Alice('s Adventures) in Wonderland (2010)


Recommended Posts

I think they focused to much on The Hatter, the book/movie is called Alice in wonderland, not Hatter in Wonderland, Granted he does play a big role, but I think the fact that they chose Johnny Dep must've made them add more screen time for hatter.

Disney pic earns $116.3 million at box office

Disney certainly hasn't lost any of its muchness.

"Alice in Wonderland" slayed the domestic B.O., earning an estimated mammoth total of $116.3 million at 3,728 playdates to become the highest-grossing first quarter opener, as well as the all-time highest debut for a non-sequel film.

Overseas, "Alice" earned $94 million at 5,600 screens in some 40 territories for a worldwide total of $210.3 million -- the fourth highest worldwide opening for a non-sequel film.

The 3D giant screened at 2,063 3D-equipped locations domestically with an additional 188 Imax locations, repping approximately 70% of the film's total domestic earnings.

Playing second fiddle to "Alice" was the frame's other wide release, Overture's "Brooklyn's Finest," exceeding expectations with $13.5 million at 1,936 screens. Pic comes just a week after the studio launched its horror remake "The Crazies," which grossed $7 million at 2,479 engagements in its soph sesh.

Source

I didn't like it mainly because it wasn't as well executed as I expected.

I agree with that. But as someone pointed out, it was a sequel to Through the Looking-Glass. I didn't think about that at first, so I was disappointed in the lack of character development, but with the fact that this is a sequel to the story we've already known for years, character development isn't needed.

I went and saw it again and the second viewing was actually much, much better. Keeping the sequel idea in mind allowed a much better viewing.

With that in mind, it would have been nice to see this made into a trilogy. I would have liked seeing Burton go for a full series with this, but he didn't.

I know the people who I went with said when they were watching, at the beginning they were confused and disappointed that they ruined the story, but it isnt till later in the movie that you realize this is not a "remake" of the Alice story but a sequel which then changed their understanding and views of it.

I know the people who I went with said when they were watching, at the beginning they were confused and disappointed that they ruined the story, but it isnt till later in the movie that you realize this is not a "remake" of the Alice story but a sequel which then changed their understanding and views of it.

Yeah, when I first went to see it, that's exactly what happened and because I was disgusted in the beginning it ruined the first viewing for me. Anyone who didn't like this film because it isn't a remake of the original story, then you really should give it a second chance with the idea of this being a sequel. On my second viewing it was a much, much better film.

I'd honestly go from my original 6 out of 10 to an 8 out of 10 rating.

Disney did a true disservice to this film by not advertising this film as a sequel. Every trailer should have made a better attempt at explaining that. I just assumed from Alice's age in the trailers that they were using an older girl and not necessarily changing any of the story.

People thought the 10 sec "dance" by the Mad Hatter was awkward. Uh it's Underland, IT IS AWKWARD.

I thought it was more awkward when Alice did it. But something to pety didn't ruin it for me. Every time that Helena would appear my theater would laugh. Never missed a beat. I figured the "OFF WITH THEIR HEADS" would get annoying. But she said them so fast, I didn't care. The voice acting was very believable.

I think if Burton would have filmed it in 3D, instead of transferring it from 2D, it would have looked 5x better.

Johnny Depp and Mia Wasikowska?s Alice in Wonderland raked in another $62 million this past weekend, clobbering the competition including Matt Damon?s The Green Zone. Here?s who else placed behind Disney?s 3-D fantasy:

1. Alice in Wonderland, $62 million

2. The Green Zone, $14.5 million

3. She?s Out of My League, $9.6 million

4. Remember Me, $8.3 million

5. Shutter Island, $8.1 million

6. Our Family Wedding, $7.6 million

7. Avatar, $6.6 million

8. Brooklyn?s Finest, $4.3 million

9. Cop Out, $4.2 million

10. The Crazies, $3.7 million

Alice, the Tim Burton-directed movie, has taken in about $430 million globally. Quite impressive for just two weeks out the gate!

Source

pretty impressive!

I've never gotten motion sickness but after watching this in 3D I was dizzy the rest of the night.

When I got into my car it felt like it was rolling backwards.

Well I watched Avatar in 3D and it was pretty annoying overall. I wish I had watched it in 2D. I won't be diving into 3D again until it is without glasses.

Alice in Wonderland Reaches $565.8M Worldwide in 3 Weeks

The ComingSoon.net Box Office Report has been updated with studio estimates for the weekend. Click here for the full box office estimates of the top 12 films and then check back on Monday for the final figures based on actual box office.

Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland easily topped the domestic box office for a third straight weekend, earning an estimated $34.5 million to bring its total to $265.8 million. The film also topped the overseas box office a third time with $47 million, bringing its total to $300 million. Made for $200 million, the Walt Disney Pictures release has reached $565.8 million worldwide. Playing in 3D, 2D and IMAX theaters, the film stars Johnny Depp, Anne Hathaway, Helena Bonham Carter, Crispin Glover, Matt Lucas, Mia Wasikowska, Alan Rickman, Stephen Fry, Michael Sheen, Timothy Spall, Christopher Lee, Paul Whitehouse and Barbara Windsor.

Source

LOL

No sadly, it deserves to because its far superior to it but no

to me, this movie failed to deliver on epic scales... i thought it would be really well made and it was. I thought it would put me through a series of journeys and it didn't really. In comparison to avatar, it really didn't however avatar was of a different genre.

