Norton Ghost 14


Recommended Posts

In this review, I will show you some features and tools of Norton Ghost 14.

Norton Ghost 14 Home screens

ng14homeig3.jpg

After the install and initial configuration, whenever you start up Norton Ghost 14, you will see a screen like this.

ng14statushc0.jpg

When you click on the Status tab, it will bring you to this screen. As you can see, I have made a back up of some files and folders on the 12th of February. It'll give you a status for each drive.

ng14taskspc6.jpg

When you click the Tasks tab, it will bring you to this screen. Here you can run or manage backups, perform a one time backup, recover my computer, recover files, and run the recovery point browser.

ng14toolshz5.jpg

Here is the Tools tab and here lie some pretty nice tools, especially convert to Virtual Disk.

ng14advanceug9.jpg

And as you can see, this is the Advance tab. A little less flashly but it gets to the point.

Recovery Disk

ng14rdhomelz8.jpg

When you boot into the recovery disk, this will be the first screen that you see. Pretty much all you can do in this tab is recover your computer.

ng14rdrecoveroj4.jpg

This would be the Recover tab, you only get one more option than the Home tab and that is to recover files.

ng14rdanalyzedk7.jpg

The Analyze tab. Here you can scan for viruses, check for errors, explore, and open a command line window.

ng14rdnetworkyr3.jpg

This is the Network tab. A few more options here, all of them self explanitory.

ng14rdutilitiesrk9.jpg

The last and final tab, the Utilities tab. These again are self explanitory.

If you have used one back-up program, you have used the rest. After having Norton Ghost 14 on my computer for almost a week now, it surprises and dissappoints. I wouldn't say it is a bad program at all. It's good at what it does and for most people, it will suffice. It's fairly easy and simple to get around and use. I beta tested this from the first build and it has improved a lot on some of the hang-ups that were first encountered. A big dissappointment and constant feature request is to be able to create an image from the recovery disk. Symantec has not delivered on our multiple requests in my experience of testing the newer Ghost versions. I would probably recommend this program to people if they needed a program to back-up their files and drives. As for the price, I have no clue because I received this for beta testing it.

Pros:

+Simple to use

+Good tools and utilities

+If you've used one, you've used them all

Cons:

-Unable to create an image from the recovery disk

-If you've used one, you've used them all

If there is anything you want to to go deeper into or clarify, please feel free to post and I will update my review to reflect those inqueries.

biohazard

Edited by biohazard
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/620696-norton-ghost-14/
Share on other sites

If all you want to do is to back up your computer, both work fine. But if you want to make an image, I would go with Acronis. I've used Acronis TrueImage and it gets the job done. So it's pretty much down to if you want to make an image or not. It's been awhile since I've used Acronis, but I think it has some of the same features.

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for posting this - I've been using Ghost 10.0, not to back up but to copy the entire C: drive on to 3 different USB HD's as my backups. I do this about 3 times a week, rotating among the drives. This way I figure I can plug any of them into another computer if mine fails -- which it has.

Ghost 10.0 started to give me weird error messages, then all of a sudden it kept trying to install itself and reboot the computer in an endless loop! I was able to F8 it and get in and stop it, then I de-installed it.

I bought and downloaded Paragon 8.5 after reading good stuff about it, and I've been playing with it for a week and have not been able to get it to successfully create an image or drive copy. It backs up using its weird formatting, but I don't want that because I don't trust that I'll be able to de-code the archive when the time comes. I want a straight backup where I can go in and grab exact folders, files, etc.

So it was back to the drawing board and just as I was about to pull out the card and buy Ghost 14.0, I read this and decided 10.0 was good enough for me, so I reinstalled it. Fortunately, I still have the disk and box. It's worked for me for a couple of years with no problems, so I'll give it another chance. And, it's "free" (to me anyway).

Don't know why these companies mess with backup software -- once you get used to using it, the last thing you want is to have some new interface or untested features. Of all software, backup software should have very deliberate, controlled and tested incremental changes, in my opinion, without any major surprises. Once you get used to it and know the ins and outs, you don't want to mess with a lot of change when the time comes to actually use it.....

Ziggy.

  • 4 months later...
would I be able to use Ghost 14 to make a bootable image; similar to DELL's purple CD that they send with new systems, which can be used to restore the PC back to factory default?

Dell's purple CD is just a Windows CD with Dell's Royalty OEM key and drivers on it. There's no image of anything.

Thanks for posting this - I've been using Ghost 10.0, not to back up but to copy the entire C: drive on to 3 different USB HD's as my backups. I do this about 3 times a week, rotating among the drives. This way I figure I can plug any of them into another computer if mine fails -- which it has.

Ghost 10.0 started to give me weird error messages, then all of a sudden it kept trying to install itself and reboot the computer in an endless loop! I was able to F8 it and get in and stop it, then I de-installed it.

I bought and downloaded Paragon 8.5 after reading good stuff about it, and I've been playing with it for a week and have not been able to get it to successfully create an image or drive copy. It backs up using its weird formatting, but I don't want that because I don't trust that I'll be able to de-code the archive when the time comes. I want a straight backup where I can go in and grab exact folders, files, etc.

So it was back to the drawing board and just as I was about to pull out the card and buy Ghost 14.0, I read this and decided 10.0 was good enough for me, so I reinstalled it. Fortunately, I still have the disk and box. It's worked for me for a couple of years with no problems, so I'll give it another chance. And, it's "free" (to me anyway).

Don't know why these companies mess with backup software -- once you get used to using it, the last thing you want is to have some new interface or untested features. Of all software, backup software should have very deliberate, controlled and tested incremental changes, in my opinion, without any major surprises. Once you get used to it and know the ins and outs, you don't want to mess with a lot of change when the time comes to actually use it.....

Ziggy.

That weird error message I had a theory back when I was testing version 7 I believe (it has been a while ago). But What fixed my issue back then- Something to do with rewriting over and over with similar images. Was to Actually put the Install Cd and do a full Format over the drive. Before ghosting the image back to the drive. Also note another thought is make sure that you have Indexing (Volume Copy/Shadow copy) turned off for the USB drive. I have heard of issues with that as well.

Though With the Light Weight Linux Boot Distributions... You probably could boot with them then use them to format over the drive to NTFS. Then Restore your image.

That is just my thoughts on the Error Messages..

As far as the Review- Top Notch- but please add for me Screens of System Usage (CPU Load/Memory Usage) I found that when I tested 9 it was a resource Hog. Since then I have given up on it. Other than using 9 to Ghost right after a fresh install. To a hard drive that I remove shortly after.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!