Why can't people spell right on the internet?


Recommended Posts

^Not true. If you have half a brain, you can spell how the hell you want whenever the hell you want.

People that correct spelling on the internet just make them selves look like ignorant pricks that have nothing better to do than bitch about everything.

I vote for worry about more important things like your own twisted self. Nobody in here is perfect enough to have any excuse to nit pick spelling on the net.

Agree.

For me, I make mistakes, sometimes knowingly, but do I correct it, no.

But one thing that does annoy me is how persons use SMS language into forums or da l337, but otherwise simple grammar and spelling mistakes I won't frown upon cos simply, people do make mistakes.

Im also amazed at some of the responses here in this thread, I really cannot believe some of you have taking spelling mistakes onboard and had a whinge about it.

FFS, there is more important things in your own life and the world to be concerned about.

Hey, I'm not an expert on the language either. Correct grammar is hard for many people, but I'm talking about the most basic here. 3rd grade stuff. I could understand using "u" for "you" or "theyre" because it's a lazy "they're". But who uses "am" for "I'm"? WTF is that all about? Using "their" when it should be "there" isn't because people are lazy.

What you say is true; it is symptomatic of just about everything in the modern world! Every activity that is undertaken, shopping at the supermarket, driving, heaven help us, playing games on your PC, chatting on the forum at Neowin, just about ANYTHING that you can think of, has to be done at once and as fast as possible! Why not play the game and then chat or stop the game and chat, but no everything needs to be done at breakneck speed! This results in inaccuracies across the board! (Excuse the unintentional pun.) I have heard people in the supermarket on the mobile phone talking to their wives, with the conversation going something like: “Where are you now honey, I am in the frozen foods section!” For God’s sake, is this necessary? What the hell did people do before the advent of mobile phones?

The point that I am trying to make is why not slow down a little and take some care! If you know that your spelling and grammar sucks, it will take 30 seconds to check and correct these errors! Once your post is finished, cut the thing and past it into an open word document and guess what, the thing will actually check everything automatically. Once this has occurred it will also help you do corrections!

It appears that as with “real” conversations no one is listening, everyone wants to get their five cents in as fast as possible! “Quick, have to get my post up before old Fred beats me to it!”

My parting shot would be to clarify one thing, I am not suggesting that every single post at Neowin has to be grammatically perfect or that a post with spelling mistakes will result in you being shot at dawn, but please make an effort. Also to the non English speaking people, if your best is just that, then keep trying. (Cue to: A crescendo of applause that takes five minutes to die down! Bows to the crowd thinking, “Man, that was almost a soliloquy” :D

Everything you say here is too funny yet too real. Especially the cell phone part. I know girls that get right on the phone right when they get in their vehicles.

Edited by Lqv2015
Then let's not even bother to do anything properly.

Correct spelling and grammar might matter less on the internet when communicating with friends, etc. But bad habits die hard, and when your spelling/grammar abilities (as part of basic communication and language) really count, you'll end up looking dumb.

Or how about we do whatever the hell we want on the net. Bitch all you want, but chances are, the person you are correcting is smarter, richer, and has a hotter significant other than you do. So unless you want to meet face to face and compare lives, **** off a little bit.

I'll say it again, nobody is perfect enough to correct something as dumb as spelling on the net. We all took a decade of English class or whatever equivalent, so no brainless stranger is going to change anybody.

wow ... i never thought this would come up ... then again there are many people who's eng is not their first language ... so it makes sense ... besides ... being lazy makes a huge difference when typing

(ex... i instead of I and so on ...

^Not true. If you have half a brain, you can spell how the hell you want whenever the hell you want.

People that correct spelling on the internet just make them selves look like ignorant pricks that have nothing better to do than bitch about everything.

I vote for worry about more important things like your own twisted self. Nobody in here is perfect enough to have any excuse to nit pick spelling on the net.

I'm not twisted :( Just was trying to get across an opinion in a non-threatening way.

I just think it's a legitimate concern. Ah well, no harm done anyway.

Or how about we do whatever the hell we want on the net. Bitch all you want, but chances are, the person you are correcting is smarter, richer, and has a hotter significant other than you do. So unless you want to meet face to face and compare lives, **** off a little bit.

