Mass Effect - PC version


Recommended Posts

Glad to see BioWare regained their sanity. Maybe this and Dragon Age will do some good to PC gaming, Although, With the supposed heavier-attention-on-action port going on here, I wonder if the RPG genre is really dead on the PC. R.I.P. Baldurs Gate.

Good, atleast we can run it at a playable FPS - The Console version is a joke.

I had no problems with that on the 360, but I had a HUGE issue with the bloody loading screens every 30 seconds, especially in the citadel. And yes, I count elevators as glorified loading screens as thats all they are. For an action rpg it really took you out of the game.

lthough, With the supposed heavier-attention-on-action port going on here, I wonder if the RPG genre is really dead on the PC. R.I.P. Baldurs Gate.
It'll probably be the same as the 360 with the benefit of hotkeys. Don't expect a step up over the console. For traditional RPG's theres dragon age and NWN2 (which I quite liked although I agree it wasnt BG2...was closer than NWN1 was but) Edited by Smigit
Any predictions on the specifications? I can play Crysis in max apart from AA which has to be set on 2x - how would it play compared to that?

Yo never mentioned a frame rate there, which would be no higher than 20 FPS.

I still havent decided if I should get this on x360 or pc

well depends if you want to wait or not. I doubt the PC version will change an awful lot besides quick slot support and having the downloadable content there so if you have a 360 maybe just go that.

Yo never mentioned a frame rate there, which would be no higher than 20 FPS.

I haven't actually checked, so I couldn't say. However, it's not laggy at all for me, and it plays as smooth as I need. Anyway, I can't wait to see what all the fuss is about, as I have yet to see a bad review about it.

Apparently the expected release date for Mass Effect (PC) is May 2008. It's a few months away but I have a feeling it'll be worth the wait. I'm glad I didn't get the Xbox 360 version when the game came out because I wouldn't have been able to play it (dead X360). It shouldn't be too demanding, hardware wise.

  • 3 months later...

I figured it's time I resurrect this thread, now that it's actually released and all. I must say the game is amazing. It runs so well on my PC and the load times are short. The decryption mini-game is fun (and hard at times). As expected, the graphics are superb.

Here are my specs:

  • Intel Core2Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz
  • ASUS P5K mobo
  • 2GB DDR2 667MHz
  • ATI Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB

The game has a launcher where you can pre-configure the graphics before launching the game itself. Upon clicking configure, it scans your hardware and determines the graphics settings for you. With my specs, it auto-set everything to high with 4xAA and anisotropic filtering enabled @ 1440x900. Increasing the resolution to 1680x1050 resulted in gameplay that was very playable with very few slowdowns.

You won't be disappointed if you waited for the PC version like I did. Kudos to BioWare for a wonderful game. They didn't simply port the game to the PC platform. They improved on it and made it even better.

NOTE: The DVD is not required to play the game. It is only required to install it.

You won't be disappointed if you waited for the PC version like I did. Kudos to BioWare for a wonderful game. They didn't simply port the game to the PC platform. They improved on it and made it even better.

NOTE: The DVD is not required to play the game. It is only required to install it.

My post was the one before yours and while months old I may as well ask, hows the loading times in this game? Would be good if your in a position to compare it to the XBox version but any comments appreciated.

Not that I'll buy it since I beat it on the 360, but I'm rather curious.

Great game, but the configuration utility crashes, so I can't go above 1280x1024 :/

I think you can change the resolution inside the game..., you dont need that utility...

I have been playing it for a bit, i already finish the game on the 360, and the graphics and FPS controls on the PC are enough reason to go through it again, that and the fact that the game rocks.

Yes, you can... and the highest resolution I can change it to is 1280x1024.

Update: I found the .ini file with the settings and changed it there... and it worked! I'm happier now, it looks a lot better, though it was pretty sweet even at a low resolution.

Edited by Darrian
My post was the one before yours and while months old I may as well ask, hows the loading times in this game? Would be good if your in a position to compare it to the XBox version but any comments appreciated.

Not that I'll buy it since I beat it on the 360, but I'm rather curious.

The loading times are short. It loads once at the beginning for about 15-25 seconds. After that, you play through until there's a major cinematic cutscene. In that case, it'll say "Loading" on the screen for a second or two. I've only played the Xbox 360 version once at a friend's house so I don't know how it compares. However I can say it's much better than other PC games I've played. Quite frankly I'm surprised at how fast the game loads, considering the amount of content in it.

PCGH (PC Gaming Hardware) has a performance review for Mass Effect. Unfortunately, the highest resolution benchmarked was 1680x1050 with max details and 16xAF. Here's the image (click to enlarge):

ME_GPU_1680.PNG

SOURCE

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!