Why can't people spell right on the internet?


Recommended Posts

^Not true. If you have half a brain, you can spell how the hell you want whenever the hell you want.

People that correct spelling on the internet just make them selves look like ignorant pricks that have nothing better to do than bitch about everything.

I vote for worry about more important things like your own twisted self. Nobody in here is perfect enough to have any excuse to nit pick spelling on the net.

Agree.

For me, I make mistakes, sometimes knowingly, but do I correct it, no.

But one thing that does annoy me is how persons use SMS language into forums or da l337, but otherwise simple grammar and spelling mistakes I won't frown upon cos simply, people do make mistakes.

Im also amazed at some of the responses here in this thread, I really cannot believe some of you have taking spelling mistakes onboard and had a whinge about it.

FFS, there is more important things in your own life and the world to be concerned about.

Hey, I'm not an expert on the language either. Correct grammar is hard for many people, but I'm talking about the most basic here. 3rd grade stuff. I could understand using "u" for "you" or "theyre" because it's a lazy "they're". But who uses "am" for "I'm"? WTF is that all about? Using "their" when it should be "there" isn't because people are lazy.

What you say is true; it is symptomatic of just about everything in the modern world! Every activity that is undertaken, shopping at the supermarket, driving, heaven help us, playing games on your PC, chatting on the forum at Neowin, just about ANYTHING that you can think of, has to be done at once and as fast as possible! Why not play the game and then chat or stop the game and chat, but no everything needs to be done at breakneck speed! This results in inaccuracies across the board! (Excuse the unintentional pun.) I have heard people in the supermarket on the mobile phone talking to their wives, with the conversation going something like: “Where are you now honey, I am in the frozen foods section!” For God’s sake, is this necessary? What the hell did people do before the advent of mobile phones?

The point that I am trying to make is why not slow down a little and take some care! If you know that your spelling and grammar sucks, it will take 30 seconds to check and correct these errors! Once your post is finished, cut the thing and past it into an open word document and guess what, the thing will actually check everything automatically. Once this has occurred it will also help you do corrections!

It appears that as with “real” conversations no one is listening, everyone wants to get their five cents in as fast as possible! “Quick, have to get my post up before old Fred beats me to it!”

My parting shot would be to clarify one thing, I am not suggesting that every single post at Neowin has to be grammatically perfect or that a post with spelling mistakes will result in you being shot at dawn, but please make an effort. Also to the non English speaking people, if your best is just that, then keep trying. (Cue to: A crescendo of applause that takes five minutes to die down! Bows to the crowd thinking, “Man, that was almost a soliloquy” :D

Everything you say here is too funny yet too real. Especially the cell phone part. I know girls that get right on the phone right when they get in their vehicles.

Edited by Lqv2015
Then let's not even bother to do anything properly.

Correct spelling and grammar might matter less on the internet when communicating with friends, etc. But bad habits die hard, and when your spelling/grammar abilities (as part of basic communication and language) really count, you'll end up looking dumb.

Or how about we do whatever the hell we want on the net. Bitch all you want, but chances are, the person you are correcting is smarter, richer, and has a hotter significant other than you do. So unless you want to meet face to face and compare lives, **** off a little bit.

I'll say it again, nobody is perfect enough to correct something as dumb as spelling on the net. We all took a decade of English class or whatever equivalent, so no brainless stranger is going to change anybody.

wow ... i never thought this would come up ... then again there are many people who's eng is not their first language ... so it makes sense ... besides ... being lazy makes a huge difference when typing

(ex... i instead of I and so on ...

^Not true. If you have half a brain, you can spell how the hell you want whenever the hell you want.

People that correct spelling on the internet just make them selves look like ignorant pricks that have nothing better to do than bitch about everything.

I vote for worry about more important things like your own twisted self. Nobody in here is perfect enough to have any excuse to nit pick spelling on the net.

I'm not twisted :( Just was trying to get across an opinion in a non-threatening way.

I just think it's a legitimate concern. Ah well, no harm done anyway.

Or how about we do whatever the hell we want on the net. Bitch all you want, but chances are, the person you are correcting is smarter, richer, and has a hotter significant other than you do. So unless you want to meet face to face and compare lives, **** off a little bit.

