Why can't people spell right on the internet?


Recommended Posts

The only one that annoys me a little, because of the fact that it's wrong 90% of the times I see it is 'Loose' instead of 'Lose'

Thank you! I thought I was the only one annoyed by this.

The thing that annoys me about people lack of understanding of the english language, not really on the internet, but in everyday usage, is the word Ignorant, Ignorance......

Everyone in my generation seems to use it when someone is ignoring them like if they call someone name and they dont hear them or choose too ignore them they go "Oh he is being so ignorant".......I bite my tounge so much when people misuse it :p

People are lazy. When they communicate on the internet they want to get the message across fast and quick, without any worries of punctuation, spelling, or grammatical errors. It does tend to annoy me at times, on my forums most of the time. However, if I'm in a game I'll use short condensed versions of words because I'm pressed for time.

In my humble opinion, I think a lot of the examples of poor usage and understanding of the English language stem from younger people just not giving a rat's backside about their poor use of grammar.

Some more examples:

Ask - not "Aks". You do not "Aks" someone a question.

A "Duel" is where two people fight, as in "Dueling" - "Dual" means two-together or in combination. Using the two words interchangeably is due to over-education by XBox, PlayStation & Nintendo.

Why is it ok for a certain ethnic group of people to use the N-word to describe others in their ethnic group when it's not ok for those outside of that ethnic group to use the N-word? Is this a double-standard? Shouldn't that ethnic group be more opposed to using the N-word by their own?

Proper words:

They're - "They Are"

Their - "Their house"

There - "We went there"

I'm - "I am"

Your - "we went to your house"

You're - "You are the one"

It's - "It is..."

"its" - "This is its proper place"

I - "I must remember that when I am writing about myself that I should always captialize "I" in any sentence.

What ever happened to using proper punctuation and sentence structure? You should always start a sentence with the first letter of the first word capitalized and end a sentence with a punctuation mark, using proper punctuation along the way to separate concepts, ideas and conclusions; doing anything less just pushes proper usage skills into the proverbial basement. Someone told me once that when they read what I write that they get an odd sence that I'm talking to them from the past but saying things that are real and relevant to present time; I simply corrected them and said "No - it's just that you haven't read or been exposed to properly-formatted English"

i've seen people that put posts on this site as if they are just throwing their words into a box with absolutely no structure or syntax or even as if their words are just dribbling out of their brain and through their hands on to the page and think that it is nicely done when they are just showing how utterly clueless they are as to the proper use of english with no proper sentence structure and i'm pretty sure that it just stems from a case of the person posting their message as not caring to do things right as long as it just gets done this one single thing just utterly torques me off to no end there are no punctuation marks no capitalization or proper sentence structure i'm pretty sure that this kind of miscarriage of the english language stems from spending too much time in chat rooms and not enough time reading any good literature or even a textbook

How can anyone make sense of the words in the previous sentence? How can people think that the previous sentence is a totall acceptable use of English? Have educators lost control and have just capitulated in deference to just getting their lackadaisical students out-the-door?

It's my opinion that everyone who sees such misuse of English and writing and correctly identifies it as such has a moral imperative to correct the person or persons who are obviously clueless as to the proper use of punctuation, sentence structure and the proper spelling of words and / or their proper use.

Some might say that my post here is just me trying to show that I'm superior to others in the proper use of English. To those that are of that opinion, I offer the following suggestion: spend some time reading a novel or some other kind of book - you might be supprised at what you find!

--ScottKin

I blame SMS messaging. Kids have become so accustomed to "phone spelling" that they do it all the time now.

I've even seen job applications where they "text spell".

In this day and age of SMS texting, you should think yourself lucky you actually get whole words at all never mind the punctuation!

My gf's dad was a recruitment manager and he came across some shocking resumes from time to time written like they were just long SMSs. I really don't like where the English language is heading...

My absolute pet hate is when people turn he's into his.

eg. i think his gonna get it now

People are lazy. When they communicate on the internet they want to get the message across fast and quick, without any worries of punctuation, spelling, or grammatical errors. It does tend to annoy me at times, on my forums most of the time. However, if I'm in a game I'll use short condensed versions of words because I'm pressed for time.

What you say is true; it is symptomatic of just about everything in the modern world! Every activity that is undertaken, shopping at the supermarket, driving, heaven help us, playing games on your PC, chatting on the forum at Neowin, just about ANYTHING that you can think of, has to be done at once and as fast as possible! Why not play the game and then chat or stop the game and chat, but no everything needs to be done at breakneck speed! This results in inaccuracies across the board! (Excuse the unintentional pun.) I have heard people in the supermarket on the mobile phone talking to their wives, with the conversation going something like: ?Where are you now honey, I am in the frozen foods section!? For God?s sake, is this necessary? What the hell did people do before the advent of mobile phones?

