Alice('s Adventures) in Wonderland (2010)


Recommended Posts

I think they focused to much on The Hatter, the book/movie is called Alice in wonderland, not Hatter in Wonderland, Granted he does play a big role, but I think the fact that they chose Johnny Dep must've made them add more screen time for hatter.

Disney pic earns $116.3 million at box office

Disney certainly hasn't lost any of its muchness.

"Alice in Wonderland" slayed the domestic B.O., earning an estimated mammoth total of $116.3 million at 3,728 playdates to become the highest-grossing first quarter opener, as well as the all-time highest debut for a non-sequel film.

Overseas, "Alice" earned $94 million at 5,600 screens in some 40 territories for a worldwide total of $210.3 million -- the fourth highest worldwide opening for a non-sequel film.

The 3D giant screened at 2,063 3D-equipped locations domestically with an additional 188 Imax locations, repping approximately 70% of the film's total domestic earnings.

Playing second fiddle to "Alice" was the frame's other wide release, Overture's "Brooklyn's Finest," exceeding expectations with $13.5 million at 1,936 screens. Pic comes just a week after the studio launched its horror remake "The Crazies," which grossed $7 million at 2,479 engagements in its soph sesh.

Source

I didn't like it mainly because it wasn't as well executed as I expected.

I agree with that. But as someone pointed out, it was a sequel to Through the Looking-Glass. I didn't think about that at first, so I was disappointed in the lack of character development, but with the fact that this is a sequel to the story we've already known for years, character development isn't needed.

I went and saw it again and the second viewing was actually much, much better. Keeping the sequel idea in mind allowed a much better viewing.

With that in mind, it would have been nice to see this made into a trilogy. I would have liked seeing Burton go for a full series with this, but he didn't.

I know the people who I went with said when they were watching, at the beginning they were confused and disappointed that they ruined the story, but it isnt till later in the movie that you realize this is not a "remake" of the Alice story but a sequel which then changed their understanding and views of it.

I know the people who I went with said when they were watching, at the beginning they were confused and disappointed that they ruined the story, but it isnt till later in the movie that you realize this is not a "remake" of the Alice story but a sequel which then changed their understanding and views of it.

Yeah, when I first went to see it, that's exactly what happened and because I was disgusted in the beginning it ruined the first viewing for me. Anyone who didn't like this film because it isn't a remake of the original story, then you really should give it a second chance with the idea of this being a sequel. On my second viewing it was a much, much better film.

I'd honestly go from my original 6 out of 10 to an 8 out of 10 rating.

Disney did a true disservice to this film by not advertising this film as a sequel. Every trailer should have made a better attempt at explaining that. I just assumed from Alice's age in the trailers that they were using an older girl and not necessarily changing any of the story.

People thought the 10 sec "dance" by the Mad Hatter was awkward. Uh it's Underland, IT IS AWKWARD.

I thought it was more awkward when Alice did it. But something to pety didn't ruin it for me. Every time that Helena would appear my theater would laugh. Never missed a beat. I figured the "OFF WITH THEIR HEADS" would get annoying. But she said them so fast, I didn't care. The voice acting was very believable.

I think if Burton would have filmed it in 3D, instead of transferring it from 2D, it would have looked 5x better.

Johnny Depp and Mia Wasikowska?s Alice in Wonderland raked in another $62 million this past weekend, clobbering the competition including Matt Damon?s The Green Zone. Here?s who else placed behind Disney?s 3-D fantasy:

1. Alice in Wonderland, $62 million

2. The Green Zone, $14.5 million

3. She?s Out of My League, $9.6 million

4. Remember Me, $8.3 million

5. Shutter Island, $8.1 million

6. Our Family Wedding, $7.6 million

7. Avatar, $6.6 million

8. Brooklyn?s Finest, $4.3 million

9. Cop Out, $4.2 million

10. The Crazies, $3.7 million

Alice, the Tim Burton-directed movie, has taken in about $430 million globally. Quite impressive for just two weeks out the gate!

Source

pretty impressive!

I've never gotten motion sickness but after watching this in 3D I was dizzy the rest of the night.

When I got into my car it felt like it was rolling backwards.

Well I watched Avatar in 3D and it was pretty annoying overall. I wish I had watched it in 2D. I won't be diving into 3D again until it is without glasses.

Alice in Wonderland Reaches $565.8M Worldwide in 3 Weeks

The ComingSoon.net Box Office Report has been updated with studio estimates for the weekend. Click here for the full box office estimates of the top 12 films and then check back on Monday for the final figures based on actual box office.

Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland easily topped the domestic box office for a third straight weekend, earning an estimated $34.5 million to bring its total to $265.8 million. The film also topped the overseas box office a third time with $47 million, bringing its total to $300 million. Made for $200 million, the Walt Disney Pictures release has reached $565.8 million worldwide. Playing in 3D, 2D and IMAX theaters, the film stars Johnny Depp, Anne Hathaway, Helena Bonham Carter, Crispin Glover, Matt Lucas, Mia Wasikowska, Alan Rickman, Stephen Fry, Michael Sheen, Timothy Spall, Christopher Lee, Paul Whitehouse and Barbara Windsor.

Source

LOL

No sadly, it deserves to because its far superior to it but no

to me, this movie failed to deliver on epic scales... i thought it would be really well made and it was. I thought it would put me through a series of journeys and it didn't really. In comparison to avatar, it really didn't however avatar was of a different genre.

In 3D/Imax, it didn't feel that great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I always thought the moon gets a lot of impact because there’s no atmosphere, so surely building a moon base is only going to end in disaster?
    • Gets them every time !  
    • This piece of ###### is probably one of the most hated apps that ever existed.
    • Microsoft is bringing a much-needed Recap app to Teams, here is a first look by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is heavily used in work and school environments, and perhaps one of its core but extremely useful features is the ability to record meetings. In past years, Microsoft has further improved upon this functionality by integrating AI, but you do need a Microsoft 365 Copilot license to leverage most, if not all, all of those capabilities. Now, the Redmond tech firm is making another significant enhancement in the area of Teams meeting recordings. Up until now, if you wanted to access Teams recordings, you had to arduously locate the meeting invite and navigate to the dedicated tab, or go to the cloud storage location such as a SharePoint site. This was a rather overwhelming activity, especially if you don't remember the name of the meeting or the meeting occurred quite a while ago. Microsoft is now attempting to solve this problem through a dedicated Recap app that consolidates all your recordings. This centralized experience will allow users to find all recordings from the past 30 days and also offer access to other related services such as transcripts and AI-powered summaries. Customers will have the option to search for recordings, filter them, and review multiple meetings by generating AI-powered podcast-style recaps. The Recap app will list all available recordings in both thumbnail and list views. The former is shown below: And here is how Teams users with a Microsoft 365 Copilot license can select multiple recordings to generate a podcast-style audio recap: Microsoft has emphasized that the Recap app is pre-installed in Teams but it will not be pinned by default. Users will able to navigate to the Teams app store from the left rail, and pin it from the apps section. It will be enabled by default for all users once it becomes available. It's worth noting that while Teams recordings and transcripts can be accessed by all users governed by existing permissions, AI-powered features like intelligent summaries, audio recaps, and video recaps will require a Microsoft 365 Copilot license. The Recap app will be generally available to Teams users on Windows, Mac, and the web by the end of next month, with mobile support coming soon.
    • It's so stupid that you have to "enroll" in these extended updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!