OS X.5: A review from a former Wintel User


Recommended Posts

Saturday was a great day. Not only did I clean my atrociously dusty room, but I came home from the city with a technological gem. The all new iMac. All my friends asked "where's the computer" and I laughed and proclaimed, "That, dear sir, is the computer." All of the wants I wanted in a computer were there. Style and performance. Elegance and power. But, what really sets this unique machine apart in what drives it, and what makes any modern computer... the OS. When you think of OS X, you think of confusion and how hard it must be the go all the way to the left to close a window instead of the right. There are several burning questions I had about OS X, and how hard it would be to switch. Where do I put my files. Where do I get to this location? How do I get through the layout of files? How in God's name do I use Automator? Where the heck is the C drive? These question, surprisingly, were very simple to answer, and hopefully this article can give you a bit of insight on the mysteries of OS X.

Intro

2242674563_3b83f51b40.jpg?v=0

Thanks for that amazing welcome. Bem-vin-idoko... whatever.

Setup was really easy, and fast. Last time I remembered, Windows took maybe 20min to set up. OS X took less than ten. I entered my info, and I was ready to use my computer. The dock popped right up. The first thing I wanted to do was figure out how files were arranged in the system. I realized that my worries of a complicated file arrangment were silly thoughts. The files are actually less complicated than Windows. In Windows, you can find C:> Program Files, Windows, etc. But in OS X, it's simply Applications (Which holds all of your applications), Users (which holds all of the media specific to each user), Library (which is kind of like your Program Files), and System (which is like WINDOWS). Each file name helped me and everyone else on the computer help locate ourselves, and revealed the contents of each folder.

Setup of Apps

Setup was pretty straightforward. You drag the App icon into the Application folder. Instead of shortcuts on the desktop, you simply drop it onto the dock. It keeps all of your icons in order, and it looks pretty, too.

2242674559_d9b969ee76.jpg?v=0

Whoa... trippy.

Glorified Features

As you know, Leopard boasts many features that people could care less about. I was one of those people. Stacks? Useless. RSS in Mail? Don't need it. Time Machine? Waste of space. Wait! Don't go thrash me with a post. Keep reading. All of these features actually made my OS X experience complete. Heres how.

Stacks- Stacks are sensational. Why didn't somebody think of this before? I don't constantly move files around, so I thought that Stacks would be useless. Come to find out, I can't imagine my daily work without it. Take my Applications stack. I don't want a bagillion icons on the dock. Thats why I can open the stack, and open an App in the convenient grid layout. And downloads. Instead of opening a large finder window, I can access my downloaded files on the fly. Still not convinced? Trust me, it is a dream.

RSS- I NEVER used RSS in any sort of way before OS X. I thought it was unneeded. But, I soon realized that it was so much faster to just open Mail and read through the headlines than opening up a webpage every time I wanted to get the news. I know that there are options on Windows for RSS, but having my eMail and my news in one convenient location is fantastic. Plus, the RSS screensaver is very cool, too.

Time Machine- You may think it's a waste, but I notice no loss in speed or performance with Time Machine on. Plus, it is very convenient. I actually used it yesterday for a file I lost. Some may say that the Vista alternative is just as good, and it is, but Time Machine seems simpler to me. I mean, how much simpler can you get than off and on?

The Simple Things

The things I love about OS X are the simple detail. Do I want scroll arrows at the bottom or the top and bottom? The possibilities for conforming OS X are endless. The simple designs are beautiful and delicate. I can't imagine if they missed anything.

Minor Annoyances

Apple is infamous for the lack of the right click mouse... or at least they used to be. Sure, the Mighty Mouse can right click, but it doesn't feel right to me. So, I use the Ctrl-Click method. It may seem a hassle, and at times, it is. But it really isn't bad. Really.

Closing apps involve more than just clicking the pretty button. You have to Command-Q and all that jazz. I understand why. You can close a window while having a process running. It's actually convenient, but others who use the computer don't actually understand, so they have 20+ plus apps running at a time. Trying to explain that to people is a little troublesome.

In Conclusion...

So. As you can guess, OS X is the coolest thing I've ever used on a computer. It's fast, amazing, and cool. Not to mention pretty. If you have any questions as a current Windows user, don't be afraid to ask. A lot of you Apple-ites may say that this is all basic stuff, and your right. You have to understand that I'm trying to deliver answers to Windows users who have used Windows all of their life, like me. So, if you are considering OS X or a Mac, trust me, you won't be disappointed.

Edited by Cormier6083

Not a bad review from a non uber-techy mac zealot. Funny you mention the subtleties about the OS as their are a few that tick me off, of which includes the right click and a host of other shortcuts I've mastered on the PC side of the universe. Yes I know you can reconstruct shortcuts etc but for the horrible travesty that might be Win OS, its the subtleties that keep me here.

But dam, OS X doesn't look bad :p Wow, I could compare women based on the previous model.....

Nicely written review. There is definitely some great progress that has been made with Leopard. I'm glad, with the recent updates, that some of the bugs in iLife have been worked out too.

Where did you get the wallpaper in the second screenshot? Link please?

Nicely written review. There is definitely some great progress that has been made with Leopard. I'm glad, with the recent updates, that some of the bugs in iLife have been worked out too.

Where did you get the wallpaper in the second screenshot? Link please?

Here you go! Props to Fr3d for linking the wall in the "Workstations" thread.

http://www.fr3d.org/dev/null/Leopard_TimeMachine.jpg

hmm, when I tried osx86 for a month straight I didn?t feel like you do.

It works great for basic things, internet, email etc. I however don?t just do "basic" things. I do video encoding, gaming, graphics design, music, videos, programming etc.