The point that I am trying to make is why not slow down a little and take some care! If you know that your spelling and grammar sucks, it will take 30 seconds to check and correct these errors! Once your post is finished, cut the thing and past it into an open word document and guess what, the thing will actually check everything automatically. Once this has occurred it will also help you do corrections!

It appears that as with ?real? conversations no one is listening, everyone wants to get their five cents in as fast as possible! ?Quick, have to get my post up before old Fred beats me to it!?

My parting shot would be to clarify one thing, I am not suggesting that every single post at Neowin has to be grammatically perfect or that a post with spelling mistakes will result in you being shot at dawn, but please make an effort. Also to the non English speaking people, if your best is just that, then keep trying. (Cue to: A crescendo of applause that takes five minutes to die down! Bows to the crowd thinking, ?Man, that was almost:D soliloquy? :D

i spell like i want to spell you dont like it to bad nobodys perfect

& what ****es me off is when somebody trys correcting my spelling

Do you hate it because people are trying to help you? Deep down maybe you feel that you are not deserving of help? Do you feel insecure and angry when someone points a fault, for example, that you don't know how to write or spell correctly? A little embarrassed, so you transfer that embarrassment into anger?

People are trying to make you a better person, and you deserve to be that better person!

Dr_Phil.jpg

Don't be angry at your lack of education in the past, be angry because you are not doing anything about it today!

You are worth it! :hug:

i spell like i want to spell you dont like it to bad nobodys perfect

& what ****es me off is when somebody trys correcting my spelling

The thing is that you're only hurting yourself in the end. The more you do it and the more you're exposed to it will cause it to subtley interfere when you want to type something out properly for an important document or something like that.

I agree that it's just as annoying when people become way too adamant on correcting people all the time.

^Not true. If you have half a brain, you can spell how the hell you want whenever the hell you want.

People that correct spelling on the internet just make them selves look like ignorant pricks that have nothing better to do than bitch about everything.

I vote for worry about more important things like your own twisted self. Nobody in here is perfect enough to have any excuse to nit pick spelling on the net.

It's actually "why can't people spell correctly?"

Grammar is just as important. ;)

"Why can't people spell right on the internet?"

:pinch:

Why are people on the internet incapable of using correct grammar?

I think you got to it right before I did.

Nice post curme, that made my day! Some folk just do not get the point; in their minds it becomes the thing to do, solely to irritate the established wisdom by being unconventional, not realizing how foolish it makes them look!

Edited by Farstrider
^Not true. If you have half a brain, you can spell how the hell you want whenever the hell you want.

People that correct spelling on the internet just make them selves look like ignorant pricks that have nothing better to do than bitch about everything.

I vote for worry about more important things like your own twisted self. Nobody in here is perfect enough to have any excuse to nit pick spelling on the net.

Then let's not even bother to do anything properly.

Correct spelling and grammar might matter less on the internet when communicating with friends, etc. But bad habits die hard, and when your spelling/grammar abilities (as part of basic communication and language) really count, you'll end up looking dumb.

I also hate when people say "I could care less" when they're trying to say "couldn't care less".
The one that really gets me is "I could care less" that doesnt even make sense it should be "I couldn't care less"

Seriously annoys me.

I'm glad it's not just me that gets wound up by this! The incorrect version seems to be quite widespread in forums at the moment.

Steve.

I also hate when people say "I could care less" when they're trying to say "couldn't care less".

i hate it when people think that the phrase 'could care less' is necessarily incorrect. i've pointed out this error before, but i'll point it out again.

I could care less! you might say sometime in disgust. You might just as easily have said I couldn?t care less and meant the same thing! How can this be? When taken literally, the phrase I could care less means ?I care more than I might,? rather than ?I don?t care at all.? But the beauty of sarcasm is that it can turn meanings on their head, thus allowing could care less to work as an equivalent for couldn?t care less. Because of its sarcasm, could care less is more informal than its negative counterpart and may be open to misinterpretation when used in writing.

http://www.bartleby.com/64/C003/078.html

a second explanation might be this: 'could care less' means, literally, 'there is a lower level of care that i might exhixrding x'. inxords, x is actually less meaningful than one might think.

99% of people confuse 'that' and :angry:'. :angry:

When will people learn that 'that' is restrictive and 'which' is unrestrictive?

incidentally, the use of 'which' in place of 'that' is more prevalent in the uk than in the us.

but there are, in fact, legitimate reasons for using 'which' instead of 'that':

that / which (restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses). The standard rule requires that you use that only to introduce a restrictive (or defining) relative clause, which identifies the person or thing being talked about; in this use it should never be preceded by a comma. Thus, in the sentence The house that Jack built has been torn down, the clause that Jack built is a restrictive clause telling which specific house was torn down. Similarly, in I am looking for a book that is easy to read, the restrictive clause that is easy to read tells what kind of book is desired.

