Sins of a Solar Empire


Recommended Posts

The next major update to Sins of a Solar Empire will be as an open beta. The preliminary change log for v1.1 can be found here. The beta will start in July, and the final release will be later this summer.

Stardock has made available the preliminary change log to Sins of a Solar Empire v1.1. Developer Ironclad has been busy updating virtually every part of the game based on player feedback. Version 1.1 not only includes a host of play balancing changes but new content such as an updated graphics engine, updated visuals, new damage animations, and more. It also includes a new multiplayer system called ?Alloy? which eliminates the need for configuring routers or changing port numbers.

:)

  • 6 months later...

Anyone play this?

I am having a very difficult time with resources in the initial stage. I have no money to both research and build up a fleet.

Current strat is:

1) Create extractors for all asteroids

2) Build Capital Ship yard

3) Create a CS that can colonize

4) Sell CS Yard

5) Build Civic Research stations

6) Start researching metal/crystal extractions while building more civic research

7) CS is already sent to colonize neighbouring planets.

At this point, I have either a crystal or metal shortage.

I just started playing this again in anticipation of the upcoming expansion.

Emorex: It's been awhile since I last played so my advice might not be that good. In any case, I think you're building a Capital Shipyard way too early. Generally you'll want to get a nice flow of resources early on in the game. What I normally do is setup a defencive position before spending money on expensive orbital facilities like the Capital Shipyard. The way I see it, it costs less to put up a good defence than a good offence. All in all, I'll play again later tonight and maybe then I'll remember the strategies I used to employ. I'll post back here soon.

  • 2 years later...

I figured I'd play this game again in anticipation of the upcoming expansion, titled "Rebellion": http://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/?aid=405917

Oddly enough, I still haven't bought Diplomacy. Perhaps it's time I did.

I figured I'd play this game again in anticipation of the upcoming expansion, titled "Rebellion": http://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/?aid=405917

Oddly enough, I still haven't bought Diplomacy. Perhaps it's time I did.

Nice, had no idea they'd do more expansions for it. Bought the Trinity edition a few weeks ago and it is one of the best RTS games I've played in years. :D

I figured I'd play this game again in anticipation of the upcoming expansion, titled "Rebellion": http://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/?aid=405917

Oddly enough, I still haven't bought Diplomacy. Perhaps it's time I did.

Wow, that looks sweet. Diplomacy is good. I like playing the advent the most. Allure of the Unity + Induced Reverence = mucho minerals ;) Using culture as an offensive weapon is also very cool. Not to mention the vast number strike craft that the Advent get :D

Nice, had no idea they'd do more expansions for it. Bought the Trinity edition a few weeks ago and it is one of the best RTS games I've played in years. :D

Nice. I still need to buy Diplomacy. :o

I keep wanting to get into this game (i only played the tutorial when i first bought it), but damn that tutorial is a lot to take in. I keep losing interest :cry:

I never tried the tutorial and that might have been a mistake because it took me awhile to get a hang of the game. And by that, I mean being able to play properly. I think you should stick with it. The game is a lot of fun when you know what you're doing.

Wow, that looks sweet. Diplomacy is good. I like playing the advent the most. Allure of the Unity + Induced Reverence = mucho minerals ;) Using culture as an offensive weapon is also very cool. Not to mention the vast number strike craft that the Advent get :D

I play as TEC 80% of the time. The other 20% is spent playing as the Advent. Minerals? This isn't Starcraft. :p I never used culture as a weapon. I mostly spent my resources improving my empire and resources. It's awesome when your metal and crystal reach 5.0/sec.

  • 1 month later...

this game is way too complicate for newcomers to enjoy.

Actually, if anything, it's *less* complicated than Starcraft (the first one) or even Galactic Civilizations II (any of them). Also, unlike most newer RTS titles (in fact, unlike Elemental), it requires nothing more than DX9c support (thus, it's both XP-friendly and portable-friendly).

I started playing as the TEC; however, I've switched over to playing as the Advent (though it does have a bit of a *wrong-shoe* feeling - an American playing as the galactic equivalent of a religious terrorist; though it's even more wrong-shoe considering that the Advent's protagonist is *female* - beware the nuns!).

Nice. I still need to buy Diplomacy. :o

I never tried the tutorial and that might have been a mistake because it took me awhile to get a hang of the game. And by that, I mean being able to play properly. I think you should stick with it. The game is a lot of fun when you know what you're doing.

I play as TEC 80% of the time. The other 20% is spent playing as the Advent. Minerals? This isn't Starcraft. :p I never used culture as a weapon. I mostly spent my resources improving my empire and resources. It's awesome when your metal and crystal reach 5.0/sec.

Anaron - metal-mining is important (in fact, you can't build OR maintain your forces without it - you can't even improve the *planet* without metal-mining satellites and the GMRX). Why else are the first two non-military structires you build in the game collection satellites?