I'll say it again, nobody is perfect enough to correct something as dumb as spelling on the net. We all took a decade of English class or whatever equivalent, so no brainless stranger is going to change anybody.

Oh burn! Dude, we just got burned by a guy who surely owns an Escalade GT, the model of luxury living. Clearly this man is referring to himself when he says he is "smarter, richer and has a hotter significant other than you", all relevant and valid points when it comes to grammar and spelling. Oh my god we got burned so bad. I have learned the error the error of my ways.

I think the most annoying kind of thing is when people don't use punctuation to indicate sentences and paragraphs. It's really frustrating and exhausting to read a giant wall of text. Then there is using single letters to replace whole words.

Edited by Emn1ty
- Am-I'm

- To-Too-Two

- Where-were-we're

- There-they're-their

- Know-now

- I-eye

- Your-you're

- Here-hear

- Off-of

that's not an internet problem. that's a general society problem. most people in the entry level English 100 classes in college don't know the difference between those homophones

they just end up not learning them in middle school. my elementary, middle and high school never taught me those. i learned from my mom when i was a little kid :unsure:

oh and i live in Southern California, surrounded by "good" schools and rich folks so there really is no excuse

edit: and keep in mind, this is the internet. you are connected to millions of foreigners that are from or live in another country. english is their second language :yes:

Whats next? the UK asking why cant the US spell colour their way. So we droped the 'u' big deal.

Whats that got to do with anything? That has nothing to do with what this topic is about, believe it or not, English people don't have a problem with American spelling or words. I know, SHOCKING! *GASP*

Perhaps i just use the net too much, but i was under the impression that "should of" is acceptable, while not as perfect as "should have" or "should've", i still wouldnt neccessary call it bad English.

Yeah... not so much.

Take the "should" or similar word out of the sentence and see if it makes sense:

"I of gone to the store"

"I have gone to the store"

One makes no sense at all because the word "of" doesn't agree with the subject "I".

Now insert the "should"

"I should have gone to the store"

Now make it a contraction:

"I should've gone to the store"

Ta-Da!!!!

(yes, I know I'm missing some punctuation, sue me.)

Oh and yeah, "common" does not mean "come on". The first time I saw that I was genuinely confused. "Common", as in, things that we have in common. The word simply cannot stand on its own. (see that lack of apostrophe in the word "its"? huh, like that? Yeah, I knew you would)

Whats that got to do with anything? That has nothing to do with what this topic is about, believe it or not, English people don't have a problem with American spelling or words. I know, SHOCKING! *GASP*

I guess you mised the post that was after my post.

Don't get me started on Americanised spellings of things. I'll rant for hours.
edit: and keep in mind, this is the internet. you are connected to millions of foreigners that are from or live in another country. english is their second language :yes:

Using correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation also assists people who don't know the language. Using a bunch of abbreviations and slang will really water down what we say and therefore make it hard for some other users who may not know English too well to comprehend it.

There are only 2 things that really drive me crazy. Should/could/would of instead of should/could/would have and common instead of come on.

The two things the get on my nerves as well.

It does annoy me as well, but if a post is worded so that I cannot understand it I more than often skip over it. Personally, I am English and I think my grammar/spelling is generally quite good. One thing that does annoy me though, is that I generally get confused with the whole "their" and "there" thing...I don't know why, I have just not been able to get my head around it since I was a kid.

I'm one of those persons who hates grammatical and spelling mistakes as well but I can understand that not every one speaks English as a mother tongue. Not only do they not speak it, they may also not learn it the way they should. If that's that case you should at least give them credit for trying their best.

We cannot expect that everyone speaks perfect English. I'm just lucky to be educated in English as it's not my mother tongue either. When people can't spell on the internet I advice them to get a spellchecker plugin for Firefox, Safari, ... . It's a small little application which can do the job.

Ps. Not only on the internet people can't spell, it happens in the real world as well. A lot actually.

Many people probably don?t even know they are making mistakes, I know that I wouldn?t know unless I spell checked what I had typed in Word.

English and spelling / grammar does not come easy to everyone even if you have been speaking English you whole life. This could be for many different reasons e.g. dyslexia.

As some people have pointed out above just because someone is typing in English on the internet that does not mean its there first language.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!