By contrast, you use which only with nonrestrictive (or nondefining) clauses, which give additional information about something that has already been identified in the context; in this use, which is always preceded by a comma. Thus you should say The students in Chemistry 101 have been complaining about the textbook, which (not that) is hard to follow. The clause which is hard to follow is nonrestrictive in that it does not indicate which text is being complained about; even if it were omitted, we would know that the phrase the textbook refers to the text in Chemistry 101. It should be easy to follow the rule in nonrestrictive clauses like this, since which here sounds more natural than that.

Some people extend the rule and insist that, just as that should be used only in restrictive clauses, which should be used only in nonrestrictive clauses. By this thinking, you should avoid using which in sentences such as I need a book which will tell me all about city gardening, where the restrictive clause which will tell me all about city gardening describes what sort of book is needed. But this use of which with restrictive clauses is very common, even in edited prose. If you fail to follow the rule in this point, you have plenty of company. Moreover, there are some situations in which which is preferable to that. Which can be especially useful where two or more relative clauses are joined by and or or: It is a philosophy in which ordinary people may find solace and which many have found reason to praise. You may also want to use which to introduce a restrictive clause when the preceding phrase contains a that: We want to assign only that book which will be most helpful.

http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/062.html

here are some errors that i cannot stand:

1. using 'where ... at' or 'where ... to' when 'where' is sufficient.

Where means ?in the place at (to) which,? so at and to are redundant in sentences such as Where is your brother at? and Where are you going to? Both locutions are Nonstandard in written English and in most spoken English as well, although they are frequent in Common and Vulgar English, especially in some regional dialects.

http://www.bartleby.com/68/92/6492.html

2. incorrect use of words ending in '-self'.

The ?self pronouns, such as myself, yourselves, and herself, are sometimes used as emphatic substitutes for personal pronouns, as in Like yourself, I have no apologies to make. The practice is particularly common in compound phrases: Ms. Evans or yourself will have to pick them up at the airport. Although these usages have been common in the writing of reputable authors for several centuries, they may sound overwrought. A large majority of the Usage Panel disapproves of the use of ?self pronouns when they do not refer to the subject of the sentence. Seventy-three percent reject the sentence He was an enthusiastic fisherman like myself. Sixty-seven percent object to The letters were written entirely by myself. The Panel is even less tolerant of compound usages. Eighty-eight percent find this sentence unacceptable: The boss asked John and myself to give a brief presentation.

http://www.bartleby.com/61/26/M0512600.html

3. misplacement of the word 'also' (or 'only', 'even', etc.).

also used ambiguously. Also shares with only the virtue of modifying the parts of the sentence to which it is closest, but this can sometimes lead to ambiguity. In the following examples, the sentence containing also is exactly the same, but in each example it modifies a different part and creates a different meaning:

I read in the paper that their band was coming to town. I also heard that the band would play here.

Mary heard that their band is coming to town. I also heard that the band would play here.

The band has been playing out on the West Coast for weeks. I also heard that the band would play here.

It?s a good policy to check that the context is sufficiently clear to limit the meaning of also so you won?t be misunderstood. If you?re in doubt, try moving also to another position and see if the meaning is less ambiguous: I heard that the band would also play here.

http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/008.html

4. using two spaces after a period rather than one.

when using proportionally-spaced fonts, use one space, not two.

5. confusing 'i' and 'me'. example: 'bob sent samantha and i an email.' 'i' is a subject word and 'me' is an object word. if you wouldn't say 'bob sent we an email', why would you say 'bob sent samantha and i an email'?

english isn't my first language either, but i had ~10years of so called "educational english" at school combined with several trips to the UK ad USA. plus i need alot of english vocabulary to deal with all my buddies on TEH INTRAWEB. no major problems so far, just keep practising daily ;)

I suspect it's for the same reason that many can't form correct sentences, or punctuate correctly.

When you wrote, "Why can't people spell right on the internet?", you could have written "Why can't people on the Internet spell correctly?", or "Why don't people spell correctly when using the Internet?" (I'm ignoring the obvious fault with that question.)

There are several ways that you could have formed the question. You, ironically, (and yes, for once, this is irony being used in its correct context) managed to mess it up.

For the most part, it's pure laziness and a lack of respect for the reader. The author, in such cases, seems to expect the reader to take the time to put up with, and decipher, his or her errors, instead of taking the time to correct them at the time of writing.

Irony - the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!