I'll say it again, nobody is perfect enough to correct something as dumb as spelling on the net. We all took a decade of English class or whatever equivalent, so no brainless stranger is going to change anybody.

Oh burn! Dude, we just got burned by a guy who surely owns an Escalade GT, the model of luxury living. Clearly this man is referring to himself when he says he is "smarter, richer and has a hotter significant other than you", all relevant and valid points when it comes to grammar and spelling. Oh my god we got burned so bad. I have learned the error the error of my ways.

I think the most annoying kind of thing is when people don't use punctuation to indicate sentences and paragraphs. It's really frustrating and exhausting to read a giant wall of text. Then there is using single letters to replace whole words.

Edited by Emn1ty
- Am-I'm

- To-Too-Two

- Where-were-we're

- There-they're-their

- Know-now

- I-eye

- Your-you're

- Here-hear

- Off-of

that's not an internet problem. that's a general society problem. most people in the entry level English 100 classes in college don't know the difference between those homophones

they just end up not learning them in middle school. my elementary, middle and high school never taught me those. i learned from my mom when i was a little kid :unsure:

oh and i live in Southern California, surrounded by "good" schools and rich folks so there really is no excuse

edit: and keep in mind, this is the internet. you are connected to millions of foreigners that are from or live in another country. english is their second language :yes:

Whats next? the UK asking why cant the US spell colour their way. So we droped the 'u' big deal.

Whats that got to do with anything? That has nothing to do with what this topic is about, believe it or not, English people don't have a problem with American spelling or words. I know, SHOCKING! *GASP*

Perhaps i just use the net too much, but i was under the impression that "should of" is acceptable, while not as perfect as "should have" or "should've", i still wouldnt neccessary call it bad English.

Yeah... not so much.

Take the "should" or similar word out of the sentence and see if it makes sense:

"I of gone to the store"

"I have gone to the store"

One makes no sense at all because the word "of" doesn't agree with the subject "I".

Now insert the "should"

"I should have gone to the store"

Now make it a contraction:

"I should've gone to the store"

Ta-Da!!!!

(yes, I know I'm missing some punctuation, sue me.)

Oh and yeah, "common" does not mean "come on". The first time I saw that I was genuinely confused. "Common", as in, things that we have in common. The word simply cannot stand on its own. (see that lack of apostrophe in the word "its"? huh, like that? Yeah, I knew you would)

Whats that got to do with anything? That has nothing to do with what this topic is about, believe it or not, English people don't have a problem with American spelling or words. I know, SHOCKING! *GASP*

I guess you mised the post that was after my post.

Don't get me started on Americanised spellings of things. I'll rant for hours.
edit: and keep in mind, this is the internet. you are connected to millions of foreigners that are from or live in another country. english is their second language :yes:

Using correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation also assists people who don't know the language. Using a bunch of abbreviations and slang will really water down what we say and therefore make it hard for some other users who may not know English too well to comprehend it.

There are only 2 things that really drive me crazy. Should/could/would of instead of should/could/would have and common instead of come on.

The two things the get on my nerves as well.

It does annoy me as well, but if a post is worded so that I cannot understand it I more than often skip over it. Personally, I am English and I think my grammar/spelling is generally quite good. One thing that does annoy me though, is that I generally get confused with the whole "their" and "there" thing...I don't know why, I have just not been able to get my head around it since I was a kid.

I'm one of those persons who hates grammatical and spelling mistakes as well but I can understand that not every one speaks English as a mother tongue. Not only do they not speak it, they may also not learn it the way they should. If that's that case you should at least give them credit for trying their best.

We cannot expect that everyone speaks perfect English. I'm just lucky to be educated in English as it's not my mother tongue either. When people can't spell on the internet I advice them to get a spellchecker plugin for Firefox, Safari, ... . It's a small little application which can do the job.

Ps. Not only on the internet people can't spell, it happens in the real world as well. A lot actually.

Many people probably don?t even know they are making mistakes, I know that I wouldn?t know unless I spell checked what I had typed in Word.

English and spelling / grammar does not come easy to everyone even if you have been speaking English you whole life. This could be for many different reasons e.g. dyslexia.

As some people have pointed out above just because someone is typing in English on the internet that does not mean its there first language.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!