Entrenchment and Diplomacy brought the old Starcraft tactic of the *fatal funnel* to space-based RTS games with the use of warp-disruption satellites, space mines, and (starting with Entrenchment) battlestations as a defensive structure - one of my nastier tactics is to deploy the entire set of delayers (gauss cannon, fighter hangers, mines, *and* a battlestation or two) to a chokepoint (especially one without planets) buying myself time if I can force the enemy the *longer way around* - or even roadblocking the opposition entirely if I can put enough bite in the defenses.

Actually, if anything, it's *less* complicated than Starcraft (the first one) or even Galactic Civilizations II (any of them). Also, unlike most newer RTS titles (in fact, unlike Elemental), it requires nothing more than DX9c support (thus, it's both XP-friendly and portable-friendly).

I started playing as the TEC; however, I've switched over to playing as the Advent (though it does have a bit of a *wrong-shoe* feeling - an American playing as the galactic equivalent of a religious terrorist; though it's even more wrong-shoe considering that the Advent's protagonist is *female* - beware the nuns!).

I agree. I've been playing the game with TEC and although a little steep on the curve, it didn't take long to know your way around. There's always helpful forums out on Stardock's site too.

the thing I don't care much for is the limited count for your fleet. Some of these larger maps in a 1 vs 2+ in SP suck because you can't always hold your systems with the limit. Are there mods out that increase that? I haven't played in about a year.

I played Entrenchment quite a bit, but the game would drop to single-digit framerates with several AIs on large maps, after a while. Combine this with the inherently slow gameplay and it was unbearable to play. I did play some multiplayer, and got crushed of course, but then again you had to wait such a long time to get a game going. And now with Diplomacy out there's no one playing Entrenchment anymore, so I'm basically stuck buying Diplomacy if I want to play any more multiplayer. So it's that combination of factors that really killed the game for me.

I played Entrenchment quite a bit, but the game would drop to single-digit framerates with several AIs on large maps, after a while. Combine this with the inherently slow gameplay and it was unbearable to play. I did play some multiplayer, and got crushed of course, but then again you had to wait such a long time to get a game going. And now with Diplomacy out there's no one playing Entrenchment anymore, so I'm basically stuck buying Diplomacy if I want to play any more multiplayer. So it's that combination of factors that really killed the game for me.

The latest patch for the game improves memory usage and performance and AI behavior, to fix issues that you were originally having.

Very large performance increase I found on my system when multi player matches had many human players vs many AI players. Before, the game would lag down so hard we couldnt finish a match. Different story now.

Entrenchment and Diplomacy brought the old Starcraft tactic of the *fatal funnel* to space-based RTS games with the use of warp-disruption satellites, space mines, and (starting with Entrenchment) battlestations as a defensive structure - one of my nastier tactics is to deploy the entire set of delayers (gauss cannon, fighter hangers, mines, *and* a battlestation or two) to a chokepoint (especially one without planets) buying myself time if I can force the enemy the *longer way around* - or even roadblocking the opposition entirely if I can put enough bite in the defenses.

Always my personal tactic. Nab a small area of the system for myself, throw a much smaller amount of funds into one/two bottleneck systems and just slowly build up my forces/tech till I can just push extremely hard. I have yet to have this tactic work on an AI though. Still, turtling in Sins is a fun challenge against such ruthless AI.

Does this game still take many hours to complete. I do not mind playing 2 or 3 hours, but beyond that gets kinda painful.

Supreme Commander is a game where I do not mind the time, but has sufficient action. Something similar to that would be nice.

Does this game still take many hours to complete. I do not mind playing 2 or 3 hours, but beyond that gets kinda painful.

Supreme Commander is a game where I do not mind the time, but has sufficient action. Something similar to that would be nice.

It is still a game with greater time investment than even SupCom. Although I have seen games in the realm of 30 minutes it usually lasts around 2-4 hours.

  • 9 months later...

So this is a "stand-alone sequel" to SoaSE, but it's the same engine and the same content with new additions and tweaks... so basically it's an expansion. I find this somewhat confusing, but anyway. I'm mainly surprised that 4 years after SoaSE IronClad is still essentially working on the same game, rather than a true sequel.

If they finally fixed the unplayable lag you'd get from putting several AI players and letting them get huge armies (which was entirely CPU-bound), I might give it a go. It was actually a great RTS, it just didn't support, performance-wise, what it allowed a player to do, which was incredibly frustrating.

I played Entrenchment quite a bit, but the game would drop to single-digit framerates with several AIs on large maps, after a while. Combine this with the inherently slow gameplay and it was unbearable to play. I did play some multiplayer, and got crushed of course, but then again you had to wait such a long time to get a game going. And now with Diplomacy out there's no one playing Entrenchment anymore, so I'm basically stuck buying Diplomacy if I want to play any more multiplayer. So it's that combination of factors that really killed the game for me.

I really hope they improve the performance. I know that they're improving the engine in terms of image quality though (see here).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!