Strange HDD behaviour after system has been asleep..


Recommended Posts

Hi folks..

Despite being the ultimate Vista sceptic, i'm giving it another go at work because SP1 is just around the corner. I'm running it on my work box (Core 2 Duo E6600, 3GB RAM, 7600GS) and it seems to be behaving mostly ok so far (though have already had one unrecoverable freeze up.. sigh). Anyway - i've woken my machine from sleep this morning and it came back up quickly EXCEPT that my 2nd / data hdd wakes up if I access it then switches off again 30 seconds later! Has anyone come across this sort problem before? Is there a known patch or anything for it?

I'm using most recent drivers for everything, and applied the Intel motherboard INF update from their website as well so everything should be fully patched.

Cheers.

Ah-hah! I'm not insane! Somebody else has this problem too!

I'd moved my secondary HDs to USB cases so they didn't get murdered...

I haven't been able to track it down to any one component. At least in my case, it doesn't seem to be related to going into or coming out of any sleep state, as I never use any of them except for hibernation occasionally, so it's mostly clean boots from normal power-off. It doesn't seem to happen on a fresh install, but that might be a false assumption since it doesn't stay fresh for long. The HD inactivity timeout setting in the power control panel doesn't have any effect, at least not between 0, 20 (the default), and 9999999 (the highest I could set it). I have a very similar machine to yours (at least, driver-wise): an Intel G31-chipset C2Q 6600, with 2GB RAM, and an 8800GT, but I had the exact same symptoms on my old machine, which was an nForce2-chipset AthXP 3200+, also with 2GB of RAM, and a 7800GS. I was planning on cobbling together a Vista-capable machine from spare parts this weekend to try and see if it happens on a clean install, and if not, what component seems to cause it. Sorry I don't have anything useful to add at present, but I'll let you know if I turn anything up.

Try adjusting your power settings by typing "Power Options" in the Start Menu.

I'm not a computer newbie mate :) I checked the power settings. The drive functions as normal prior to the system going into sleep mode, and when I bring it back out, the drive goes to sleep after being accessed after only 15 or so seconds. I tweaked the power settings thinking that changing them whilst the system was on would somehow reset it, but it didn't seem to make a difference and still spun down.

Ah-hah! I'm not insane! Somebody else has this problem too!

Ah - well i'm glad i'm not alone on this one.

At least in my case, it doesn't seem to be related to going into or coming out of any sleep state

Hm - other way round for me. The drive remains active throughout the day no problems. Its only after the machine slept last night and I came back in this morning that I noticed this behaviour.. i've rebooted now (applied various updates to see if it'd help) and it hasn't done it since rebooting but I can't help but think i'll be seeing the same behaviour again once I leave my machine to go into sleep mode.

I'm not a computer newbie mate

You didn't specify whether you looked within the Power Options, so I assumed you didn't look there. Just trying to help out by making sure all of the bases have been covered.

Since I haven't experienced this issue, I only have 3 suggestions for now: check your bios settings, poke around in the device manager, or obtain SP1 somehow.

If I happen to stumble upon a fix elsewhere, I'll be sure to report it here.

You didn't specify whether you looked within the Power Options, so I assumed you didn't look there. Just trying to help out by making sure all of the bases have been covered.

I'd have to agree here, that bordered on being impolite, but hey, I can't whinge :p

Anyway, I'd suggest you to do the SP1 update (obtain however you like) and i'd be confident it'd help your issue.

This problem HAS been mentioned before, I remember someone posting a thread about last year, can't remember who though.

Good luck though. Xp ftw, it seems.

I'd have to agree here, that bordered on being impolite, but hey, I can't whinge :p

Anyway, I'd suggest you to do the SP1 update (obtain however you like) and i'd be confident it'd help your issue.

This problem HAS been mentioned before, I remember someone posting a thread about last year, can't remember who though.

Good luck though. Xp ftw, it seems.

Found that thread, and a few more:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=618465

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=615704

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=611399

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=580727

^ I guess I'd just picked terminally useless search terms when Googling, in the past... or maybe limiting my search to just NW would have been more fruitful.

  • I don't think it's related to SATA/PATA - I've seen this with both a Maxtor 250GB PATA, and a WD 500GB PATA on both the nF2 and G31 machines, and with a 200GB Hitachi SATA I borrowed from another machine on the G31 (the nF2 machine doesn't have a SATA controller).
  • SP1 doesn't have any effect for me - and I'm pretty sure I remember seeing this back in the Beta 1+2 days, but didn't stick with it long enough to confirm anything other than "Nope, I'm not ready for Vista yet."
  • I'm almost positive it has to be related to some piece of software or combination thereof, as I have friends who have Vista and multiple hard drives who don't have this issue.
  • Disabling drive powerdown is kinda sloppy, since it (probably) breaks suspend support, and if it's a BIOS option, might not be available to anybody else who experiences the problem. Universality!
  • XP FTW, indeed. I donated my license to my mother (who was still running win98), though, so no more of that for me :/

Edited by vertigosity

xiphi - no, you're absolutely right. My reply wasn't intended to sound that 'short' - it was just early and I hadn't had any coffee. Please accept an apology from me.

