive letters and how to map that drive.

Hey Scripting Guys

Thanks, but that seems to be for VBScript. I'm just working with command line batch.

  • 0
Alright I just gave this a try and it seems to work perfectly fine so far. I'll keep testing to make sure.

@echo off

echo --------------------------------------------------

echo Now running database maintenance. Please wait...

echo IMPORTANT: DO NOT TOUCH THE COMPUTER DURING THIS PROCESS

echo --------------------------------------------------

IF EXIST \\domain and filename here.exe (

echo The drive is already mapped.

GOTO SKIPPED

) ELSE (

echo The drive has not yet been mapped.

net use x: \\domain and share here Password /user:domain\user

)

:SKIPPED

[command that I need to run regardless]

echo --------------------------------------------------

echo Maintenance complete.

echo --------------------------------------------------

pause

Thanks for the help guys! I'll post here again if something comes up. The only thing I'm uncertain about is if it's okay that I don't specify X: in the EXISTS statement.

IF EXIST \\domain and filename here.exe (

Once you use a UNC connection you're going to be logged into the server as the current user. If the users are different, then you're going to have a problem. You should specify the X: in the if exists.

  • 0

Hmm alright, so then should I do:

IF EXIST X:\\address\file.exe

or

IF EXIST X:\file.exe ?

For some reason I'm tempted to use the second one but the first one seems more technically correct to me...

  • 0
Hmm alright, so then should I do:

IF EXIST X:\\address\file.exe

or

IF EXIST X:\file.exe ?

For some reason I'm tempted to use the second one but the first one seems more technically correct to me...

X:\file.exe is what you want, (assuming it's in the root of the share)

  • 0

Alright I thought so (yes it's at the root). Thanks.

But now I have another problem. I want to schedule this using the "Schedule Task" app on WinXP. The only problem is the computers here are required to press CTRL+ALT+DEL before you can log in (secure logon). For some reason the batch script fails to do any mapping when it is run at the "press CTRL+ALT+DEL to log in" screen.

However, if I do press CTRL+ALT+DEL and go to the actual log in screen (still not logged in) the script works fine. Any ideas why, or how to get around this?

EDIT: I ran into this idea here, http://joedix.com/tech_help/2006/07/schedu...running-wo.html but I think that would be a pretty big security risk, no?

Edited by Xtreme $niper
  • 0
Alright I thought so (yes it's at the root). Thanks.

But now I have another problem. I want to schedule this using the "Schedule Task" app on WinXP. The only problem is the computers here are required to press CTRL+ALT+DEL before you can log in (secure logon). For some reason the batch script fails to do any mapping when it is run at the "press CTRL+ALT+DEL to log in" screen.

However, if I do press CTRL+ALT+DEL and go to the actual log in screen (still not logged in) the script works fine. Any ideas why, or how to get around this?

EDIT: I ran into this idea here, http://joedix.com/tech_help/2006/07/schedu...running-wo.html but I think that would be a pretty big security risk, no?

What account are you running the task under? Does it have a password?

  • 0

I'd be running this task under non-administrator accounts I believe. All accounts have to have a password, and every user has to press the CTRL+ALT+DEL combo before logging in.

I'm not sure why but it seems drive mapping doesn't work if you don't press CTRL+ALT+DEL.

EDIT: I just did another round of testing. The drive mapping actually doesn't work in ANY form if your account is locked. I previously thought as long as you hit the safe logon combo first you'd be okay, but apparently I was wrong.

As long as the system is at the login screen (even though the account itself is logged in) the application that needs to be run from the network share won't run, causing the script to fail.

Any ideas?

Edited by Xtreme $niper
  • 0

Ok, that's a little strange, I run batches via the task shceduler in Windows 2000 all the time.

Are you on a domain? What OS/SP are you using (XP sp2?)?

Have you tried using an admin account?

Are you using the task scheduler or the AT command?

Also, try this, get a copy of whoami.exe from the MS resource kit and pipe the output to a local file, see if it's using the correct account.

  • 0

Well I guess it's more complicated than just that... I forgot to mention I'm using an application called TestPlanner that automates some tasks for you by controlling the keyboard and mouse to accomplish "macro" like tasks.

The script itself actually opens and runs, but the problem is once the TestPlanner app runs, it's supposed to do a few things. One of which is to open the run window from the start menu and run another application... but for some reason the keys are never mapped to the text field within the run window and so the script fails.

So now I realize your ability to help me out can easily end here, because you probably have no idea what this TestPlanner application is...

The problem is that I am just an employee in a corporation, so there is no chance of me getting admin access. I don't think that's the problem though. I think that because the computer is in a locked state, the text field in the run command window can't be selected and so the script fails when it is trying to enter text into a field that cannot be selected. It looks like I just can't get a fix for that.

  • 0
Well I guess it's more complicated than just that... I forgot to mention I'm using an application called TestPlanner that automates some tasks for you by controlling the keyboard and mouse to accomplish "macro" like tasks.

The script itself actually opens and runs, but the problem is once the TestPlanner app runs, it's supposed to do a few things. One of which is to open the run window from the start menu and run another application... but for some reason the keys are never mapped to the text field within the run window and so the script fails.

So now I realize your ability to help me out can easily end here, because you probably have no idea what this TestPlanner application is...

The problem is that I am just an employee in a corporation, so there is no chance of me getting admin access. I don't think that's the problem though. I think that because the computer is in a locked state, the text field in the run command window can't be selected and so the script fails when it is trying to enter text into a field that cannot be selected. It looks like I just can't get a fix for that.

There's one last chance, you can try this, but I don't think it will work, see if the TestPlanner has the ability to 'allow service to interact with desktop'. In windows 2000, you could set this in the services control panel.

Honestly, I don't think that would solve your problem though. Since it's a macro program it most likely needs an unlocked console to work.

  • 0
There's one last chance, you can try this, but I don't think it will work, see if the TestPlanner has the ability to 'allow service to interact with desktop'. In windows 2000, you could set this in the services control panel.

Honestly, I don't think that would solve your problem though. Since it's a macro program it most likely needs an unlocked console to work.

I just took a look at the program, and I unfortunately have found no such feature. Thanks for the suggestion though.

The funny thing is that although it can't select a text field to enter text into as part of the macro, it still successfully opens the Run command window via the "Windows key + R" shortcut.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!