Why can't people spell right on the internet?


Recommended Posts

I hate it when people use just horrific spelling/grammar on the Internet. Occasional misspellings are OK if the word in question is one that would be difficult for most people to spell, but when people mix up "there," "their," and "they're," or "where" and "were," it's that stuff that gets on my nerves. American English versus British English doesn't bother me, although sometimes it can be tough to understand what someone means if they're using British English.

The funniest thing is when people misspell "grammar" as "grammer" when they're trying to correct somebody. Hilarious!

I have to use a spell checker cause in my mind and to my eyes my spelling is correct but then I see those dreaded red lines under every other word. I always type or write letters in the wrong order such as taht- that, gilr- girl.

Thank heavens for word processors and Tipp- Ex :laugh:

^Not true. If you have half a brain, you can spell how the hell you want whenever the hell you want.

People that correct spelling on the internet just make them selves look like ignorant pricks that have nothing better to do than bitch about everything.

I vote for worry about more important things like your own twisted self. Nobody in here is perfect enough to have any excuse to nit pick spelling on the net.

Wow!

Can I follow your own line of logic, please?

People that whine about people who feel the need to help people learn and use the english language properly are too self-conscious as it is and hate it when people point out to them their obvious linguistic inadequacies. Since when does a command of the english language = ignorance?

:blink:

--ScottKin

I learned English mainly by hearing people speak it, and reading it in magazines, forums, etc. The downside to that is that I'm often confused on what formulation to use, because I know a lot of native English speakers make mistakes. I'd love to speak a better English, but I can't say chatting on forums helps me a lot in that regard.

I attribute much of it to laziness. Then again, with the internet, there is no accountability, so people don't really feel the need to be held to a standard of a faceless person on the internet that they will most likely never meet. I'll try to make my sentences flow nicely, but also don't pretend to be the grammar police.

I've held a lot of conversations with someone who could not fathom the difference between their, they're, and there. When I would have a messaging session with them, I would get frustrated, beyond belief, at how someone could claim they work in the programming field and make such horrible grammatical errors as that.

When I see a sentence that has grammatical errors in it, I will fill in the blanks in my head to make is sound more like what the poster intended.

I have never made the assumption that my grammar or spelling is flawless, but I can't stand it when someone makes errors constantly, even after you have politely pointed out the difference of the words.

Forget spelling. Why is everyone's grammar so poor?

There is a difference between a simplified sentence, slang, and poor grammar. Sadly, myself included on many occasions, are guilty of using poor grammar on the internet.

I say it's because of a lousy education system - everywhere.

Forget spelling. Why is everyone's grammar so poor?

There is a difference between a simplified sentence, slang, and poor grammar. Sadly, myself included on many occasions, are guilty of using poor grammar on the internet.

I say it's because of a lousy education system - everywhere.

+1

If you know what the person is saying does it matter? NO! The only thing you get out of correcting someone is an ego boost and a slam on that person.
The grammar of a language inbodies its internal logic and depth; the similarities and differences between the orthograph of different words tells the semantic similarities and differences between those words. An essential part of being able to communicate with precision, and thus express elaborate ideas, is writing with proper grammar and orthograph. If you're not aware of the rules of how your language is written or spoken, that makes you inferior at communication using this language.

When I correct someone, I am both making sure I really got his confuse meaning, and helping him do better in communication later. Of course, everyone can be a prick doing just about anything but that doesn't mean I should never correct someone.

One thing that does annoy me though, is that I generally get confused with the whole "their" and "there" thing...I don't know why, I have just not been able to get my head around it since I was a kid.

There - To identify a location or time.

I left my car keys over there.

This morning there was snow.

There will be cake.

Their - When referring to someone's possessions.

Spies like their coffee cold.

Both companies sold off most of their shares.

Their blood was full of neurotoxins.

They're - Instead of "they are".

They're so gullible.

I'm not sure where they're going.

They're going over there to pick up their shoes.

What's so hard to understand?

Forget spelling. Why is everyone's grammar so poor?

There is a difference between a simplified sentence, slang, and poor grammar. Sadly, myself included on many occasions, are guilty of using poor grammar on the internet.

I say it's because of a lousy education system - everywhere.

I disagree, I mean I usually make hundreds of grammar or spelling mistakes on forums or other sites but when I'm on a forum I know(or should think) that everyone doesn't care about there grammar as much as they would in a real life(not the internet!). So I just relax with my grammar and spelling on forums, but when it comes to an important email,letter,essay or something along those lines, everyone would use better grammar, well I know I do.

quite & quiet

It's so easy to make mistakes with those...

I don't see how... Not only are they spelled differently and have different meanings, but they don't even sound the same.

My number one annoyance is when people add 'but' to the end of sentences, when they mean to add 'though'.

For example, they will say "I don't eat junk food. I do like chips but."

This is an increasing problem and it drives me mad! :angry:

In fact, my first Neowin post was to highlight this mistake.

You should have used 'are'.

Would you speak that sentence out aloud in real life? If so, that's really bad grammar.

No, I wouldn't say that because speaking something is not the same as typing it.

Man, you people... wow. If bad grammar on the internet actually gets you mad, then I reckon you need to be rethinking your priorities.

I had a major issue with my little brother doing this, I even started ignoring him until he started typing properly as it was getting boring having to try to understand what he had typed.

I told him to read what he had written back to himself and he always said it sounded ok in his head.

Always read things back before you hit the submit button.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!