In 3D/Imax, it didn't feel that great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >Improved system sounds when using Windows in dark mode. The story being that bug would be an interesting one.
    • Edifier S3000MKII hi-fi audiophile grade bookshelf speaker is at its lowest price now by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered a bunch of Dolby Atmos soundbar deals with several ones from Sony, as well as from JBL, Samsung, Polk Audio, and more. You can check them out in this dedicated piece. Those are not audiophile category speakers though as they are built with home theater use in mind. If you are searching for the former then Edifier has its S3000MKII at its lowest price at the moment (purchase link under the specs table down below). This is a two-way bookshelf monitor speaker designed to produce accurate sound. While it may not produce the best high-fidelity audio possible out there, it should still be significantly better than what you will get on soundbars of this price range. As such it will do justice to high-res audio played back through it. The only thing that may feel lacking is sub-bass as Edifier claims the unit can go down to 38 Hz, which should be enough for studio monitor purposes, but not for deep room-shaking rumbling bass. Where this does excel though is in its treble reproduction. With its super-tweeter, it claims to go as high as 40 kHz in the frequency spectrum, which should offer a sense of "air"yness. This is an active speaker which means it packs its own amplfication. It has a top-notch Class D amp that may be able to rival many Class AB designs too in terms of sound reproduction quality. The technical specs of the Edifier S3000MKII are given in the table below: Specification Value RMS Output Power 256W RMS (Treble: 8W × 2, Mid-Low: 120W × 2) Tweeter Driver 107mm × 107mm Planar Magnetic Tweeter Mid-Low Driver 6.5-inch (179mm) Long-Throw Aluminum Diaphragm Driver Frequency Response 38Hz – 40kHz Signal-to-Noise Ratio ≥ 85dB (A) Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth Codec Qualcomm® aptX™ HD Wireless Speaker Link Proprietary 5.8GHz wireless connection between speakers Supported Hi-Res Audio Hi-Res Audio Certified, up to 24-bit/192kHz Digital Processing XMOS XU216 Digital Signal Processor Audio Inputs Balanced XLR, Optical, Coaxial, USB Type-B, Line In, Bluetooth Input Sensitivity (USB) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Optical) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Coaxial) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Bluetooth) 450 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Balanced XLR) 1000 ± 50mV Input Sensitivity (Line In) 600 ± 50mV ADC Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DSP Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DIX Capability Up to 24-bit/216kHz DAC Capability Up to 32-bit/384kHz XMOS Processing Power Up to 2,000 MIPS Edifier S3000MKII Audiophile Active (Powered) Wireless Speakers: $799.99 (Sold by Edifier US, Shipped by Amazon US) If you do not have the kind of budget to spend on the S3000MKII, you can also check out the Edifier R1280Ts which is right now on sale at just $114 (its lowest price in a very long time). Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • > The G 7 Pro supports wireless (XBOX Wireless, proprietary dongle, or Bluetooth) If anybody else's brain translates this to 'it works wirelessly on Xbox', according to the linked product page, it does not.
    • Ignoring the fact that this "colony" kicked the empire of King George's arse during those early years... You are confusing the First Industrial Revolution (which was clearly pulled out of some butt-hurt Brit historian's arse after the fact) with the Second Industrial Revolution (aka now called the Technological Revolution, undoubtedly by that same butt-hurt Brit), which transitioned the world from the UK/UPS Empire to the USA as the world's only superpower. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution I hope you realize that I am having big fun here.
    • OpenAI announces GPT‑5.6 Sol, its next-generation flagship model beating Claude Mythos 5 by Pradeep Viswanathan Credit: OpenAI OpenAI today announced a limited preview of its new GPT-5.6 model series, which includes the Sol, Terra, and Luna models targeting different price points. GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model targeted at demanding reasoning and agentic workloads. GPT-5.6 Terra is positioned as a balanced model for everyday work, featuring performance competitive with GPT-5.5 while being half the cost. GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most affordable model, delivering strong capability at a lower price point. Unlike previous model releases from OpenAI, GPT-5.6 is starting with a limited preview for a small group of trusted partners due to U.S. government restrictions. As expected, OpenAI previewed its plans and the models' capabilities to the U.S. government ahead of launch, and the government asked OpenAI to limit the first wave of access to select partners. OpenAI also mentioned in the official announcement blog post that it does not believe this type of government access process should become the long-term default. OpenAI highlighted that GPT-5.6 Sol comes with a robust safety stack featuring improved protections for higher-risk activity, sensitive cyber requests, and repeated misuse. The company also spent several weeks pressure-testing the system and hardening it against real-world attacks. On the capability side, as expected, GPT-5.6 Sol is OpenAI’s strongest model yet. It delivers better results in agentic performance across coding, biology, and cybersecurity. On the Terminal-Bench 2.1 benchmark, which tests command-line workflows requiring planning, iteration, and tool coordination, GPT-5.6 Sol sets a new record with a score of 91.9%, beating Anthropic's Claude Mythos 5. Additionally, GPT-5.6 introduces a new "max" reasoning effort for even deeper reasoning. The new "ultra" mode uses subagents to accelerate complex work beyond what a single agent can handle. Pricing starts at $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens for Sol. Terra costs $2.50 for input and $15 for output, while Luna costs $1 for input and $6 for output. GPT-5.6 comes with more predictable prompt caching, including support for explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. Sol will also launch on Cerebras in July at speeds up to 750 tokens per second for select customers. OpenAI plans to make GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna broadly available in ChatGPT, Codex, and the API in the coming weeks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!