Why can't people spell right on the internet?


Recommended Posts

I can spell right!

R-I-G-H-T See? :D

I agree with you, it gets annoying when people use rotten grammar.

Damn you! I was searching though the posts to see if anyone had already posted this. My comical genius has once again been unrealised. Hope you're happy.

Now I know people shouldn't be too picky about this on the Internet, but some people just make me pull out my hair. I'm not talking about slangs or words like millennium, psychology or tyrannosaurus rex. I'm talking about these.

- Am-I'm

- To-Too-Two

- Where-were-we're

- There-they're-their

- Know-now

- I-eye

- Your-you're

- Here-hear

- Off-of

Am I the only one who gets extremely annoyed by this? :wacko:

Well, here in Norway, the English education in our schools is one of the best in world.

It's more a second language than an auxiliary language.

Still, the this sms/msn world of ours, good education does not help when people are LAZY,

and cut down you to "u" and other abbreviations.

One word that most people get wrong, which frustrates the hell out of me, is "lose" and "loose". "I don't want to loose my sanity"

That annoys me one hell of a lot and also when people make up words like.. "wouldent" and "couldent".

AHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

I think mistakes are fair enough, when it's an entire paragraph though then it's pretty bad if they are a native English speaker. What bugs me the most is all the 'teh' and things like that. I don't see what's funny about it at all, it just makes you sound about 5 years old.

None of this bothers me at all. :rolleyes:

There are all sorts of ways to speak and write. I almost never have problems figuring out what people mean to say whether they write the Queen's English or something sort of like it or something very different from it. :yes:

PS These sorts of thread annoy me because they make me pay too much attention to my own writing :laugh:

PPS I would like to know, though, what the difference between 'which' and 'that' is.

Little grammatical or spelling mistakes don't bother me. What does some of the laziness that goes on. Some people can't even take the time to spell check, capitalise and format their posts into something vaguely readable.

Just thought of something else. People who have to use tags in every sentence of their post. It drives me mad.

Edited by monkey13

Very simple answer. Todays schools don't teach students crap and most students don't pay a lick of attention anyway.

"THEY'RE" to busy talking on cell phones, or listening to "THEIR" ipods, or playing "THEIR" portable games.

In other words,

Half of the students today, would probably be classified as illiterate, in the days I went to school.

It's a little annoying, but hey -- it's only the Internet. :laugh:

Any idiot can get on a computer.

I remember one guy who spelled I'am ... he would never believe me when I told him it's spelled I'm.

Edited by Hum

the only one that **** me off to a large degree are those that either:

a) Do not use paragraphing (or worse, sentences). Also those that put a line break after each sentence.

b) write all in caps (or alternatively in a non default colour or size)

Either of the above is a quick way for me to close the tab and read something else. Spelling I can often forgive as long as I can get the general gist of it, especially online. But poor presentation through the lack of sentences, paragraphs ect is unforgivable. I don't even mind if the paragraphs aren't logically split into their own "theme" as is standard, as long as there isn't a full page with a single block of text I'm happy.

I suspect it's for the same reason that many can't form correct sentences, or punctuate correctly.

When you wrote, "Why can't people spell right on the internet?", you could have written "Why can't people on the Internet spell correctly?", or "Why don't people spell correctly when using the Internet?" (I'm ignoring the obvious fault with that question.)

There are several ways that you could have formed the question. You, ironically, (and yes, for once, this is irony being used in its correct context) managed to mess it up.

For the most part, it's pure laziness and a lack of respect for the reader. The author, in such cases, seems to expect the reader to take the time to put up with, and decipher, his or her errors, instead of taking the time to correct them at the time of writing.

Edited by SniperX
English isn't my first language, but I still get annoyed by people who abuse it.

I'm not a perfect English speaker/writer, but you'd expect that people with English as their first language should at least speak/write it as well as I do. :laugh:

I feel the same way. I always thought that native speakers should have the advantage (logically), but when talking about English and USA citizens, that logic fails for some (and I say so since I haven't read anyone from the UK write so badly).

I think what has happened is that before the internet, forums, MSN where we use a full keyboard to type became popular people used to text. In order to get around the low character limit and to speed the task up, as typing on a phone is a lot slower than a full size keyboard.

Trouble is these people have it so drilled into them they have transferred it to the computer/internet as its how they type. What is more I was talking to someone who said in order to "be cool" I am meant to use this text talk. I thnk ppl r 2 stuk in their ways 2 chnge.

I read somewhere that a percentage (I forget the figure) use "txt tlk" in their GCSE exams (Taken at the age of 15 in the UK) as its all they know. Oh well, the world will change. I use full sentences on MSN like I am in this post and it doesn't bother me, but that is because I am a very fast typist in comparison to most.

PS I'm 16.

I actually often type "of" instead of "off" usually because I'm typing quickly and not paying much attention, don't hit that "o" properly the second time around. I imagine its the same for many people...

That's a lame excuse considering the text remains on your screen until you click the submit button. Type it in as fast as you like then read what you actually typed and correct spelling and grammar errors before submitting the post.

There was a previous post on this site from someone asking for professional help at their place of business. How can one be taken seriously when there were six spelling errors and two grammar errors? I told him to get back with us when he completes the fifth grade and can write at least one sentence.

Perhaps i just use the net too much, but i was under the impression that "should of" is acceptable, while not as perfect as "should have" or "should've", i still wouldnt neccessary call it bad English.

unacceptable(!)

The worst are these people:

"That guy was crazy, I mean pysicho (I don't know if I spelled that right???)"

If you know you don't know, open up a new tab and look it the **** up, lazy ass! :argh:

I wholeheartedly agree. Its not rocket science. I'm such a pedant and as such will ensure that 98% of what I type is grammatically correct as well as right from a spelling point of view as well. How hard is it to google things?

The only time that errors are acceptable is if the person is not a native speaker. I learnt to spell between the ages of 3 and 11. Were these people asleep during this time? Its not idiocy because its not that hard - its laziness and I can't bear it.

GRRRRRR!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!