HP iPAQ 312 Travel Companion GPS


Recommended Posts

Review originally published on my blog.

I would say I'm quite good with maps and for that reason I've never needed a GPS device. Having said that, I'm also deeply intrigued by the technology. Today I received a HP iPAQ 312 Travel Companion to review.

2256858507_8225f17091.jpg

Prior to this, I had no idea Hewlett Packard had made a GPS product. This is in fact their second. Still, I was a little worried they might be stepping into unfamiliar territory and the quality of this product would reflect their lack of experience in the field. Having played with it now, it has overcome all my fears and I believe there's no reason why anyone looking for a GPS device should exclude this from their list. Here's my what I found.

2257655786_fe5f4ea551.jpg

At the first impression, you'll come to admire how beautiful the user interface is on this gorgeous high-resolution (800?480) resolution screen. Each icon is finely detailed and there are plenty of them. The cool blue theme is consistent yet refreshing.

2257656298_dfa261a603.jpg

The interface is also well optimized for touch, the only method of input. Unlike the capacitative multi-touch craze, this device uses the traditional resistive touch technology which means any object forced onto the display will register. A stylus is included and sits in a slot on top of the device, but because the buttons are so large anyway there's little if any reason to use them.

2257066959_bb9b82197b.jpg

You might be led to believe this device is running a custom operating system - perhaps Symbian or Java, but in fact like most of the other HP iPAQ devices it runs Windows, Windows CE 5.0 to be exact. And no, it hasn't crashed. This is a great example of a Windows device that doesn't scream Windows.

2257656128_753d99a9eb.jpg

By looking at some of the promotional HP images of this device, you might be easily convinced that this is a large device, but in fact it's very compact. In comparison, it's smaller than my mouse. There's minimal bevel around the generous 4.3-inch screen. Whilst the screen size doesn't hinder readability, it would have been nice if it was just a little bigger to space out the smaller buttons a little more.

2256858051_6bfef0fc2f.jpg

On the right side is a rotatable and clickable scroll wheel - similar feel to a mouse scroll wheel, this serves as an easy way to zoom in and out of maps as well as changing volume and screen brightness. There is also a rubber flap for antenna, headphone and USB connectors. And at the very bottom, a small reset button.

2256858345_a4a6fb7bb8.jpg

On the left side is the slot for the Secure Digital card. No SD card is required to operate the device, however you can access the media stored on it.

2256860823_583e085726.jpg

A big selling feature of this device is the 3D map capability, which is a combination of the software and third-party mapping data. Unfortunately the digital map data in Australia is very primitive and does not show buildings and other structures as it would in US or Europe, but you can still see some of the 3D effects on bridges as above.

2257657978_968cbe4464.jpg

Personally, I find myself switching back to 2D view again and again because 3D view is quite processing incentive, and doesn't give the fluid experience of panning around a map very well.

2257659230_a75178f90d.jpg

This device had no problems routing all the routes I threw at it, including those in outer suburbia. All the returned routes were exactly the ones I know are the best from personal experience. Routing journeys of around 40 kilometers (25 miles) took less than 4 seconds. Route recalculations such as those from a wrong turn were under 2 seconds. In the route details screen, it was smart enough to show me how many kilometers were traveled on highways and if there were any tolled highways or roads.

2257660574_343bafd485.jpg

However if you're a freeloader like myself, you can easily set up to avoid toll roads as well as many others unfavorable road features.

2256862957_c0b11f45f6.jpg

The turning point of this device for me from just a digital map to a useful driving tool is this feature of address filtering. I'm not too familiar with GPS devices so I'm not sure how many of them offer similar functionality like this, but what it does is it prevents you from typing addresses which do not exist such as road names and suburb names.

For example, after you input a suburb, it will only allow you to type the roads that exist in that suburb. This filtering continues to cut down letter-by-letter. When appropriate, it will switch views to present you with a list of options you can select.

2257659916_f99e1494c9.jpg

The same applies to street numbers too.

The text-to-speech synthesizer is equally impressive as well.Whilst it doesn't announce street names> Impressively, it even announces street names through the text-to-speech engine available on some languages including US English but not Australian English, a feature usually available on devices $200 more expensive than this. It provides very clear and natural directions via the loudspeaker on the back.

