Why can't people spell right on the internet?


Recommended Posts

Now I know people shouldn't be too picky about this on the Internet, but some people just make me pull out my hair. I'm not talking about slangs or words like millennium, psychology or tyrannosaurus rex. I'm talking about these.

- Am-I'm

- To-Too-Two

- Where-were-we're

- There-they're-their

- Know-now

- I-eye

- Your-you're

- Here-hear

- Off-of

Am I the only one who gets extremely annoyed by this? :wacko:

The one that bugs me the most is "were" and "we're", because it's completely different. Now, I know that it's the norm on alot of sites/games etc to leave out punctuation, but leaving out the ' is COMPLETELY different :p

I don't know what you mean with "I - eye". Hear-here is another annoying one.

Or how about "should of" instead of "should've"?

Very veary simple reason. Most people still use IE, and there is no spell check in these boxes. When I want to sound credible, eye copy-paste in to Word :-p

Oh, haha, your post is about word usage and grammar: get the title right!!1!!eleven

True, but I'm picking on the most simplest thing. Stuff you're suppose to know before leaving the 4th grade.

I agree....

How is it possible that people cannot properly spell the words they use everyday?

How is it possible for someone who speaks 'English', of the American dialect or otherwise, to not know the words they use?

*edit-

To the OP: I think you meant "Why can't people on the Internet spell 'correctly'."

"Internet" is a proper noun and should be capitalized.

You should never end a sentence with a prepositional phrase: "on the Internet".

:D

Edited by Regression_88

It annoys me in some way, but in others it doesn't. For the most part, it's just like someone here said - there is no spell checker in IE. However, I do find it strange people do not take at least a few seconds to check what they've written first before posting. It's not that hard, is it?

Considering that you can take your time to word your conversations/school paper/reviews/newsletter/etc. before sending it in, I find the present situation amusing.

Scirwode

First of all I have to agree with your sentiments, I am also of the opinion that people on the internet have all the tools available to avoid looking like an uneducated yobbo! That said, the thread header should read: Why "can't" people spell correctly on the internet? And not:

Why can't people spell right on the internet?

The is also a BIG difference between the word ?your? ?you?re??re>"Your&quotour", as in the first sentence, meaning: You is the second person singular and plural pronoun in Engl>yourb>yours or what have you>youyour d>You'r're being very noisy today&>you aryou are being very noisy today!

There are many of these spelling errors that come to mind beside the ones that you have highlighted. Thanks for an excellent post!

The one that bugs me the most is "were" and "we're", because it's completely different. Now, I know that it's the norm on alot of sites/games etc to leave out punctuation, but leaving out the ' is COMPLETELY different :p

I don't know what you mean with "I - eye". Hear-here is another annoying one.

Or how about "should of" instead of "should've"?

How about alot - should be 'a lot' ;)

lol u gaiz r juz 2 pikie

I guess that you are being "funny'! (Funny ha ha and not funny peculiar!) It is not really being [sic] ?pikie?. Speaking and writing correctly defines your character when you interact with people on the Internet. The reason I say this is because you rarely get to meet the person you are talking to and because of this, you tend to create an image of the person that could be way off the mark!

I guess that you are being "funny'! (Funny ha ha and not funny peculiar!) It is not really being [sic] ?pikie?. Speaking and writing correctly defines your character when you interact with people on the Internet. The reason I say this is because you rarely get to meet the person you are talking to and because of this, you tend to create an image of the person that could be way off the mark!
y3pp3rz

Imagine emailing a resume' or some other correspondence to someone and that person already knows you and your 'net presence.

Things like those spelling errors don't annoy me too much. However, large blocks of text without periods or commas are very frustrating to read.

Don't forget about "through" and "threw." :D

Edited by SakuraKira
y3pp3rz

Imagine emailing a resume' or some other correspondence to someone and that person already knows you and your 'net presence.

yepperz

I am not really following your logic, but so what..................!

Well, people like me that have not English as main language and don't take English courses will obliviously make errors. Sure FX Spellchecker helps, but it don't give me the right answer out a multi-choice result.

It can't be helped ^^; (Unless you want to pay me for Advanced English Courses)

It annoys me quite a bit but I have done it myself. I always do my best to scan things before I post but I still miss things.

I also hate when people say "I could care less" when they're trying to say "couldn't care less".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!