Norton Ghost 14


Recommended Posts

In this review, I will show you some features and tools of Norton Ghost 14.

Norton Ghost 14 Home screens

ng14homeig3.jpg

After the install and initial configuration, whenever you start up Norton Ghost 14, you will see a screen like this.

ng14statushc0.jpg

When you click on the Status tab, it will bring you to this screen. As you can see, I have made a back up of some files and folders on the 12th of February. It'll give you a status for each drive.

ng14taskspc6.jpg

When you click the Tasks tab, it will bring you to this screen. Here you can run or manage backups, perform a one time backup, recover my computer, recover files, and run the recovery point browser.

ng14toolshz5.jpg

Here is the Tools tab and here lie some pretty nice tools, especially convert to Virtual Disk.

ng14advanceug9.jpg

And as you can see, this is the Advance tab. A little less flashly but it gets to the point.

Recovery Disk

ng14rdhomelz8.jpg

When you boot into the recovery disk, this will be the first screen that you see. Pretty much all you can do in this tab is recover your computer.

ng14rdrecoveroj4.jpg

This would be the Recover tab, you only get one more option than the Home tab and that is to recover files.

ng14rdanalyzedk7.jpg

The Analyze tab. Here you can scan for viruses, check for errors, explore, and open a command line window.

ng14rdnetworkyr3.jpg

This is the Network tab. A few more options here, all of them self explanitory.

ng14rdutilitiesrk9.jpg

The last and final tab, the Utilities tab. These again are self explanitory.

If you have used one back-up program, you have used the rest. After having Norton Ghost 14 on my computer for almost a week now, it surprises and dissappoints. I wouldn't say it is a bad program at all. It's good at what it does and for most people, it will suffice. It's fairly easy and simple to get around and use. I beta tested this from the first build and it has improved a lot on some of the hang-ups that were first encountered. A big dissappointment and constant feature request is to be able to create an image from the recovery disk. Symantec has not delivered on our multiple requests in my experience of testing the newer Ghost versions. I would probably recommend this program to people if they needed a program to back-up their files and drives. As for the price, I have no clue because I received this for beta testing it.

Pros:

+Simple to use

+Good tools and utilities

+If you've used one, you've used them all

Cons:

-Unable to create an image from the recovery disk

-If you've used one, you've used them all

If there is anything you want to to go deeper into or clarify, please feel free to post and I will update my review to reflect those inqueries.

biohazard

Edited by biohazard
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/620696-norton-ghost-14/
Share on other sites

If all you want to do is to back up your computer, both work fine. But if you want to make an image, I would go with Acronis. I've used Acronis TrueImage and it gets the job done. So it's pretty much down to if you want to make an image or not. It's been awhile since I've used Acronis, but I think it has some of the same features.

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for posting this - I've been using Ghost 10.0, not to back up but to copy the entire C: drive on to 3 different USB HD's as my backups. I do this about 3 times a week, rotating among the drives. This way I figure I can plug any of them into another computer if mine fails -- which it has.

Ghost 10.0 started to give me weird error messages, then all of a sudden it kept trying to install itself and reboot the computer in an endless loop! I was able to F8 it and get in and stop it, then I de-installed it.

I bought and downloaded Paragon 8.5 after reading good stuff about it, and I've been playing with it for a week and have not been able to get it to successfully create an image or drive copy. It backs up using its weird formatting, but I don't want that because I don't trust that I'll be able to de-code the archive when the time comes. I want a straight backup where I can go in and grab exact folders, files, etc.

So it was back to the drawing board and just as I was about to pull out the card and buy Ghost 14.0, I read this and decided 10.0 was good enough for me, so I reinstalled it. Fortunately, I still have the disk and box. It's worked for me for a couple of years with no problems, so I'll give it another chance. And, it's "free" (to me anyway).

Don't know why these companies mess with backup software -- once you get used to using it, the last thing you want is to have some new interface or untested features. Of all software, backup software should have very deliberate, controlled and tested incremental changes, in my opinion, without any major surprises. Once you get used to it and know the ins and outs, you don't want to mess with a lot of change when the time comes to actually use it.....

Ziggy.

  • 4 months later...
would I be able to use Ghost 14 to make a bootable image; similar to DELL's purple CD that they send with new systems, which can be used to restore the PC back to factory default?

Dell's purple CD is just a Windows CD with Dell's Royalty OEM key and drivers on it. There's no image of anything.

Thanks for posting this - I've been using Ghost 10.0, not to back up but to copy the entire C: drive on to 3 different USB HD's as my backups. I do this about 3 times a week, rotating among the drives. This way I figure I can plug any of them into another computer if mine fails -- which it has.

Ghost 10.0 started to give me weird error messages, then all of a sudden it kept trying to install itself and reboot the computer in an endless loop! I was able to F8 it and get in and stop it, then I de-installed it.

I bought and downloaded Paragon 8.5 after reading good stuff about it, and I've been playing with it for a week and have not been able to get it to successfully create an image or drive copy. It backs up using its weird formatting, but I don't want that because I don't trust that I'll be able to de-code the archive when the time comes. I want a straight backup where I can go in and grab exact folders, files, etc.

So it was back to the drawing board and just as I was about to pull out the card and buy Ghost 14.0, I read this and decided 10.0 was good enough for me, so I reinstalled it. Fortunately, I still have the disk and box. It's worked for me for a couple of years with no problems, so I'll give it another chance. And, it's "free" (to me anyway).

Don't know why these companies mess with backup software -- once you get used to using it, the last thing you want is to have some new interface or untested features. Of all software, backup software should have very deliberate, controlled and tested incremental changes, in my opinion, without any major surprises. Once you get used to it and know the ins and outs, you don't want to mess with a lot of change when the time comes to actually use it.....

Ziggy.

That weird error message I had a theory back when I was testing version 7 I believe (it has been a while ago). But What fixed my issue back then- Something to do with rewriting over and over with similar images. Was to Actually put the Install Cd and do a full Format over the drive. Before ghosting the image back to the drive. Also note another thought is make sure that you have Indexing (Volume Copy/Shadow copy) turned off for the USB drive. I have heard of issues with that as well.

Though With the Light Weight Linux Boot Distributions... You probably could boot with them then use them to format over the drive to NTFS. Then Restore your image.

That is just my thoughts on the Error Messages..

As far as the Review- Top Notch- but please add for me Screens of System Usage (CPU Load/Memory Usage) I found that when I tested 9 it was a resource Hog. Since then I have given up on it. Other than using 9 to Ghost right after a fresh install. To a hard drive that I remove shortly after.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!