Recommended Posts

I just use middle click on my mouse, and I end up doing the same in Firefox (since some windows i want to open in the background instead of replacing the current tab), but I'd like to be able to avoid multiple windows unless I specifically open it.

And I'm talking about this port (or "sub-port") http://www.atoker.com/blog/2008/02/10/webk...-cairo-support/

I just use middle click on my mouse, and I end up doing the same in Firefox (since some windows i want to open in the background instead of replacing the current tab), but I'd like to be able to avoid multiple windows unless I specifically open it.

And I'm talking about this port (or "sub-port") http://www.atoker.com/blog/2008/02/10/webk...-cairo-support/

Well, my laptop doesn't have other than an emulated middle click, and I dug up that cairo with windows subport. Now if they can just get it out the door for us. I also learned about the epiphany webkit project and the various other webkit on Linux and devices that are out there. I love search engines.

Safari needs to look native in Windows, or else it will never take off.

I agree that it needs to look more native to Windows, just like iTunes needs to. However, I don't agree that it needs to look more like that in order to take off because iTunes took off and that doesn't look native to Windows...

If they aren't going to make iTunes or Safari native to Windows then they should at least make them consistent with each other on the Windows platform and put the same Close, Maximize and Minimize buttons on Safari which they have in iTunes.

i heard 3.1 is coming out soon

Yes, it is, at least on the Mac platform. Not sure if they are planning a simultaneous release on the Windows platform.

Am I the only one who loved the way the fonts looked on the Windows Safari?? :s

Not at all, I think Safari has great font rendering. It looks good on Windows, although its actual methods of rendering were borrowed from OS X's Quartz technology. It looks as good as ClearType does on Vista, I think.

I tried Safari 3.0.4 and went back to Firefox in 20 minutes. Couldn't stand it.

That's a new record.

I agree, Safari doesn't belong on Windows, it's just not "there." It really sticks out, just like Firefox 2 does on OS X.

Safari needs to look native in Windows, or else it will never take off.

Agreed. Between Safari and iTunes, Apple seems far too concerned with the aesthetics of the software itself, and not how it integrates into the rest of the platform. One of the reasons people are drawn to OS X is not because it looks beautiful, but because everything works together. Safari for Windows (as well as iTunes), does not. And I doubt this will change because it would go against Apple's (smug?) image.

Yes, it is, at least on the Mac platform. Not sure if they are planning a simultaneous release on the Windows platform.

Not at all, I think Safari has great font rendering. It looks good on Windows, although its actual methods of rendering were borrowed from OS X's Quartz technology. It looks as good as ClearType does on Vista, I think.

I agree, Safari doesn't belong on Windows, it's just not "there." It really sticks out, just like Firefox 2 does on OS X.

Agreed. Between Safari and iTunes, Apple seems far too concerned with the aesthetics of the software itself, and not how it integrates into the rest of the platform. One of the reasons people are drawn to OS X is not because it looks beautiful, but because everything works together. Safari for Windows (as well as iTunes), does not. And I doubt this will change because it would go against Apple's (smug?) image.

I think firefox looks hella lot more integrated in OSX than Safari does on windows. At least it tries to have a somewhat osx-like look. Safari looks ridiculously out of place in windows and so does itunes.

Safari, imo, is a terrible browser (on Windows).

It hogs more memory than I've seen any other browser. It loads pages slower than Opera, the interface is not for me, the font rendering is crap. Also, certain pages don't work right or look right. Did I mention the fact that it's a huge memory (Virtual memory too) hog?

God damn, Apple software on Windows is MAJOR FAIL.

I will agree that Apple software ported to Windows is absolutely terrible. (iTunes, Quicktime, Safari, QUICKTIME)

However, I will say I like the ability to run Safari and render websites how they would look in OS X. The font rendering looks a lot nicer depending on what I'm viewing.

Am I the only one who loved the way the fonts looked on the Windows Safari?? :s

No I loved the way it displays the web pages but I think the memory is the only let down otherwise I would use it all the time.

Safari's non-native UI didn't really bother me too much. In fact, it looked quite refreshing (despite the dull shade of grey that was all over the place). But however, like others said, it used too much memory for its own good, the fuzzy font rendering looked terrible in my eyes, and it used twice the disk space of Firefox.

And it lacks one crucial thing that Firefox has: PLUGINS!

I tried Safari 3.0.4 and went back to Firefox in 20 minutes. Couldn't stand it.

That's a new record.

Same here, brother, same here.

Gee, I'm liking Safari for Windows, a lot.

Sure it does not have the plug-in extensibility of FF, and it could do with the ability to change the HSV of the various widgets, and the bookmarks manager lacks some right click facility. However, I like it, and I like using it. The Find features are nice, the grammar checking, etc.

The only issue right now is that the 3.1 beta cannot log into Neowin so I will have to back up and go with 3.0.4. Which is no real problem, as I don't have to be bleeding edge.

Safari is pointless on Windows until they fix the damn memory usage. My system has 2gb of ram under Windows XP, after Safari has been open for 10 minutes its using 10% of my memory alone. It can use up to 500mb on its own, which is ridiculous. Not a problem, unless you're like many people that have a web browser open in the background while they do other stuff.

Its just not usable, no matter how fast it is.

Safari is pointless on Windows until they fix the damn memory usage. My system has 2gb of ram under Windows XP, after Safari has been open for 10 minutes its using 10% of my memory alone. It can use up to 500mb on its own, which is ridiculous. Not a problem, unless you're like many people that have a web browser open in the background while they do other stuff.

Its just not usable, no matter how fast it is.

Where have I heard this complaint before?

Oh, I know against Phoenix, now Firefox for years now. I'm betting others have heard it against Opera.

On my computer, Firefox 2.0.x through 3.0.b4 have had huge memory footprints, as has Opera. And yes, sometimes Safari will eat up to 70 MB with several tabs, but so has Firefox. And looking at them both via Task Manager, I note that Safari seems to release ram when minimized by default, unlike Firefox.

But then both 3.0 versions, whether Firefox or Safari are in beta and issues like that must be expected.

Safari is pointless on Windows until they fix the damn memory usage. My system has 2gb of ram under Windows XP, after Safari has been open for 10 minutes its using 10% of my memory alone. It can use up to 500mb on its own, which is ridiculous. Not a problem, unless you're like many people that have a web browser open in the background while they do other stuff.

Its just not usable, no matter how fast it is.

The other night I noticed for the first time my Firefox was at 200mb but that was open for like 6 hours so not bad.

Skip 3.04 and try out the latest webkit. Fastest browser ever.

http://nightly.webkit.org/

How are you even supposed to even get the safari nightly builds to run? I was expecting a full safari build in there. Do I need to install Safari first? This is weird. Thanks.

<edit> Yeah had to install Safari first..figured it out.</edit>

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!