I've fully updated and rebooted my machine this morning again and come back to it this afternoon (was out of the office all day) and the problem persists! Something to read up about...

The main reason I put Vista on my PC was to give it a chance, and also in time for SP1 so I could see what changes it bought about. I'll be sure to check those other posts when I get few minutes.. just leaving work now and got a busy evening so hopefully sometime before I go to bed.

Thanks for the replys, guys.

XP FTW, indeed. I donated my license to my mother (who was still running win98), though, so no more of that for me

You know the interesting thing here is that i'm trying Vista again because i've been particularly scathing of it on here in recent months. I've "discovered" Mac ownership and my attitudes and opinions on here have reflected that but i've been set upon REGULARLY by those who tell me i'm a fanboy and that Vista is a wonderful product. So this is me stepping back and giving it another fair chance. I simply went into this as someone who likes XP - but wants a bit more eye candy and is fortunate enough to have the choice of OS's thanks to a generous enterprise licensing scheme.

Taking all that into consideration, it's fair to say that it's rather something of a let down that i'm running into a problem like this on day one. And it's not like I can be told i've got crappy or out of date hardware, or i'm not using the most recent drivers, or i've not fully patched the product because i'm using a cracked copy.

I'll keep at it though and i'll wait for SP1 - I owe Microsoft at least that much!

And interestingly my problem mirrors a lot of those other threads you posted vertigosity in that its only my second drive that goes to sleep all the time - the main / boot drive does not. Though I suppose its quite possible that there is enough read / write demands going to the boot drive regularly enough that it doesn't get to the state where it feels it can go into standby.

You know the interesting thing here is that i'm trying Vista again because i've been particularly scathing of it on here in recent months. I've "discovered" Mac ownership and my attitudes and opinions on here have reflected that but i've been set upon REGULARLY by those who tell me i'm a fanboy and that Vista is a wonderful product. So this is me stepping back and giving it another fair chance. I simply went into this as someone who likes XP - but wants a bit more eye candy and is fortunate enough to have the choice of OS's thanks to a generous enterprise licensing scheme.

Taking all that into consideration, it's fair to say that it's rather something of a let down that i'm running into a problem like this on day one. And it's not like I can be told i've got crappy or out of date hardware, or i'm not using the most recent drivers, or i've not fully patched the product because i'm using a cracked copy.

I'll keep at it though and i'll wait for SP1 - I owe Microsoft at least that much!

Yeah, I'm not a Vista fanboy (although I guess anybody experiencing the problem of topic and keeps using it anyways has to be a little biased) by any means; although I like the eye-candy and the shell+kernel improvements, I don't have Vista tweaked to perfection as I did with XP and probably wouldn't have jumped if I hadn't wanted to play with resource hacking it, and my mom hadn't desperately needed an OS upgrade. Heck, I'm one of those "problem users" who removes components just because I didn't want them, or prefer a third-party concept... as users, we don't owe MS anything, except that if we find a better solution, we are obligated to use it instead ;)

FWIW, I seem to not be having random HD power cycling using WinVI 64-bit SP1, although that doesn't count as a diagnosis or a real solution.

Edited by vertigosity

Right. I found there was a very recent BIOS update from Intel (my motherboard is a genuine Intel one) which I applied. I forced my PC into the sleep / standby and when I woke it back up, the drive didn't keep shutting off.. hopefully the BIOS update will have done it!

I'll leave the PC on tonight in standby and see what happens tomorrow morning.

As an addendum, the other beef I had with Vista was the disk thrash and total lack of responsiveness after booting / logging in thanks to SuperFetch - I decided to experiment (taking onboard arguments both for and against leaving it enabled) and for me, I much prefer the experience with it turned off. It flies through startup and onto the desktop with none of the normal lethargy i'd experienced in the past. I don't notice any real application launch slowdown without it so going to stick with it for now!

I'm slowly.. slowly.. starting to warm to the idea of using Vista more regularly.