2256861005_5a1a56b8c6.jpg

Having walked around on foot with the device, the GPS accuracy has an error margin of around 10 meters which is not that much of a deal in a car. However after turning a corner and changing orientation, it is able to correct itself pretty much instantly. Surprisingly with the internal antenna, I was even able to receive some GPS signal on and off under a tin metal roof.

2257656498_3024e51a12.jpg

In addition to the navigation features, this device also includes a range of basic entertainment functions like viewing pictures, videos, music and a range of arcade games. I applaud for HP for trying to extend the device with useful multimedia features, but it really falls short.

The Achilles heel of this device is that it is severely underpowered. For example, when trying to play a standard-definition Windows Media Movie video, it was downright unwatchable almost like a picture slideshow. On top of that, when the announcer informed me the GPS signal had been lost, the video actually froze so the speech synthesizer could do its job. Either the multimedia software is severely unoptimized or the processor is not powerful enough, I hope HP takes this problem seriously for the next version. It could have been a serious PMP-contender, but the software and hardware is just not up to scratch.

2256860305_22f8b3aa19.jpg

Since I don't have a Bluetooth phone, I wasn't able to check out the Bluetooth connectivity features but at the least it offers hands-free answering capability to receive and dial calls. Most points of interest on the map also has a telephone number which makes it even easier to book reservations at your destinations without ever touching your phone.

2256857529_edabe26e02.jpg

The device comes with a standard set of accessories including USB cable, wall-socket power charger, car charger, car windscreen mount, dashboard mount as well as faux leather pouch.

At a recommended retail price of US$450, this GPS device does slip a little into the pricey side. Having briefly compared it with some competing products, I think the user interface alone might be worth its difference. For its second try, HP has built a very solid device with a great piece of software that really shows they're committed to the GPS experience as much as any of the other competitors. Can't wait to see where they'll go next.

Check out my Flickr gallery for more pictures of this device.

Update:> I decided to try out the HP Content Manager available from the iPAQ website. Much to my surprise, there’s an abundance of updates already available for my device which I believe to be fairly recent.

hp_content_manager.jpg

From here, I can download and install base software updates, map updates, POI updates, menu languages and voice languages. At the time of writing, there are 560MB worth of updates I’m downloading and installing. I’m going to see if this has any impact on performance.

Edited by Long
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/619328-hp-ipaq-312-travel-companion-gps/
Share on other sites

when trying to play a standard-definition Windows Media Movie video, it was downright unwatchable almost like a picture slideshow.

Can you provide more detail? What was the resolution/bit rate? If you don't know, how long was the file and what size was it?

Nice review... i'm tempted to buy a GPS device but know almost nothing about them. One thing that concerns me is battery life. How long does this device last using GPS? Does it have a replaceable battery? How long does it take to charge from empty?

Most people would just plug it into a cigarette lighter in the car to supply power. I believe the batteries usually last in the range of a few hours. It would really depend on the unit.

For those asking about the spec, check out the link below for the spec on the 314 (similar to the 312 reviewed).

http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/uk/en/ho/WF...=reg_R1002_UKEN

Nice review... i'm tempted to buy a GPS device but know almost nothing about them. One thing that concerns me is battery life. How long does this device last using GPS? Does it have a replaceable battery? How long does it take to charge from empty?

I wouldn't be able to give you an exact hours number, but I would say it's quite battery intensive, especially when it's in GPS mode. It does have a replaceable battery, but I don't think you'd want to swap out batteries while driving. The car charger is the most obvious way to go.

Obviously, but that doesn't really help when you are walking around with it :p

Oh you'd be fine if you're day-hiking with it or something, it's not like it'll run out of battery half way. But you'll probably have problems with it if you're going on a multi-day camping trip.

It seems like a good GPS, but reading more review of the device is turning me off....