For me osx could not deliver in the way that I need an os to deliver, I need to be able to have a wide variety of choices for everything, I ABSOLUTELY HATE ITUNES... I program in VS.net and SQL so osx didn?t help me.

I will say that it was very very friendly and that I was not confused about anything. The speed was nice considering it was emulation for a few apps; also internet browsing was nice for the most part, except when plug-ins were required etc.

I?m glad to hear that you enjoyed switching.

Yeah, the Mighty Mouse looks nice, but the scroll ball dies after a few months as well. Wish Apple would fix it up a bit :\

My MM is two years old and I haven't had any problems with it at all. :blink:

hmm, when I tried osx86 for a month straight I didn?t feel like you do.

It works great for basic things, internet, email etc. I however don?t just do "basic" things. I do video encoding, gaming, graphics design, music, videos, programming etc.

hmmm, as far as I know, OSX can handle most of those and excels at a few of them.

on the programming, its good if you're a lamp programmer not a .net

hmm, when I tried osx86 for a month straight I didn't feel like you do.

It works great for basic things, internet, email etc. I however don't just do "basic" things. I do video encoding, gaming, graphics design, music, videos, programming etc.

OSX excels in everything you mentioned above. When you say OSX86? Do you mean OSX on non-Apple hardware. Well, I think, that's what your problem was.

Get a proper right click mouse--it'll work fine. Mighty Mouse is utter crap.
Yeah, the Mighty Mouse looks nice, but the scroll ball dies after a few months as well. Wish Apple would fix it up a bit :\

Yes to both of these, the "scroll nipple" on my MM stopped working one day (couldn't scroll up or down), ended up buying a new mouse for my PC and used the old one for my Mac, it works great.

And you can program .NET apps on the Mac, but IMO nothing really beats VS.NET (I love MS's development apps)

I like OSX but I can't STAND apples mouses that can't right click, ctrl+clicking drives me insane! I have macs at my school and it gets so annoying that I can't just right click. Who the HELL at apple decided (Let's make our mouse practically useless and remove right click for no damn reason!) /rant

I like OSX but I can't STAND apples mouses that can't right click, ctrl+clicking drives me insane! I have macs at my school and it gets so annoying that I can't just right click. Who the HELL at apple decided (Let's make our mouse practically useless and remove right click for no damn reason!) /rant

But then Macs had a mouse before Windows was a spec in Bills eye.

Its what you grow up with, you've used windows, you expect a right click button

people who started on macs have never noticed any difference

and Oh, macs can right click, they;ve being able to for years!

I like OSX but I can't STAND apples mouses that can't right click, ctrl+clicking drives me insane! I have macs at my school and it gets so annoying that I can't just right click. Who the HELL at apple decided (Let's make our mouse practically useless and remove right click for no damn reason!) /rant

The Mighty Mouse is a multi-button mouse. Has been since it was released. The buttons are just touch-sensitive hence it looks like it only has one button.

OSX excels in everything you mentioned above. When you say OSX86? Do you mean OSX on non-Apple hardware. Well, I think, that's what your problem was.

Except for the gaming part :p

Nice review, I'd love to get my hands on Leopard, however, I can't really afford a Mac right now :ermm:

The Mighty Mouse is a multi-button mouse. Has been since it was released. The buttons are just touch-sensitive hence it looks like it only has one button.

But it still sucks. The scroll ball becomes unusable after a while, it just gets so dirty. Why Apple doesn't make it quick and simple to take it apart and clean it is beyond me. They'd rather maintain the clean lines and have you spend another $69 for a new one with a few months shelf life.

I just replaced it with a Microsoft wireless notebook mouse, and it works great, much better than the Mighty Mouse, I think.

Nice review, but [rant]I don't like Macintosh nonetheless. I'm a programmer and a gamer. I can't use Visual Studio nor my favorite games on a Mac. So, too bad Apple, I'm sticking with Windows. But there are other minor things.

First I don't WANT my OS to organize my stuff for me, to provide me with a "user" folder and an "application" folder and whatnot. I want to know where that folder is located and usually it is not where I want it to, or down a complicated path. I create my own Program Files, on the hard drive partition I reserved for applications. I create my own user folders, on the hard drive partition I reserved for files. My own way of organizing my files is better for me than the default OS way.

Ok Windows does the same thing, but that's precisly one the gripes I have with Windows too.

Next, I hate that bulky dock at the bottom of the screen. I don't want things that inflate when I mouse over them, I don't want them jumping around gaily when I click on them. Besides aesthetical reasons, the damn thing just takes too much space. There's already a bar at the top of the screen with many functionality, now I have to get a second one at the bottom, a large and animated one. Where do I put my windows now?

Next, why is it so hard to maximize a window? Double-clicking doesn't work. None of the three standard buttons do it. So since I'm not aware of yet another mac-[insert key here] shortcut here, I have to manually expand the window. Then they minimize at the bottom-right of the screen, yes, with a graphical representation of the contents, but so tiny its useless and much less informative than the sensible, sobre title used in Windows. Well you can make them huge if you like your dock to be huge but I'd rather make it as small as possible and make my screen estate actually useful.

Next, Safari font rendering looks horrible, and Apple keyboards, mice and lcd screens are simply among the cheapest I ever saw.

Oh yeah OS X is better for multimedia. Right. I had Digital Performer hang or crash at least once everyday on the G4 I used for a year.[/rant]

Great review, and really nicely written (Y)

I have been using OS X since I bought my MacBook in November, and it is wonderful for University life. Everything is simple, elegant and clear...it is actually a joy to use OS X sometimes.

Windows is a great operating system as well, and I could not completely switch from one to the other, I work better using both. I have Vista on my desktop, but I still find myself lieing down in bed with my MacBook writing this post (albeit with a hangover) so that says something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!