Yeah, I ruined the experiment on my G31/Q6600 machine, a new BIOS revision only weeks old seems to have fixed it. I'll probably still try and narrow it down with some hardcore testing this weekend if I get the chance, but at least as far as my and Chicane's boxes go... thread closed :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple has clarified Series 9 was left off the watchOS 27 compatibility list by mistake.
    • Signal accuses UK government of using child safety as cover for mass surveillance by David Uzondu Recently, the UK's Home Office announced a sweeping set of proposals to make Britain the "first country in the world" where children cannot share or view nude photos on their smart devices, an initiative that authorities claim will protect children from online predators and combat pornography. In response, Signal believes that while the government must keep children "safe" and "protected," it should do so through social services and education, not by "surveillance, funding cuts, and cover-ups." The company called the plan "dystopian" and warned that it violates everyone's fundamental right to privacy, arguing that scanning on the presumption of nudity will only strengthen the market dominance and data control of giant corporations like Apple and Google. The statement continues by accusing the government of hiding its true intentions under the guise of child safety. Signal argues that the Home Office is building an invisible surveillance infrastructure that remains ripe for exploitation by future administrations and authoritarian regimes. According to the company, this aggressive approach completely ignores the actual needs of young people, such as properly funded schools and mental health services. Tech companies like Apple and Google have a three-month window to implement these mandatory device-level filters across the United Kingdom. If these tech firms refuse to comply with the mandate, the government will pass emergency legislation to force them to comply, threatening massive fines and even going after the CEOs of these companies with criminal charges. The technology will work by blocking explicit images directly on the operating system of all smartphones and tablets by default. This system monitors the device camera and third-party apps to intercept nudity before anyone can upload or send the image. Adults can still view explicit content, but only after completing a strict age verification check to unlock their devices. Several bodies like the NSPCC and Barnardo's praised the Home Office's decision, arguing that device-level intervention stops the cycle of grooming before it starts. The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) also supported the policy, claiming that tech companies can implement on-device checks "without threatening privacy or collecting any data."
    • Did you watch the keynote? It is way beyond what is described in this article. Looks interesting. Now it is time for them to deliver unlike what happened in 24.
    • It pretty much has to be compatible with MS Office or it is going nowhere. The rest of the world runs office including Europe. If it is not compatible it will not survive.
    • Incredible deal gets you free NVMe 512GB SSD with AMD AM5 B850 motherboard for only $150 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week we covered the story of an interesting PC case wherein you can build two full-size computers inside it as in it can house and run an AMD and an Intel system simultaneously. Speaking of building PCs, these are hard times to make one for sure as prices are often very high except during flash sales or discounts. If you are in the market for a 1080p gaming PC then Nvidia's 8GB RTX 5060 Ti is currently on sale for just $330 and you get the latest James Bond game too, for free. Speaking of which, right now there is another incredible sale going on as we can get a free 512 GB NVMe SSD from TeamGroup in the form of the G50 alongside the purchase of an AMD B850 socket AM5 motherboard for only $150 (purchase link under the specs table down below). Getting an AM5 motherboard now in 2026 will be a wise investment for sure, especially since AMD confirmed its commitment to support the socket till at least 2029. The MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI is a micro-ATX motherboard that is compatible with AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors. Since it is AM5, the motherboard works with DDR5 memory and includes MSI’s Memory Boost technology, along with EXPO and XMP support. Connectivity features include built-in Wi-Fi 7 paired with a 5G LAN solution. The board offers a PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot with MSI’s EZ M.2 Shield Frozr II thermal solution, that is said to help maintain SSD performance by providing ample cooling against overheating. The technical specifications of the MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI motherboard are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor Micro-ATX (mATX), 243.84 × 243.84 mm Chipset AMD B850 Socket AM5 Supported Processors AMD Ryzen 9000, 8000, and 7000 Series Desktop Processors Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Max Memory 256 GB Memory Speed DDR5 8200–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Display Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 (up to 4K 60Hz) 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 (up to 4K 60Hz) PCIe Slots 1 × PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) 3 × PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) Audio Codec Realtek ALC897 Audio Channels 7.1-Channel High Definition Audio M.2 Slots 3 × M.2 slots M.2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU) M.2_2: PCIe 4.0 x4 (CPU) M.2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset) M.2 Device Sizes M.2_1: 2280/2260 M.2_2: 2280/2260 M.2_3: 2280 SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support SATA: RAID 0, 1, 10 NVMe: RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 2 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126VB 5Gb Ethernet Wireless Networking Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Tri-band 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz MU-MIMO, MLO, 4KQAM Up to 2.9Gbps Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4 Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 1 × CPU Power 1 × PCIe Power (8-pin) Cooling Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan/Pump 3 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable RGB Gen2 (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Additional Internal Headers 2 × Front Panel (JFP) 1 × Chassis Intrusion (JCI) 1 × Front Audio (JAUD) 1 × COM Port (JCOM) 1 × JDASH Tuning Controller 1 × TPM 2.0 Header The free TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe SSD is a PCIe Gen4 and as such it promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 5,000 MB/s, helping accelerate game loading, file transfers, and everyday computing tasks. The SSD features an InnoGrit controller and SLC caching technology to support consistent performance. An ultra-thin, patented graphene heatsink is included to aid in heat dissipation. The NAND flash is based on TLC which means it has plenty of endurance up its sleeve. The random performance may not be as amazing as other drives with DRAM though. Still it should be very good since it can access system memory via HMB to use it as its DRAM cache. The technical specifications of the TeamGroup 512GB G50 NVMe SSD are given in the table below: Specification Value Model / Part Number TM8FFE512G0C129 Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen4x4 with NVMe Sequential Read Speed Up to 5,000 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 2,500 MB/s Endurance (TBW) 325 TBW DRAM Cache No Cache Technology SLC Cache Controller InnoGrit Controller Solution Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Weight 7 g Dimensions 80.0 × 22.0 × 3.7 mm Vibration Resistance 80 Hz ~ 2,000 Hz / 20G Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5 ms MTBF 3,000,000 hours Get it at the link below: MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI AM5 AMD motherboard + Team Group T-FORCE G50 TM8FFE512G0C129 512GB SSD (free gift): $149.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) This Newegg deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      223
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      80
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!