From ZdNet:

http://review.zdnet.com/navigation/hp-ipaq...6-32595205.html

Disappointingly, the voice prompts were a bit soft even with the volume at its highest level and there was a bit of reverberation. Also, the text-to-speech directions weren't as smooth as some of the other GPS devices we tested as it mangled and chopped up the pronunciation of some street names. However, more concerning is the system's ineptitude at route recalculations. We missed a number of turns to test this functionality, and while the iPaq 310 was quick to come up with new directions, they were completely circuitous. Instead of coming up with a new route, it would try to have us go back to the point where we missed the actual turn instead of plotting a new course from our current location.

From Digital Trends:

http://reviews.digitaltrends.com/review4898.html

Since that route wasn?t working, pun intended, we decided to just enter our zip code. Once we did that, it asked us for ?name/zip code.? What is this supposed to mean? We tried typing in ?Starbucks? but it wouldn?t let us complete the word. We were befuddled, but this is pretty much par for the course on this device. The interface is utterly baffling.

The Terminator

We also had an issue with not being able to cancel navigation. Typically when you are navigating to a destination, and you navigate away from the screen giving you directions it?ll ask you if you want to cancel the route planning, but that is not the case with the 310; it keeps navigating, no matter what. In fact, if you choose a route and then decided to just cancel, it won?t, even if you go back to the home page. From there, pressing the ?map? button takes you back to the route you were previously navigating. One time we even turned it off because we were tired of hearing it tell us to turn here and go there, and it magically turned itself back on a few minutes later to tell us to make a turn. It?s literally like the Terminator as far as navigation goes.

Extras

You are supposed to be able to add music, movies and pictures to the 310, but we were unable to figure out how to do it. There?s nothing about importing content in the instructions, and when we connected the device to our PC we got a notice saying the drive in the 310 had to be formatted before it could be used.

CNet :

http://reviews.cnet.com/car-gps-navigation...7-32595205.html

The bad: The iPaq 310 was pretty awful at route recalculations, and the voice prompts weren't very loud or clear.

Most of the review site rate the HP device at 5/10 or at best, 6.3/10 - Very low score I would say. Only GPSReview.net (http://www.gpsreview.net/hp-ipaq-310/) gave a very good review. So I wonder if it's really good, o:|really bad....

:|

It seems like a good GPS, but reading more review of the device is turning me off....

Okay here's what I have to say.

Audio

The device comes with dozens of voice languages. There's even dozens more non-English languages you can download yourself onto the device with the content manager software. Usually each language has at least 4 voices - 2 male, 2 female. Each of the male/female voices has a text-to-speech version, and a non-TTS version. The non-TTS versions - the ones that don't pronounce street names - are generally 'better sounding' because they're more consistent.

A couple of the voices ones can be very quiet even on maximum volume, which is what the ZDNet review refers to.

One of the voices is described as v1.1, as opposed to the standard v1.0. Whilst I don't know what determines their version number, it sounds way better than everything else. On that note, I hope they will eventually offer more v1.1 voices in the future.

Personally I prefer TTS so I stick to a v1.0 TTS voice. I picked one that sounded the best to me and wasn't quiet at all.

Basically, I can confirm there are problems with some of the voices, but the number of choices available make it a non-issue for me.

Routing

I have no problems entering addresses or navigating the interface. It is a very unique inteface I must admit and doesn't provide very clear instructions and how to get started. But once you play through it a few times, as you would, it's very to pick up what to do.

I've had no problems with actual route calculations. It takes me exactly where I would have went if I did it by hand, and even route recalculations when you make a wrong turn make sense too. It's never directed me in a loop, or a road which doesn't make sense for me. Of course, there's always changes to roads and sometimes it thinks you're going off-route when it's just a simple detour, but as long as you know what you're doing, it'll catch up pretty quickly.

Its not true you can't cancel a route, but it's not very straightforward to do so. You have to go to the 'route mapping' menu and click on "Remove Destination". I don't think it'll be very often you'll want to cancel a route anyway.

Extras

I agree with getting media onto the device is not very clear. By default, the device is inproperly configured and doesn't read anything from your SD card. After a few attempts, I got it to work. But since the device is really a poor portable media player anyway (like I've pointed out), I wouldn't bother in general.

Edited by Long
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!